Updated: Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 4:28 PM MST
Published : Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 1:16 AM MST
Reporter: Tim Maestas ,/br> Web Producer: Bill Diven

ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) - A retiring FBI agent in the thick of investigating and prosecuting public officials said Tuesday New Mexico may be the most corrupt state in the nation. New Mexico has a long list of corrupt politicians, and the list could be growing. High-profile political figures and associates have been convicted, and ongoing investigations are making frequent headlines. Many of those cases began with FBI agents in Albuquerque.

"It's our No. 1 criminal program," Thomas McClenaghan, special agent in charge of the FBI Albuquerque field office, said. Corruption scandals that took down former state Sen. Manny Aragin, once considered the most powerful politician in the Senate. Former State Treasurer Robert Vigil, his predecessor and a long list of criminal accomplices have been convicted or cut plea deals in federal court.

McClenaghan will lead Albuquerque's team of FBI agents only through the end of the week. He retires on Friday. "From what we've seen here, corruption in this state is epidemic," he told KRQE News 13. "It is at all levels of government." New Mexico is not alone, of course. Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich is at the center of a federal investigation that had him arrested late last year. At the time Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant of the Chicago FBI field office had little good to say about how Illinois does political business. "If it isn't the most corrupt state in the United States, it is certainly one hell of a competitor," Grant said.

McClenaghan's take? "All I can say is Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant never worked in New Mexico." That's a strong statement from a man who's made it a point to pursue political corruption aggressively. When his agents went after Vigil, then the sitting state treasurer, undercover video showed a California financial consultant who was cooperating with the FBI handing him $10,000 in cash. At Vigil's first trial jurors couldn't decide whether he was guilty or not, and ultimately the evidence was not enough to convict him on 23 counts of racketeering, conspiracy and extortion. However Vigil was eventually convicted on one count of attempted extortion in 2006.

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: No. 13cv247 JAP/GBW
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

Link Addressed Congress Committees question of fitness of Judges to overrule other US Circuits; holding hearings after case withdrawn; holding case without presence of required 2 parties...The Court began it's abuse by critizing a Congressional Archive where it has no legal standing:.

1. Civil case where 2 parties are not served; present; and represented by counsel (FRCP)

2. Courts pursued case after being notified the issues were resolved in USDC, NDT and 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals

3. Courts declined to permit Plaintiff to withdraw action per FRCP 41(a) Voluntary Withdrawl

4. Courts describes "50" related cases frivilious which is a patent lie and extraordinary abuse of the court's discretion

5. Express no problem with commission of alleged crimes against humanity or genocide

1 03/14/2013 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Chris Walters. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Complaint, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mr) (Entered: 03/15/2013)

2. 03/14/2013 U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (mr) (Entered: 03/15/2013)

3. 03/14/2013 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a)(1) and (e)(2) review. (mr)

4. 03/14/2013 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chris Walters. (mr) (Entered: 03/15/2013)

5. 03/14/2013 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT Exhibits to 1 COMPLAINT by Chris Walters. (mr) (Entered: 03/15/2013)

6. 03/14/2013 Remark: CD entitled "Evidence and Testimony Submitted to Congress lodged in Records Department. (mr) (Entered: 03/15/2013)

7. 03/16/2013 ***FILED IN ERROR***NOTICE by Chris Walters (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B)(Walters, Christopher) Modified restriction level and marked Filed in Error on 3/18/2013. Pro se Plaintiff is required to receive leave of the Court to file electronically (mr). (Entered: 03/16/2013)

8. 03/18/2013 ***FILED IN ERROR***COUNTERCLAIM against Shawn Donovan, filed by Chris Walters, Shawn Donovan. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Memorandum of Law, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits, # 3 Supplement Summons)(Walters, Christopher) Modified restriction level and marked Filed in Error on 3/18/2013. Pro se Plaintiff is required to receive leave of the Court to file electronically (mr). (Entered: 03/18/2013)

9. 03/18/2013 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. (mr) (Entered: 03/18/2013)

10. 03/22/2013 MOTION For Electronic Filing By Plaintiff Chris Walters and MOTION for Electronic Summons to be Issued by Clerk. (bc) Modified texton 3/26/2013 to add additional Motion (mr). (Entered: 03/25/2013)

11. 04/01/2013 District Judge James A. Parker assigned. (bap) (Entered: 04/01/2013)

12. 04/04/2013 NOTICE to the Court by Chris Walters.. (jrm) (Entered: 04/05/2013)

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: No. 13cv247 JAP/GBW
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

13. 04/11/2013 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 3 , 9 by District Judge James A. Parker. It Is Further Ordered that Walters must show cause in writing, w/in 14 days of the filing of this Order, why filing restrictions should not be imposed against him. If Walters fails to respond as required, the Court will issue filing restrictions without further notice.. (jrm) (Entered: 04/11/2013)

14. 04/15/2013 SECOND MOTION for Order to reply to Court's Order & motion for Summary Judgment on FRCP by Chris Walters.. (jrm) (Entered: 04/16/2013)

15. 04/15/2013 MOTION for Order to reply to Court's Order of Dismissal 4/11/2013 by Chris Walters.. (jrm) (Entered: 04/16/2013)

16. 04/16/2013 ORDER Precluding Use of Court E-Mail by District Judge James A. Parker.. (jrm) (Entered: 04/16/2013)

17. 04/17/2013 4TH MOTION for Order to reply to Court's Order of Dismissal 4/11/2013, request for jury trial for sanctions by Chris Walters.. (jrm) (Entered: 04/18/2013)

18. 04/17/2013 MOTION to Amend pleadings based on new rulings by 3 additional USDC Courts by Chris Walters.. (jrm) (Entered: 04/18/2013)

19. 04/19/2013 MOTION for clarification on Orders by the Court by Chris Walters.. (jrm) (Entered: 04/19/2013)

20. 04/22/2013 BRIEF filed by Chris Walters (jrm) (Entered: 04/23/2013)

21. 04/22/2013 MOTION for Order to certify question on constitutionality of 28: U.S.C. 1915(a) and (e) "Rule 5.1 constitutional challenge to a statute" by Chris Walters. (jrm) (Entered: 04/23/2013)

22. 04/22/2013 MOTION for Order to certify question on constitutionality of Title 28: U.S.C. per FRCP 5.1 constitutional challenge to a statute by Chris Walters. (jrm) (Entered: 04/23/2013)

23. 04/24/2013 NOTICE of question of term limits for Federal Judges based on docket #11, Order and ruling of the Honorable Senior Judge James Parker (amended) by Chris Walters (jrm) (Entered: 04/24/2013)

24. 05/01/2013 ORDER IMPOSING FILING RESTRICTIONS by District Judge James A. Parker as described herein.. (jrm) (Entered: 05/01/2013)
05/01/2013 FINAL ORDER that Plaintiff's cause of action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE by District Judge James A. Parker.. (jrm) (Entered: 05/01/2013)

26. 05/06/2013 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Chris Walters.. (Appeal Fee Not Paid.) (jrm) (Entered: 05/07/2013)

27. 05/07/2013 Transmission of Preliminary Record to US Court of Appeals re 24 Notice of Appeal.. (jrm) (Entered: 05/07/2013)

28. 05/07/2013 AMENDED LETTER to USCA re 24 Notice of Appeal.. (jrm) Modified text on 5/7/2013 (jrm). (Entered: 05/07/2013)

29. 05/07/2013 USCA Information Letter with Case Number 13-2087 for 24 Notice of Appeal filed by Chris Walters.. (jrm) (Entered: 05/07/2013)

30. 05/14/2013 Information Letter from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals re 24 Notice of Appeal : (Attachments: # 1 Supplement motion)(jrm) (Entered: 05/14/2013)

31 05/21/2013 Transmitted Record on Appeal in 1 Volume(s) to US Court of Appeals re 24 Notice of Appeal.. (jrm) (Entered: 05/21/2013)

32. 05/21/2013 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re 24 Notice of Appeal filed by Chris Walters. USCA Case Number 13-2087.."THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY, THERE ARE NO DOCUMENT(S) ATTACHED" (jrm) (Entered: 05/22/2013)

33. 06/19/2013 **FILED IN ERROR** (jrm) Modified on 6/25/2013 (pg). (Entered: 06/19/2013)

34. 06/19/2013 USCA ORDER the captioned petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir.R.42.1 and 3.3(B) (pg) (pg). (Entered: 06/25/2013)

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: No. 13-2087
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

1. 05/07/2013 Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 05/07/2013. Fee or ifp forms due 06/06/2013 for Chris Walters. Notice of appearance due on 06/06/2013 for Chris Walters. [13-2087]

2. 05/13/2013 Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Chris Walters for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Not on the court's form). Served on 05/09/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

3. 05/13/2013 Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Chris Walters. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 05/08/2013. Manner of Service: US mail [13-2087]

4. 05/13/2013 Appellant brief filed by Mr. Chris Walters. Original and 3 copies. Served on 05/08/2013 by US mail. Oral argument requested? n. (Original brief contains one cd-rom attached to last page - single hard copy only) --[Edited 05/16/2013 by AD to attach supplement to brief, (filed 5/16/13)] [13-2087]

5. 05/15/2013 Appellant's motion for summary judgment filed by Mr. Chris Walters. Served on 05/12/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

6. 5/15/2013 Order filed by Clerk of the Court (DEC) denying motion for summary judgment filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters. Served on 05/15/2013. [13-2087]

7. 05/16/2013 Supplement to appellant's brief filed by Mr. Chris Walters. Original and 3 copies. Served on 05/10/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

8. 05/21/2013 Miscellaneous notice f filed by Mr. Chris Walters. Served on 05/17/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

9. 05/21/2013 Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Chris Walters Motion to withdraw certain questions briefs based on this court's 5/15/13 order. Served on 05/17/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

10. 05/21/2013 Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellant's motion to withdraw certain questions briefs filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters. See order for additional information. Served on 05/21/2013. [13-2087]

11. 05/21/2013 Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Vol. I (electronic pleadings). [13-2087]

12. 06/04/2013 Appellant's motion for miscellaneous relief filed by Mr. Chris Walters. Served on 05/01/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

13. 06/04/2013 Order filed by Clerk of the Court (DEC) denying without prejudice motion for miscellaneous relief filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters. Served on 06/04/2013. [13-2087]

14. 06/07/2013 Jurisdictional review complete. [13-2087]

15. 06/07/2013 Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Chris Walters to dismiss case. Served on 06/01/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

16. 06/10/2013 Minute order filed - Appellant has tendered another copy of the motion he filed on 6/4/13. That motion was addressed in the court's order of 6/4/13 and will not be addressed again. (Text Only - No Attachment) [13-2087]

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: No. 13-2087
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

17. 06/10/2013 Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Chris Walters to amend Appellant motion to amend appellant brief & substitute rule 21 as extraordinary writ. Served on 06/07/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

18. 06/11/2013 Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying "Appellant Motion to Amend Appellant Brief & Substitute Rule 21 as Extraordinary Writ." filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters. Served on 06/11/2013. [13-2087]

19. 06/17/2013 Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Chris Walters appellant motion supplement to brief based on recent 3rd party inquiry. Served on 06/13/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

20. 06/17/2013 Order filed by Clerk of the Court (DEC) denying Appellant's Motion Supplement to Brief Based on Recent 3rd Party Inquiry," filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters. Served on 06/17/2013. [13-2087]

21. 06/20/2013 Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Chris Walters for miscellaneous relief. Served on 06/13/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

22. 06/20/2013 Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying appellant's "Motion certify questions for review for petition for writ of certiorari by U.S. Supreme Court" filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters. Please see order for additional information. Served on 06/20/2013. [13-2087]

23. 709/2013 [10089056] Appellant's "Motion of Transfer Jurisdiction & Venue" filed by Mr. Chris Walters. Served on 06/27/2013. Manner of Service: US mail. [13-2087]

24. 08/06/2013 [10097422] Order filed by Judges Tymkovich, Anderson and Bacharach, as found in the order and judgment, denying motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters; denying as moot motion to transfer jurisdiction and venue filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters. [Text only entry - see case termination for order and judgment]. [13-2087]

25. 08/06/2013 [10097425] Dismissed;Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing;Written, signed, unpublished; Judges Tymkovich, Anderson and Bacharach (authoring). Mandate to issue. [13-2087]

26. 08/15/2013 [10100413] Appellant's "Motion for Reconsideration Final Order/Judgement in Lieu of Appeal to US Supreme Court, is construed as a petition for panel rehearing filed by Mr. Chris Walters. Served on 08/11/2013. Manner of Service: US mail.[13-2087]

27. 08/19/2013 [10101259] Order filed by Judges Tymkovich, Anderson and Bacharach denying the petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: No. 13-2087
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

NOW COMES THE Appellant Pro Se Chris Walters before the Honorable 10th US Circuit Court Of Appeals in this Motion For Reconsideration to wit:

1. As the lower court has pointed out the Commissioner of Social Security has been named in possibly as many as 50 civil actions since 2007 and has successfully defended the SSA sovereign rights (not Chris Walters rights) to have any additional legal discussions reserved to a time and place of the SSA legal Counsel’s determination pursuant to Title 42 USC 405 Judicial Review.

2. Exhibit A: The question of law which both the lower court and this Court are attempting to adjudicate have already been ruled meritorious in USDC, Northern District of Texas and the Commissioner has long, long time ago removed the suspension of Chris Walters SSI benefits and been reviewed up to and approved for final disposition by the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals.

3. Exhibit B: The US Supreme Court letter has cited for the 3rd time it has found no basis in fact or law to permit any activities in this SSI claim not authorized by the Commissioner’s legal staff by filing in a US District Court and it is important to remember the Commissioner has not even been issued a Summons to appear at Bar in this case.

Chris Walters wishes to thank the Court for it’s time and efforts. It is not clear if Chris Walters did not adequately bring these fact forward or if they were one of the items dismissed by the Clerk’s office earlier. The Appellant’s concern here is to make sure we don’t have some miscommunication where the Court is not aware the issue at law has long since been ruled on; the Commissioner acted as a matter of fact and law to resolve the issue; and we don’t have to appear before the Supreme Court and have someone explain why we are challenging their previous instructions and standing ORDERS of 4 other US Circuit Courts of Appeals.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: No. 13-2087
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

If the Court Concurs the Appellant would recommend the Judgment and ORDER of the Court should Reflect the fact the questions of law were adjudicated in the Northern District of Texas and 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals and that the questions brought in the USDC, NM and 10th Circuit Court of Appeals are moot.

Respectfully Submitted By Appellant Counsel
Chris Walters
SSI 261-90-6357
Appellant Counsel of Record
P.O. Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807

The Appellant has Petitioned for Motion for Reconsideration for the Courts to withdraw the civil action in USDC, NDT, USDC, NM, and before this Court because he states he does not wish to prosecute a civil action where the actions of former Commissioner Michael Asture would be carried forward against the Acting Commissioner Carolyn Colvin who is not responsible for the actions of her predecessor.

The Court’s Judgment is to commend the Social Security Commissioner; the Honorable Presiding Judge James Parker (USDC NM 1:13-cv-0246-JAP GBW); The Honorable Presiding Judge Judith Herrera (USDC, NM 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP) ; The Honorable Presiding Judge Mary Robinson USDC, TX (USDC,NDT 2-13-cv-025); The Honorable Presiding Judge Fred Biery (USDC WDT CA: SA-97-CA-1313) and all other jurist who have supported and successfully defended Title 42 USC 405(g)(h) Judicial Review and the right of the Social Security Administration to a timely review before a United States District Court over the last 15 years from many many challenges.

Done and So Ordered

Proposed ORDER Mailed Friday 8-2013

Addressed To Chairman Christopher Coons 		
US Senate Committee on Judiciary-Banking & Courts 	
1105 N. Market St., Suite 100, 			 
Wilmington, DE 19801-1233 				

US Congressman Bob Goodlatte 
Chairman House Committee On Judiciary 
10 Franklin Road SE, Suite 540 
Roanoke, VA 24011 
(302) 573-6345

As you can see from the enclosures the Office of International Prosecutor has agreed to review some questions relating to violations of Human Rights and in fact a question involving Walters V Colvin USDC, NM Civil Case: 1:13-cv-00247-GBW and 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals 13-2087 is appended for your Committees consideration.

We have never heard of a US District Court Judge over ruling another USDC in another Circuit, overruling standing ORDERS of several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and holding proceeding where there are not 2 parties present. The ORDER of Supreme Court Justice Parker (Docket #11) ignores the fact the Complaint had already been withdrawn (Docket #10) because it was already resolved in the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (USDC No. 2:13-CV-25) Could your Committees find out when Supreme Court Justice James Parker was voted into the High Court? As Supreme Court Justice Parker pointed out in his ruling (Docket #11) has been re-heard about 50 times in various Courts since 2007 when the Honorable Judge Judith Herrera (#: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP) closed the proceeding with an agreement of the parties. Why anyone would wish to challenge the ruling of the Court that any further proceedings must be filed pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review.

The International Prosecutor has been asked to consider that further suspensions of benefits without the required process of law should be considered violations of the Human Rights Code known as Abuse of Power and prosecuted.

Many Thanks Appellant Counsel of Record 
Chris Walters 	
1224 E Trent Ave 			
Spokane, WA 99202
Date November 5th, 2013

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities what appears to be a large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect.

Updated: Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 4:28 PM MST
Published : Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 1:16 AM MST
Reporter: Tim Maestas ,/br> Web Producer: Bill Diven

ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) - A retiring FBI agent in the thick of investigating and prosecuting public officials said Tuesday New Mexico may be the most corrupt state in the nation. New Mexico has a long list of corrupt politicians, and the list could be growing. High-profile political figures and associates have been convicted, and ongoing investigations are making frequent headlines. Many of those cases began with FBI agents in Albuquerque.

"It's our No. 1 criminal program," Thomas McClenaghan, special agent in charge of the FBI Albuquerque field office, said. Corruption scandals that took down former state Sen. Manny Aragin, once considered the most powerful politician in the Senate. Former State Treasurer Robert Vigil, his predecessor and a long list of criminal accomplices have been convicted or cut plea deals in federal court.

McClenaghan will lead Albuquerque's team of FBI agents only through the end of the week. He retires on Friday. "From what we've seen here, corruption in this state is epidemic," he told KRQE News 13. "It is at all levels of government." New Mexico is not alone, of course. Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich is at the center of a federal investigation that had him arrested late last year. At the time Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant of the Chicago FBI field office had little good to say about how Illinois does political business. "If it isn't the most corrupt state in the United States, it is certainly one hell of a competitor," Grant said.

McClenaghan's take? "All I can say is Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant never worked in New Mexico." That's a strong statement from a man who's made it a point to pursue political corruption aggressively. When his agents went after Vigil, then the sitting state treasurer, undercover video showed a California financial consultant who was cooperating with the FBI handing him $10,000 in cash. At Vigil's first trial jurors couldn't decide whether he was guilty or not, and ultimately the evidence was not enough to convict him on 23 counts of racketeering, conspiracy and extortion. However Vigil was eventually convicted on one count of attempted extortion in 2006.

1. Exhibit Page #17 The Social Security Approves Disability/Medicade Extensive Frauds In USDC, NM Addressed by Congress: Feburary, 2007-July 2007

2. Exhibit Page #18 Social Security Begins To Default On Agreements April-October 2007

3. Exhibit Page #19 Social Security Contract Obligations Search For Affordable Housing In 2007

4. Exhibit Page #25 Social Security Administration's Secret Hearing & Request For Unauthorized Review Generates $15,000 Capital Loss

5. Exhibit Page #27 Motion For Reconsideration Denied By Judge Robert Scott USDC NM June, 2008-August 2008

6. Exhibit Page #31 Can Social Security Administrative Law Judges Over Rule Federal Judges & US Circuit Courts of Appeals? November-December, 2008

7. Exhibit Page #35 Operational Audits July, August, September 2009 Budget Program Cuts Eliminate Services-Options

8. Exhibit Page #36 FBI Director Mueller Apologies US Senate Committee ON Judiciary July 2009-September, 2009