Why would a member of the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security authorize or engage in terrorist activities against electronic resources located in the United Kingdom?

The Library placed a minor website block on my resume which was released-haven't got a clue

1. This link review violations of the law association with government officials violation of counsels papers/ communications/ and effects.

2. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

from: support@freehostia.com support@freehostia.com
to: cwaltersgonefishing@gmail.com
date: Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: Contact form: Website missing?

Hello

I have just tested the website and it appears to be operational on our end.

http://afterdarkportal.freehostia.com

Please check this again from your end. If troubles are still noticed, please open a trouble ticket from your account with us so we will be able to investigate this issue for you. You will be able to do this via the Open Support Ticket menu of your account control panel Help section.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Best Regards, Miles Claton
support@freehostia.com
http://www.freehostia.com

A series of electronic blocks or denial of service attacks were directed against my new Domain Indictandconvict.net from Aug 12-2013. No action was taken.

A series of electronic blocks or denial of service attacks were directed against my new Domain Indictandconvict.net from September 9-23-2013. A sanction protocol was implemented

A series of electronic blocks or denial of service attacks were directed against my new Domain Indictandconvict.net from September 9-11-2013. A sanction protocol was implemented

This groups is monitoring communications at UM and responded directly to a nuclear bait program in person the same day. Hugs and kisses on a street corner with Allah Akbar means we are friends?

Chris Walters,
Appellant

Vs.

Civil # 13-35019
Amicus Curiae Brief

The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

Recommendation To Transfer National Security Asset
To the Department of Defense

Addressed To The Honorable Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel
US Department of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000

Dear Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel:

I wanted to inquire about a public service donation of a 20 year research project on emergency management to the Department of Defense:

1. Exhibit A: the various public and private concerns in Washington State participate in the Creation of the data for about 20 years.

E:\afterdarkportal\index.html

2. Exhibit B: Conventional emergency management technology is not expected to address a superquake In the pacific NW and so a stand alone or back up system has been developed

E:\afterdarkportal\win\big.htm

3. Exhibit C: Sustained terrorist and electronic warfare attacks crippled the server last year located in the United Kingdom

E:\hssecurity\spywareact\index16.htm

4. Exhibit D: description of an actual terrorist appeared in person in Spokane, WA is on the bottom of
This page:

E:\hssecurity\spywareact\index16k.htm

1. Exhibit E: Walters V Horowitz 13-cv-00001 TOR USDC EDW Court ruled on disposition of the matters were set aside for medical reasons by the Honorable US District Court Judge Thomas Rice-Spokane.

E:\hssecurity\spywareact\index16j.htm

afterdarkportal\win\big.htmThe report on unavoidable failures in traditional emergency management responses suggest that the type of research of a stand alone system or back up system on CD-Rom would be a better alternative than to let events take their course.

Many Thanks Chris Walters
Volunteer Project Coordinator
PO Box 652
Burlington, NC 27216
Email: cwaltersgonefishing@yahoo.com

cc: US Senator Patrick Leadhy
US Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Priority Mail
9505510482343213459348
9505510482343213459720

cc City Spokane Chief Police
Director Washington EMD
Washington State Attorney General

historic-ruling-federal-judge-declares-nsa-mass-phone-surveillance-likely In Historic Ruling, Federal Judge Declares NSA Mass Phone Surveillance is Likely Unconstitutional

In a historic decision, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. today declared that the NSA’s mass phone records surveillance is likely unconstitutional, ruling that the plaintiff’s data should be purged from the system and prohibiting the NSA from collecting further phone records from the plaintiffs. The case, Klayman v. Obama, undermines the government’s assertions that its bulk surveillance program, which collects virtually every phone record in the United States, is legal. Judge Richard Leon found the “[b]ulk telephony metadata collection and analysis almost certainly does violate a reasonable expectation of privacy," which, in turn, likely results in a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Judge Leon stayed the order pending appeal because of the significant nature of the decision. Both EFF and the ACLU have active lawsuits challenging the same program, before other judges. But make no mistake: the judge’s language in condemning the program was unequivocal. “I cannot imagine a more ‘indiscriminate’ and ‘arbitrary invasion’ than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval,” he wrote. He continued: "the author of the Constitution, James Madison...would be aghast” at the NSA’s surveillance program.

Judge Leon also rejected the idea that courts other than the secret, one-sided FISA court could not rule on the program's constitutionality: “While Congress has great latitude to create statutory scheme like FISA, it may not hang a cloak of secrecy over the Constitution.”

Critically, the judge directly addressed the Supreme Court case Smith v. Maryland— the ruling from the 1970s that allowed law enforcement to obtain the records of a single targeted individual without a warrant, for a few days. This decision is the pillar upon which the government has justified its expansive surveillance, having secretly re-interpreted that decision to allow them to get every phone record of every individual in the country, regardless of whether they were under investigation.

Judge Leon wrote: “The question before me is not the same question that the Supreme Court confronted in Smith” and is “a far cry from the issue in this case.” He correctly differentiated between surveillance of the limited information on one person and the ability of today’s law enforcement to take in mass amounts of information over long periods of time and map out a person’s life through every single connection made through a telephone:

“This short-term, forward looking (as opposed to historical), and highly-limited data collection is what the Supreme Court was assessing in Smith. The NSA telephony metadata program, on the other hand, involves the creation and maintenance of a historical database containing five years’ worth of data. And I might add, there is the very real prospect that the program will go on for as long as America is combatting terrorism, which realistically could be forever.”

Judge Leon emphasized that “the almost-Orwellian technology that enables the Government to store and analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user in the United States is unlike anything that could have been conceived in 1979.” He continued: “Admittedly, what metadata is has not changed over time. As in Smith, the types of information at issue in this case are relatively limited: phone numbers dialed, date, time, and the like. But the ubiquity of phones has dramatically altered the quantity of the information that is now available, and more importantly, what that information can tell the Government about people’s lives.”

“Put simply,” Judge Leon concluded, “people in 2013 have an entirely different relationship with phones than they did thirty-four years ago.” This analysis crystalizes the problems with the government’s over reliance on Smith, recognizes the limits on that holding in relation to all sorts of digital surveillance we see today as a result of the expansion of technology. But in perhaps his most important point when he discussing privacy in the digital age, Leon explained that because of an increased awareness of the ability of law enforcement to track our movements via technology, we have a more reasonable expectation of privacy, not less:

“Whereas some may assume that these cultural changes will force people to 'reconcile themselves' to an 'inevitable' 'diminution of privacy that new technology entails,' I think it is more likely that these trends have resulted in a greater expectation of privacy and a recognition that society views that expectation as reasonable." While we still have a long way to go before the NSA mass phone records program is permanently declared unconstitutional once and for all, this is a truly historic ruling and an important first step in ensuring American’s privacy is protected in the digital age.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBB

Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

Directed To Congress should death or serious injury occur due to denial of medical treatment (Medicaid Card) a recommendation for execution of the responsible party is filed in USDC, NDT

An electronic blocks or denial of service attacks were directed against my Domain http://afterdarkportal.freehostia.com from September 9-11-2013. A sanction protocol was implemented

The Library placed a minor website block on my resume which was released-haven't got a clue

1. This link review violations of the law association with government officials violation of counsels papers/ communications/ and effects.

2. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Motion without US Government Objection to proceed as Counsel Pro Hac before UN in issues of law relating to Human Rights

The general public knowledge that Micosoft Corporation installs software in thier computers even after they block live updates; windows installers; and other programs would would be detrimental to sales. It appears windows is capable to deliverying and downloading software without the owners permission and overloading the computer 2 gigabyte of RAM.Microsoft already has an extensive history of breakkins to web services and theft of competitors products when the company was owned by Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer as cited in this link

Good Morning Chairman Trey Gowdy:
House Committee on Oversight
2157 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington,DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5074
Fax: (202) 225-3974

My name is Chris Walters and I retired from 30 some odd years of probono field audits and surveys of federal programs as you can see:

http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/zzcontract/index26.htm

I understand your committee and Congressman Bob Goodlatte expressed an interest in abuse of FISA assets as USDOJ on March 18th, 2018

During my tenure of service we documented hundreds of instances of abuse of law enforcement and intellingence assets primary during Obama Administration which can be viewed online

http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/hssecurity/spywareact/index16.htm

Electronic Warfare Attacks in Montana 2017:

http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/zzzretirement/index21.htm

It is believed the Obama Administration may have been engaged in abuse of FISA assets to abuse it's political enemies and use meta data for blackmail and extortion:

If I can be ov any services to your Committee of Congressman Bob Goodlatte, please contact me. I am temporarily at

Chris Walters
c/o Gods Love
533 N Last Chance Gulch
Helena, MT 59601
(406) 442-7000

PS I am disabled; live on disability and may have problems traveling

Support Data on Abuse of FISA Assets online:

Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov,whistleblower@ronjohnson.senate.gov, whistleblowers@mccaskill.senate.gov,sheria.clarke@mail.house.gov, james.lesinski@mail.house.gov,dave.rapallo@mail.house.gov, rob.borden@mail.house.gov,hannah_berner@hsgac.senate.gov, christopher_hixon@hsgac.senate.gov,david_brewer@hsgac.senate.gov,

This new bill proposed by Congress is to enable Congress to appear in as amicus curiae actions in Court and challenges litigation which over laps Congressional law making authority

judge_sr_thomas@ca9.uscourts.gov,lauren_zack@ca9.uscourts.gov, jatkins@supremecourt.gov,uvance@supremecourt.gov, nharper@supremecourt.gov,bkubisch@supremecourt.gov, esimson@supremecourt.gov,mgoodlander@supremecourt.gov, mowen@supremecourt.gov,helenapolicedepartment@helenamt.gov, countyattorney@lccountymt.gov,aireland@lccountymt.gov, bocc@lccountymt.gov,shelley.husband@mail.house.gov, branden.ritchie@mail.house.gov,stephanie.gadbois@mail.house.gov, perry.apelbaum@mail.house.gov,aaron.hiller@mail.house.gov, liam.mckenna@mail.house.gov,rassnerrassnergold@gmail.com, stephen.castor@mail.house.gov,jon.skladany@mail.house.gov, judge_wardlaw@ca9.uscourts.gov,ronald_gould@ca9.uscourts.gov, paul_watford@ca9.uscourts.gov,bcc@co.missoula.mt.us, caps@missoulacounty.us,countyattorney@missoulacounty.us, attorney@ci.missoula.mt.us,contactmpd@ci.missoula.mt.us, rod.ostermiller@usdoj.gov,kurt.alme@usdoj.gov, victoria.francis@usdoj.gov,leif.johnson@usdoj.gov, john.kilgallon@usdoj.gov,gerald.auerbach@usdoj.gov, armando.bonilla@usdoj.gov,drew.j.wade2@usdoj.gov, rod.ostermiller@usdoj.gov,timothy.hornung@usdoj.gov, carol.rash@usdoj.gov,aaron_murphy@tester.senate.gov, laura_peterson@tester.senate.gov,rachel_court@tester.senate.gov, shannon_lewis@tester.senate.gov, jason_thielman@daines.senate.gov,corey_sellers@daines.senate.gov, sheila_rath@daines.senate.gov,spenser_merwin@daines.senate.gov, lesley.robinson@mail.house.gov,tayla.snapp@mail.house.gov, christine.heggem@mail.house.gov,