This link is to Nobel Prize Winner Professor Michio Kaku and his excellent book on Hyperspace and multiple dimensions. The Professor is credited with creation of string theory that all atomic and subatomic particles are composed of strings which exist at the Plank Level.

In 1928 Prince Louis de Broglie proposed that electrons were both waves and particles as the above pictures suggest and the theory I am proposing is that the waves are composed of "strings"

The theory of wave packets is that electrons are composed of groups of waves or maybe strings which are created by standing wave formations.

Don't existing laws of physics support the concept that exchange of quanta or packets of energy composed of "strings" occur on a regular basis in the nucleus between particles and even between particles and light? Aren't we therefore suggesting certain changes do occur in "strings" in the subatomic physics on a regular basis which do not require Planck energy or 10X19 billion electron volts? If we already admit that particles are composed of string and claim that particles and various types of radiation; energy; and waves are part of the same process couldn't we also admit that light & other waves are also probally composed of "strings"? Can we use this knowledge that energy/matter are related and exchangable to tinker with or manipulate the "string" without having to probe the Planck energy 10x19 BEV at the Planck constant?

Professor Michio Kaku explains in his book "Hyperspace" the theory of strings on page 153: "String theory answers this question because the sting, about 100 billion billion times smaller than a proton is vibrating; each mode of vibration represenats a distinct resonance of particle. The string is so incredibly tiny that, from a distance a resonance of a string and a particle are indistinguishable. Only when we somehow magnify the particle can we see that this is not a point at all, but a mode of vibrating string..... According to string theory, if we could somehow magnify a point particle we would actually see a small vibrating string. In fact, according to this theory, matter is nothing but the harmonies created by this vibrating string. Since there are an infinite number of harmonies that can be composed for the violin, there are an infinite number of forms of matter than can be constructed from our of vibrating strings.... Professor Michio Kaku in his excellent book "Hyperspace" presents superstring theory and concepts of multiple universes in the "N Dimensions" and scientist are missing an 80% of the mass of the universe. If you a Scientist and have to admit that a large part of the universe is missing requires some explanations. Scientist are considering that the "missing matter" or dark matter" might be present in another universe of dimension.

Doesen't modern string theory provide that although strings vibrate in 10 or 26 dimensions they can only be viewed in 2 dimensions in this universe? So we have a model above in which the object vibrates out of the visible spectrum into the invisible.

Would the frequency of a given wave of light be determined by the harmonies of the string vibration for instance 1 string produced green light; 1 string red;....? Could we say that the large variety of frequencies found throughout the electromagnetic spectrum are the result of large number of frequencies different strings vibrate at as we quote: Since there are an infinite number of harmonies that can be composed for the violin, there are an infinite number of forms of matter than can be constructed from our of vibrating strings...?*Professor Michio Kaku-Page 153 Hyperspace"

If the universe is composed of "strings" engaged in vibrations would it be possible to study particles by using ultra high vibrations to shake matter apart to study subatomic particles? Could atoms be vibrated apart and by overloading the Yang Mills Field and gluons without the Planck energy or 10X19 billion electron volts? What would be the proper frequencies in radio waves; microwaves;maser waves; or other energy frequency to shake atoms and particles apart Instead of creating cyclotrons to accelerate matter to speed of light; could we create a much smaller machine to vibrate atoms apart? This idea appears to have been generalized In this article in 1996

Could a high energy device be constructed of several high energy radio transmitters to vibrate particles via high energy radio waves; masers; microwaves; or prehaps even magnets shifting cycle at very high possible frequencies? This interesting link discusses various devices used to speed up particles and this link is a picture of the Klystron at Oscar RF resonator. It should be possible to induce enough vibration in the the atom to cause disintegration and production of subatomic particles or maybe even some of the string materials.

What does a limit exist as to how fast light can travel in our universe? According to our theory or idea we live inside the event horizon of a black hole and light cannot excape the event horizon. You might be able to travel faster than light at the quantum level by traveling around the event horizon to another point in the singularity.

In the year 1947 some scientist speculated that travel faster than sound would be impossible. In the real world of their era however high velocity rifle bullets regularily traveled faster than sound on a regular basis. The speed of sound limits how fast sound can travel in the air as you can see from this picture of the airplane breakin the sound barrier. If the airplane travels 4 times the speed of sound or more the speed of sound remains the same;however the airplane travels faster than sound on a regular basis. What if the speed of light is not a limit on how fast something can travel but rather a limit on how fast a signal can travel through a medium such hyperspace?

Let's say the string above represents the distance light travels in 1 second which on my computer screen looks like 2 inches.

Consider the 2 photons of light moving in exactly the opposite direction. Each second that passes the distance between then increases by twice the speed of light which itself violates the traditional constant of C itself. An observer on the photon on the right however believes he is stationary and thinks we are moving away from him at C. The observer on the right however can't see the photon on the left because the speed of light is a limit on how fast the signal can travel. Which observer is right and who is wrong might ask the wrong question by assuming your current energy level; or speed instead of being stationary is actually many times the value of C to an observer in the N Dimension in hyperspace.