It is the job of local,state, and federal prosecutors to enforce and prosecute all laws with fairness and equity and not deny any person the equal protection of the law (14th and 5th Amendments. This Link Political Patronage Briefly reviews how the political patronage system entices local prosecutors and others to refuse to enforce the law. This Link former US Attorney General Eric Holder also addressed serioius abuses of prosecutorial authority

US Congressman Bill Pascell has efforts to have nursing homes regulated by CMS by US Department of HHS which was revolked by Trump Administration.2 Million dead (250,000 a year) since 2014 as a result of medical error. The online databases show that actually began paying in 2010 to deny patients treatment for pre-existing conditions and block prosecution:

1. Previous Page Exhibit Page 33

2. Exhibit #A Move To Charlotte North Carolina/March, 2009

3. Exhibit #B Question Violation Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights Shelter Prevented Medical Work/March, 2009

4. Exhibit #C Social Security/Medicaid Missing in Winston Salem, NC/March, 2009 Question Violation of Title 18 USC 1702. Obstruction of correspondence

5. Exhibit #D Bethesda Ministry Gives US Supreme Court "The Finger"/March, 2009 Question Of Violation Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court ORDER

6. Exhibit #E Courtesy Brief To Mayor/ June 2009 Question Violation Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER

7. Exhibit #F It's Broke It's Broke I can't fix it/ March, 2009

8. Exhibit #G Should Social Security Be Placed Custody of World Court?

9. Exhibit #H Amended Complaint USDC For Judicial Review Filed US District Court District of Columbia

10. Exhibit #I Regional SSI Commissioner Grants Benefits Guilford County Cancels SSI Benefits Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Of Court ORDERS/ May, 2009

11. Exhibit #J Judge Collyer Denies Request For Hearing/Judicial Review May, 2009

12. Exhibit #K PACER Access Blocked/ Late 2009 Ongoing Theft or Interception of US Mail

13. Exhibit #L Question Of $5 Billion Diplomatic Sanctions for Seizure Safe Deposit Box/ July, 2009

14. Exhibit #M Petition For Writ of Certiorari To Complete the Record Denied by 3 Judge Mandate

15. Exhibit #M-A Amicus Curiea Brief To UN Disappears?Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction Of Correspondence

16. Exhibit #M-Bait Program/As Appellant Brief Question Constitutionality of US Patriot Act-Multiple Confirmed Kills

17. Next Page Exhibit Page 34a Alqueda Operations in Triad

1. In this section the "Bethesda Ministry" has abused their nonprofit status to step rather broadly over the previous rulings of the US Supreme Court, 3 US Circuit Courts of Appeals, and a bunch of USDC rulings to tamper with a Social Security claim and matters which can only be heard of reviewed pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review before a US District Court Judge. The Uptown Shelter in Charlotte, NC declined to provide services request by the local hospital for disabled person.

2. The Social Security Administration then closed my SSI claim and denied benefits because I declined to attend a meeting they request which the Court have already ruled can only take place in front of a federal judge questioning the Constitutional Provision of Equal Protection under 5th Amendment

Doctors from Carolina Medical Center have hospitalized me for treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and swelling of leg. The written request to the shelter for medical or transitional program status was declined probably due to over crowded conditions at shelter.

Mike Harmon BSW
Assessment Specialist, Homeless Support Services
Mecklenburg County Government
1210 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28206
Office 704-334-3187-ext 118
Mike.Harmon@MecklenburgCountyNC.gov

Case Manager Pam Neal
Uptown Shelter
1210 North Tryon Street
PO Box 36471
Charlotte, NC 28236
704-334-3187-ext 119
Pam.Neal@UptownShelter.org
Which the shelter declined to provice

1. The denial of appropriate medical treatment specified in the patients advanced medical directive shown at the borrom of the page or with chronic medical history of life threatening issuesis likely to result in servere injuries or death

a. Patient Rights To Be fully informed by a physician of his or her total health status and to be afforded the opportunity to participate on an immediate and ongoing basis in the total plan of care. (42CFR §483.10(c))

b. Be fully informed in advance about care and treatment and of any changes in care or treatment that may affect the resident. (42 CFR §483.10(c)(2),(4))

c Participate in planning care and treatment or changes in care or treatment unless adjudged incompetent or otherwise found to be incapacitated under State law. (42 C.F.R. §483.10(d)(3), 42 CFR §483.10(c))

d. To receive all information that is material to his or her decision concerning whether to accept or refuse any proposed treatment or procedure. (42 CFR §483.10(c)(5)(6))

2. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials as the operation of fact and law. Online documents

3. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

Having been given a courtesy brief that we have no basis for a conversation regarding my social security or benefits the case manager Ms. Gaines by federal court ORDERS. Ms. Gaines demands I move into a home/room house for $400.00 operated by her friend Sister Chickenhead 4-17-2009. She explains I am denied services until her request to violate the law can be accomodated

Mayor Allen Joines
City of Winston Salem
Suite 150, City Hall,
101 North Main St.,
Winston-Salem, NC 27101

RE: Your request denied by US District Court Judge 2nd Time.

Dear Mayor Allen Joines:

I am sorry for the delay in answering your previous question as to whether a city funded homeless shelter the Bethesda could involved itself in a client’s social security claim where the issues of law were already closed by ORDER Of several US Circuit Courts of Appeals.

As you can see from the enclosed ORDER of the Honorable Judge Rosemary Collyer the question was denied twice and 2nd time the Court refused to permit the Social Security Administration to be named as a party itself.

While some technical questions are being reviewed by the US Circuit Court of Appeals it appears unlikely that a city funded organization will be permitted to create 3rd party joinders to federal proceedings. Of course the conventional wisdom is that nonprofit agencies and city governments lacking any standing to over rule a US Circuit Court of Appeals. The US Supreme Court itself explained last year the time for appeals had expired long, long ago.

With Kindest Regards
Chris Walters, Counsel
SSI #261-90-xxxx

CC Guilford County Commissioners

Greensboro, NC is in the heart of the North Carolina "Triad". A former industrial area known for furniture and textile production the region is home to 3 major medical teaching hospitals. With a large supporting network of homeless shelters; medical resources; and interconnecting transit systems the area should be ideal to assist my medical work and placement in an assisted living facility.

Dr. Gangi explains it is broke way too long it can't be fixed and in 5 years the pain will be bad you will be begging me to cut your legs off. The termination of medical insurance ended any hope of medical treatment or his referral to primary care physician.

Over a period of several weeks the Coumadin Clinic is unable to balance the medication which is really bad since I won't be able to balance the meds at home if the doctor can't figure it out

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

1. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

1. Motion to Correct Record Addressed to SSA Worker Mrs. James who is apparently requesting hearing under Title 42 Sec 405 (g)(h) Judicial Review.

2. The answer is permitted pursuant to FRAP Rule 10 Record on Appeal(2)(c) asked the US Circuit Court of Appeals to complete the Appellate Record with items discarded by the origional trial Judge Rosemary Collyer.

3. Costs $15.00 including printing and Priority US Mail 0309 0330 0001 0755 2811

4. Letter to Circuit Clerk items missing in mail; FYI SSA General Counsel noted voluntary appearance and waiver of Summons Monday, June 01, 2009.

5. Letter To Mayor Alan Joines City of Winston Salem (June 16th, 2009); that request for 3rd party joinder to SSA claim previously made by city funded homeless shelter was denied by ORDER USDC

6. Letter to David Black SSA General Counsel mailed Saturday June 20th, 2009 from Hanover, PA on 2nd denial by USDC

7. Letter to Regional Legal Counsel Kressman Case update and Courtesy letter mailed Monday June 22nd, 2009 from Hanover, PA

8. FYI 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals On possible Contempt of previous ORDER Of Court and Denial of review by USDC: mailed Saturday June 27th, 2009 from Chambersburg, PA

9. Letter to Ms. James explaining I am planning to move back to Oregon

As Attorney Marin Keane explained the fact the question of law has been in both Federal Court and US Circuit Court of Appeals will make finding an Attorney almost impossible. Mr. Keane indicated during our final phone call the Weaver House where I am staying is refusing to take phone calls in an apparent attempt to obstruction counsel and returning mail to sender.

Mr. Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Kenneth D. Lewis CEO
Bank of America
Defendants Vs. Civil #Civil # 3:09cv238

After receiving request to close Safe Deposit Box 259 in Las Cruces, NM the bank went on ahead and charged me $70.00 which I have asked the Court to return.

1. Complaint In USDC Walters v Kenneth Lewis & Bank of America

2. Notice of Transfer of Causes Court was unable to process IMP because of lack of information and instead of refiling the matter was deferred to existing USCA Review

3. Link to Diplomatic Sanctons

Mr. Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Kenneth D. Lewis CEO
Bank of America Civil #Civil # 09-811

This Link The Presiding Judge explains in dismissing this action he could not prove I am homeless and poor enough to waive filing fees. Theft of origional USDC files Walters V Asture USDC, NM was done to obstruct any litigation; claims of proof of service.....

This Link The Honorable Judge Bruck Black ruling in Mr. Chris Walters,v. Kenneth D. Lewis CEO Bank of America Attorney Civil #Civil # 09-811in USDC New Mexico expressed no objection to seizure of counsel's papers in violation of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law ( US v Haldeman, Erlichman, Dean) as cited:

The Court also recommends denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 10). In that motion, Plaintiff claims that Defendant violated his equal protection and due process rights by seizing his social security money from his safe deposit box in violation of an order entered in another case in the United States District Court. Document 10 at 1 (referring to Walters v. Social Security Administration, CV-07-0257 JCH/RLP). Plaintiff’s claim that his constitutional rights were violated because of an order entered in another case is without merit because Plaintiff fails to state which order entered in his previous case was violated....The purpose of the criminal activity with the tatic approval of the USDC was to destroy legal documents which showed service of process as made on the Social Security Commissioner and other documents related to Court process.

Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Mr. Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Kenneth D. Lewis CEO
Bank of America
Attorney James E Shively
(602-840-1400) Vs. Civil #Civil # 09-811-BB-LAM

Addressed To Honorable
US Congressman Barney Franks
House Financial Services Committee
2129 Rayburn House Office Building,
Washington, DC 20515
Ph: (202) 225-4247
Fax: (202) 225-6952

While the IRS can't seize my SSI benefits and several Federal Courts have ruled my benefits exempt from seizure I wanted to thank Bank of America Attorney James E Shively for appearing and explaining the USDC lacks jurisdiction to what Bank of America openly admits:

1. Bank of America seized $73.00 in funds from my SSI monies to pay for year rent on Safe Deposit Box 259 at 250 Amador, in Las Cruces, NM and has declined to return the contents Since April, 2009.

2. Safe Deposit Box 259 contains Counsel's papers and it is an apparent violation of Title 18 US 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law to pilfer legal papers as cited in US V John Edwards, Haldeman, Erlichman, and Dean.

3. Bank of America (Claim 2231626MAR09) After Greyhound Bus Lines hospitalized me 3 times I filed a challenge to payment of the $251.00 which Bank of America paid even when Greyhound failed to complete the service and has done similar seizures (Claim 1795606MaR09) in other situations where services paid for were not completed.

1. It appears in processing debits that Bank of America holds out payment of completed Customer transactions to create artificial float time or basically a short term interest free loan from the customers account and business transactions.

2. This practice generates a false account balance which is likely to cause the customer to overdraft and the customer is required to pay overdraft fee's on all items caused by Bank of America's writing itself a short term interest free loan.

When I worked at National Bank of Commerce in 1983 we had float time because it took bank items up to 14 days to physically travel to other banks across the United States and get their items credited. In the electronic world today debits travel at the speed of light and transactions and printed receipts for purchases are virtually instantaneous. In creating unneeded float time on debits it appears that the Bank of America and other banking institutions have adopted a commonly used practice of holding out debits to garner interest they are not entitled too. The abuse of this practice is to have the customer penalized by refusing the complete electronic transactions and then charge the customers for overages caused by Bank of America.

Any changes in Chris Walters SSI benefits or case status is protection from seizure by anyone as cited in #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi Presiding Judge Judith Herrera USDC NM; 3 US Circuit Courts of Appeals****…. The right of Bank of America to seize property from anyone without the due process and equal protection of the law does not exist.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
PO Box 266 Greensboro, NC 27402

By Jonathan Stempel Jonathan Stempel 46 mins ago

NEW YORK (Reuters) Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) has agreed to pay $410 million to settle lawsuits accusing it of charging customers with excessive overdraft fees, court documents show.

The largest U.S. bank by assets is among the more than two dozen U.S., Canadian and European lenders named as defendants in the class-action litigation, which in 2009 consolidated lawsuits filed across the country. JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), Citigroup Inc (C.N) and Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N) are among the other defendants named in the case, court records show.

Bank of America spokeswoman Anne Pace in an email said the bank has already changed its overdraft practices, eliminating fees for debit transactions and significantly lowering fees for customers who overdraw excessively. he also said the Charlotte, North Carolina-based lender has "fully accrued funds" to cover the settlement. Notice of the January 27 accord with Bank of America was filed on Friday with the U.S. district court in Miami. The settlement requires court approval.

Many banks let customers overdraw their accounts in exchange for fees, typically $25 or $35. Critics say the fees disproportionately burden lower-income customers and others who often maintain low account balances. In a November 2009 complaint filed with the Miami court, customers said Bank of America routinely processed debit transactions from largest to smallest rather than in chronological order, causing account balances to fall faster and boosting potential overdraft fees.

They said the bank also did not clearly tell customers they could decline overdraft protection, and typically charged the fees to debit card users rather than decline transactions. Bank of America customers would often rack up hundreds of dollars of overdraft fees, even when they may have been overdrawn by only a few dollars, the complaint said. Overdraft fees industry wide totaled about $23.7 billion in 2008, up from $10.3 billion just four years earlier, according to the Center for Responsible Lending.

Last year the Federal Reserve imposed a rule that prohibits banks from charging overdraft fees on electronic and debit card transactions without advance customer approval. In August, a federal judge ordered Wells Fargo to pay $203 million to California customers who complained about overdraft fees. The bank is appealing. The case is In re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, No. 09-md-02036.

(Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

The Political Patronage Systems controls the government and prevents normal protections to entire classes of citizens aiding acts of genocide, criminal activities; terrorist activities... A large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus or lesser sections while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect. Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities

1. Maybe I got the facts wrong but I thougt North Carolina is supposed to be the "Bible Belt" where Christians show their stuff or moral values? Almost a decade later the facts and these website links suggest "Bible Belt" is about a twisted as it gets. No filth or depravity or violation of basic moral decency seems to be beyound the folks who live here in this period of time.

2. Has your family been fagged in the public library?100 Breaks ins of my email and websites helped write new federal law.

3. North Carolina Bible Fags? 2003-2006 hard to believe these folks preach this from the pulpit and are sexual predators later NC 2005 and North Carolina 2006

4. Our Program Will Run Your Life? October 2008 followed by first attempt to challenge Social Security Commissioners final determination

5. Federal Court Quashes challengs 2009 to Social Security Awards in 2007 Link

6. Samaritan Ministry Janurary 2010 tells federal bar to kiss off just about time US Attorney was sacked... Generally called tampering with federal agency

7. Minor frauds March 2010 medical providers attempt to defraud Medicaid

8. Recommended Federal Grand Jury December 2010 serious abuse of medicaid process by local medical providers

9. Genocide American Style history of NC involvement in sedition and insurrection and class based Genocide. Profile Report NC request to seceed from Union in 2012 after losing Presidential Elections.

10. Assassinaton Attempts July 2012 attempt to cause injury or death to SSI recipient by refusing to issue Medicaid

11. Interference With Medical Work Hickory NC April 2013

12. North Carolina Nuring Home Janruary 2015 makes illegal transfer to Skilled Nursing Home in Charlottes Virginia

14. Extensive Denial of Medical Treatment April 2018 extremely well coordinated effort to cause death or injury through denial of medical work in Virginia and North Carolina