It is the job of local,state, and federal prosecutors to enforce and prosecute all laws with fairness and equity and not deny any person the equal protection of the law (14th and 5th Amendments. This Link Political Patronage Briefly reviews how the political patronage system entices local prosecutors and others to refuse to enforce the law. This Link former US Attorney General Eric Holder also addressed serioius abuses of prosecutorial authority

US Congressman Bill Pascell has efforts to have nursing homes regulated by CMS by US Department of HHS which was revolked by Trump Administration.2 Million dead (250,000 a year) since 2014 as a result of medical error. The online databases show that actually began paying in 2010 to deny patients treatment for pre-existing conditions and block prosecution:

This is an apparent attempt by Administrative Law Judges to Quash the final ORDER and ruling of several US District Courts and US Circuit Courts of Appeals. Needless to say it didn't make it. After the Social Security Commissioner issues his/her final ruling there can be no additional review except before a USDC Judge Title 42 USC 405(g)(h) Judicial Review

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

Mr. Chris Walters
SSI 261-90-6357
C/o 1243 N Patterson
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Monday, November 17th, 2008
The Chief Administrative Law Judge
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1608
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255

RE: ORDER OF DISMISSAL 11-14-2008 Quashed
by Several ORDERS Of US Courts:

I have just received an ORDER OF DISMISSAL from a ALJ Mark R Dawson in New Mexico which has already been quashed by ORDER of 2 US District Court Judges and 2 US Circuit Court of Appeals Et all... I had asked your staff several times over the last 2 years to explain why they had cut off payment of medical bills and cash benefits in California and a number of minor items. Several Judges explained that all legal questions are reserved to review by US Courts only.

ALJ ORDER OF DISMISSAL Admits It Is Frivolous
ALJ Mark Dawsons ORDER OF DISMISSAL appears to cite many attempts by several Administrative Law Judges to hold hearings to address a non-existent SSID benefits claim which he correctly states has not existed for years. When I originally applied for SSI in 1997 I applied for SSDI based on advice of legal counsel…. I discharged legal counsel to represent myself after finding they are at least as incompetent as the Administrative Law Judges.
ORDERS Quashing Request Made by ALJ-Principal of Just Lithigum
Cited: ssi/clinton/index15c.htm
The Social Security Administration has previously appeared by and through counsel and demanded the right to process Chris Walters SSI claim without medical records and without Chris Walters being permitted to appear at hearings or to move hearings thousands of miles from where the claimant resides. The claims made in Walters v. Crownover, Miller CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT (Affirmed 5th Circuit 1997); Walters v Apfel CA 99-CV-0668 USDC District of Columbia and Walters V Apfel USDC, WDT Civil A:99CA0156SS. In a legal Tour De force Assistant North Carolina Attorney General Dorthy Powers explained in David Bradshaw vs Chris Walters & Carmen Odom Case 04CVS2674 Superior Court, NM that as representative of the Social Security Administration they have the right to suspend any portion of the law whenever they so wish and were continuing to exercise the right to throw away Chris Walters medical records... While Congress declined to amend Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act the ORDERS of the several Courts granting SSAs extraordinary request are still valid and in force. Just Litigium or justice has been served means neither myself nor your staff have any legal standing to step over the body of the ruling.

I dont want to be a stickler for details but for us to have a legal action someone has to disagree on some fact of law. When SSA issued their denial in February 2, 2007 I filed the action of law Walters v Asture in USDC, NM 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP the record shows service of process on the US Attorney and Commissioner. No litigation occurred because your staff waived right to counsel and demanded to make a statement of fact and law that I am disabled and didn’t even explain what my disability is. Based on the informal settlement and lacking any controversy I asked for the Courts permission to withdraw the Complaints which both Judges ruled is “Well Pleaded” The closure was quickly affirmed by the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals. The Honorable US District Court Judge Judith Herrera had ruled that resolution of legal communications between myself and Social Security must occur in under the supervision of a US District Court pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(h) Judicial Review

I am unaware of any civil actions for damages against ALJ cited Judge Dawsons ORDER. When I lived at the Plaza Suite Hotel in New Mexico for 9 months your staff admitted their questions were occurring in the wrong venue. Based on admission that venue did not reside in California the 2nd civil action Walters v. Asture CV-380-08 before the Honorable Judge Scott was subsequently withdrawn.

The only controversy which occurred was that I sent your Technical Expert Betsy Huber a nice arrangement of flowers and commendation for her excellent work and a free diner to Case Manager Davis in Lodi, CA. Your staff explained in a written letter that SSI applicants are not permitted to commend employees for their excellent work and provide minor thanks.

As with many previous documents from ALJ the ORDER OF DISMISSAL continues to make statements that arent supported by Plaintiffs Exhibit C a United States Source Document submitted as “Evidence and Testimony Before Congress or existing facts. While the ALJ states they don’t know where I am Deputy Commissioner of Operations Linda S McMahon mailed me a current letter affirming residence here dated October 14th, 2008. The online records document exactly where I am at all times; why I am present; how much it cost; where I stayed.

I bet youd love to appear in a US District Court and explain Mr. Walters is a psychopath as described by your staff. Well you see your Honor there are numerous commendations in newspapers concerning his volunteer work doing public service. Uh Your Honor we know but failed to mention that Mr. Walters was a volunteer field investigator for HUD programs from 1986-1997 where he work created what 4 federal statues….? Yes your Honor we know Mr. Walters was also the first National 911 Administrator for a 15 state area and has hundreds of commendations from law enforcement and government. Yes your honor we know Mr. Walters has never been seen by or treated by a mental health specialist. Yes Your Honor we lied when we stated Mr. Walters has an extensive history of convictions for threatening public officials because he has never met an Administrative law or Federal Judge in person. Yes your honor we threw away Chris Walters 200 some odd doctors and even disability statements from SSI doctors and don’t have a fuzzy clue as to why Mr. Walters is disabled. We could go to a Court of law to prove that Chris Walters is disabled and entitled to SSI but who needs the embarrassment?

I mailed a letter to the US Magistrate in US District Court, District of Columbia and suggested that if the Administrative Law Judges are all that concerned with the online audit of the Social Security process-let Social Security purchase the rights to the materials under color of attorney fees; training activities. We have been in litigation for 11 years If you staff needs something important just drop me an email.

With Kindest Regards
Chris Walters, Prevailing Counsel Before Congress
nims2006@gmail.com

From "cmecfbb@nmcourt.fed.us" to cmecfto@nmcourt.fed.us
date Dec 16, 2008 11:28 AM
subject Activity in Case 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP Walters v. SSA Letter

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court
District of New Mexico - Version 3.2.1
Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 12/16/2008
at 10:28 AM MST and filed on 12/10/2008
Case Name: Walters v. SSA
Case Number: 1:07-cv-257
Filer: WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 04/17/2007
Document Number: 32

Docket Text: Letter by Chris Walters (ma)

1:07-cv-257 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Chris Walters Chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
1:07-cv-257 Notice has been delivered by fax to:
1:07-cv-257 Notice has been delivered by USPS to:

Good Afternoon Federal Bar Association

I am prevailing counsel in a successful action in Title 42 USC Chapter 7 for SSI Benefits which were approved before several years ago. We have an interesting question of law where several Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judges are filing briefs prohibited by 2 US Circuit Courts of Appeals and several US District Courts apparently seeking to quash Court rulings. The Courts have ruled and Circuits Affirmed that after the Social Security Commissioner issues his/her final denial in a claim the jurisdiction of review exist with the US Courts pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Source documents cited in these briefs

Social Security Case History:

Link

Jonder to Congressional Committees

Link

Report On Pending UN Sanctions or Liabilities Database:

Link

This is an apparent attempt by Administrative Law Judges to Quash the final ORDER and ruling of several US District Courts and US Circuit Courts of Appeals. Needless to say it didn't make it.

RE: Question of Law Deferred to Court Which has
Been Prohibited By 5th & 10th US Circuit Courts of Appeals et all

Your Honor:

I wanted to thanks the United States Social Security Administration for dropping by the United Nations High Commission On Human Rights for the last 11 years by and through legal counsel and allocuting to terrorist activities; crimes against humanity; and possibly genocide. These extraordinary request were made while officials were apparently asking if they could amend the key provisions of the largest item in the US Budget Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations and Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act. Many of the questions are executable offenses and violation of International Law which might be best addressed by putting the Social Security Administration into control of a "Special Master" and then using direct Military Intervention through deployment of "Special forces" to guarantee adherence to the "Rule of Law" is also found online:

1. ssi/fgj/index.html

Exotic questions of law from Social Security apparently proposing to amend Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations and Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act were moved in a timely and appropriate matter to both Congress and the United Nations where the House Committee On the Judiciary has established a clear cut right of Congressional Jurisdiction and both have a clear cut right at this time to impose Sanctions The question of law is found on Plaintiff Exhibit C filed in USDC, New Mexico as a well established United States Source Docuument submitted as "Evidence and Testimony" to several US Congressional Committees and is also an excellent and comprehensive case history and is also cited on the line website:

1. ssi/index.html

I have received another in a series of endless correspondences from Social Security Administration this one from Law Judge Mark R Dawson New Mexico Dated November 14th, 2008 (Appended Exhibit A) in the Social Security Claim of Christopher A. Walters (261-90-6357). At least 2 US Circuit Court of Appeals and the several US District Courts have ruled that such request are unlawful pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H). Judicial Review The several US Circuits and US District Courts have issued ORDERS and Findings that the questions of law are reserved as fact and law to the US District Court for the District of Columbia. ALJ Mark Dawson admits in the body of his Order of Dismissal that no claim fof SSI Disability benefits exist and makes claims as fact and law which appear to be supported by the finding of no court of law(to this point in time). The US District Court may have a jurisdiction under Title 18 USC 402 Contempt or possibly might have a means to convience the Social Security Administration they won their claim in April, 2007 in a US District Court. The ORDER Of Dismissal suggest the Administrative Law Staff is simply embarassed and who wouldn't be? I might suggest a painless solution

1. Don't send any additional legal communications to Chris Walters that have not been signed and approved by a United States Attorney with notations of federal bar membership

2. The massive extraordinary request from SSA for exotic legal questions which have been deemed inappropriate by Congress might be the basis of appropriate legal fees for Chris Walters

3. The parties at bar might consider that the operational audit of the Social Security case from 1997-2008 demonstrates substantial operational impediments in the social security process which might in and of themselves sustantially violate the rights of claimants to services and benefits.

4 Purchase Plaintiff Exhibit C the Social Security Audit for $20,000 which would show that Chris Walters made $2,000 a year going back 10 some odd years as a training activity and skill builder.

5. Having achieve ownership of the document which seems to be an embarrassment the Administrative Law Staff can do with it whatever they wish.

Respectfully Yours
Prevailing Counsel Before Congress
c/o 1243 N Patterson
Winston Salem, NC 27101

cc: Addressed To The Social Security Appeals Council
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255

Attached Exhibits

1. ORDER of Dismissal Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson 11-14-2008
2. List of ORDERS prohibiting additional conversation outside of Court.
3. Plaintiff Exhibit C

Mailed first class Monday, November 17th, 2008

Legal Costs $2.25
Postage $1.79
Counsel's Time to Prepare Documents
2 Hours at $110.00 Hour=$220.00

Total $221.01

1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

A $237.00 bus trip to New Mexico to file briefs to answer Administrative Judge Mark Dawson's question in several locales and a $237.00 bus trip back to the Eastern US. I inquired if I should drop into Seattle, Washington and work on my vocational training program and the social service network explained it would be a very bad time to stay in the shelters because of massive homeless population which is growing because of economic downturn.

The Case manager of the Lutheran Compass Center reports they are extremely crowded and have an unusually large homeless population which is having problems finding shelter and my appearance by greyhound would constitute a major imposition

$237.00 Greyhound bus trip back from Western United States also goes near San Antonio, Texas. Because many of the irregular request for Social Security hearings are coming from San Anotnio I will stop in San Antonio maybe for the winter and see if I can figure out exactly

The Salvation Army manager had explained I could stay in the Lodge here for an extended period of time-due to circumstances this did not work out. Saturday, December 13th, 2008 the Manager of the Salvation Army Lodge John Woods went on a drinking binge beat his wife. When the Commanding Officer caught him he made public statements to every homeless person in town the Salvation Army intends to close the shelter on a permanent basis effective 1-26-2009. John went on to explain other Salvation Army shelters in Odessa; San Angelo; Midland and Fort worth were also being closed. John's public statements apparently drew the comments to the attention of the Salvation Army Divisional Office who issued this statement that John is full of BS:

Too: chrissaidthanks2005@gmail.com
From: "Valerie_Monteith@uss.salvationarmy.org"chrissaidthanks2005@yahoo.com, council@mybigspring.com, editor@bigspringherald.com, gfuqua@mybigspring.com, valerie_monteith@uss.salvationarmy.org, viewpoint@kwes.com

Friends,

Please be aware that the below email sent to us this morning did not come from myself, or any Salvation Army offices. It is full of inaccuracies and false information. Please disregard.
Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Thank you.

$43.95 for motel night in Willows, California 12/04/08

Joan Kroc McDonald's Heiress left $1.5 billion for the Salvation Army to expand community centers into needy communities. The Salvation Army Lodge gives clients 2 or 3 days stay before running them out of town.

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

The Political Patronage Systems controls the government and prevents normal protections to entire classes of citizens aiding acts of genocide, criminal activities; terrorist activities... A large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus or lesser sections while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect. Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities

1. Maybe I got the facts wrong but I thougt North Carolina is supposed to be the "Bible Belt" where Christians show their stuff or moral values? Almost a decade later the facts and these website links suggest "Bible Belt" is about a twisted as it gets. No filth or depravity or violation of basic moral decency seems to be beyound the folks who live here in this period of time.

2. Has your family been fagged in the public library?100 Breaks ins of my email and websites helped write new federal law.

3. North Carolina Bible Fags? 2003-2006 hard to believe these folks preach this from the pulpit and are sexual predators later NC 2005 and North Carolina 2006

4. Our Program Will Run Your Life? October 2008 followed by first attempt to challenge Social Security Commissioners final determination

5. Federal Court Quashes challengs 2009 to Social Security Awards in 2007 Link

6. Samaritan Ministry Janurary 2010 tells federal bar to kiss off just about time US Attorney was sacked... Generally called tampering with federal agency

7. Minor frauds March 2010 medical providers attempt to defraud Medicaid

8. Recommended Federal Grand Jury December 2010 serious abuse of medicaid process by local medical providers

9. Genocide American Style history of NC involvement in sedition and insurrection and class based Genocide. Profile Report NC request to seceed from Union in 2012 after losing Presidential Elections.

10. Assassinaton Attempts July 2012 attempt to cause injury or death to SSI recipient by refusing to issue Medicaid

11. Interference With Medical Work Hickory NC April 2013

12. North Carolina Nuring Home Janruary 2015 makes illegal transfer to Skilled Nursing Home in Charlottes Virginia

14. Extensive Denial of Medical Treatment April 2018 extremely well coordinated effort to cause death or injury through denial of medical work in Virginia and North Carolina