US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

Chairman Sheldon Whitehorse

US Senate Committee On Judiciary
Administrative Oversight and the Courts
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

US Attorney General Eric Holder

US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
202-514-2000

Director John F. Clark

US Marshal Service
U.S. Courthouse
Washington, DC 20001

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Anna Mills S. Wagoner, USA*

P.O. Box 1858
Greensboro, NC 27402
FBI Director Apoligies to
US Senate Committee on Judiciary
FBI admits cheating on tests Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 28th Jul 2010
McClatchy Newspapers WASHINGTON

An undisclosed number of FBI agents have cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases, FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged Wednesday, but he added that he is waiting for the results of an inspector general's investigation to determine how widespread the cheating has become.... The FBI head was asked about the controversy by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who heads the committee. Leahy he said he knew that some agents had been caught cheating on the tests, in which they were supposed to show they understood the limitations in conducting domestic surveillance and beginning cases without first having evidence of a crime. The test is mandatory, and it is put on by the bureau's Domestic Investigation and Operations Guidelines section.

"We are expecting a letter from the IG pointing out other occasions, where there were abuses and the procedures were not followed, with recommendations. And we will follow those recommendations." Mueller added that "it is quite obviously my concern that all of our personnel understand the parameters in which we are to work." He pledged that eventually all the agents will understand "the limitations of what we can do."

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

US Congressman James Sensebrenner

House Committee On Judiciary
120 Bishops Way, Room 154
Brookfield, WI 53005-6294
(262) 784-1111
Fax: (262) 784-9437


Chairman Darrell Issa

Subcommittee Courts, ....
House Judiciary Committee
2269 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-3906

Congressman Jim Jordan

Subcommittee On HealthCare
1524 Longworth House Office Bldg
Washington, DC 20515
T (202) 225-2676

Chairman Jason Chaffetz

House Oversight Committee
2157 Rayburn HOB
Washington,DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5074
Fax: (202) 225-3974
Exhibit C Submitted As Evidence And
Testimony To Congress-Exclusive Jurisdiction
You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings
Standing US Court ORDERS
And Black Letter Law
Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

US Senator Chuck Grassley

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
Wahsington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-7703

US Senator Ron Johnson

Chairman Senate Oversight
Whistleblower
340 Dirksen SOB
Washington, DC, 20510
(202) 224-4751

Congressman Mike Thompson

House Ways and Means Committee
2300 County Center Dr. Suite A100
Santa Rosa, CA 95403

President Barrack Obama

The Whitehouse
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Social Security Commissioner Michael Asture

Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland 21235

Secretary of Health and Human Services

Kathleen Sebelius
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
Exhibit Page 36 USA Eric Holder Cleans Up USDOJ
Date Omitted as Not Required This Page
1. Link to Exhibit Page 35Operational Audits July, August, September 2009 Budget Program Cuts Eliminate Services-Options

2. Exhibit #A USAG Reigns In US Department of Justice After Abuses of Bush Administration

3. Exhibit #B Deferred Congress: Questions On Unlawful Conservatorships Pursuant To Title 18 USC 4 Misprison The Felony

4. Exhibit #C Extensive History Criminal Activity Around NM Courts Report By US House Committee on Judiciary

5. Exhibit #D FBI Admits Intercepting US Mail Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction Of Correspondence

6. Exhibit #E- Legal Brief to 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals Vanishes Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction Of Correspondence

7. Exhibit #F- Discussion With Court Over Missing Mail

8. Exhibit #G Priority Mail to DOD Disappears Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction Of Correspondence

9. Exhibit #H Amicus Curiea Brief To UN Disappears? Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction Of Correspondence

10. Exhibit #I Statement of Facts In Support of Appellant Brief

11. Exhibit #J SSA Inspector General Retrieves SSI Check In Reply Frivilious Sanction Recommendation

12. Exhibit #K Bank of America Steals Safe Deposit Box? US District Court Has No Objections

13. Exhibit #L Bank of America Agrees to $410 Million Restitution For Overdraft Fees

14. Exhibit #M Offer To Repay Overpayment SSI Benefits Resulting From Theft of US Mail

15. Exhibit #N Misdirection of US Mail & Move Back NC Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction of Correspondence

16. Exhibit #O Review Of Sanctions Policy to SSA OIG Obama Administration Enacts Law 2012 Army Can Arrest Seditionist

17. Exhibit # P Reply FBI Directors Previous Question Cite: Obama Administration Enacts 2012 Law Army Arrest Seditionist

18. Exhibit #Q FBI Director Testifies Before Senate Judiciary Committee That Mistakes Were Made and Agents Cheated On National Security Exams

19. Exhibit #R Discovery Motion FRCP Rule 37 Question Redirected To Congressman Peter Defazio

20. Exhibit #T Attorney Fees & Other Costs $1969.00

21. Link to Exhibit Page 37 Samaritan Ministries Tells Federal Court Kiss Off November, 2009-December, 2010

22. Similar Pages About New Mexico

Anna Mills S. Wagoner, USA*

P.O. Box 1858
Greensboro, NC 27402

Former Deputy Attorney General David Ogden
US Department of Justice
Can't Get Along With Policy-Resign

Director John F. Clark

US Marshal Service
U.S. Courthouse
Washington, DC 20001

Former Bush Advisor Carl Rove
"King Carl"
White House

Too Special Agent In Charge

Special Agent in Charge Carol K.O. Lee
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107

Former Special Agency In Charge

T Mc Gleagham FBI
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107
(505) 889-1300,
News Conference Called New Mexico
Most Corrupt State in US


US Senator Pete Domenici

505 South Main, Suite 118
Loretto Town Center
Las Cruces, NM 88001

United States District Court

District of New Mexico
Honorable Judge Bruce Black
Forme Chief Judge
Judge Magistrate Lourdes A. Martínez
333 Lomas, NW.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

UN Counter Terrorism Committee

Hardeep Singh Puri, Ambassador and
Permanent Representative of India,
Chairman Of Committee
New York, New York 10017
Confirmed Kills & Recommend Diplomatic Sanctions
USDC Judge Bruck Black... Per UN Terrorism Protocol
In 2008 The US House Committee On Judiciary took out the trash as this link suggest in a scathing report which ended the careers of US Senator Pete Domenici; White House Advisor Karl Rove...and many others The The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals have already denied any such request as well as further extrajurisdictional conact with counsel. The Chief Judge Bruce Black in New Mexico has permitted Bank of American to seize Chris Walters Safe Deposit Box & Legal papers without any Court ORDER or legal process and should be blessed with a Diplomatic Sanction.

Exhibit #A USAG Reigns In US Department of Justice
After Abuses of Bush Administration/ September, 2009


US Attorney General Eric Holder

US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
202-514-2000
US Attorney General
New State Secrets Policies and Procedures
9-23-2009-Attorney General Eric Holder today issued a memorandum instituting new Department of Justice policies and procedures in order to ensure greater accountability in the government's assertion of the state secrets privilege in litigation. "This policy is an important step toward rebuilding the public's trust in the government's use of this privilege while recognizing the imperative need to protect national security," Holder said. "It sets out clear procedures that will provide greater accountability and ensure the state secrets privilege is invoked only when necessary and in the narrowest way possible."

Earlier this year, Attorney General Holder ordered senior Justice officials to conduct a review of the Department's existing state secrets policies and procedures, including an internal evaluation of the pending cases in which the privilege had been invoked. The results of that internal review were shared with an interagency group comprised of officials from the Department and the intelligence community, which provided input into the formulation of the new policies and procedures. The new policy and procedures take effect October 1, 2009.

The Attorney General's memorandum outlines several aspects of the new administrative process that increases accountability and oversight, including:

Facilitation of Court Review – The policy ensures that before approving invocation of the state secrets privilege in court, the Department must be satisfied that there is strong evidentiary support for it. In order to facilitate meaningful judicial scrutiny of the privilege assertions, the Department will submit evidence to the court for review.

Significant Harm Standard – The policy adopts a more rigorous standard to govern when the Department will defend assertions of the state secrets privilege in new cases. Under the new policy, the Department will now defend the assertion of the privilege only to the extent necessary to protect against the risk of significant harm to national security.

Narrow Tailoring of Privilege Assertions – Under this policy, the Department will narrowly tailor the use of the states secrets privilege whenever possible to allow cases to move forward in the event that the sensitive information at issue is not critical to the case. As part of this policy, the Department also commits not to invoke the privilege for the purpose of concealing government wrongdoing or avoiding embarrassment to government agencies or officials.

State Secrets Review Committee – A State Secrets Review Committee will be formed consisting of senior Department officials designated by the Attorney General who will evaluate any recommendation by the Assistant Attorney General of the relevant Division to invoke the privilege. The Committee would make its recommendation to the Associate Attorney General, who would review and refer to the Deputy Attorney General for a final recommendation to the Attorney General or his designee.

Approval by the Attorney General The policy requires the approval of the Attorney General prior to the invocation of the states secret privilege, except when the Attorney General is recused or unavailable. Previously, the invocation of the state secrets privilege could be approved by the appropriate Assistant Attorney General. Referral to Inspectors General. The policy implements a referral process to relevant Offices of Inspector General whenever there are credible allegations of government wrongdoing in a case, but the assertion of state secrets privilege might preclude the case from moving forward. Under the policy, the Department also commits to provide periodic reports on all cases in which the privilege is asserted to the appropriate oversight Committees in Congress.

Policies and Procedures Governing Invocation of the State Secrets Privilege

US Attorney General Eric Holder

US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
202-514-2000
AP WASHINGTON: The Justice Department has reined in electronic surveillance by the National Security Agency after finding the agency had improperly accessed American phone calls and e-mails.

The problems were discovered during a review of the intelligence activities, the Justice Department said in a statement Wednesday night. The New York Times, which first reported the matter on its Web site, said the NSA had been improperly intercepting communications by Americans.

In its statement, the Justice Department said it has taken "comprehensive steps to correct the situation and bring the program into compliance." The Justice Department did not elaborate on what problems it found. Once corrective measures were taken, Attorney General Eric Holder sought authorization for renewing the surveillance program, officials said. Government officials have also briefed lawmakers on the issue.

Domestic eavesdropping has been a contentious issue since 2005, when the Times revealed that for years following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the NSA intercepted international phone conversations and e-mails involving U.S. citizens without a warrant. That program ended in 2007, and the following year Congress passed legislation requiring the NSA to get court approval to monitor the purely domestic communications of Americans who came under suspicion.

US Congressman Bob Goodlatte

Chairman of Agriculture
2240 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5431
(202) 225-9681 fax
Justice Dept. Reins In Surveillance Program
Research Supports Anti SpyWare Act of 2005
The Bush Administration authorized several thousand black bag or breakins of my websites and create enought support for this type of hacking as to create the Anti Spyware Act of 2005

US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
FBI Director Apoligies to
US Senate Committee on Judiciary
FBI admits cheating on tests Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 28th Jul 2010
McClatchy Newspapers WASHINGTON

An undisclosed number of FBI agents have cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases, FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged Wednesday, but he added that he is waiting for the results of an inspector general's investigation to determine how widespread the cheating has become.... The FBI head was asked about the controversy by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who heads the committee. Leahy he said he knew that some agents had been caught cheating on the tests, in which they were supposed to show they understood the limitations in conducting domestic surveillance and beginning cases without first having evidence of a crime. The test is mandatory, and it is put on by the bureau's Domestic Investigation and Operations Guidelines section.

"We are expecting a letter from the IG pointing out other occasions, where there were abuses and the procedures were not followed, with recommendations. And we will follow those recommendations." Mueller added that "it is quite obviously my concern that all of our personnel understand the parameters in which we are to work." He pledged that eventually all the agents will understand "the limitations of what we can do."

Exhibit #B Deferred Congress: Questions On Unlawful Conservatorships
Pursuant To Title 18 USC 4 Misprison The Felony/ November, 2009


US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Question on Bogus Conservatorships & Other Abuses
To Be Addressed Too US Circuit Court of Appeals Executives
Link Citatation I wanted to thank the Director of the FBI Robert Mueller for his recent question on extra ordinary sanctions proposed for certain extraordinary crimes normally addressed to Federal Prosecutor. It is suggested that since most federal prosecutors lack the time and resources for prosecution the matters might best be remanded to jurisdiction of the Chief Judge of each US Circuit Court of Appeals.
Specifications Interception of ORDERS of Courts
Plaintiff Exhibit C: CD-Rom D://ssi/fgj/herbertf5.htm
We have an online request for a National Security Death Warrant for a John Doe who is responsible for interception of USDC NM Court ORDER in Walters V SSA Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP the Honorable Judge Herrera Presiding; Walters v SSA USDC NM cv-C080380 The Honorable Judge Robert Scott Presiding and subsequent ORDER of 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals. It appears that more recently that an FBI Agent at Las Cruces, NM verbally implicated himself and the Director in the Interception of a legal brief to 10th US Circuit sent by certified US Mail 7008 3230 0001 8958 5146; and probably the ORDER US Circuit Court of Appeals DC Civil: 09-05206. The US Postal Inspector reference to interception of ORDER OF Judge Robert Scott is 9380708 and the matter was deferred to US Supreme Court which can be viewed online:

http://afterdarkportal.net/ssi/zzcontract/ussupremecourt.docx
Specifications Challenges to Ruling of Several US Circuit Courts
Plaintiff Exhibit C: CD-Rom D:// ssi/index.html
We have quite a number of parties attempting to create additional questions or joinders where the questions have been permanently closed by ORDER of Federal Court Rulings: USDC ,WDT Walters v Miller: CA: SA-97-CA-1313 before the Honorable US Judge Fred Biery; Walter v Miller: Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals Before Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges- 99-50174; Walters v Apfel: Civil A:99CA0156SS before the Honorable Judge Sparks; Walters v Apel; USDC DC Judge Robertson Presiding CA 99-CV-0668; Bradshaw v Walters, Hooker Superior Court 04 CVS 2674 Winston Salem, NC;Walters v Asture USDC, NM Judge Herrera Presiding #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP; Walters v Astrue; C080380 The Honorable Judge Robert Scott; Decision affirmed by 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals 08-2094; Walters v Astrue 09-0956 the Honorable Rosemary Collyer Presiding; Walters V Asture US Circuit Court of Appeals DC Civil: : 09-05206 declined to over turn lower court ruling; US Supreme Court declined to permit reviews of actions 10/2008 because the time limits have expired.
Question Of Expanded Jurisdictional Review
Title 28 USC 372 372. Retirement for disability...
Impeachment Guidelines: D:// ssi/fgj/index.html
The easiest way to deal with gross irregularities in judicial process or challenges to the rule of law might be to expand the jurisdictional authority for review by US Circuit Executives under Title 28 USC 372 372. Retirement for disability... The scope and purpose of the law would be to speedily end tampering and challenges to the rule of law which US District Court Judges state they lack statutory authority to pursue:

1. Interception of theft of a US Court ORDER would fall into jurisdictional authority for the Circuit Executive to prosecute pursuant to- Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court ORDER

2. Challenges to the ORDER of Federal Courts by persons who have Sworn an Oath of Allegiance to the United States might also be prosecuted by the Circuit Executive pursuant to Title 18 CRIMES aka Sedition

3. Judges or conservators creating fictious conservator ships for the purpose of looting retiree's benefits can also be prosecuted under by Circuit Executive. Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.

Given the openness of the Committees and US Department of Justice in dealing with misuse of law enforcement a nd intelligence activities by renegade elements of these communities I can only suggest what President Obama has already stated: "There Will Be Change".

Respectfully Submitted By
Appellant Counsel of Record
PO Box 266
Greensboro, NC 27402
Certificate of Service Costs $95.00
The cost to produce and mail these documents was estimated at $95.00

Rates Cited Based on USDC SDNY

500 Pearl Street, New York
New York 10007-1312
Cost to print these documents at Kinko & Computer usage was $95,00
3 Hours at $110.00 Hour=$330.00
Total $445.00

#468700010170747Delivered Signed for by: LMILES To US Senator Patrick Leahy Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009 Delivery date Nov 4, 2009 3:08 PM DestinationHyattsville, MD.

#468700010170747Delivered Signed for by: LMILES To US Senator Patrick Leahy Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009 Delivery date Nov 4, 2009 3:08 PM DestinationHyattsville, MD.

#468700010170747Delivered Signed for by: LMILES To US Senator Patrick Leahy Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009 Delivery date Nov 4, 2009 3:08 PM DestinationHyattsville, MD.

468700010170754 Delivered Signed for by: MHERNANDEZ To US Congressman Lamar Smith. Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009 Delivery date Nov 5, 2009 10:52 AM Destination San Antonio, TX

746677810043463 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: PPALMER Director Robert Mueller of Federal Bureau of Investigations Delivered Signed for by: PPALMER Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 3, 2009 Delivery date Nov 5, 2009 2:39 PM Destination Washington, DC

746677810043470 Delivered Signed for by: CANDERSON US Circuit Court of Appeals District of Columbia Delivered Signed for by: CANDERSON Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 3, 2009 Delivery date Nov 5, 2009 1:54 PM Destination Hyattsville, MD

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814

California Assembly Dave Jones

State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0009
New Landmark Laws Overhaul California's
Troubled Conservatorship System
By Assemblymember Dave Jones

California's conservatorship system for elderly and dependent adults -- originally designed to protect vulnerable adults from fraud and abuse -- is broken. But help is on the way. On Wednesday, the Governor signed the Omnibus Conservatorship and Guardianship Reform Act of 2006, a landmark package of bills to overhaul California's troubled conservatorship system. The legislative package, comprised of bills I authored, along with those of Senator Debra Bowen (D-Redondo Beach), Senator Liz Figueroa (D-Sunol), and Senator Jack Scott (D-Pasadena), is designed to remedy alarming deficiencies in California's conservatorship system that have led to shocking abuses of California's elderly and most vulnerable.

The system today allows private conservators to get themselves appointed in an inappropriate manner. Some steal or mismanage the money that their conservatees spent a lifetime earning. Most public guardians and probate courts do not have the resources to help. Worst of all, the system provides no place to turn for help. Consider the case of Emmeline Frey. Her private, for-profit conservator hired the conservator's own son, a car salesman, as Ms. Frey's financial advisor. The car salesman squandered $100,000 of Ms. Frey's estate, but still collected his commissions. The court overseeing the conservator did nothing to prevent it.

By significantly enhancing court oversight and requiring licensure of professional conservators, the Omnibus Conservatorship and Guardianship Reform Act of 2006 will protect vulnerable adults like Ms. Frey. AB 1363 (Jones) requires much stronger and more frequent court review and oversight of conservators, along with uniform standards of conduct that conservators must follow, brand new and aggressive training rules for all professionals involved in the system, and a new requirement that Public Guardians take the cases of all those at imminent risk of harm. SB 1550 (Figueroa) creates the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau within the Department of Consumer Affairs to license and regulate professional fiduciaries, including conservators, guardians and trustees.

In addition, SB 1116 (Scott) will remedy some of the problems with the sale of a conservatee's home, and SB 1716 (Bowen) will allow the court to take action when it receives informal reports of abuse and neglect from concerned friends or family members. Not all conservators are abusing the system -- many are doing a good job. But the current system has left elderly and dependent adults at the mercy of those who abuse their position. The Omnibus Conservatorship and Guardianship Reform Act will help ensure that our frail loved ones are protected both from those who seek to abuse them and from a system indifferent to their plight.

Assemblymember Dave Jones (D-Sacramento) is the Chair of the Assembly Judiciary Committee. He formerly served on the Sacramento City Council. He can be reached at www.assembly.ca.gov/jones.

Posted on September 29, 2006


US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

US Senator Pete Domenici

505 South Main, Suite 118
Loretto Town Center
Las Cruces, NM 88001

Former Bush Advisor Carl Rove

"King Carl"
White House

Former US Attorney General

Alberto Gonzalez
US Department of Justice

Former Special Agency In Charge

T Mc Gleagham FBI
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107

Exhibit #C Extensive History Criminal Activity Around NM Courts
Report By US House Committee on Judiciary/ Cited From 2008


US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Former Special Agency In Charge

T Mc Gleagham FBI
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107,
News Conference Called New Mexico
Most Corrupt State in US
Congressional Sanctions Document Corruption
In Federal Court System In New Mexico
Caused By Political Operatives
The House Judiciary Committee released a 700 page report on efforts by White House Advisor Karl Rove and Harriet Miers to fire New Mexico US Attorney David Iglesia in order to tamper with the bar of justice in the State of New Mexico. report can be viewed on line at this link

2005 White House "Decision" to fire David Iglesias – It has previously been known that New Mexico Republicans pressed for Iglesias to be removed because they did not like his decisions on vote fraud cases. New White House documents show that Rove and his office were involved in this effort no later than May 2005 (months earlier than previously known) - for example, in May and June 2005, Rove aide Scott Jennings sent e-mails to Tim Griffin (also in Rove's office) asking "what else I can do to move this process forward" and stressing that "I would really like to move forward with getting rid of NM US ATTY." In June 2005, Harriet Miers e-mailed that a "decision" had been made to replace Iglesias. At this time, DOJ gave Iglesias top rankings, so this decision was clearly not just the result of the White House following the Department's lead as Rove and Miers have maintained.1
Iglesias criticized by Rove aide for not "doing his job on" Democratic Congressional Candidate Patricia Madrid – An October 2006 e-mail chain begun by Representative Heather Wilson criticized David Iglesias for not bringing politically useful public corruption prosecutions in the run up to the 2006 elections. Scott Jennings forwarded Wilson's email to Karl Rove and complained that Iglesias had been "shy about doing his job on Madrid," Wilson's opponent in the 2006 Congressional race. Just weeks after this e-mail, Iglesias’ name was placed on the final firing list.2

An "agitated" Rove pressed Harriet Miers to do something about Iglesias just weeks before Iglesias was placed on the removal list – Karl Rove phoned Harriet Miers during a visit to New Mexico in September 2006 – according to Miers’ testimony, Rove was "agitated" and told her that Iglesias was "a serious problem and he wanted something done about it."3

Senator Domenici personally asked Bush's Chief of Staff Josh Bolten to have Iglesias replaced – In October 2006, Senator Domenici stepped up his campaign to have Iglesias replaced. According to White House phone logs and emails, as well as Rove's own testimony, Domenici spoke with President Bush's Chief of Staff Josh Bolten about Iglesias on October 5, 2006, and during October 2006, Domenici or his staff spoke with Karl Rove at least four times.4

Todd Graves removed in Rove–approved deal with Republican Senator – Kansas City U.S. Attorney Todd Graves was removed as part of a White House–brokered deal with U.S. Senator Kit Bond. In exchange for the administration firing Graves, Senator Bond agreed to lift his hold on an Arkansas judge nominated to the Eighth Circuit federal appeals court. A White House e-mail stated that "Karl is fine" with the proposal.5

Miers obtained favorable statement on Rick Renzi in violation of DOJ policy – When rumors of the FBI investigation of Rep. Rick Renzi surfaced in October, 2006, one of Rove's subordinates contacted Harriet Miers, who called Deputy Attorney General McNulty seeking a possible statement that would have "vindicated" Renzi. Even though this was contrary to standard DOJ policy, such a statement was issued several days later.6

Former US Attorney David Iglesia

New Mexico

US Senator Pete Domenici

505 South Main, Suite 118
Loretto Town Center
Las Cruces, NM 88001
White House Tampering
Prevented US Attorney Filing Briefs?
In August 12, 2009 US Senator John Cornyn explained the Senate Committee on Judiciary had finally cut through the layers of lies and bullshit from the Bush Administration to establish that White House Advisor Carl Rove had played a central role in firing the US Attorney David Iglesi for New Mexico for political reasons. Which would explain why the US Attorney never filed a brief in USDC at this time.

Exhibit #D FBI Admits Intercepting US Mail
Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction Of Correspondence


Press On Image to Enlarge

Before the United States District Court
US District of New Mexico
Honorable Judge Robert Scott Presiding
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102
505-348-2013

Chris Walters
vs.
Michael Astrue
Commissioner SSA
Civil #C080380
Impediment #1 Theft Or Interception
USDC ORDER Deferred US Supreme Court
1. The ORDER of the Court disappeared in the US Mail and is either lost, missing, or stolen? A Notice of Appeal to US Supreme Court and Answer for ODAR Monday, May 19th, 2008 on technical question for Judical Review SSI Claim from Kinko Copies 4418 Broadway Street, San Antonio, Texas 78209:

US Senator Pete Domenici

505 South Main, Suite 118
Loretto Town Center
Las Cruces, NM 88001

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Too Special Agent In Charge

Special Agent in Charge Carol K.O. Lee
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107
FBI Admits Interception
USDC ORDER Under Color of US Patriot Act
In 2009 FBI Officials admitted they had been intercepting federal Court ORDERS and other documents for some years under color of Title 18 Chapter 113b Terrorism or the US Patriot Act. Exactly how a Federal Court ORDERs; my SSI check; eye glass prescriptions... threatens the national security remains a profound mystery.

PACER Service Center Transaction Receipt
07/11/2007 13:08:05
PACER Login: cw2281 Client Code:
Description: Docket Report
Search Criteria: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
Billable Pages: 2 Cost: 0.16


Rates Cited Based on USDC SDNY

500 Pearl Street, New York
New York 10007-1312

Cost to print these documents at Kinko & Computer usage was $150.00
3 Hours at $110.00 Hour=$330.00
Total $480.00

1.
#468391510048409 Delivered Signed for by: AWOOD Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 27, 2008 9:36 AM Destination Denver, CO To US Congressman Lamar Smith. Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009

2. #468391510048416 Delivered Signed for by: JHERNANDEZ Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 22, 2008 10:01 AM Destination Albuquerque, NM

3. #468391510048423 Delivered Signed for by: BBECKELHEIMER Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 22, 2008 1:31 PM Destination Albuquerque, NM

4. #468391510048430 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: JPORITS Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 20, 2008 5:30 PM Destination Dallas, TX

5. #468391510048444 Delivered Signed for by: AZERTUCHE Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 20, 2008 2:55 PM Destination San Antonio, TX Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008

6. #468415010042160 Delivered Signed for by: DWEHEAM Shipment Dates Ship date May 27, 2008 Delivery date Jun 2, 2008 1:04 PM Destination Falls Church, VA

7. #468415010042177 Delivered Signed for by: MMARTINEZ Shipment Dates Ship date May 27, 2008 Delivery date May 28, 2008 1:30 PM Destination Albuquerque, NM

8. #468415010042184 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: DGAMBLE Shipment Dates hip date May 27, 2008 Delivery date Jun 2, 2008 9:58 AM Destination Washington, DC

9. #To US Supreme Court???? Jonder to Congress was filed May 24, 2008 from Fed Ex Kinko 1001 E University Ave, Las Cruces, NM 88001 Transaction #210110154963:

David C Williams

Postal Inspector General
14800 Trinity Blvd Ste 600
Fort Worth, TX 76155-2675
Theft Or Interception
USDC Filed US Postal Services
The type and variety of mail I have been missing in Las Cruces suggest the problem might be human. It is possible the problem could be caused by a sorting machine or whatever

From MailTheft@uspis.gov
tonims2006@gmail.com
dateTue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:19 PM

subjectMail Theft Report
mailed-byuspis.gov

Thank you for completing this form. Your Reference number is: 9380708

The U.S. Postal Inspection Service gathers data on mail-related crime to determine whether a violation has occurred. While we can't guarantee that we can recover lost money or items, your information can help alert Inspectors to problem areas and possibly prevent other people from being victimized.

U.S. Postal Inspectors base their investigations on the number, substance, and pattern of complaints received from the public. We ask you to keep all original documents related to your complaint. We will contact you ONLY if more information is needed.

US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue UNDC, NM #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP The Social Security Commissioner made a determination of fact and law that Chris Walters is disabled and the only review which can be had is Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

3. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

5. US Supreme Court rulings that all parties are entitled too fair hearing:
a. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

b. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

c. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.


Haldeman, Erlichman, Dean

40 Government Convicted -Sentenced 200 Years @Watergate
Exhibit #E Interception of Amicus Curiea Briefs In US Mail
Questions Constitutionality of Title 28 Chapter 33 FBI
It was subsequently suggested that the FBI was involved in theft or interception of an Amicus Curiea brief addressed to 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals; some mail to Inspector General of DOD; and it was learned was not responsible for interception of final ORDER from USCA in DC. The new US Attorney General must have his hands full trying to reign in renegade elements of the law enforcement and intelligence community from activities which would have been authorized in Bush Administration.

Case Law It is a violation of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law to attempt to vend, dispense, or pratice law or secret counsels legal papers as you probally remember when 40 some odd government officials each earned 5 years in federal prison in US V. Haldeman, Erlichman, and Dean and US Attorney General John Mitchell.


Standing ORDER of 10th US Circuit

Press To Enlarge May 2, 2008
Before The 10th United States Court Of Appeals
Byron White U.S. Courthouse
1823 Stout Street
Denver, CO 80257

US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
FBI Director Apoligies to
US Senate Committee on Judiciary
FBI admits cheating on tests Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 28th Jul 2010
McClatchy Newspapers WASHINGTON

An undisclosed number of FBI agents have cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases, FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged Wednesday, but he added that he is waiting for the results of an inspector general's investigation to determine how widespread the cheating has become.... The FBI head was asked about the controversy by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who heads the committee. Leahy he said he knew that some agents had been caught cheating on the tests, in which they were supposed to show they understood the limitations in conducting domestic surveillance and beginning cases without first having evidence of a crime. The test is mandatory, and it is put on by the bureau's Domestic Investigation and Operations Guidelines section.

"We are expecting a letter from the IG pointing out other occasions, where there were abuses and the procedures were not followed, with recommendations. And we will follow those recommendations." Mueller added that "it is quite obviously my concern that all of our personnel understand the parameters in which we are to work." He pledged that eventually all the agents will understand "the limitations of what we can do."

Exhibit #E- Legal Brief to 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals Vanishes
Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction Of Correspondence/ August 2009


10th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Chief Judge Mary Briscoe
United States Court of Appeals The Byron White U.S. Courthouse
1823 Stout Street,
Denver, CO 80257

10th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Former Chief Judge Robert Henry
United States Court of Appeals The Byron White U.S. Courthouse
1823 Stout Street,
Denver, CO 80257

10th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Former Chief Judge Deanella Tacha
United States Court of Appeals The Byron White U.S. Courthouse
1823 Stout Street,
Denver, CO 80257
Chris Walters,
Appellant Pro Se

Vs.
Michael Astrue
Commissioner SSA
USCA# Case 08-2094
1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
Amicus Curiae Brief On Continued 3rd Party Tampering
& Obstruction of Standing Orders of Court
NOW COMES THE Appellant Pro Se Chris Walters in this Amicus Curiae Brief to provide more detailed information to Social Security, the lower Courts, and 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals on obstruction of the ORDERS of the Court and extensive 3rd party tampering to wit;

1. The Social Security Administration made a good faith statement in 2007 that Chris Walters is disabled and entitled to SSI and Chris Walters made a good faith offer to attempt to have the physical disabilities addressed and if possible repaired where the Honorable judge Judith Hererra permitted the matter to be concluded and state it was “Well Pleaded”.

2. Plaintiff Exhibit C: ref file D://ssi/index.html show massive 3rd party tampering by non parties who lack any recognized standing however are substantially interfering with the informal agreements between Chris Walters, the Social Security Administration, and USDC, NM.

3. Although Judge Hererra 2nd ORDER provides that no changes can be made to the case or benefits other USDC have declined to prosecute 3rd parties tampering causing further losses to the parties.

4. Exhibit A: Chris Walters requested Bank of America close his Safe Deposit Box 259 in Las Cruces, NM which contained original Court documents and it appears Bank of America went on and charged Chris Walters for another years rent and is refusing to hand over the contents which might do further harm to the case at bar if the matter is reheard in a lower court.

5. Exhibit B: Given the reluctance of the other Courts to prosecute tampering Chris Walters has created an offset to the Office of International Prosecutor to see if relief might be granted from an obscure venue on the basis of human rights.
Discussion On Amicus Curiae
& Administrative ORDER
Chris Walters might respectfully suggest the US Circuit Court of Appeals draft an Administrative Order to the US Marshal to proceed to Bank of America on 250 W Amador in Las Cruces, NM and seize Safe Box 259 so as the contents and original Court papers can be placed in protective custody until such time as a lower US Court permits review of the SSI claim pursuant to the ORDER of the lower Court and Title 42 USC 405 (g)(H) Judicial Review.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters
Appellant Pro Se
PO Box 266
Greensboro, NC 27402

Standing ORDER of 10th US Circuit

Press To Enlarge May 2, 2008
Before The 10th United States Court Of Appeals
Byron White U.S. Courthouse
1823 Stout Street
Denver, CO 80257

US Postal Inspector

14800 Trinity Blvd STE 600
FORT WORTH TX 76155-2675
877-876-2455
Report Missing Certified US Mail
Certified # 7008 3230 0001 8958 5146 USPS IG 13578487

## 7008 3230 0001 8958 5146

Postal IG #13578487
Amicus Curiea brief for 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals filed in August, 2009. Certified US Mail # 7008 3230 0001 8958 5146 document appears to have disappeared after being mailed to Denver to travel 4 blocks to USCA Offices in Denver.CO Service emailed to Courts report filed with Postal Inspector Your Reference number is: 13578487

US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue UNDC, NM #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP The Social Security Commissioner made a determination of fact and law that Chris Walters is disabled and the only review which can be had is Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

3. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

5. US Supreme Court rulings that all parties are entitled too fair hearing:
a. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

b. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

c. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

Chairman Sheldon Whitehorse

US Senate Committee On Judiciary
Administrative Oversight and the Courts
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Possible Prosecutable or
Executable Federal Offenses
We have a rather large going theft of Court ORDERS, legal instrumentalities,,, which some persons have alleged are being engineered by law enforcement or intelligence persons. Certifed Mail 7008 3230 0001 8958 5146 or USPS IG Complaint 13578487

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt
2. Title 18 USC 242Deprivation of rights under color of law
3. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER
4. Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

5. Title 18 USC CHAPTER 115Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities

Exhibit #F- Discussion With Court Over Missing Mail/August, 2009


United States District Court

Clerk's Office
U.S. District Court
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102
From CWalters chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
To: herrerachambers@nmcourt.fed.us,
PuglisiChambers@nmcourt.fed.us,
ScottChambers@nmcourt.fed.us,
usanm.webmaster@usdoj.gov
ccnims2006@gmail.com,
chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
Date Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Subject Brief obstruction Court ORDER/Interception Brief to 10th Circuit Certified Mail

Addressed To the Honorable
Emaied Too: To the Honorable USDC Judge Judith Herrera
US District Court New Mexico
333 Lomas NW
Albuquerque,New Mexico

Your Honor:

The attached Amicus Curiea brief addressed to 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals cv-08-02094 questioned tampering/obstruction your previous ORDER Walters v Asture Civil Docket For Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP The text of the brief to the clerk of 10 Cicuit is that the brief and documents mailed by certified US Mail in Denver, CO have apparently intercepted by an unknown 3rd party:

10th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Clerk's Office
1828 Stout
Denver, CO 80257
From Author nims2006@gmail.com
To 10th_Circuit_clerk@ca10.uscourts.gov,
jeffrey.dorschner@usdoj.gov,
nims2006@gmail.com
Date Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM
subjectRe: Certified Mail

Dear Clerk of 10th Circuit:

Many thanks for your reply to an Amicus Curiea brief in (Walters v Asture 08-2094) mailed by certified US Mail last week in Denver to your Court where the online tracking shows the item didn't transit the 4 blocks to your office: On Line Postal Shows:

Label/Receipt Number: 7008 3230 0001 8958 5146

Your item was accepted at 9:29 AM on August 6, 2009 in DENVER, CO 80202. Information, if available, is updated periodically throughout the day. Please check again later. I have attached a copy of the brief and exhibits on CD-Rom can be viewed online:

ssi/index.html

ssi/fgj/index.html

Sorry for any inconvience concerning obstruction of the Court previous ORDER which is also attached 08-2094
Appellant Chris Walters

From 10th_Circuit_clerk@ca10.uscourts.gov
To nims2006@gmail.com
Date Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:25 AM
Subject Certified Mail
mailed-byca10.uscourts.gov

We checked with our mail room. Nothing received. The mail room deputy called the USPS and nothing received yet. You may track your certified material by contacting the United States Postal Service.

US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue UNDC, NM #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP The Social Security Commissioner made a determination of fact and law that Chris Walters is disabled and the only review which can be had is Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

3. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

5. US Supreme Court rulings that all parties are entitled too fair hearing:
a. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

b. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

c. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

Exhibit #G Priority Mail to DOD Disappears
Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction Of Correspondence/July 2009


US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

Chairman Sheldon Whitehorse

US Senate Committee On Judiciary
Administrative Oversight and the Courts
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Possible Prosecutable or
Executable Federal Offenses
We have a rather large going theft of Court ORDERS, legal instrumentalities,,, which some persons have alleged are being engineered by law enforcement or intelligence persons:

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt
2. Title 18 USC 242Deprivation of rights under color of law
3. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER
4. Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
5. Title 18 USC CHAPTER 115Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

North Carolina Bureau of Investigations

Former Director Robin Pendergraft
Raleigh North Carolina

Too Special Agent In Charge

Special Agent Owen Harris
7915 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
Impediment #2 Interception of Priority Mail
To Department of Defense
Priority mail item addressed to DOD shows missing on the online mail delivery verification system

#0309 0330 0001 4193 5922

Status Notice Left
We attempted to deliver your item at 9:15 am on July 11, 2009 in ARLINGTON, VA 22202 and a notice was left. No further information is available for this item.

US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue UNDC, NM #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP The Social Security Commissioner made a determination of fact and law that Chris Walters is disabled and the only review which can be had is Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

3. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

Exhibit #H Amicus Curiea Brief To UN Disappears?
Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction Of Correspondence


US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

Cites Inability To Govern
United States Circuit Court of Appeals
District of Columbia
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

Chris Walters,      		)
      Appellant Pro Se 	)
			)
Civil NO: 09-5206		)	
USDC Civil # 090956		)
			)
v.   			)
                        	) 
Michael Asture, Commissioner 	) 
Of Social Security et all  	)
Appellant's Cross Brief
In Reply To Interlocutory ORDER USDC
Addressed to Office of International Prosecutor
Cover Sheet pursuant D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(8);Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(2)
NOW COMES THE APPELLANT Chris Walters from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia Case cv-09-956 on the Interlocutory ruling Judge Friedman in the lower Court to Quash an existing jonder to the United Nations Organs previously permitted by several US Circuit Courts of Appeals in this Appellant Cross Brief addressed to wit:

Addressed Too International Criminal Court
Mr. Luis Moreno-Ocampo-Prosecutor
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
Post Office Box 19519
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands
Jurisdictional Statement Statutes & Regulations
Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(4);D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(4) Appellant's Briefs;
1. Generally question of International Law are filed with the United States Supreme Court pursuant to Title 28 USC 1251 Original Jurisdiction

(b) The Supreme Court shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of:

(1) All actions or proceedings to which ambassadors, other public ministers, consuls, or vice consuls of foreign states are parties;

2. The scope and purpose of the 1503 International Treaty is to provide technical assistance to a UN state which might be having human rights problems. Some of the technical assistance provided to the United States already generated several federal law and other relief
Certificate of Service
Certified US Mail showing the pleadings have been served on the other Courts and parties is attached Certified US Mail Cross Brief filed with office of International Prosecutor regarding statements the United States lacks the ability to govern.

1. #7009 1410 0001 1124 8858
Status Delivered SSA General Counsel David Black Status: Delivered Your item was delivered at 8:52 am on August 03, 2009 in BALTIMORE, MD 21235

2. #7009 1410 0001 1124 8889<
Status Delivered UN Disabilities, NY Your item was delivered at 11:56 am on August 03, 2009 in NEW YORK, NY 10017

3. #7009 1410 0001 1124 8872
Status Delivered Channy Phillips USA, Wash DC Your item was delivered at 11:33 am on August 07, 2009 in WASHINGTON, DC 20530

4. #7009 1410 0001 1124 8865
Status Delivered Clerk USCA District Columbia Your item was delivered at 3:06 pm on August 03, 2009 in WASHINGTON, DC 20001.

5. #7008 3230 0001 8958 5146
Status Delivered 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Status: Acceptance Your item was accepted at 9:29 AM on August 6, 2009 in DENVER, CO 80202.
Status: Notice Left. We attempted to deliver your item at 11:34 am on June 15, 2009 in WASHINGTON, DC 20001 and a notice was left. No further information is available for this item.

US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
Title 18 USC Chapter 115
Insurrection, Sedition and Treason
1. Case Law: Walters v Astrue UNDC, DC #: Civil NO: 09-5206/USDC Civil # 090956 and being Affirmed by US Circuit Court of Appeals DC the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 115 Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities an extensive set of statutes which address persons engaged in treason;insurrection; and subsersive activities.
Missing Priority Mail
Addressed US Circuit Court of Appeals DC

Press On Image To Enlarge

Certificate of Service
On the Several Courts & UN

Press On Image To Enlarge

US Circuit Court of Appeals
for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

Exhibit #I Statement of Facts In Support of Appellant Brief
Probable Confirmed Kills-Interception Documents From USCA, DC


US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
STATEMENT OF FACTS IN
SUPPORT OF APPELLANT's BRIEF
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(5)
Appellant's Briefs
1. I wanted to thanks the United States Social Security Administration during the Bush Administration for dropping by the United Nations High Commission On Human Rights for the last 11 years by and through legal counsel and allocuting to terrorist activities; crimes against humanity; and possibly genocide as cited in the Appendix.

2. Over the past 11 years the United States District Court have stated they lack jurisdictional authority to prosecute serious violations of Title 18 CRIMES ; receive information of such allegations or authorize prosecution of persons engaged in terrorist activities under the US Patriot Act:

3. Exhibit A: The State of North Carolina discontinued SSI benefits in March, 2009 after Exhibit B: several Social Security Administrative law Judges tried to over rule Exhibit D: the standing ORDERS of several US Circuit Courts and US District Courts in an apparent challenge to the general rule of law; due process; and equal protection.

4. The Office of International Prosecutor and Human Rights Council are asked to consider that various Court lack of standing to enforce the laws of the United States has resulted in serious Human Rights violations and consider placing limited functions of several US agencies into the custody of the United Nations Or World Court is the subject of the Appendix.
Summary of Argument
Pursuant To Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8); D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(6)
It is possible that Obama Administration might to effect change and under mind the “status quo” it is as it is unlikely those who profit from human suffering will resign their position of power voluntarily.
Argument Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9) All Briefs
A lot of the massive ongoing corruption in government programs such as the abuse of banking system stems from the long term belief that the government is bought and owned through the political patronage system and protection from prosecution for those who donate to the right cause is a fact of life. The statement; fact; and action of various 3rd parties that they have the right to tamper with or set aside the due process and equal protection of the law is so extraordinary that the ORDERS and Findings of US Courts are either set aside or ignored as in the case at bar.

While Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act and Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act are different US statutes operated by different Departments they in fact operate very closely or in many cases the failure to operate affects clients of both. The problems normally associated with Homeless Programs in providing services to maybe 300,000 persons would be greatly increased if the US economy were to fail and put say 10 million persons into the existing system. The need of the US to learn to operate a responsible and professional homeless shelter to indigent persons as an established national technology is a viable alternative to an actual shooting war in the United States as a result of failed economic policies.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters,
Appellant Pro Se
PO Box 266,
Greensboro, NC 27402

US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

Alamance County District Attorney & KKK

Confirmed Kill
212 West Elm Street Room 210
Graham, NC 27253

Anna Mills S. Wagoner, USA*

P.O. Box 1858
Greensboro, NC 27402

North Carolina Bureau of Investigations

Former Director Robin Pendergraft
Raleigh North Carolina

Director John F. Clark

US Marshal Service
U.S. Marshal: George Walsh
U.S. Courthouse
3rd & Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room 1103
Washington, DC 20001
Impediment #3 Confirmed Kills
Insurrection, Sedition
1. The suggestion that federal law enforcement personnel were obstructing delivery of federal documents shows at the end of the opposite page was a little too much-shortly before their termination from government service

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue UNDC, DC #: Civil NO: 09-5206/USDC Civil # 090956 and being Affirmed by US Circuit Court of Appeals DC the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

3. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

4. Title 18 USC 115 Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities an extensive set of statutes which address persons engaged in treason;insurrection; and subsersive activities.

Exhibit #J SSA Inspector General Retrieves SSI Check
In Reply Frivilious Sanction Recommendation/ September, 2009


From; Office of the Inspector General

Allegation Management and Fugitive Enforcement Division
P.O. Box 17768
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Impediment #4 Missing SSI Check Retrieved
By Social Security Inspector General?
I early September, 2009 two gentlemen introduced themselves as FBI Agents however neither produced any identification or by name. They explained the FBI Director had asked them to meet with me on an emergency basis and explain he throught I am a terrorist? I had seen both of these gentlemen before and was not sure who they were as they were following me around.

The question of a sanction comes into play for seizing and holding the SSI check until September 21,2009 right after the US Circuit Court of Appeals revolked the right of the government to tamper with or amend the SSI claim:

The FBI Agents explained or alluded to the fact they have been responsible for seizing my mail and asked if I still received my mail at UPS on Las Cruces, NM

Social Security Commissioner

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235
Frivilious Sanctions Proposal
As Discovery Motion & Interview
With FBI, US Marshal, SSA IG
A proposal for UNSC Sanction on Commissioner Mike Asture was emailed throughout southern New Mexico around early September, 2009. During subsequent interview with FBI, Deputy US Marshal, and SSA IG representative it was possible to determine

1. That the 1 document had become 4 different versions of the same items-suggesting a 3rd party had tampered with the contents.....

2. During the interview with a very harried and unprepared pair of FBI Agents who didn't actually produce any ID it was suggested the FBI Director was explaining I am supposed to be "terrorist" as I understand things.

3. I can only surmise the FBI had been using some part of the National Security Act to seize US Mail; my SSI check; various US Federal Court ORDERS; and my Safe Deposit Box 259 at Bank of America and God only knows what else

4. After a meeting with FBI, US Marshal, and SSA Office of Inspector General it has been decided to withdraw UN Sanction because officials state they do not adequately understand UN law or the difference between request for sanctions and a terrorist activity.

5.US Attorney General Eric Holder subsequently stated on 9-23-2009 that the right to impose sanctions on USDOJ employees for misuse of NSA assets it an official function of his department where USDOJ employees make improper claims of NSA relating to US Courts.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Rule 4 Amended Complaints
Retraction of Sanction Proposal
FRCP Rule 4 Amended Complaint/Pleading
Addressed Too All Officers & Agents
United States of America
in 10th and 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Dear Friend:

A deputy US Marshal, resident FBI Agent, and Special Agent for Social Security Administration recently requested clarification on a proposed sanction document emailed under color of UN treaty. These excellent persons explained they are not familiar enough with UN law to clearly understand the content so the document is as of this date retracted.

A revised generic sanction document is appended where the several US Circuit Court of Appeals; US Courts; and Congress have ruled that further conversations related to the Social Security question are prohibited to be addressed to Appellant Counsel or record as cited on this website:

this link
US District Court challenges
previous rulings in 10th and 5th
US Circuit Court of Appeals
The appended document filed in US District Court of Columbia shows the Court (civ 090956)has denied the Social Security Administration's request for a hearing under Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review which the US Circuit Court (0905206) has declined to overturn.

Persons having further questions are requested to address them in writting to the Honorable US Congressman Lamar Smith US House Committee on Judiciary or the Honorable Chairman Patrick Leahy US Senate Judiciary Committee since Congressman has claimed exclusive jurisdiction...

Many Thanks Chris Walters,
Appellant Counsel of Record

US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue UNDC, NM #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP The Social Security Commissioner made a determination of fact and law that Chris Walters is disabled and the only review which can be had is Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

3. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime


US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Exhibit #K Seizure of Diplomatic Pouch
Diplomatic Relations 1961 Article 29
Chris Walters is recognized as ad hoc counsel before an UN High Commission on UN and given leave to proceed as counsel by several US Circuit Courts of Appeals. Counsel's papers of box is defined as a "diplomatic pouch with the meaning of Question Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 Article 29 and effects were stored in a safe deposit box in Las Cruces, New Mexico and safe deposit box in San Antonio, TX.

When Bank of American officials were asked to return the box they declined and when we went to US District Court the Bank claimed the right to seize the box. The action at law seeks relief for legal costs to travel to New Mexico to address the problem. The 2nd Motion questions constitutionality of Title 28 USC Chapter 33 FBI since it seems likely the box and it's contents were seized by the local FBI personnel.... Case Law It is a violation of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law to attempt to vend, dispense, or pratice law or secret counsels legal papers as you probally remember when 40 some odd government officials each earned 5 years in federal prison in US V. Haldeman, Erlichman, and Dean and US Attorney General John Mitchell.

United States District Court

District of New Mexico
Honorable Judge Bruce Black
Former Chief Judge
Judge Magistrate Lourdes A. Martínez
333 Lomas, NW.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Too Special Agent In Charge

Special Agent in Charge Carol K.O. Lee
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107

CEO Ken Lewis

Bank of America
100 North Tryon Street, Ste 220
Charlotte, NC 28202

Exhibit #K Bank of America Steals Safe Deposit Box?
US District Court Has No Objections/ August-October, 2012


United States District Court

District of New Mexico
Honorable Judge Bruce Black
Former Chief Judge
Judge Magistrate Lourdes A. Martínez
333 Lomas, NW.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Too Special Agent In Charge

Special Agent in Charge Carol K.O. Lee
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107

CEO Ken Lewis

Bank of America
100 North Tryon Street, Ste 220
Charlotte, NC 28202
(704) 386-4771
Mr. Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Kenneth D. Lewis CEO
Bank of America
Attorney James E Shively
(602-840-1400) Vs. Civil #Civil # 09-811
Date Filed:_________________
Impediment #5 Question of Impeachment Of
USDC Judge Bruce Black?
1. The question of Impeachment of USDC Judge Bruce Black arises where he correctly assets that Plaintiff's Complaint is defective however ignores unlawful seizure of Counsel's papers and legal effects from a safe deposit bank at Bank of America without any judicial review or legal process. Seizure of the contents of any safe deposit box requires prior authorization by a Federal Judge:

2. After receiving request to close Safe Deposit Box 259 in Las Cruces, NM the bank went on ahead and charged me $70.00 which I have asked to have closed; apparently lost the keys; and decline to compensate me for costs to travel to New Mexico to resolve the matter.

3. The Attorney James E Shively (602-840-1400) for Bank of America filed a brief which suggested BA had actually seized my Safe Deposit Box 259 although why they would do this is unclear:

4. The court cites lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Title 28 USC 1331 Federal Question because BA is not a federal or state agency as cited" The Court has no federal question jurisdiction over Plaintiffs claim that his due process and equal protection rights were violated by Defendant because Defendant is not a federal agency, Defendant was not acting under state law, nor is Defendants alleged conduct chargeable to the state. In other words, Defendants conduct is merely private conduct. See American Manufacturers Mutual Ins. Co. v. Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40, 50 (1999) (explaining that both the state action requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment and the under color of state law requirement of Section 1983 exclude merely private conduct, no matter how discriminatory or wrongful) (internal quotations and citations omitted)"

5. The Court apparently does not consider the Bank of America a federal actor although the Bank and it's assets are insured by the FDIC and other provisions of federal laws.

6. The Court also expressed no objection to seizure of counsel's papers in violation of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law ( US v Haldeman, Erlichman, Dean) as cited: The Court also recommends denying Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 10). In that motion, Plaintiff claims that Defendant violated his equal protection and due process rights by seizing his social security money from his safe deposit box in violation of an order entered in another case in the United States District Court. Document 10 at 1 (referring to Walters v. Social Security Administration, CV-07-0257 JCH/RLP). Plaintiffs claim that his constitutional rights were violated because of an order entered in another case is without merit because Plaintiff fails to state which order entered in his previous case was violated....

7. Complaint In USDC Walters v Kenneth Lewis & Bank of America

8. This Finding from Court and ORDER dismissing the cause found no grounds for Bank of American to return the contents of the Safe Deposit Box. Delivery of the Court Materials was delayed until 11-30-2010 when I was able to access PACER.

Order to Transfere Safe Box to North Carolina

Social Security Inspector General

Social Security Fraud Hotline
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, Maryland 21235

Thomas Perez Asst Attorney General

Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Former US Attorney Gregg Fouratt

555 South Telshor, Suite 300
Las Cruces, NM 88011
Citation of Authority Question Violation
Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
1. Persons private papers are protected by the 4th Amendment to US Constitution and legal papers or counsels papers visa via US V. Haldemen, Erlichmand, and Dean

2. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Court Docket
Question of Diplomatic Sanctions?
& Article of Impeachment

Exhibit #L Bank of America Agrees to $410 Million Restitution For Overdraft Fees


United States District Court

District of New Mexico
Honorable Judge Bruce Black
Judge Magistrate Lourdes A. Martínez
333 Lomas, NW.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Too Special Agent In Charge

Special Agent in Charge Carol K.O. Lee
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107

CEO Ken Lewis

Bank of America
100 North Tryon Street, Ste 220
Charlotte, NC 28202
(704) 386-4771
Mr. Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Kenneth D. Lewis CEO
Bank of America
Attorney James E Shively
(602-840-1400) Vs. Civil #Civil # 09-811-BB-LAM
Bank Of America Claims Right to
Embezzle Funds From Customer?
Addressed To Honorable
US Congressman Barney Franks
House Financial Services Committee
2129 Rayburn House Office Building,
Washington, DC 20515
Ph: (202) 225-4247
Fax: (202) 225-6952
While the IRS can't seize my SSI benefits and several Federal Courts have ruled my benefits exempt from seizure I wanted to thank Bank of America Attorney James E Shively for appearing and explaining the USDC lacks jurisdiction to what Bank of America openly admits:

1. Bank of America seized $73.00 in funds from my SSI monies to pay for year rent on Safe Deposit Box 259 at 250 Amador, in Las Cruces, NM and has declined to return the contents Since April, 2009.

2. Safe Deposit Box 259 contains Counsel's papers and it is an apparent violation of Title 18 US 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law to pilfer legal papers as cited in US V John Edwards, Haldeman, Erlichman, and Dean.

3. Bank of America (Claim 2231626MAR09) After Greyhound Bus Lines hospitalized me 3 times I filed a challenge to payment of the $251.00 which Bank of America paid even when Greyhound failed to complete the service and has done similar seizures (Claim 1795606MaR09) in other situations where services paid for were not completed.
Question of Money Laundering Abusing
Customer Floating Transaction Debits
1. It appears in processing debits that Bank of America holds out payment of completed Customer transactions to create artificial float time or basically a short term interest free loan from the customers account and business transactions.

2. This practice generates a false account balance which is likely to cause the customer to overdraft and the customer is required to pay overdraft fee's on all items caused by Bank of America's writing itself a short term interest free loan.
Discussion On Merits of
Congressional Investigation
When I worked at National Bank of Commerce in 1983 we had float time because it took bank items up to 14 days to physically travel to other banks across the United States and get their items credited. In the electronic world today debits travel at the speed of light and transactions and printed receipts for purchases are virtually instantaneous. In creating unneeded float time on debits it appears that the Bank of America and other banking institutions have adopted a commonly used practice of holding out debits to garner interest they are not entitled too. The abuse of this practice is to have the customer penalized by refusing the complete electronic transactions and then charge the customers for overages caused by Bank of America.

Any changes in Chris Walters SSI benefits or case status is protection from seizure by anyone as cited in #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi Presiding Judge Judith Herrera USDC NM; 3 US Circuit Courts of Appeals****…. The right of Bank of America to seize property from anyone without the due process and equal protection of the law does not exist.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
PO Box 266 Greensboro, NC 27402

Bank of America Customer Service
Frivilious Request From
Bank of America Customer Service
After legal action completed I got this letter; replied; and never received a response.
B of A to pay $410 million to settle overdraft lawsuit
By Jonathan Stempel Jonathan Stempel 46 mins ago

NEW YORK (Reuters) Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) has agreed to pay $410 million to settle lawsuits accusing it of charging customers with excessive overdraft fees, court documents show.

The largest U.S. bank by assets is among the more than two dozen U.S., Canadian and European lenders named as defendants in the class-action litigation, which in 2009 consolidated lawsuits filed across the country. JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), Citigroup Inc (C.N) and Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N) are among the other defendants named in the case, court records show.

Bank of America spokeswoman Anne Pace in an email said the bank has already changed its overdraft practices, eliminating fees for debit transactions and significantly lowering fees for customers who overdraw excessively. he also said the Charlotte, North Carolina-based lender has "fully accrued funds" to cover the settlement. Notice of the January 27 accord with Bank of America was filed on Friday with the U.S. district court in Miami. The settlement requires court approval.

Many banks let customers overdraw their accounts in exchange for fees, typically $25 or $35. Critics say the fees disproportionately burden lower-income customers and others who often maintain low account balances. In a November 2009 complaint filed with the Miami court, customers said Bank of America routinely processed debit transactions from largest to smallest rather than in chronological order, causing account balances to fall faster and boosting potential overdraft fees.

They said the bank also did not clearly tell customers they could decline overdraft protection, and typically charged the fees to debit card users rather than decline transactions. Bank of America customers would often rack up hundreds of dollars of overdraft fees, even when they may have been overdrawn by only a few dollars, the complaint said. Overdraft fees industry wide totaled about $23.7 billion in 2008, up from $10.3 billion just four years earlier, according to the Center for Responsible Lending.

Last year the Federal Reserve imposed a rule that prohibits banks from charging overdraft fees on electronic and debit card transactions without advance customer approval. In August, a federal judge ordered Wells Fargo to pay $203 million to California customers who complained about overdraft fees. The bank is appealing. The case is In re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, No. 09-md-02036.

(Editing by Mohammad Zargham)


Mr. Chris Walters

Email: nims2006@gmail.com
SSI 261-90-6357
c/o PO Box 266
Greensboro, NC 27406
Friday, September 25th, 2009

Greyhound

Exhibit #M Move Back to North Carolina
November, 2009
It is too expensive to maintain a host of legal actions and other activities to get my mail delivered in New Mexico so I hop Greyhound.

Anna Mills S. Wagoner, USA*

P.O. Box 1858
Greensboro, NC 27402

US Congressman Mel Watts

301 S. Greene St.Suite 210
Greensboro, NC 27401-2615

Exhibit #M Offer To Repay Overpayment SSI Benefits
Resulting From Theft of US Mail/ November, 2009


Mr. Chris Walters

Email: nims2006@gmail.com
SSI 261-90-6357
c/o PO Box 266
Greensboro, NC 27406
Friday, September 25th, 2009
Chris Walters Moving
Back To North Carolina
Office Manager
Social Security Administration
2141 Summit Ave
Las Cruces, NM 88011

Dear Officer Manager:

I recently moved to Las Cruces to attempt to get my medical work done here and it appears that due to unforeseen circumstances I will be moving back to North Carolina.. Given the extra work your staff has to do every time I move I wanted to thank you for your help and offer an explanation:
Cant Purchase Medications Due Medicade Cutbacks
As your staf f is no doubt aware a slow down in the economy many states have had to cut back on what their Medicade program will permit and my doctor here recently explained that medications I require to stay healthy including Nexium; Flagyl; and Avelox are not longer covered to the best of his knowledge.
Seizure of SSA Monies & Court Documents
By Bank of America
As you can see from the enclosure brief from Bank of America Attorney James E Shively (602-840-1400) he has filed a brief in Walters v BA (NO 2:09-CV-0811-BBB-LAM) that the Bank has seized 2 safety deposit boxes containing legal and SSA records; impounded monies to pay for another year’s rent after I asked service to be ended; and paid Greyhound and Amtrack a contested bill where both failed to complete the service paid for. Your staff is probably already aware I no longer use Bank of America. Exactly what Bank of America wants with USDC documents in Walters v Asture which were filed in New Mexico in 2007 remains a great mystery.
Seizure of US Mail & Statement by Director of FBI
As your staff can see from the amicus curiae the Director of the FBI sent an agent out to explain the FBI consideres me a terrorist without any explanation. The FBI apparently has been intercepting Court ORDERS in the SSI claim; certified US Mail; and probably more recently my SSI check. As you can see it was stamped received on 9-1-2009 and again on 9-4-2009 and finally was available for pick up on 9-21-2009. I can only surmise your SSA Inspector General rep from El Paso prevailed in getting my check released. As the FBI is not held in high regard in North Carolina I don’t have to maintain constant legal actions to have my mail released there.
Substitution of Payment Checks
Since I will be moved out of Las Cruces before October 1, 2009 my monthly SSI check will be returned. As good fortune would have the replacement check for September, 2009 has arrived and I intend to cash it in exchange for the regular check for October I will miss.

Thanks To Your Staffs Efforts

I wanted to thank your staff for their time and efforts even when things don’t work out. I also wanted to thank the Las Cruces Gospel Rescue Mission for permitting me to volunteer while I am in town. I would have sent a copy of this letter to your SSA Inspector General Office in El Paso but don’t know their address.

Respectfully Yours
Chris Walters
SSI Recipient
PO Box 266
Greensboro, NC 27406
Enclosures:

1. Brief from Bank of America.
2. Copy of Brief from Walters v Asture, USDC, NM
3. Photo Copy of Treasury Document showing multiple date stamps at Post Office.

From; Office of the Inspector General

Allegation Management and Fugitive Enforcement Division
P.O. Box 17768
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Request For Repayment Waiver Based ON
Per Theft SSI Check
Addressed To Social Security Administration
Mid Atlantic Program Service Center
PO Box 3490
Philadelphia, PA 19122-9986

From Christopher Walters
SSI 261-90-6357

Dear Friend: many thanks for your recent letter on a question of overpayment for September, 2009 and I would like to ask for a Waiver on Repayment based on extra ordinary circumstances and evidence which is enclosed:

1. Exhibit A: A request for execution of John Doe for interception of the SSI check in Las Cruces, NM which was mailed to general delivery.

2. Exhibit B: The SSI envelope shows the check was received 9-1-2009 and stamped received 9-4-2009 and was ultimately released on 9-21-2009 after the Post Office and others were apparently contacted by the Social Security Inspector General from El Paso, TX.

3. Exhibit C: I explained to your local office that I was moving to North Carolina and your normal check would arrive on October 1, 2009 and would be returned because I am in another state.
Discussion
What can I say? I already admitted to the FBI, Social Security Inspector General, and US Marshal that I generated a written request to execute John Doe and if your October 1, 2009 check disappears I guess I will have John Doe whacked all after some fashion or another. Sorry for the inconveince to your staff. Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters, SSI Recipient

Exhibit #N Misdirection of US Mail & Move Back NC
Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction of Correspondence


Plaza Suites Hotel

301 East University Las Cruces, NC 88005-3399
Plaza Suites
September, 2009 $100.00 for 2 nights

Greyhound
Move to North Carolina
September, 2009 Costs About $200.00

Kingscort Motel

265 Union Ave
Memphis, TN 38103-5208
(901) 527-4305
September 30th, 2009 $81.00-ouch

Motel 6

605 S Regional Rd,
Greensboro, NC
(336) 454-6120
Motel 6
October 1, 2009 $34.00

David C Williams

Postal Inspector General
14800 Trinity Blvd Ste 600
Fort Worth, TX 76155-2675

US Congressman Mel Watts

301 S. Greene St.Suite 210
Greensboro, NC 27401-2615
Impediment #6 You Sent My
Mail Where Until 2010?
Upon returning to Winston Salem, NC on 9-29-2009 I found my PO Box blocked. The Clerk explained the temporary notice of a move I made for a month had developed into a request to forward my mail to Medford, Oregon until 8/1/2010. The Postal Clerk was able to rectify the problem.

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

North Carolina Bureau of Investigations

Former Director Robin Pendergraft
Post Office Box 29500
Raleigh, NC 27626

Too Special Agent In Charge

Special Agent Owen Harris
7915 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
Citation of Authority Question Violation
Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction of Correspondence
Title 18 Sec 1702 Obstruction of correspondence Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Exhibit #O Review Of Sanctions Policy to SSA OIG
Obama Administration Enacts Law 2012 Army Can Arrest Seditionist/October 2010

Amended Reply Too
Social Security Inspector General
Mr. Chris Walters
SSI 261-90-6357
PO Box 266
Greensboro, NC 27406
Friday, September 25th, 2009

Social Security Inspector General
Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

RE: Your field rep request clarify National Security Death Warrants and other Exotic sanctions:

Dear SSA Inspector General:

I wanted to thank your El Paso field office for fielding a representative recently to inquire about a proposed sanction or sanctions possibly including UN legal action. I am sorry that the meaning of a proposed sanction is so exotic that the scope and purpose are not clear.

The standardized FYI cites request for National Security Death Warrants filed with various Committees of Congress where officials are requested to impose sanctions. In Walters v Astrue 1:07 cv 00257 JCH-RLP a request was made for a John Doe who intercepted several final ORDERS of the Court which I described in Docket #19 as an act of Sedition. The envelope from Treasury was received by US Post Office here on Sept 1, 2009 apparently reappeared and was stamped received again on Sept 4, 2009 and finally released on September, 21, 2009. Request for sanctions should never be considered personal and are only actionable by Officials in government acting under color of their law ful authority.

As your staff can see I have moved back to North Carolina and deferred questions of law which might involve proposed changes in Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act to the Office of the President with a notice being filed in USDC, NM.

I am sorry for any confusion and am with regards.
Chris Walters,
Appellant Counsel of Record

Cc: Social Security office of Legal Counsel

From; Office of the Inspector General

Allegation Management and Fugitive Enforcement Division
P.O. Box 17768
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
OIG Hotline OIG.Hotline@ssa.gov
tonims2006@gmail.com
Date Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM
subjectRe: your message

Social Security Administration
Office of the Inspector General
Allegation Management and Fugitive Enforcement Division

We have received your recent internet communication of potential fraud, waste and/or abuse in Social Security Administration programs. Thank you for taking the time to send us your report. Your allegation will be carefully reviewed.

Federal law prohibits the disclosure of any information relating to allegations of potential wrongdoing; even to the person who filed the initial report. Therefore, we will be unable to provide you with any information relating to actions we may take. However, if you have additional information that you wish to add to your report, please contact us using one of the following:

Internet: www.socialsecurity.gov/oig
Mail: Social Security Administration
Office of the Inspector General
Allegation Management and Fugitive Enforcement Division
P.O. Box 17768
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Facsimile: 410-597-0118
Toll Free: 1-800-269-0271

You may also obtain additional information at our website: www.socialsecurity.gov/oig. Director

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

District of Columbia
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

Mr. Chris Walters,
Appellant Pro Se

Vs Civil: 09-05206
USDC DC 09-0956
Honorable Rosemary Collyer Presiding

Michael Astrue, et all
Social Security Administration
Appellee
Letter To
USCA District of Columbia?
Addressed To Circuit Executive
US Circuit Court of Appeals
District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

Dear Circuit Executive

I wanted to thank Director Robert Mueller of the FBI for inquiring about sanction questions in a family of legal actions known as Walters v Asture or Walters v SSA where additional litigation has been denied by the US Supreme Court; 5th, 10th, and DC Circuit Court of Appeals and several US District Courts (Attached Legal Notice). Request for sanctions or "Death Warrants" are generally requested from the US Congress pursuant to several statutes including Title 18 USC § 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees ; questions of judicial disability or misconduct are heard pursuant to Title 28 USC 372 §... and or UN Organs such as the UN Security Council under color of Geneva Convention or International Treaty.

Request for summary execution of US officers, agents, representatives, or other persons acting under color of law are generally instituted when the "actor" as they frequently do gives "the bird" to the bar of Justice; rulings of the Court; Obstructs delivery of Court ORDERS; intercepting legal brief to 10th US Circuit Court of appeals (Certified US Mail # 7008 3230 0001 8958 5146 ) and other acts which are generally described as "sedition". The US District Court ruled in Paula Jones v William Jefferson Clinton that public officials are not above the law and the US Senate Committee on Judiciary and US House Judiciary Committee have recently neutered former US Attorney General Gonzalez; former White house official Karl Rove; former US Attorney Johnny Sutton; and others for misuse of law enforcement and intelligence assets and can be reviewed online:
http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/issues_WHInterviews.html

During the course of proceedings various US Officials allocuted to what appear to be serious violations of International Law or Treaty including Genocide; Crimes Against Humanity; and terrorist activities which are described online in Plaintiff Exhibit C:

ssi/fgj/index.html

It might merit mention that UN officials are likely to summarily execute any Officer; agent; or representative of the United States engaged in many of these activities without benefit of arrest or trial and return their mortal remains to the US Department of State with a toe tag "executed terrorist". The current status of these matters under the 1503 Treaty is an Amicus Curiae or "Friend of the Court Proceeding" designed to permit the United States to resolve it's problems internally.

Respectfully Submitted By
Appellant of Record Chris Walters
PO Box 266
Greensboro, NC 27402
Certificate of Service via Federal Express

#841348910019897
Delivered Delivered Signed for by: PPALMER Delivered Signed for by: RCARSON Shipment Dates Ship date Sep 30, 2009 Delivery date Oct 2, 2009 2:28 PM Destination Washington, DC

#841348910019903 Delivered Signed for by: Signature on File Shipment Dates Ship date Sep 30, 2009 Delivery date Oct 5, 2009 9:26 AM Destination Denver, CO

3. Fax transmission to US Senate and House Committee on Judiciary 9/30/2009 20222249516 and 20222250072 from Fed Ex Kinko Memphsis Tennessee.


US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
FBI Director Apoligies to
US Senate Committee on Judiciary
FBI admits cheating on tests Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 28th Jul 2010
McClatchy Newspapers WASHINGTON

An undisclosed number of FBI agents have cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases, FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged Wednesday, but he added that he is waiting for the results of an inspector general's investigation to determine how widespread the cheating has become.... The FBI head was asked about the controversy by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who heads the committee. Leahy he said he knew that some agents had been caught cheating on the tests, in which they were supposed to show they understood the limitations in conducting domestic surveillance and beginning cases without first having evidence of a crime. The test is mandatory, and it is put on by the bureau's Domestic Investigation and Operations Guidelines section.

"We are expecting a letter from the IG pointing out other occasions, where there were abuses and the procedures were not followed, with recommendations. And we will follow those recommendations." Mueller added that "it is quite obviously my concern that all of our personnel understand the parameters in which we are to work." He pledged that eventually all the agents will understand "the limitations of what we can do."

Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543

Exhibit #P FBI Continued Challenges To
US Supreme Court & Rule of Law
These articles question wheather the FBI continues to undermine and challenge the rules of law. The FBI Director eventually testified before Congress his agents had begun criminal investigatons where no evidence of a crime existed and some had cheated on national secuirty exams and may not have been fully qualified to do their jobs.

Exhibit P Reply FBI Directors Previous Question
Cite: Obama Administration Enacts 2012 Law Army Arrest Seditionist/ October, 2000


David C Williams

Postal Inspector General
14800 Trinity Blvd Ste 600
Fort Worth, TX 76155-2675
Mr. Chris Walters
c/o PO Box 266
Greensboro, NC 27402
Wednesday, September 29th, 2009

Director Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(202) 324-3000

RE: Your request information on National Security Death Warrants;
Exotic Sanctions; and Terrorist-Background Info:

Dear Director Robert Mueller:

I was recently doing some volunteer work at the Las Cruces Gospel Rescue Mission and was approached by 2 men who failed to produce any identification but claimed to be FBI agents and wanted to ask about a recent proposed Notice of Sanctions on a US Government employee…. If I am not mistaken the gentlemen explained you said that “I am a Terrorist”. In order to assist and clarify your efforts and make sure your organization gets a fair shake I though we might review:

Request for National Security Death Warrants & Exotic Sanctions

As your probably aware most Courts of Law, Congress and the UN have legal criteria for authorizing legal sanctions as a process of law which are quite different from “terrorist activities”. You can see from the attached enclosure the ongoing request made by the Social Security Administration for legal conversations have been prohibited by ORDER of 3 US Circuit Courts of Appeals; US Supreme Court; and a variety of federal Courts. On finding a government employee; organization; or others giving the Bar of Justice the Finger as it were I usually make a timely and lawful request to have their summarily executed for sedition. Other criteria for requesting summary execution might include government employees attempting to writer or empower their own federal laws without asking Congress or in some cases obstructing US Court ORDERS…. Persons in a position of authority such as Chairman of Congressional Committees receiving such a request might elect to do something completely different based on what they feel is compelling national interest.
Who & What Is Chris Walters Based On
US Government Source Document Exhibit C
http://afterdarkportal.net
Exhibit C the digitized CD Rom at 324 megabytes submitted as “Evidence and Testimony Before Congress” might suggest in whole or part:

1. 1969-1983: I worked in the private security industry, hotel services; and banking industry.

David C Williams

Postal Inspector General
14800 Trinity Blvd Ste 600
Fort Worth, TX 76155-2675
2. 1983 Worked for US Intelligence group in San Antonio, Texas doing research. The moron I worked for pulled a police department through his operational area and the resulting mess was addressed by Special Agent Paul Hosslocker.

3. 1984-1985 Lived and worked under assumed name in South Florida intelligence materials created by the intelligence group in San Antonio, Texas.

4. 1986-1996 Given contract to be primary field investigator for some HUD programs over an area 1 third of the United States.

5. 1999-2009 US first National 911 Administrator created and maintained a portable 911 interoperability program for a 15 state area which super ceded the command and control functions of the Department of Homeland Security by about a decade.

6. 1997-2009: First national operational audit of the Social Security process and operational Impediments.
Disposition of Questions of Law Under 1503 Treaty
As you can see from the package of items deferred to the President of the United States rather than seek sanctions I have asked the President to enclose the data in his health care reform agenda. The 1503 Treaty is an amicus curiae which means the FBI and the intelligence community as well as everyone else gets to resolve possible problems internally as cited in Exhibit C:

FBI created and maintained a “criminal history longer than your arm” without trial or conviction: D://hssecurity/sanctions/index.html

The intelligence engaged in enough black bag jobs of my emails and websites to assist in creation of the antispyware act of 2005: D://hssecurity/spywareact/index16.html

Systematic attacks on homeland security emergency management structure: D://hssecurity/nims/index.html

Assassination attempt visa via Social Security process: D://ssi/zzcontract/index10.htm

Extensive report on terrorist activities in the United States were created by Chris Walters and the receipts from US Senate Select Committee On Intelligence are not addressed to the FBI. D://hssecurity/index2.htm
Why The FBI Hasnt Offered Me Employment?
How many employees does the Bureau have whose field work created at least 4 federal statutes? How many employees does the Bureau have who create the first national 911 system which is field portable? You don’t have any employees who have cripple as many organized criminal interest or terrorist without the power or arrest or use of physical violence. A cursory examination of my medical records and 200 some odd doctors suggest chronic medical problems would keep me from completing basic training in the Army or training at your facility at Quantico, VA: D://ssi/access/index.html

I am with kindest regards Chris Walters, Appellant & Opposing Counsel

#841348910019866
Signed for by: JANDRESON Ship date Sep 29, 2009 Delivery date Oct 1, 2009 11:21 AM Destination Hyattsville, MD

Exhibit #Q FBI Director Testifies Before Senate Judiciary Committee That
Mistakes Were Made and Agents Cheated On National Security Exams

Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543

US Supreme Court Rulings ON
Misuse of NCIC Criminal History
You may have never even have been arrested; however the FBI probally has an extensive criminal history on you. The United States District Courts have ruled that Congress did not authorize the Federal Bureau of Investigation to slander, liable, and defame your good name and reputation:
Tarlton V Saxbe
(1994)11 165 App DC 293. 507 F2d 1116. case remanded (DC Dist Col) 407 F Supp 1083 "Congress did not intend to authorize FBI to damage reputation of innocent individuals in contravention of settled common law principles hence, Congress did not intend through USCS 534 to authorize FBI to disseminate in accurate criminal information without taking reasonable precautions to prevent inaccuracy; dissemination of inaccurate criminal information without precaution of reasonable efforts to forestall inaccuracy restricts subject's liberty without any procedural safeguards designed to prevent such inaccuracies to permit FBI to disseminate inaccurate criminal information without FBI making reasonable effort to prevent inaccuracy would be tantamount to accuse individuals of criminal conduct without ever providing such individuals opportunity to disprove that accusation: reliable and responsible performance of record-keeping function requires such reasonable care as FBI is able to afford to avoid injury to innocent citizens through dissemination of inaccurate information."
The Court also rules in McKnight v Webster
(1980,Ed PA 499 F Supp 420)
"FBI has duty to request correct information from local law enforcement agencies which initially reported Plaintiff arrest when Plaintiff informs FBI it's records are inaccurate."The scope and intend of the law Title 28 USC 534 Acquisition, preservation.... was clearly to acquire and maintain records on crime and "criminals" for the good of the country>
The Court also rules in Mendard V Mitchell
(1971, DC Dist (24 Col) 328 F Supp 718, remanded on other grounds 162 App DC 284, 498 F2d 1017,28 ARL Fed 248...( superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Utz v. Culliname, 172 App DC 67, 520 F2d 467)
"File of arrest records is designed only to facilitate coordinated law enforcement activities between federal and local government, that is, to assist arresting agencies, courts, and correctional institutions in apprehension, conviction, and proper disposition of criminal offenders."
Jurisdiction over rights to due process can also
be found in Constitutional Laws 318 56,257, and 992.
As the Constitution Guarantees:
Article the seventh [Amendment V]
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy or life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Article the eight [Amendment VIII]
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
FBI Continues To Challenge
US Supreme Court Rulings-SAR Program
5 revelations from the Washington Posts Monitoring America investigation
By Liz Goodwin
By Liz Goodwin liz Goodwin – Mon Dec 20, 10:05 am ET

The FBI is assembling a massive database on thousands of Americans, many of whom have not been accused of any crime, the Washington Post's Dana Priest and William Arkin report. The reporters' latest look at the country's ballooning national security system focuses on the role that local agencies -- often staffed by people with little to no counter-terrorism training -- have played in combating terrorism since 2001.

Here are five striking revelations in their piece:

1. The FBI's Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative, or SAR, currently contains 161,948 suspicious activity files, into which authorities can put information they've gathered about the people at the center of the files: employment history, financial documents, phone numbers, photos. In many cases, the people in the files have not been accused of any crime but have attracted the suspicions of a local cop, FBI agent or even fellow citizen. The files have led to five arrests but no convictions, the FBI says. Some of the files are unclassified so that local police agencies and even businesses can submit reports on anyone they deem suspicious.

2. The Department of Homeland Security does not know how much it spends in funding state fusion centers, which synthesize security information from all state agencies and feed information to SAR. But since 2001, the department has doled out $31 billion to states and localities for domestic security initiatives.

3. Local officials at these fusion centers are tasked with understanding terrorism, but have little or no training. To fill the void, self-styled experts with fairly extreme views on the scope of the Muslim terrorist threat are asked to come in and train local authorities, the Post reports. Professed ex-terrorist Walid Shoebat told a group at the first annual South Dakota Fusion Center Conference in Sioux Falls this year that they should monitor local Muslim student groups and mosques and try to tap their phones. "You can find out a lot of information that way," he said.

National intelligence officials told the Post they preferred that people with "evidence-based" approaches to Islam were lecturing instead, but that no guidelines are in place to determine the qualifications of a given speaker.

4. The localities are often left without guidance from the Department of Homeland Security, which can lead to confusion about the counter-terrorism actions they're supposed to be carrying out. Virginia's fusion center named historically black colleges as "potential" terrorism hubs; Maryland State Police infiltrated local groups that lobbied for bike lanes and human rights; and a contractor in Pennsylvania writing an intelligence bulletin flagged meetings of the Tea Party Patriots Coalition and environmental activists.

5. Many states and towns are taking the unprecedented amounts of money handed out to fight terrorists and are using it instead to fight crime. "We have our own terrorists, and they are taking lives every day," Memphis Police Director Larry Godwin said.

US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
FBI admits cheating on tests
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
28th Jul 2010
McClatchy Newspapers WASHINGTON — An undisclosed number of FBI agents have cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases, FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged Wednesday, but he added that he is waiting for the results of an inspector general's investigation to determine how widespread the cheating has become.

"I've got a general idea. But I do not know how many" have cheated, he said in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. "And I'm not sure the IG knows how many either." But, Mueller added, the IG "has pointed out instances orally to me where there may be persons and a particular office where it was widespread. And it may be attributable to a lack of understanding and confusion about the procedures."

The FBI head was asked about the controversy by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who heads the committee. Leahy he said he knew that some agents had been caught cheating on the tests, in which they were supposed to show they understood the limitations in conducting domestic surveillance and beginning cases without first having evidence of a crime. The test is mandatory, and it is put on by the bureau's Domestic Investigation and Operations Guidelines section.

"We learned last year that a small number of agents were accused of cheating on the test. That's what I was told," Leahy said to Mueller. "I was amazed when I went online this morning to find from press accounts that the cheating was reportedly more widespread." Mueller strongly defended the bureau and said his agents are instructed not to purposely target Muslim-Americans and other religious and ethnic groups for investigations. "That is at the heart of these guidelines. And that is what we teach each of our personnel," he said.

He said the guidelines require agents to undertake more than 16 hours of training, followed by an open-book test. He said that a year ago, problems surfaced because some agents were taking it with the help of other agents. At that point, he said, the FBI's IG office began to investigate. Since then, he said, the IG "has indicated that there are additional personnel that did not abide by those procedures."

"We are expecting a letter from the IG pointing out other occasions, where there were abuses and the procedures were not followed, with recommendations. And we will follow those recommendations." Mueller added that "it is quite obviously my concern that all of our personnel understand the parameters in which we are to work." He pledged that eventually all the agents will understand "the limitations of what we can do."


US Attorney General Eric Holder

US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Director of The FBI

Robert Mueller
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

Chairman Sheldon Whitehorse

US Senate Committee On Judiciary
Administrative Oversight and the Courts
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Exhibit #R Discovery Motion FRCP Rule 37
Question Redirected To Congressman Peter Defazio


US Circuit Court of Appeals

for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
Chris Walters
Appellant

vs

Michael Asture,
Social Security Administration
Appellee

US Circuit Court District of Columbia
Docket # 1:09-cv-00095206
USDC-DC Docket #1:09-cv -09-0956
The Honorable Rosemary Collyer Presiding
Impediment #7 Question of Congressional Sanctions
Deferred To Congressional Committees
Addressed To The Honorable US Congressman Peter DeFazio
US House Committee on Homeland Security
Subcommittee on Management, Investigations, and Oversight
405 East 8th Ave, #2030
Eugene, Oregon 97401

Dear Congressman Peter DeFazio:

I wanted to thank the Director of the FBI and US Marshal Service for sending out their representatives in the recent past to inquire as to whether their agencies could be sanctioned for theft or interception of various items in the US Mail including Federal Court ORDERS; seizure of counsels papers in safe deposit box and other items as suggested by the Amicus Curiea brief on a Congressional Sanction.

The nice folks involved committed enough black bag jobs of counsels papers to successfully support the Anti Spyware Act of 2005 sponsored by your colleague Congressman Bob Good Latte which is on the enclosed CD-Rom known as Exhibit C and online:

http://afterdarportal.net/hssecurity/spywareact/index16.htm

The federal representatives inquired if I might be engaged in terrorist activities and you can easily see that an extensive list of confirmed kills credited to me by the Senate Select Subcommittee on Intelligence occurring the in 1980s-1990s.

http://afterdarkportal.net/hssecurity/index2.htm

Compelling National Interest Deferred To Congress

I am sure your committee can easily see from the brief that I have a very limited course of options including asking to have sections of the US Code declared unconstitutional. In the past Congress has created 4 federal statutes based on my work and I believe has a much larger range of options, paid staff, and jurisdictional authority to oversight the federal government that a mere Appellant Pro SE.

If I can be of any service please feel free to contact me.

Chris Walters
Prevailing Appellant Pro SE
US Circuit Court of Appeals, DC
c/o 345 Commercial Street
Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: nims2006@gmail.com

Enclosures:

Bound 8 page brief addressed to US Senate Committee on Judiciary and CD-Rom Exhibit C.

Discovery Motion

Discovery Motion

Exhibit #U Attorney Fees & Other Costs


1. #468700010170747Delivered Signed for by: LMILES To US Senator Patrick Leahy Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009 Delivery date Nov 4, 2009 3:08 PM DestinationHyattsville, MD.

2. #468700010170747Delivered Signed for by: LMILES To US Senator Patrick Leahy Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009 Delivery date Nov 4, 2009 3:08 PM DestinationHyattsville, MD.

3. #468700010170747Delivered Signed for by: LMILES To US Senator Patrick Leahy Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009 Delivery date Nov 4, 2009 3:08 PM DestinationHyattsville, MD.

4. 468700010170754 Delivered Signed for by: MHERNANDEZ To US Congressman Lamar Smith. Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009 Delivery date Nov 5, 2009 10:52 AM Destination San Antonio, TX

5. 746677810043463 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: PPALMER Director Robert Mueller of Federal Bureau of Investigations Delivered Signed for by: PPALMER Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 3, 2009 Delivery date Nov 5, 2009 2:39 PM Destination Washington, DC

6. 746677810043470 Delivered Signed for by: CANDERSON US Circuit Court of Appeals District of Columbia Delivered Signed for by: CANDERSON Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 3, 2009 Delivery date Nov 5, 2009 1:54 PM Destination Hyattsville, MD

7. #468391510048409 Delivered Signed for by: AWOOD Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 27, 2008 9:36 AM Destination Denver, CO To US Congressman Lamar Smith. Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009

8. #468391510048416 Delivered Signed for by: JHERNANDEZ Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 22, 2008 10:01 AM Destination Albuquerque, NM

9. #468391510048423 Delivered Signed for by: BBECKELHEIMER Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 22, 2008 1:31 PM Destination Albuquerque, NM

10. #468391510048430 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: JPORITS Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 20, 2008 5:30 PM Destination Dallas, TX

11. #468391510048444 Delivered Signed for by: AZERTUCHE Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 20, 2008 2:55 PM Destination San Antonio, TX Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008

12. #468415010042160 Delivered Signed for by: DWEHEAM Shipment Dates Ship date May 27, 2008 Delivery date Jun 2, 2008 1:04 PM Destination Falls Church, VA

13. #468415010042177 Delivered Signed for by: MMARTINEZ Shipment Dates Ship date May 27, 2008 Delivery date May 28, 2008 1:30 PM Destination Albuquerque, NM

14. #468415010042184 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: DGAMBLE Shipment Dates hip date May 27, 2008 Delivery date Jun 2, 2008 9:58 AM Destination Washington, DC

15. #To US Supreme Court???? Jonder to Congress was filed May 24, 2008 from Fed Ex Kinko 1001 E University Ave, Las Cruces, NM 88001 Transaction #210110154963:

16. ## 7008 3230 0001 8958 5146 Postal IG #13578487 Amicus Curiea brief for 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals filed in August, 2009.

17. Certified US Mail # 7008 3230 0001 8958 5146 document appears to have disappeared after being mailed to Denver to travel 4 blocks to USCA Offices in Denver.CO Service emailed to Courts report filed with Postal Inspector Your Reference number is: 13578487

18 #0309 0330 0001 0755 2811
IG report # 3137627 Status: Notice Left. We attempted to deliver your item at 11:34 am on June 15, 2009 in WASHINGTON, DC 20001 and a notice was left. No further information is available for this item.

19. #7009 1410 0001 1124 8858
Status Delivered SSA General Counsel David Black Status: Delivered Your item was delivered at 8:52 am on August 03, 2009 in BALTIMORE, MD 21235

20. #7009 1410 0001 1124 8889<
Status Delivered UN Disabilities, NY Your item was delivered at 11:56 am on August 03, 2009 in NEW YORK, NY 10017

21 #7009 1410 0001 1124 8872
Status Delivered Channy Phillips USA, Wash DC Your item was delivered at 11:33 am on August 07, 2009 in WASHINGTON, DC 20530

22. #7009 1410 0001 1124 8865
Status Delivered Clerk USCA District Columbia Your item was delivered at 3:06 pm on August 03, 2009 in WASHINGTON, DC 20001.

23. #7008 3230 0001 8958 5146
Status Delivered 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Status: Acceptance Your item was accepted at 9:29 AM on August 6, 2009 in DENVER, CO 80202.

24 #841348910019897 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: PPALMER Delivered Signed for by: RCARSON Shipment Dates Ship date Sep 30, 2009 Delivery date Oct 2, 2009 2:28 PM Destination Washington, DC

25. #841348910019903 Delivered Signed for by: Signature on File Shipment Dates Ship date Sep 30, 2009 Delivery date Oct 5, 2009 9:26 AM Destination Denver, CO

26 Fax transmission to US Senate and House Committee on Judiciary 9/30/2009 20222249516 and 20222250072 from Fed Ex Kinko Memphsis Tennessee.

27 #841348910019866 Signed for by: JANDRESON Ship date Sep 29, 2009 Delivery date Oct 1, 2009 11:21 AM Destination Hyattsville, MD

October, 2009
$1969.00 Service Or Process
Costs Through October, 2009
1. $445.00 Question Amending Title 28 USC 372 Senate Judiciary Committee
2. $480.00 Question Supreme Court theft/interception USCA ORDER Exhibit #592
3. $140.00 Missing Certified Mail Exhibit #593
4. $110.00 Intercepted Document DOD Exhibit #595
5. $110.00 Missing Priority mail Item USCA DC Exhibit #596
6. $400.00 Appellant Cross Brief Exhibit #595
7. $142.00 FYI Circuit Executive
8. $142.00 Reply to FBI Director Exhibit 601
Total: $1969.00