1. Link to Exhibit Page 15 Washington DSHS Defaults On Contract Recommended For Federal Grand Jury

1. Citation of Authority By Administrative Law Judge Decision April, 2005 Request Appeals Council Review

2. Citation of Authority Disabiltiy Findings Thrown Out By Administrative Law Judge Decision April, 2005 Request Appeals Council Review

3. Exhibit #A Notice of Final Denial By Acting Commissioner of Social Security Feburary 8, 2007 Final Determination Can't Be Modified Or Setaside Except In USDC

4. Exhibit #B Official USDC Trial Transcript March, 2007 Theft of Court ORDER By FBI Voids USDC Case

4. Exhibits #C SSA Makes Admission of Disability Request for Settlement Before the US District Court

5. Exhibit #D Parties Informal Agreement Submitted Too USDC

6. Exhibits #D-2 Social Security Appeals Council Attempts To Overturn USDC Ruling Remanded USDC, New Mexico Janurary, 2008
7. Exhibit #E Judge Hererra's Subsequent ORDER (4-11-2008) On Case Closure & Rehearings Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review US Circuit Court of Appeals Quashes Further Discussions

8. Exhibit #G Convict Labor Runs Chris Walters Out Of Town

9. Exhibit #N Special Agent In Charge Acknowledges Corruption In New Mexico

10. Exhibit #H FBI Takes Out Prison Based Gangs

11. Exhibits #I Question of Fraud On Part of Court US House Committee on Judiciary Documents Frauds in USDC, NM

12. Exhibit #J House Committee On Judiciary Reports on Corruption USDC, NM Question of Impeachment of USDC Judge Judith Hererra & USDC Judge Bruce Black

13. Exhibit K Theft of US Mail By FBI

14. Exhibit L Theft of US Mail By FBI

15. Exhibit #O Administrative Law Judges Challengs Commisssioners Final Determination

16. Exhibit #P Question of Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER

17 .Link to Exhibit Page 18 Social Security Begins To Default On Agreements April-October 2007

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Civil Docket For Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Presiding Judge Judith Hererra

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant

Walters v. SSA
Assigned to: District Judge Judith C. Herrera
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi
Cause: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Date Filed: 03/15/2007
Date Terminated: 04/17/2007
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 864 Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Date Filed # Docket Text

1. Complaint 03/15/2007 and Memorandum of Law against Social Security Administration, The (IFP sent to RLP ), filed by Chris Walters. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Letter #(2) Exhibit Resume# (3) Exhibit Letter2)(yc) (Entered: 03/20/2007)

2. Letter consent to proceed 03/15/2007 before a U.S. Magistrate Judge (yc) (Entered: 03/20/2007) 03/15/2007 Judge Richard L. Puglisi assigned (yc) (Entered: 03/20/2007)

3. Motion To File Amended Complaint 03/26/2007 by plaintiff Chris Walters. (ln) (Entered: 03/26/2007)

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Civil Docket For Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Presiding Judge Judith Hererra

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant

Walters v. SSA
Assigned to: District Judge Judith C. Herrera
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi
Cause: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Date Filed: 03/15/2007
Date Terminated: 04/17/2007
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 864 Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

1. Complaint 03/15/2007 and Memorandum of Law against Social Security Administration, The (IFP sent to RLP ), filed by Chris Walters. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Letter #(2) Exhibit Resume# (3) Exhibit Letter2)(yc) (Entered: 03/20/2007)

2. Letter consent to proceed 03/15/2007 before a U.S. Magistrate Judge (yc) (Entered: 03/20/2007) 03/15/2007 Judge Richard L. Puglisi assigned (yc) (Entered: 03/20/2007)

3. Motion To File Amended Complaint 03/26/2007 by plaintiff Chris Walters. (ln) (Entered: 03/26/2007)

Lacking any jurisdictional standing to overturn the Commissioners Final Determination the Social Security Administration simply granted 4 years back pay and benefits without any jurisdictional standing.

1. MOTION for instructions on expartied request for emergency hearing by ALJ William Herbert (03/26/2007) by plaintiff Chris Walters. (ln) (Entered: 03/26/2007) This is the request from B Huber and Regional Commissioner David Gonzalez for an emergency meeting after the Social Security Commissioner has issued her final ruling and when I file and appeal to USDC.

2. Letter To Chief Judge Vazquez Social Security employee request for emergency hearing after final ruling of Commissioner.

3. The Court was asked to consider Motion for Emergency Hearing to consider extension of time and Discovery and Discovery Document to Social Security Employee and State of New Mexico which includes the

4. Letter to USA Larry background="../images/ Tuesday,March 13th, 2007 asking him to clarify unauthorized communications from his client for special hearings...

5. 5 04/02/2007 ORDER granting Chris Walters' Application to proceed in forma pauperis by Judge W. Daniel Schneider w/order for service of process by U.S. Marshal (Blank Summons and Form USM-285 mailed to pro se plaintiff to fill out and mail back to us for service) (bap) (Entered: 04/02/2007)

6. Request for Settlementand Docket #7 Memorandum of Law based on proposal by the Social Security Administration to agreed to give me my SSI benefits and considered the matters and issues resolved (Entered: 04/03/2007)(Exhibit C: CD Rom is located in file in the Records Dept in Albuquerque) (bap) (Entered: 04/03/2007)

7. 7. 04/05/2007 MOTION to (Dismiss) Withdrawal of Law Suit w/memorandum of law in support of based on informal agreement of parties by Chris Walters. (jrm) (Entered: 04/06/2007). Letter SSA General Counsel asking for more definite instructions after lawsuit withdrawn.

8. Summons Issued as to SSA, U.S. Attorney and Attorney General 04/09/2007and forwarded to U.S. Marshal to perfect service pursuant to Las Cruces staff (bap) Modified on 4/9/2007 (bap) (Entered: 04/09/2007)

9 MINUTE ORDER 4/16/2007REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Judith C. Herrera as the presiding judge. Judge Richard L. Puglisi is assigned as the referred judge in this case (bap) (Entered: 04/16/2007)

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Civil Docket For Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Presiding Judge Judith Hererra

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant

Walters v. SSA
Assigned to: District Judge Judith C. Herrera
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi
Cause: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Date Filed: 03/15/2007
Date Terminated: 04/17/2007
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 864 Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Now Comes The Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the Honorable United States District Court in the District of New Mexico to give Notice of Withdrawal of Lawsuit based on an informal agreement of the parties:

1. Exhibit A: A letter the Social Security Administration dated March 26, 2007 that Chris Walters has been granted SSI benefits based on medical considerations going back to January 2004.

2. Exhibit B: Letter from 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals closing the avenues of Judicial Review to amend the Court’s original ORDERS.

3. Exhibits C: Letter from New Mexico State asking for medical records which are expressly Prohibited by ORDERS of several Courts… as an unresolved issue.

As explained more fully in the Attached Memorandum of Law In Support of Motion To Withdrawal of Law Suit Based on Informal Agreement of Parties.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Civil Docket For Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Presiding Judge Judith Hererra

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant

Walters v. SSA
Assigned to: District Judge Judith C. Herrera
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi
Cause: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Date Filed: 03/15/2007
Date Terminated: 04/17/2007
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 864 Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Now Comes The Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the Honorable United States District Court in the District of New Mexico to give Notice of Withdrawal of Lawsuit based on an informal agreement of the parties:

1. Over the last decade the parties have been in engage in the practice of law before several US District Courts, 1 or 2 US Circuit Courts; several Administrative Law Hearings; and before Committees of Congress and had their actual first face to face meeting on April 2, 2007 in With Technical Expert Betsy Huber the Social Security office in Las Cruces, NM which was very beneficial to all the parties involved.

2. Exhibit A: A letter the Social Security Administration dated March 26, 2007 that Chris Walters has been granted SSI benefits based on medical considerations going back to January 2004 which was appended by A Review Statement Summary Made for Supplemental Security Income made in good faith to Betsy Huber, Technical Expert at Social Security Administration on April 2, 2007 at Las Cruces, NM 88004.

4. Exhibit B: Letter from 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals: While there are unresolved issues and questions the parties will attempt arbitration in good faith as opposed to litigation as the FYI suggest.

5. Exhibit C: Letter from Dora M Fresquez New Mexico Support Division dated March 27, 2007 requesting medical evidence the Social Security Commissioner has already had expunged.

The Social Security Commissioner and his predecessors went to Court and demanded the extraordinary right to process a Social Security claim without medical records; testimony; or evidence and successfully challenged his own jurisdictional authority in Title 42 Section 7 Social Security Act. For the Social Security Commissioners or his agents or representatives to be in possession of Chris Walters medical or doctors records is an apparent violation of Title 18 USC 4 Contempt which as the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals indicated is not open to debate or discussion.

Administrative Law Judge William Herbert made the correct decision to issue an ORDER OF DISMISSAL in July 2005 after lacking any legal right to possess medical evidence. The Appeals Council then ORDERED Judge William Herbert to Complete The Record” in December, 2005. While Judge Herbert’s “Notice Of Partially Favorable Decision cites a lot of evidence and a Social Security doctor it impeaches or strikes all of Chris Walters 160 or 170 some odd doctors including the Disability Finding of Washington State DSHS of 10-2005. Given the existing ORDERS of various Courts it is unclear why Judge Herbert’s “Notice of Partially Favorable Decision is itself entitled to present medical evidence or testimony.

Ms. Betsy Huber is a technical expert with 35 years experienced in working with the Social Security Administration and explained normally the Social Security Administration would contact the estimated 70 some odd doctors and clinics Chris Walters was treated by going back to 2004 and pay their bills. In the case at bar the Administrative Law Judge expunged all Chris Walters medical records and neither Chris Walters nor Ms. Betsy Huber have any clear idea how these medical authorities can be paid.

The request by Dora M Fresquez of March 27,2007 for all Chris Walters doctors within the last 6 months is best described as a violation of Title 18 USC 4 Misprison the felony. As the Plaintiff was given to understand the Social Security Commissioner will not require any additional medical testing for 3 years which is nice since the acquisition of Chris Walters medical records by the Social Security Commission is a prosecutable offense. So how do the parties proceed in good faith? As good fortune would have it the Social Security Commissioner is paid a large salary; has a large legal staff; and will avoid asking any more questions which have to be removed or supervised to the US Congress. Barring objection by the Court or the Defendant Chris Walters will consider the foregoing action at law withdrawn without prejudice.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Certificate of Service
I Chris Walters the Plaintiff Pro Se and Counsel of Record do state and affirm to the best of my Ability that a true and correct copy of the Motion To Withdrawal of Lawsuit Based On Informal Agreement Of Parties, Memorandum of Law and Exhibits have been mailed by First Class United

States Mail this 3rd Day of April, 2007 too:

Larry Gomez, USA
P.O. Box 607
Albuquerque, NM 87103

Betsy Huber, Technical Expert
Social Security Administration
2141 Summit Court
Las Cruces, NM 88011
Signed and So Stated:_Date:

Administrative Law Judge Ruling April, 2006 where Administrative Law Judge threw away all medical documentation and disability statements previously signed by by SSA. Title 42 USC 423(d)(5)(b) Disability insurance benefit payments and Hallex Volume require Social Security to gather all medical records for consideration in the official record

Dr. Susan Pfeizer testifies about what she believes Chris Walters medical condition is who she has never met.

Appeal to Appeals Council made in April, 2006 from Austin, Texas and appeared in 2008 and attempted to review the Commissioners Final Determination and Ruling in USDC,NM

In early April, 2007 it appears the Las Cruces Gospel Rescue Mission and other local agencies are under attack by a prison based gang trying to take over their ministries for criminal activities. The Mission is currently accepting parolees and it appear this has opened the door for problems:

1. Gilbert Bishop
(505-526-5766)
2. Francis Burke
(505-524-3220
3. Dr. Norman Harrison
(505-647-5156)
4. Jerry Jaquess
(505-524-2088)
5. Clarence Martin
(505-526-1531)
6. Willis Parsons
(505-526-5379
7. George Stafford
(505-527-4343

1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

2. The gest of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

3. Article 12 Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.

4. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

N.M. corruption 'epidemic,' fed says
Agents took down political heavyweights

Updated: Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 4:28 PM MST
Published : Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 1:16 AM MST
Reporter: Tim Maestas ,/br> Web Producer: Bill Diven

ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) - A retiring FBI agent in the thick of investigating and prosecuting public officials said Tuesday New Mexico may be the most corrupt state in the nation.

New Mexico has a long list of corrupt politicians, and the list could be growing. High-profile political figures and associates have been convicted, and ongoing investigations are making frequent headlines. Many of those cases began with FBI agents in Albuquerque.

"It's our No. 1 criminal program," Thomas McClenaghan, special agent in charge of the FBI Albuquerque field office, said. Corruption scandals that took down former state Sen. Manny Arag�n, once considered the most powerful politician in the Senate. Former State Treasurer Robert Vigil, his predecessor and a long list of criminal accomplices have been convicted or cut plea deals in federal court.

McClenaghan will lead Albuquerque's team of FBI agents only through the end of the week. He retires on Friday. "From what we've seen here, corruption in this state is epidemic," he told KRQE News 13. "It is at all levels of government." New Mexico is not alone, of course.

Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich is at the center of a federal investigation that had him arrested late last year. At the time Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant of the Chicago FBI field office had little good to say about how Illinois does political business. "If it isn't the most corrupt state in the United States, it is certainly one hell of a competitor," Grant said.

McClenaghan's take? "All I can say is Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant never worked in New Mexico." That's a strong statement from a man who's made it a point to pursue political corruption aggressively. When his agents went after Vigil, then the sitting state treasurer, undercover video showed a California financial consultant who was cooperating with the FBI handing him $10,000 in cash. At Vigil's first trial jurors couldn't decide whether he was guilty or not, and ultimately the evidence was not enough to convict him on 23 counts of racketeering, conspiracy and extortion. However Vigil was eventually convicted on one count of attempted extortion in 2006.

That conviction was much needed motivation for the FBI discouraged by the outcome of the first trial. "We just felt that it may be hard to convict anyone in this state," McClenaghan said. They were much more successful in prosecuting the coconspirators who skimmed $4 million from the $80 million spent to construct the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Courthouse in Albuquerque.

By late last year a total of eight people pleaded guilty in the scheme including Arag�n who admitted he accepted illegal kickbacks. "We were eventually were able to convict everybody without even going to trial," McClenaghan said. And, he added, the work at the FBI field office is far from over. McClenaghan would not comment on any current investigations including the probe of the Richardson administration's dealings with a California investment company that did business with the state about the time it contributed money to Richardson political committees.

Question of Federal Grand Jury Investigation of the
Las Cruces Gospel Rescue Mission

Addressed Too Special Agent In Charge Thomas C. McClenaghan
Assistant Special Agents In Charge Scott O'Neal, Robert M. Evans
Supervisory Special Resident Agent Art Gonzales
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107
(505) 889-1300,
(505) 526-2351

Dear Special Agent In Charge Thomas C . McClenaghan:

Please find attached a question addressed to the United States Attorney Larry background="../images/ on a Federal Grand Jury investigation of the Las Cruces Gospel Rescue Mission in question of law including alleged violations of Title 18 USC 1512 Retaliating against a witness, victim, or informant; assisting a violation of Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States (Social Security; possibly allowing state parolees to practice in Satanism or demonic activities while engaged in a Christian Rehabilitation Program.

Another 3rd party alleges that the Rescue Mission staff actively requires sexual favors from persons or employees within the organization seeking promotion or advancement.

Another client a Thomas Reed openly professes to be a major drug dealer who has never been captured or arrested and identified a $2 million vessel in the Key West harbor he owns which he explains were purchased with drug monies. It is not clear whether Mr. Reed is currently engaged as a drug smuggler or simply trying to recover from his previous lifestyle and turning over a new leaf.

Recommended Subponea Of Evidence
If your office is interested in investigating this matter I have enclosed some additional materials to support your inquiry. Your office might also consider asking a US Magistrate to subpoena the Las Cruces Gospel Rescue Mission desk security log which documents an extensive pattern of criminal activity going on at the location in question.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters, chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
Aka Federal Informant
Counsel of Record Before USDC,NM
c/o 1050 W Amador
Las Cruces, NM 88004

Our Drug Dealer
Needs Your Identification 2007?

Thomas Reed who works at the mission does not claim to be homeless but rather explains he is a gourmet cook by trade with a $2 Million yacht sitting in the Key West Harbor. Thomas is not shy about sharing his stock and trade as an international drug dealer with an passer by in quite intricate detail which might make a person wonder if he is legitimate?

a. Earl Martin Staff of The Rescue Mission routinely scans color copies of guest ID; Birth Certificates; Social Security Cards; and other restricted documents illegally for their records. Or it just might be that Thomas Reed needs a large database of legitimate background information for his expanding drug business.

b. The Board of Directors reportedly recently changes the Mission Rules to permit the Staff and Management to have sexual relations with female guest. It was somewhat embarassing to have a policy against sex when most of the Shelter Managers are actively "Banging the Beaver" as a means of determining who gets promoted in as women's dorm matron.

c. Addressed To Resident Agency FBI Las Cruces reviews possible violations of Title 18 CRIMES occuring on the property of the Las Cruces Gospel Rescue Mission and provides background information on:

d. Question of Federal Grand Jury Investigation addressed to US Attorney General Larry background="../images/ and US Attorney at San Diego.

e. Question of Indictment of Mission resident Ken Fine for violation of Title 18 USC 372 Conspiracy to defraud the United States

f. Letter to Board of Directors of Las Cruces Gospel Rescue Mission delivered April 6, 2007 question threats against me by program persons at the Mission and an incident where an unknown party deposited human feces on my bed.

g. I happened to meet former House Manager John Woods in Big Spring, Texas who explained that former Assistant Director Chuck Vivarette is doing time in a New Mexico State Prison. It seems that Chuck demanded the cook in the kitchen work for free and when he refused assualted him and Chuck is savoring the value of Slavery in the State Pen.

The House Judiciary Committee released a 700 page report on efforts by White House Advisor Karl Rove and Harriet Miers to fire New Mexico US Attorney David Iglesia in order to tamper with the bar of justice in the State of New Mexico. report can be viewed on line at this link

2005 White House "Decision" to fire David Iglesias – It has previously been known that New Mexico Republicans pressed for Iglesias to be removed because they did not like his decisions on vote fraud cases. New White House documents show that Rove and his office were involved in this effort no later than May 2005 (months earlier than previously known) - for example, in May and June 2005, Rove aide Scott Jennings sent e-mails to Tim Griffin (also in Rove’s office) asking "what else I can do to move this process forward" and stressing that "I would really like to move forward with getting rid of NM US ATTY." In June 2005, Harriet Miers e-mailed that a "decision" had been made to replace Iglesias. At this time, DOJ gave Iglesias top rankings, so this decision was clearly not just the result of the White House following the Department’s lead as Rove and Miers have maintained.1

Iglesias criticized by Rove aide for not "doing his job on" Democratic Congressional Candidate Patricia Madrid – An October 2006 e-mail chain begun by Representative Heather Wilson criticized David Iglesias for not bringing politically useful public corruption prosecutions in the run up to the 2006 elections. Scott Jennings forwarded Wilson’s email to Karl Rove and complained that Iglesias had been "shy about doing his job on Madrid," Wilson’s opponent in the 2006 Congressional race. Just weeks after this e-mail, Iglesias’ name was placed on the final firing list.2

An "agitated" Rove pressed Harriet Miers to do something about Iglesias just weeks before Iglesias was placed on the removal list "Karl Rove phoned Harriet Miers during a visit to New Mexico in September 2006" according to Miers testimony, Rove was "agitated" and told her that Iglesias was "a serious problem and he wanted something done about it."

Senator Domenici personally asked Bush's Chief of Staff Josh Bolten to have Iglesias replaced In October 2006, Senator Domenici stepped up his campaign to have Iglesias replaced. According to White House phone logs and emails, as well as Rove’s own testimony, Domenici spoke with President Bushs Chief of Staff Josh Bolten about Iglesias on October 5, 2006, and during October 2006, Domenici or his staff spoke with Karl Rove at least four times.

Todd Graves removed in Roves "approved deal with Republican Senator Kansas City U.S. Attorney Todd Graves was removed as part of a White House brokered deal with U.S. Senator Kit Bond. In exchange for the administration firing Graves, Senator Bond agreed to lift his hold on an Arkansas judge nominated to the Eighth Circuit federal appeals court. A White House e-mail stated that "Karl is fine" with the proposal.

Miers obtained favorable statement on Rick Renzi in violation of DOJ policy When rumors of the FBI investigation of Rep. Rick Renzi surfaced in October, 2006, one of Roves subordinates contacted Harriet Miers, who called Deputy Attorney General McNulty seeking a possible statement that would have "vindicated" Renzi. Even though this was contrary to standard DOJ policy, such a statement was issued several days later.

In August 12, 2009 US Senator John Cornyn explained the Senate Committee on Judiciary had finally cut through the layers of lies and bullshit from the Bush Administration to establish that White House Advisor Carl Rove had played a central role in firing the US Attorney David Iglesi for New Mexico for political reasons. Which would explain why the US Attorney never filed a brief in USDC at this time.

Mr. Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Kenneth D. Lewis CEO
Bank of America
Attorney James E Shively
(602-840-1400) Vs. Civil #Civil # 09-811
Date Filed:_________________

1. This Link The Honorable Judge Bruck Black ruling in Mr. Chris Walters,v. Kenneth D. Lewis CEO Bank of America Attorney Civil #Civil # 09-811in USDC New Mexico expressed no objection to seizure of counsel's papers in violation of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law ( US v Haldeman, Erlichman, Dean) as cited: The Court also recommends denying Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 10). In that motion, Plaintiff claims that Defendant violated his equal protection and due process rights by seizing his social security money from his safe deposit box in violation of an order entered in another case in the United States District Court. Document 10 at 1 (referring to Walters v. Social Security Administration, CV-07-0257 JCH/RLP). Plaintiffs claim that his constitutional rights were violated because of an order entered in another case is without merit because Plaintiff fails to state which order entered in his previous case was violated....


2. The purpose of the criminal activity with the tatic approval of the USDC was to destroy legal documents which showed service of process as made on the Social Security Commissioner and other documents related to Court process.

This Link The House Judiciary Committee apparently forced several members of the Bush Administration out of office as a disapproval of criminal and terrorist activities

1. ORDER 04/17/2007 ORDER by Judge Judith C. Herrera granting Motion to Dismiss [7] and dismissing this action without prejudice. (bw) (Entered: 04/17/2007)

2. Office Hearings & Appeals letter noting transfer from Texas and asking for more definite instructions. The ORDER of the Court was apparently intercepted and had to be retrieved from PACER:

07/09/2007 Doucment filed with the US House & Senate Oversight Committees suggest a national Security Death Warrant for a John Doe in USDC New Mexico (bap) (Entered: 07/09/2007) for 3rd party who has apparently seized or intercepted USDC ORDER-Docket #20. After the shooting was over it appears the US Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez and others official expired from numerous and painful wounds.

PACER Service Center Transaction Receipt
07/11/2007 13:08:05
PACER Login: cw2281 Client Code:
Description: Docket Report
Search Criteria: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
Billable Pages: 2 Cost: 0.16

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

1. Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking;computer hacking...including at least 10 incidents at Spokane Community College.

2. In 2009 FBI Officials admitted they had been intercepting federal Court ORDERS and other documents for some years under color of Title 18 Chapter 113b Terrorism or the US Patriot Act.

1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

In 2009 FBI Officials admitted they had been intercepting federal Court ORDERS and other documents for some years under color of Title 18 Chapter 113b Terrorism or the US Patriot Act. Exactly how a Federal Court ORDERs; my SSI check; eye glass prescriptions... threatens the national security remains a profound mystery.

Question National Security Death Warrant? a request to Congressional Committees on Intelligence recommended execution of "John Doe" who it is alleged siezed or obstructed delivery of ORDER of Judge Herrerra and later Judge Scott in these causes. This link reviews evidence by US House Committee On Judiciary that both the former US Attorney General and Former White House Official Karl Rowe were heavily engaged in tampering with US District Court in New Mexico. In 2009 FBI Officials admitted they had been intercepting federal Court ORDERS and other documents for some years.

1. Brief As to question of Interception USDC Order/Findings 05/17/2007 ...deferred to U.S. House Committee on Judiciary by Chris Walters. (yc) (Entered: 05/17/2007) Citation: All or most of the documents arriving for Chris Walters appear to have been opened; examined; and taped closed as well as mail received from other 3rd parties.

2. A certified US Mail letter to US Congressman Lamar Smith Vice Chairman of House Committee on Judiciary commending him for his excellent assistance was mailed 4/20/07 and took 10 days by certified US mail to travel 600 miles and 9 days to have the return reciept arrive back in Las Cruces, NM.

3. Exhibit F: A certified US Mail letter to Office of Disability Adjudication acknowledging case transfere to New Mexico was a mailed by certified US Mail 4/21/2007 and was delivered in Albuquerque, New Mexico on 4-26-2007 however the return reciept did not arrive back in Las Cruces, New Mexico a mere 200 miles away until May 11, 2007.

4. Dr. Paz, Thomas A OD - of Looks Eyewear Studio at 330 E Boutz Rd, Las Cruces, NM 88005 (505) 526-0824 explains his staff sent Chris Walters his glass prescription by registered US Mail on May 2, 2007 and they have not crossed town by May 12, 2007.

5. Documents filed with the USDC Report of Apparent Interception of USDC Docket #20 and note to US Postmaster; shows pilfering of US Mail; and loss of a registered US Mail containing my eye glass prescriptions. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt It is a federal offense to obstruct a USDC ORDER;Title 18 USC 1708. Theft or receipt of stolen mail matter generally; Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law concerns obstruction or secreting counsels papers.

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

1. Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking;computer hacking...including at least 10 incidents at Spokane Community College.

2. The United Parcel Service where I receive my mail sent me a very nice email thanking me for the nice postcards from Oregon and California. They however could not email me and explain why they refused to forward my mail for several months and we are definitely going to Court to ask for damages-unless they have a very very good story.

3. ORDER 05/22/2007 ORDER by Judge Judith C. Herrera ADOPTING Report and Recommendations [16] and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration [13] and Motion for Attorney Fees [12] (baw) (Entered: 05/22/2007)

4. Summons Returned Executed 06/12/2007 By Chris Walters as to Cindy Hill for U.S. Attorney on 4/25/2007. (yc) Modified on 6/13/2007 to include additional docket text (bap). (Entered: 06/12/2007)

1. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

2. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

Mr. Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Kenneth D. Lewis CEO
Bank of America
Attorney James E Shively
(602-840-1400) Vs. Civil #Civil # 09-811

This Link The Honorable Judge Bruck Black ruling in Mr. Chris Walters,v. Kenneth D. Lewis CEO Bank of America Attorney Civil #Civil # 09-811in USDC New Mexico expressed no objection to seizure of counsel's papers in violation of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law ( US v Haldeman, Erlichman, Dean) as cited: The Court also recommends denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 10). In that motion, Plaintiff claims that Defendant violated his equal protection and due process rights by seizing his social security money from his safe deposit box in violation of an order entered in another case in the United States District Court. Document 10 at 1 (referring to Walters v. Social Security Administration, CV-07-0257 JCH/RLP). Plaintiff’s claim that his constitutional rights were violated because of an order entered in another case is without merit because Plaintiff fails to state which order entered in his previous case was violated....


2. The purpose of the criminal activity with the tatic approval of the USDC was to destroy legal documents which showed service of process as made on the Social Security Commissioner and other documents related to Court process.

Chris Walters
vs.
Michael Astrue
Commissioner SSA

#C080380

Walters v Asture USDC, NM 2008 this link Walters v Asture USDC, NM 2008 Judicial Review on SSA employees challenge to Commissioners Final Determinations Commisioners claim to soverginity over state employees sustained Waltes V Asture 10th Circuit withdrawn by Appellant for lack of cause of action where Commissioner resolved problem Request for Judicial Review 2007 Commissioner waives right to trial and makes admission of disability while case at Bar. Case Withdrawn. The Social Security Administration apparently held a hearing in a state I no longer reside in after having been given notice I moved. The Social Security Administration has already issued a final denial by the Commissioner and lacks jurisdictional standing to adjudicate further.

Chris Walters
vs.
Michael Astrue
Commissioner SSA

C08000483EMC

Walters v SSA USDC,NDC Question on Judical Review-US Magistrate Judge Chen recommends rehearing of matters in proper jurisdiction USDC,NMThis link concerns an apparent request by ALJ William Herbert of San Antonio, Texas to ask for a "Secret hearing On October 15th, 2008 and subsequent demand by ALJ Sandra Rogers of Stockton, CA for a review of the SSI claim. The SSA reviw if prohibited under Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts of review of the disability determination made by USDC NM Walters V Astrue 07-cv-257 the Honorable Judith Hererra Presiding. The failure of the Social Security Administration to appear and answer the summons in the origional case (USDC NM cv-07-0257 means the SSA can't appeal Commissioner's own final determination. US Magistrate explained in his ORDERS he is having problems understanding the complex case and finally decides the proper venue is USDC New Mexico.

Mr. Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Walters v Asture USDC, DC 2011

Michael Astrue, et all
Social Security Administration
Defendants

Walters v Asture USDC, DC 2011 Judge Rosemary Collier denies hearing on North Carolina proposal to cancel SSI or medical benefits. Commissioner Legal Counsel express lack of interest in going to bar. US Circuit Court sustains Judge Colliers ruling for lack of interest of parties to litigate. As far as is possible to know the Social Security Administration is requesting a hearing pursuant to Title 42 Sec 405 (g)(h) Judicial Review The questions origionally appeared to be violations of Title 18 USC 402 Contempt however the later communications appear meritorious. The Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer will not permit the case to be filed or heard so a Petition For Writ of Certiorari has been filed in US Circuit Court of Appeals:

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Michael Asture
Commissioner SSA
Stanley Friendship
Defendant
Case 1:11-cv-000359-LMB
Filed 8-04-2011

Walters v Asture USDC Idaho Presiding Magistrate authorizes Judicial Review based on HHS termination of medicaid-however case dropped when SSA Commissioner realizes I am in a Skilled Nursing Facility. This page reviews Commissioner Asture first request for Judicial Review as filed in USDC, Idaho which the USDC Idaho granted to move forward. As I was in Kindred Skilled Nursing Facility at this time creating $7,000 in medical bills monthly the Commissioner simply turned the benefits back on ending the need for a Judicial Review at this time. A Self Professed Texas Terrorist appeared and demanded to have Chris Walters thrown out of nursing home; kidknapped to Texas; held without trial or legal representation:

The right to review operations of government is vested in Article 1 Of the US Constitution and such statutes as Title 5 Part 1 Chapter 8 Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking and Title 2 USC Sec. 190d. Legislative review by standing Committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives is based on ongoing challenges to Judge Judith Herrera's ruling of 2007:

*** Citation of Authority Case Closure Federal Court Rulings: USDC ,WDT Walters v Miller: CA: SA-97-CA-1313 before the Honorable US Judge Fred Biery; Walter v Miller: Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals Before Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges- 99-50174; Walters v Apfel: Civil A:99CA0156SS before the Honorable Judge Sparks; Walters v Apel; USDC DC Judge Robertson Presiding CA 99-CV-0668; Bradshaw v Walters, Hooker Superior Court 04 CVS 2674 Winston Salem, NC;Walters v Asture USDC, NM Judge Herrera Presiding #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP; Walters v Astrue; C080380 The Honorable Judge Robert Scott; Decision affirmed by 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals 08-2094; Walters v Astrue 09-0956 the Honorable Rosemary Collyer Presiding; Walters V Asture US Circuit Court of Appeals DC Civil: : 09-05206 declined to over turn lower court ruling; US Supreme Court declined to permit reviews of actions 10/2008 because the time limits have expired.

1 This link reviews challenges to constitutionality and legality of the Social Security Act and other statutes based on challenges to rule of law

2. This link to Appendix concerns sanctions, jonders; certificate of service;

3. $50,000 cost to counsel to defend against frivilious litigation not authorized by law.

4. Certificate of Service

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.