Dear Friend:

I wanted to drop by and explain why I recently asked several Congressional Committees and other officials to authorize a National Security Death Warrant for a John Doe in the United States District Court in the District Court of New Mexico. My name is Chris Walters and I am Plaintiff of record in a civil action Walters V McMahon/SSA #07-257 where the Honorable Judge Judith C Hererra is presiding and the Court and Social Security Commissioner have done an excellent job of adjudicating the complex questions. We have also seen the untimely and unlawful appearance of a person known as John Doe who is actively seizing Plaintiff's mail; registered US Mail; and more recently the ORDER of the USDC Docket #20 5/22/2007:

1. Exhibit A is Notice to pick up UPS package which is a registered mail from Vision Optical to Chris Walters at his UPS address dated Saturday May 19,2007 which has not apparently been seen or heard from in 2 months although it's actual travel distance is 1 1/2 miles across Las Cruces, New Mexico

2. Statement of Fact: Chris Walters wrote a letter to the UPS Store where the mail is received in early June, 2007 and several weeks later the owner of the mail service admits he has not forwarded Chris Walters mail and states he is currently holding it as is also cited in Docket 19 concerning routine theft and pilferage of Chris Walters mail.

3. Exhibit B: is one of several reciepts to Congressional Committees recommending the authorization for the execution of John Doe

Chris Walters is supposed to be trying to locate a permanent place of residence on behalf of the Social Security Administration and will have to stop what he is doing and travel 1,200 miles to Las Cruces, New Mexico and spend a large portion of his monthly check on transportation to pick up his mail. More money will be spent faxing copies of this document to many members of Congress asking John Doe a non party to be whacked for tampering with a US District Court action where he or she is not a named party of interest. While the theft and extreme delays in delivery of the US Mail in the Las Cruces area is legendary and the frequent topic of newspaper and television commentaries the history of the SSA claim shows a history of organized theft of official documents from several Courts who have heard this cause over a decade. Given the evidence and circumstances it is believed that John Doe might be a sitting US District Court Judge or Magistrate in the Western District of Texas who has for years authorized theft of official documents to prevent appeals. For the purposes of this action Chris Walters has suggested that John Doe is engaged in what should be considered a "terrorist activity" and subject to summary execution pursuant to the US Patriot Act:

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters, Counsel of Record
email; chrissaidthanks2005@yahoo.com
Box 245 1300 "G" El Paseo Road
Las Cruces, New Mexico 88001

Courtsey Copies Mailed Too:

Clerk's Office
U.S. District Court
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102
Fax: 505-348-2028

Larry Gomez, USA
P.O. Box 607
Albuquerque, NM 87103
(505)346-7274
Fax (505)346-7296

United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

1. Changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

a. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

b. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

c. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue UNDC, NM #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP and being Affirmed by 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals (08-2094) the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 42 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

3. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

4. Title 18 USC 115 Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities an extensive set of statutes which address persons engaged in treason;insurrection; and subsersive activities.