Specification #5
Based On Confession of "CyberPatrol"
City of Roanoke Virgina12-30-2001 Cyberpatrol a private net nanny has
blocked access to an internet sitehttp://genocide.topcities.com addressing
questions to 107th US Congress and United Nations
From: "Eric Colby"
eric.colby@surfcontrol.com
To: Legal Counsel'"
legalquestion2002@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Policy Question
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 15:30:32 -0500
Taking your specific case in mind, I will answer this question. This website that you emailed us about is what is called "Virtually
Hosted". That means that thousands of websites could be on the same IP address.Taking this in account, we had a website in our database
that shares this IP with this one. We entered in the website into our database, and classified it using
our Category Definitions. Now the next time a list is built we will filter this site and only this site.
However, it looks as though there was an error in our database (this was not caused by a human). This sites IP was flagged to be blocked, not just
the domain name. So, in this instance, we were blocking all the sites on this IP. Now, there is no way to know how many sites are on this IP, nor what
the URLs of them are. So there is no way for us to email all the webmasters of this situation.
Now if what you are asking is, "Do we email every webmaster of every website that we categorize, so that they may change their content?"
The answer to this question is "No, we do not". 99.999% of the time the person(s) that put up an adult website knows
exactly what they are putting up. For us to email them warning them that we are going to categorize their site as "Adult" in our database, this could
be viewed by the webmaster as us trying to censor this site by making the owner take down the offending page. That is not what we do at SurfControl.
We are not about censoring the internet, or making the adult content go away, we are here for the people who choose not to see this content,
and look to us to categorize these sites so that they do not have to view them if they don't want to. If you have any other questions, please let me know.
SurfControl
100 Enterprise Way Suite A110
Scotts Valley, California, USA 95066
Customer Service: (800)828-2608
(800)368-3366
Tech Support: (508)870-7200
(831)431-1300
Customer Service Email: email
Tech Support Email email
|
|
Specification #6
Based On Confession of "ServerPro"
Dear legalcounsel@eudoramail.com
This is a message to advise you that we have recently worked on your ticket. Your question was the following:
Link to your homepage-abuse Our Technicians response to your ticket is as follows
Genocide.topcities.com is no longer on our servers. That
account has been terminated.
Regards,Kenny Jou
ServerPro.com ServerPro Web Hosting
P.O. Box 4905
La Puente, CA 91747
Email
|
|
John McKay USA*
US Department of Justice
700 Stewart Street Suite 5220
Seattle 98101-1271
(206)553-7970
|
Specification #7
Based On Actions By Washington State
http://nemd3.tripod.comIt is alleged that the principals
acting in furtherance of the activities cited in the complaint to the UNHCHR and 107th Congress did
hack and destroy the internet site marked "evidence and testimony" on or about August, 2001 in or
near Bellingham in the State of Washington to prevent and hinder communications to the United Nations
and the United States Congress in violation of principals set forth in international treaty
Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power
Where the Principal May Reside or where the Alleged Crime Was Committed:
Terra Lycos Com
Corporate Headquarters and Terra Lycos
Calle Nicaragua, 54
Barcelona, Spain
Tel: 34-91452-3000
|
|
Mr. Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Rodolfo Stavenhagen)
United Nations )
UNHCHR )
Civil Case 5:02CV00018
Filed Feburary 26,2002
Defendant
Specification #8
UN Represenative Appears In USDC
3rd Party Seizes USDC ORDER
The Respondent of the United Nations apparently had no
objection to appearing in an Amicus Curiea proceeding which concerned third party
hacking of computer sites addressing questions to the United Nations and other
internet sites related to vocational training. A Motion for Summary Judgement and
Finding-Questions of 3rd party tampering with Social Security Claims draws into
question the constitutionality of Social Security Act. Unconfirmed information
suggest the Motion was denied about April 24th, 2002. Delivery of the Order of
the USDC was apparently obstructed by a Mr. Fred Haas-Plaintiff in an unrelated case.
|
|