AfterDark
Emergency Management
Washington State
Sustained Electronic Warfare Attacks on
Emergency Management System
This link reviews extenisve long term electronic
ware fare attacks on the emergency management program being developed for public and private interest in Washington
State which appear to have origionated from FEMA; Washington State; and Microsoft. The final attack occured in Janurary, 2012 and destroyied the program
located on a server in the United Kingdom.
|
Chris Walters,
Appellant
Vs.
Civil # 13-35019
Amicus Curiae Brief
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants
Recommendation To Transfer National Security Asset
To the Department of Defense
Addressed To The Honorable Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel
US Department of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000
Dear Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel:
I wanted to inquire about a public service donation of a 20 year research project on emergency
management to the Department of Defense:
1. Exhibit A: the various public and private concerns in Washington State participate in the
Creation of the data for about 20 years.
E:\afterdarkportal\index.html
2. Exhibit B: Conventional emergency management technology is not expected to address a superquake
In the pacific NW and so a stand alone or back up system has been developed
E:\afterdarkportal\win\big.htm
3. Exhibit C: Sustained terrorist and electronic warfare attacks crippled the server last year located in the United Kingdom
E:\hssecurity\spywareact\index16.htm
4. Exhibit D: description of an actual terrorist appeared in person in Spokane, WA is on the bottom of
This page:
E:\hssecurity\spywareact\index16k.htm
1. Exhibit E: Walters V Horowitz 13-cv-00001 TOR USDC EDW Court ruled on disposition of the matters were set aside for medical reasons by the Honorable US District Court Judge Thomas Rice-Spokane.
E:\hssecurity\spywareact\index16j.htm
Discussion On Merits
afterdarkportal\win\big.htmThe report on unavoidable failures in traditional emergency management responses suggest that the type of research of a stand alone system or back up system on CD-Rom would be a
better alternative than to let events take their course.
Many Thanks Chris Walters
Volunteer Project Coordinator
PO Box 652
Burlington, NC 27216
Email: cwaltersgonefishing@yahoo.com
cc: US Senator Patrick Leadhy
US Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Priority Mail
9505510482343213459348
9505510482343213459720
cc City Spokane Chief Police
Director Washington EMD
Washington State Attorney General
|
|
NSA Spying Ruled Unconstitutional
By USDC Judge Leon
historic-ruling-federal-judge-declares-nsa-mass-phone-surveillance-likely
In Historic Ruling, Federal Judge Declares NSA Mass Phone Surveillance is Likely Unconstitutional
In a historic decision, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. today declared that the NSA�s mass phone records
surveillance is likely unconstitutional, ruling that the plaintiff�s data should be purged from the system
and prohibiting the NSA from collecting further phone records from the plaintiffs. The case, Klayman v. Obama,
undermines the government�s assertions that its bulk surveillance program,
which collects virtually every phone record in the United States, is legal. Judge Richard Leon found
the �[b]ulk telephony metadata collection and analysis almost certainly does violate a reasonable
expectation of privacy," which, in turn, likely results in a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Judge Leon stayed the order pending appeal because of the significant nature of the decision. Both EFF
and the ACLU have active lawsuits challenging the same program, before other judges. But make no mistake:
the judge�s language in condemning the program was unequivocal. �I cannot imagine a more �indiscriminate�
and �arbitrary invasion� than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on
virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval,�
he wrote. He continued: "the author of the Constitution, James Madison...would be aghast� at the NSA�s
surveillance program.
Judge Leon also rejected the idea that courts other than the secret, one-sided FISA court could not
rule on the program's constitutionality: �While Congress has great latitude to create statutory scheme
like FISA, it may not hang a cloak of secrecy over the Constitution.�
Critically, the judge directly addressed the Supreme Court case Smith v. Maryland� the ruling from the
1970s that allowed law enforcement to obtain the records of a single targeted individual without a
warrant, for a few days. This decision is the pillar upon which the government has justified its
expansive surveillance, having secretly re-interpreted that decision to allow them to get every phone
record of every individual in the country, regardless of whether they were under investigation.
Judge Leon wrote: �The question before me is not the same question that the Supreme Court confronted
in Smith� and is �a far cry from the issue in this case.� He correctly differentiated between
surveillance of the limited information on one person and the ability of today�s law enforcement to
take in mass amounts of information over long periods of time and map out a person�s life through every
single connection made through a telephone:
�This short-term, forward looking (as opposed to historical), and highly-limited data collection is
what the Supreme Court was assessing in Smith. The NSA telephony metadata program, on the other hand,
involves the creation and maintenance of a historical database containing five years� worth of data.
And I might add, there is the very real prospect that the program will go on for as long as America is
combatting terrorism, which realistically could be forever.�
Judge Leon emphasized that �the almost-Orwellian technology that enables the Government to store and
analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user in the United States is unlike anything that could
have been conceived in 1979.� He continued: �Admittedly, what metadata is has not changed over time. As in Smith, the types of information at issue
in this case are relatively limited: phone numbers dialed, date, time, and the like. But the ubiquity of
phones has dramatically altered the quantity of the information that is now available, and more importantly,
what that information can tell the Government about people�s lives.�
�Put simply,� Judge Leon concluded, �people in 2013 have an entirely different relationship with phones
than they did thirty-four years ago.� This analysis crystalizes the problems with the government�s over
reliance on Smith, recognizes the limits on that holding in relation to all sorts of digital surveillance
we see today as a result of the expansion of technology. But in perhaps his most important point when he discussing privacy in the digital age, Leon explained that
because of an increased awareness of the ability of law enforcement to track our movements via technology,
we have a more reasonable expectation of privacy, not less:
�Whereas some may assume that these cultural changes will force people to 'reconcile themselves' to an
'inevitable' 'diminution of privacy that new technology entails,' I think it is more likely that these
trends have resulted in a greater expectation of privacy and a recognition that society views that
expectation as reasonable." While we still have a long way to go before the NSA mass phone records
program is permanently declared unconstitutional once and for all, this is a truly historic ruling and an
important first step in ensuring American�s privacy is protected in the digital age.
|
|
