US Senator Richard Burr

2000 West First Street Suite 508
Winston-Salem, NC 27104

US Senator Elizabeth Dole

225 North Main Street
Suite 304,
Salisbury, NC 28144

Anna Mills S. Wagoner, USA*

P.O. Box 1858
Greensboro, NC 27402

Allen Joines Mayor

Suite 150, City Hall,
101 North Main St.,
Winston-Salem, NC 27101

Congressman Howard Coble
Retired 2014
Chair Subcommittee Courts
Stripped Chair Homeland Security Comm
2102 North Elm St, Suite B
Greensboro, NC 27408-5100


Chairman Darrell Issa

Subcommittee Courts, ....
House Judiciary Committee
2269 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-3906

Congressman Jim Jordan

Subcommittee On HealthCare
1524 Longworth House Office Bldg
Washington, DC 20515
T (202) 225-2676

Chairman Jason Chaffetz

House Oversight Committee
2157 Rayburn HOB
Washington,DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5074
Fax: (202) 225-3974
Exhibit C Submitted As Evidence And
Testimony To Congress-Exclusive Jurisdiction
You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings
Standing US Court ORDERS
And Black Letter Law
Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

US Senator Chuck Grassley

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
Wahsington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-7703

US Senator Ron Johnson

Chairman Senate Oversight
Whistleblower
340 Dirksen SOB
Washington, DC, 20510
(202) 224-4751

Congressman Mike Thompson

House Ways and Means Committee
2300 County Center Dr. Suite A100
Santa Rosa, CA 95403

President George Bush JR

1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, DC 20501

Former HHS Secretary

Mike Leavitt
Health and Human Services
200 Independence Ave, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201

Social Security Commissioner

Mike Asture
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235
Exhibit Page #31 November-December, 2008
Table of Contents
1. Previous Page Exhibit Page 30

2. Citation of Authority Administrative Law Judge Makes Partially Favorable Decision April, 2005 Commissioners Final Denial Can't Be Overturned

3. Citation of Authority US Attorney USDC, WDT Civil Case Number A:99CA0156SS Commissioners Final Ruling Cannot Be Overturned Outside USDC

4. Exhibit A Unlawful Communications from Mark Dawson Office Hearings and Appeals/November, 2008 Can't Appeal Commissioners Final Denial/Court ORDERS

5. Exhibit B Unlawful Communications from Office Hearings and Appeals authority Title 18 Sec 1509 Obstruction of Court Order

6. Exhibit #C Unlawful Communication from Office of Hearings and Appeals authority Title 18 Sec 1509 Obstruction of Court Order

7. Exhibit #D Confirmed Kills-Judicial Misconduct Replies From Circuit Executives authority Title 18 Sec 1509 Obstruction of Court Order

8. Exhibit E Letter to US Magistrate Judge Alan Kay under authority Title 18 Sec 1509 Obstruction of Court Order

9. Exhibit #F Don't Move To Seattle

10. Exhibit #G Salvation Army Employee Goes On Binge

11. Current Operational and Authorized Medical Protocols

12. Citation of Authority & Audit of Operational Audits 1997-2017 Review of Possible Federal Crimes and Operational Impediments

13. Next Page Exhibit Page 32 San Antonio, TX Home Federal Grand Jury Texas 12-2008/Janurary 2009

United States District Court

US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Clerk's Office
U.S. District Court
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Acting Commissioner Linda McMahon

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

Former US Attorney Larry Gomez

555 South Telshor, Suite 300
Las Cruces, NM 88011
Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Civil Docket For Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Presiding Judge Judith Hererra

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant
Commissioner's Final Determiination
Out of Court Settlement/ Can't Be Overturned
Acting Commisssioner Linda McMahon issued a final denial which can only be overturned or modified in a USDC as cited in Title 42 USC 405(g) Judicial Review:

...No findings of fact or decision by the Commissioner shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or government agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under Section of 1331 or 1346 of Title 28,United States Code, to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter

1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:


Winston Salem Chamber of Commerce

601 W 4th St # 101
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
(336) 728-9200

The Social Security Administration

Office of Disability Adjuciation and Review
Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson
555 Broadway, NE Suite 200
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102
Exhibit #A Motion To Quash
Addressed Chief Administrative Law Judge
This is an apparent attempt by Administrative Law Judges to Quash the final ORDER and ruling of several US District Courts and US Circuit Courts of Appeals. Needless to say it didn't make it. After the Social Security Commissioner issues his/her final ruling there can be no additional review except before a USDC Judge Title 42 USC 405(g)(h) Judicial Review

Winston Salem Chamber of Commerce

601 W 4th St # 101
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
(336) 728-9200

Citation of Authority Administrative Law Judge Makes Partially Favorable
Decision April, 2005 Commissioners Final Denial Can't Be Overturned


Social Security Administration

office Of Hearings and Appeals
10222 San Pedro Avenue
San Antonio, TX 78216
Partially Favorable Decision
Judge Threw Out All Doctor Records
Administrative Law Judge Ruling April, 2006 where Administrative Law Judge threw away all medical documentation and disability statements previously signed by by SSA. Title 42 USC 423(d)(5)(b) Disability insurance benefit payments and Hallex Volume require Social Security to gather all medical records for consideration in the official record

Dr. Susan Pelzer
SSA Expert
506 Jackson Keller Rd
San Antonio, TX 78216

Judge Admits Testimony Dr. Pfizer
Who Has Never Met Chris Walters

Dr. Susan Pfeizer testifies about what she believes Chris Walters medical condition is who she has never met.

Social Security Administration

Office of Hearings and Appeals
One Skyline Tower
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041

Walters Residence

c/o Dr. Robert Canon
2006-2007
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724

Appeal to Appeals Council

Appeal to Appeals Council made in April, 2006 from Austin, Texas

United States District Court

US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Clerk's Office
U.S. District Court
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Acting Commissioner Linda McMahon

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

Former US Attorney Larry Gomez

555 South Telshor, Suite 300
Las Cruces, NM 88011
Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Civil Docket For Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Presiding Judge Judith Hererra

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant
Commissioner's Final Determination
Out of Court Settlement/ Can't Be Overturned
Acting Commisssioner Linda McMahon issued a final denial which can only be overturned or modified in a USDC as cited in Title 42 USC 405(g) Judicial Review:

...No findings of fact or decision by the Commissioner shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or government agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under Section of 1331 or 1346 of Title 28,United States Code, to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter
Social Security Commissioner Offers Out Of Court
Settlement As Final Determination-Judge Rules Well Pleaded
Rather than go to Bar the Social Security Administration demanded the right to issue SSI/SSDI benefits and granted 4 years back pay and benefits without and mechanism for further review

Request for Emergency Communications

From Technical Expert Betsy Huber
Social Security Administration
2141 Summit Court
Las Cruces, NM 88011

Citation of Authority US Attorney USDC, WDT Civil Case Number A:99CA0156SS
Commissioners Final Ruling Cannot Be Overturned Outside USDC


US District Judge Sam Sparks

US Magistrate Albright
US District Court
Western District Texas
U.S. District Clerk's Office
655 East Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, Texas 78206
(210) 472-6550

Social Security Commissioner

Kenneth Apfel
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

Former US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216
Chris Walters
Plaintiff

Civil Case Number A:99CA0156SS

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner
Social Security Admin
Defendant
Only Federal Court Can Review
Or Modify Commissioners Final Determination
Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint
And Incorporate Memorandum in Support Thereof
Comes now Kenneth S Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, the Defendant in the above-entitled and numbered cause, acting by and through the United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas, and hereby moves the court to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on the grounds that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the instant action and becuase the Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Judicial review of cases arising under title XVI of the Social Security Act is provided in, and expressly limited by, Sections 205(g) and(h) of the Act, 42 U.s.C. 405(g) and

(h). The remedy provided there is exclusive. It is well settled that the United States is immune from suit execpt as it specificially consents to besued and that the terms of such consent define the jurisdictionof any court in which such suit properly can be brought. United States v. Sherwood 312 U.S. 584 (1941). Where a right is a creature of statute, herein the right to sue, and the statute provides a special remedy, as Section 205(g), infra provides, that remedy is exclusive. United States v. Babcock, 250 U.S. 328 (1919) Secton 205(g) reads in pertinent part that follows:

Any individual, after any final decison of of the Commissioner made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in convtroversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner may allow...As part of his answer the Commissioner shall file a certified copy of the transcript of the record including the evidence upon which the findings and decision and complained of are based. The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcripts of the record, a judgement affirming, modifying or reversing the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the case for a rehearing. The finding of the Commissioner as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence shall be conclusive... Section 205(H). reads in pertinent part as follows:
Cite Section 205(h)
...No findings of fact or decision by the Commissioner shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or government agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under Section of 1331 or 1346 of Title 28,United States Code, to recover on any claim arising under this subchaper.

Social Security Administration Regulation NO.16 sets forth the adminstrative procedures by which a claimant for benefits under the Act may obtain a "final decision" of the Commissioner. Following the initial determination on his claim, a dissatisified claimant may obtain reconsideration thereof. 20 CFR 416.1409. After reconsideration he may request a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, and in certain specific instances and upon timely request therefor, has an absolute right to such hearing. 20 C.F.R. 416.1433, 416.1436.416.1455.

Under certain circumstances, the Administrative Law Judge may dismiss a request for such a haring. 20 C.F.R. 416.1456, 416,1459. Such dismissal is final and finding, 20 C.F.R. unless vacated by Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration, either on it's own motion within 60 days after the Administrative Law Judge's Order of dismissal or upon request by the Plaintiff of the Appeals Council made within 60 days of the dismissal order. ...

Exhibits B Social Security Appeals Council Attempts To Overturn Commissioners
Final Determination April 2007...Quashed In USDC, New Mexico Novermber 14, 2008


United States District Court

US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Clerk's Office
U.S. District Court
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Acting Commissioner Linda McMahon

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

Former US Attorney Larry Gomez

555 South Telshor, Suite 300
Las Cruces, NM 88011
Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Civil Docket For Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Presiding Judge Judith Hererra

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant
Commissioner's Final Determiination
Out of Court Settlement/ Can't Be Overturned
Acting Commisssioner Linda McMahon issued a final denial which can only be overturned or modified in a USDC as cited in Title 42 USC 405(g) Judicial Review:

...No findings of fact or decision by the Commissioner shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or government agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under Section of 1331 or 1346 of Title 28,United States Code, to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter

1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

ORDER-Docket #11

Recovered From PACER
ORDER USDC NM
Acknowleges Out Of Court Settlement

Before the United States District Court

The Honorable Judge Robert Scott
US District of New Mexico
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Commissioner Michael J. Astrue

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

Former US Attorney Gregg Fouratt

555 South Telshor, Suite 300
Las Cruces, NM 88011
Chris Walters
vs.
Michael Astrue
Commissioner SSA

#C080380
USDC NM Finds No Merit
In Reviewing Comissioners Final Determination 2008
Judge Magistrate Edward M Chen explains the Complaint is too complicated for him to understand and the matter was subsequently resolved in by Judge Robert Scott in US District Court of New Mexico with no great problem and the Commissioners legal counsel made to supportive pleadings to move the cause forward.

Before Social Security Appeals Council

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
ODAR Hearing Documents
For Disability Determination 2007
These documents were finally secured fro the Stockton Administrative Law Judge and offered some explanation of what was going on and denial of benefits by the Appeals Counsel in April,2 2007

Press To Enlarge

ODAR Hearing Materials
Office of Disability Adjudication & Review
3116 W March Lane #200
Stockton, CA 95249

Press To Enlarge

ODAR Hearing Materials
Office of Disability Adjudication & Review
3116 W March Lane #200
Stockton, CA 95249

Press To Enlarge

ODAR Hearing Materials
Office of Disability Adjudication & Review
3116 W March Lane #200
Stockton, CA 95249

Before Social Security Appeals Council

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson
Attempts Unknown Hearing November, 2008
About year and half after my benefits were granted as part of out or court settlement ALJ Mark Dawson was still attempting hearings

Press On Image to Enlarge

The Social Security Administration
Office of Disability Adjuciation and Review
Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson
555 Broadway, NE Suite 200
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Press On Image to Enlarge

The Social Security Administration
Office of Disability Adjuciation and Review
Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson
555 Broadway, NE Suite 200
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Press On Image to Enlarge

The Social Security Administration
Office of Disability Adjuciation and Review
Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson
555 Broadway, NE Suite 200
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Exhibit #B Letter to Chief Administrative Law Judge/November, 2012
Question Violation Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court Order

Mr. Chris Walters
SSI 261-90-6357
C/o 1243 N Patterson
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Monday, November 17th, 2008

The Chief Administrative Law Judge
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1608
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255

RE: ORDER OF DISMISSAL 11-14-2008 Quashed
by Several ORDERS Of US Courts:


I have just received an ORDER OF DISMISSAL from a ALJ Mark R Dawson in New Mexico which has already been quashed by ORDER of 2 US District Court Judges and 2 US Circuit Court of Appeals Et all... I had asked your staff several times over the last 2 years to explain why they had cut off payment of medical bills and cash benefits in California and a number of minor items. Several Judges explained that all legal questions are reserved to review by US Courts only.

ALJ ORDER OF DISMISSAL Admits It Is Frivolous

ALJ Mark Dawsons ORDER OF DISMISSAL appears to cite many attempts by several Administrative Law Judges to hold hearings to address a non-existent SSID benefits claim which he correctly states has not existed for years. When I originally applied for SSI in 1997 I applied for SSDI based on advice of legal counsel…. I discharged legal counsel to represent myself after finding they are at least as incompetent as the Administrative Law Judges.
ORDERS Quashing Request Made by ALJ-Principal of Just Lithigum
Cited: ssi/clinton/index15c.htm

The Social Security Administration has previously appeared by and through counsel and demanded the right to process Chris Walters SSI claim without medical records and without Chris Walters being permitted to appear at hearings or to move hearings thousands of miles from where the claimant resides. The claims made in Walters v. Crownover, Miller CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT (Affirmed 5th Circuit 1997); Walters v Apfel CA 99-CV-0668 USDC District of Columbia and Walters V Apfel USDC, WDT Civil A:99CA0156SS. In a legal Tour De force Assistant North Carolina Attorney General Dorthy Powers explained in David Bradshaw vs Chris Walters & Carmen Odom Case 04CVS2674 Superior Court, NM that as representative of the Social Security Administration they have the right to suspend any portion of the law whenever they so wish and were continuing to exercise the right to throw away Chris Walters medical records... While Congress declined to amend Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act the ORDERS of the several Courts granting SSAs extraordinary request are still valid and in force. Just Litigium or justice has been served means neither myself nor your staff have any legal standing to step over the body of the ruling.
Current ORDERS Quashing ALJ Findings
ssi/nm/index.html
ssi/zzcontract/index2.htm
I dont want to be a stickler for details but for us to have a legal action someone has to disagree on some fact of law. When SSA issued their denial in February 2, 2007 I filed the action of law Walters v Asture in USDC, NM 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP the record shows service of process on the US Attorney and Commissioner. No litigation occurred because your staff waived right to counsel and demanded to make a statement of fact and law that I am disabled and didn’t even explain what my disability is. Based on the informal settlement and lacking any controversy I asked for the Courts permission to withdraw the Complaints which both Judges ruled is “Well Pleaded” The closure was quickly affirmed by the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals. The Honorable US District Court Judge Judith Herrera had ruled that resolution of legal communications between myself and Social Security must occur in under the supervision of a US District Court pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(h) Judicial Review

I am unaware of any civil actions for damages against ALJ cited Judge Dawsons ORDER. When I lived at the Plaza Suite Hotel in New Mexico for 9 months your staff admitted their questions were occurring in the wrong venue. Based on admission that venue did not reside in California the 2nd civil action Walters v. Asture CV-380-08 before the Honorable Judge Scott was subsequently withdrawn.

The only controversy which occurred was that I sent your Technical Expert Betsy Huber a nice arrangement of flowers and commendation for her excellent work and a free diner to Case Manager Davis in Lodi, CA. Your staff explained in a written letter that SSI applicants are not permitted to commend employees for their excellent work and provide minor thanks.
Would Embarrassing Errors of
ALJ Staff Merit Additional Litigation?
ssi/index.html
As with many previous documents from ALJ the ORDER OF DISMISSAL continues to make statements that arent supported by Plaintiffs Exhibit C a United States Source Document submitted as “Evidence and Testimony Before Congress or existing facts. While the ALJ states they don’t know where I am Deputy Commissioner of Operations Linda S McMahon mailed me a current letter affirming residence here dated October 14th, 2008. The online records document exactly where I am at all times; why I am present; how much it cost; where I stayed.
I bet youd love to appear in a US District Court and explain Mr. Walters is a psychopath as described by your staff. Well you see your Honor there are numerous commendations in newspapers concerning his volunteer work doing public service. Uh Your Honor we know but failed to mention that Mr. Walters was a volunteer field investigator for HUD programs from 1986-1997 where he work created what 4 federal statues….? Yes your Honor we know Mr. Walters was also the first National 911 Administrator for a 15 state area and has hundreds of commendations from law enforcement and government. Yes your honor we know Mr. Walters has never been seen by or treated by a mental health specialist. Yes Your Honor we lied when we stated Mr. Walters has an extensive history of convictions for threatening public officials because he has never met an Administrative law or Federal Judge in person. Yes your honor we threw away Chris Walters 200 some odd doctors and even disability statements from SSI doctors and don’t have a fuzzy clue as to why Mr. Walters is disabled. We could go to a Court of law to prove that Chris Walters is disabled and entitled to SSI but who needs the embarrassment?
Request To Strike ORDER OF DISMISSAL As Frivolous /Unlawful
http://www.geocities.com/chrissaidthanks2007/ssi/index.html
I mailed a letter to the US Magistrate in US District Court, District of Columbia and suggested that if the Administrative Law Judges are all that concerned with the online audit of the Social Security process-let Social Security purchase the rights to the materials under color of attorney fees; training activities. We have been in litigation for 11 years If you staff needs something important just drop me an email.

With Kindest Regards
Chris Walters, Prevailing Counsel Before Congress
nims2006@gmail.com

From "cmecfbb@nmcourt.fed.us" to cmecfto@nmcourt.fed.us
date Dec 16, 2008 11:28 AM
subject Activity in Case 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP Walters v. SSA Letter

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court
District of New Mexico - Version 3.2.1
Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 12/16/2008
at 10:28 AM MST and filed on 12/10/2008
Case Name: Walters v. SSA
Case Number: 1:07-cv-257
Filer: WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 04/17/2007
Document Number: 32

Docket Text: Letter by Chris Walters (ma)

1:07-cv-257 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Chris Walters Chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
1:07-cv-257 Notice has been delivered by fax to:
1:07-cv-257 Notice has been delivered by USPS to:
Courtesy Email Bar Association WDT
Good Afternoon Federal Bar Association

I am prevailing counsel in a successful action in Title 42 USC Chapter 7 for SSI Benefits which were approved before several years ago. We have an interesting question of law where several Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judges are filing briefs prohibited by 2 US Circuit Courts of Appeals and several US District Courts apparently seeking to quash Court rulings. The Courts have ruled and Circuits Affirmed that after the Social Security Commissioner issues his/her final denial in a claim the jurisdiction of review exist with the US Courts pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Source documents cited in these briefs

Social Security Case History:

Link

Jonder to Congressional Committees

Link

Report On Pending UN Sanctions or Liabilities Database:

Link


Rates Cited Based on USDC SDNY

500 Pearl Street, New York
New York 10007-1312
1. Mailed first class Monday, November 17th, 2008
Legal Costs $2.25
Postage $1.79
Counsel's Time to Prepare Documents
2 Hours at $110.00 Hour=$220.00

Total $221.01

5th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges
Case- 99-50174
USDC,WDT CA: SA-97-CA-1313
600 Maestri Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Main Number (504) 310-7700
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

Exhibit #C Unlawful Communication from Office of Hearings and Appeals/October 2008
Question Violation Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court Order


Press On Image to Enlarge

The Social Security Administration
Office of Disability Adjuciation and Review
Deputy Commissioner Linda McMahon

Press On Image to Enlarge

The Social Security Administration
Office of Disability Adjuciation and Review
Deputy Commissioner Linda McMahon

5th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges
Case- 99-50174
USDC,WDT CA: SA-97-CA-1313
600 Maestri Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Main Number (504) 310-7700
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER #13
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

Exhibit #D Confirmed Kills-Judicial Misconduct Replies From Circuit Executives
ALJ Sandra Rogers Stockton,Ca and ALJ Mark Dawson, NM


Press On Image to Enlarge

Before Office of Circuit Executive
United States Courts for the Tenth Circuit
Byron White United States Courthouse
1823 Stout Street
Denver, Colorado 80257

Press On Image To Enlarge
Before Office of Circuit Executive
United States Courts for the 9th Circuit
95 Seventh Street
San Francisco, CA 94103

Press On Image To Enlarge

Director Susan Wakshul
Division of Field Procedures
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
5107 Leesburg Pike Suite 1608
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255

5th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges
Case- 99-50174
USDC,WDT CA: SA-97-CA-1313
600 Maestri Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Main Number (504) 310-7700
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER #14
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime


The Alamo

300 Alamo Plaza,
San Antonio, TX
(210) 225-1391

Addressed To the Honorable Magistrate Judge Alan Kay

United States District Court
District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Exhibits E Letter To Judge McKay & Move To San Antonio, Texas
This is an apparent attempt by Administrative Law Judges to Quash the final ORDER and ruling of several US District Courts and US Circuit Courts of Appeals. Needless to say it didn't make it.

The Menger Hotel

204 Alamo Plaza
San Antonio, TX 78205

Exhibit E Letter to US Magistrate Judge Alan Kay/November, 2008
Question Violation Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court Order


Addressed To the Honorable Magistrate Judge Alan Kay

United States District Court
District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 354-3000
The Social Security Administration
Asked For What?
RE: Question of Law Deferred to Court Which has
Been Prohibited By 5th & 10th US Circuit Courts of Appeals et all

Your Honor:

I wanted to thanks the United States Social Security Administration for dropping by the United Nations High Commission On Human Rights for the last 11 years by and through legal counsel and allocuting to terrorist activities; crimes against humanity; and possibly genocide. These extraordinary request were made while officials were apparently asking if they could amend the key provisions of the largest item in the US Budget Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations and Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act. Many of the questions are executable offenses and violation of International Law which might be best addressed by putting the Social Security Administration into control of a "Special Master" and then using direct Military Intervention through deployment of "Special forces" to guarantee adherence to the "Rule of Law" is also found online:

1. ssi/fgj/index.html
Statement of Concurrent Jurisdictions Before
Congress & United Nations Statement of Concurrent
Jurisdictions Before Congress & United Nations
107thcongress/service/service.htm
ssi/index.html
Exotic questions of law from Social Security apparently proposing to amend Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations and Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act were moved in a timely and appropriate matter to both Congress and the United Nations where the House Committee On the Judiciary has established a clear cut right of Congressional Jurisdiction and both have a clear cut right at this time to impose Sanctions The question of law is found on Plaintiff Exhibit C filed in USDC, New Mexico as a well established United States Source Docuument submitted as "Evidence and Testimony" to several US Congressional Committees and is also an excellent and comprehensive case history and is also cited on the line website:

1. ssi/index.html
The United State Wanted What Which Is
Prohibited By How Many Court ORDERS?
I have received another in a series of endless correspondences from Social Security Administration this one from Law Judge Mark R Dawson New Mexico Dated November 14th, 2008 (Appended Exhibit A) in the Social Security Claim of Christopher A. Walters (261-90-6357). At least 2 US Circuit Court of Appeals and the several US District Courts have ruled that such request are unlawful pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H). Judicial Review The several US Circuits and US District Courts have issued ORDERS and Findings that the questions of law are reserved as fact and law to the US District Court for the District of Columbia. ALJ Mark Dawson admits in the body of his Order of Dismissal that no claim fof SSI Disability benefits exist and makes claims as fact and law which appear to be supported by the finding of no court of law(to this point in time). The US District Court may have a jurisdiction under Title 18 USC 402 Contempt or possibly might have a means to convience the Social Security Administration they won their claim in April, 2007 in a US District Court. The ORDER Of Dismissal suggest the Administrative Law Staff is simply embarassed and who wouldn't be? I might suggest a painless solution
Counsel's Proposal For Extra Ordinary Settlement?
1. Don't send any additional legal communications to Chris Walters that have not been signed and approved by a United States Attorney with notations of federal bar membership

2. The massive extraordinary request from SSA for exotic legal questions which have been deemed inappropriate by Congress might be the basis of appropriate legal fees for Chris Walters

3. The parties at bar might consider that the operational audit of the Social Security case from 1997-2008 demonstrates substantial operational impediments in the social security process which might in and of themselves sustantially violate the rights of claimants to services and benefits.

4 Purchase Plaintiff Exhibit C the Social Security Audit for $20,000 which would show that Chris Walters made $2,000 a year going back 10 some odd years as a training activity and skill builder.

5. Having achieve ownership of the document which seems to be an embarrassment the Administrative Law Staff can do with it whatever they wish.

Respectfully Yours
Prevailing Counsel Before Congress
c/o 1243 N Patterson
Winston Salem, NC 27101

cc: Addressed To The Social Security Appeals Council
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255

Attached Exhibits

1. ORDER of Dismissal Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson 11-14-2008
2. List of ORDERS prohibiting additional conversation outside of Court.
3. Plaintiff Exhibit C

Rates Cited Based on USDC SDNY

500 Pearl Street, New York
New York 10007-1312
Mailed first class Monday, November 17th, 2008

Legal Costs $2.25
Postage $1.79
Counsel's Time to Prepare Documents
2 Hours at $110.00 Hour=$220.00

Total $221.01

Citation of Authority To Close Further Litigation


5th US Circuit Court of Appeals

600 Camp Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Questions Before 5th US Circuit Court Of Appeals
Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges Case- 99-5017
Exhibits Cited

Press On Image to Enlarge

ORDER MAY 10TH, 2004
US Circuit Court of Appeals
For The Fifth Circuit
600 Camp Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
(504-310-7700

Press On Image to Enlarge

ORDER April 5th, 2007
Honorable Judge Judith Herrera
United States District Court
New Mexico
200 E. Griggs,
Las Cruces, New Mexico 88001

Press On Image to Enlarge

ORDER April 29th, 2008
Honorable Judge Robert Scott
Before the United States District Court
US District of New Mexico
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

5th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges
Case- 99-50174
USDC,WDT CA: SA-97-CA-1313
600 Maestri Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Main Number (504) 310-7700
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

Exhibit #F Don't Move To Seattle/ December, 2008


Greyhound
Greyhound Trip To New Mexico
& Back Costs About $300.00
A $237.00 bus trip to New Mexico to file briefs to answer Administrative Judge Mark Dawson's question in several locales and a $237.00 bus trip back to the Eastern US. I inquired if I should drop into Seattle, Washington and work on my vocational training program and the social service network explained it would be a very bad time to stay in the shelters because of massive homeless population which is growing because of economic downturn.

The Lutheran Compass

77 South Washington St.
Seattle Wa 98104-3499
Impediment #25 Don't Come To Seattle
To Do Job Training At This time!
The Case manager of the Lutheran Compass Center reports they are extremely crowded and have an unusually large homeless population which is having problems finding shelter and my appearance by greyhound would constitute a major imposition

Greyhound
Greyhound Back From Western US
Too San Antonio & Costs About $300.00
$237.00 Greyhound bus trip back from Western United States also goes near San Antonio, Texas. Because many of the irregular request for Social Security hearings are coming from San Anotnio I will stop in San Antonio maybe for the winter and see if I can figure out exactly what is they want.

Willow Inn & Suites

900 W Rice Street
Blythe, California 92225
Willows Motel
$43.95 for motel night in Willows, California 12/04/08

Exhibit #G Salvation Army Employee Goes On Binge/ December, 2008


The Salvation Army Lodge

c/o 308 S Aylesford St,
Big Spring, TX 79720
Impediment #26 Salvation Army Manager
Goes On Binge Threatends To Close Shelter
The Salvation Army manager had explained I could stay in the Lodge here for an extended period of time-due to circumstances this did not work out. Saturday, December 13th, 2008 the Manager of the Salvation Army Lodge John Woods went on a drinking binge beat his wife. When the Commanding Officer caught him he made public statements to every homeless person in town the Salvation Army intends to close the shelter on a permanent basis effective 1-26-2009. John went on to explain other Salvation Army shelters in Odessa; San Angelo; Midland and Fort worth were also being closed. John's public statements apparently drew the comments to the attention of the Salvation Army Divisional Office who issued this statement that John is full of BS:

Too: chrissaidthanks2005@gmail.com
From: "Valerie_Monteith@uss.salvationarmy.org"chrissaidthanks2005@yahoo.com, council@mybigspring.com, editor@bigspringherald.com, gfuqua@mybigspring.com, valerie_monteith@uss.salvationarmy.org, viewpoint@kwes.com

Friends,

Please be aware that the below email sent to us this morning did not come from myself, or any Salvation Army offices. It is full of inaccuracies and false information. Please disregard.
Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Thank you.

The Salvation Army Lodge

855 Hays St,
Kerrville, TX 78028
Salvation Army Gets
$18 Million Expansion From Joan Kroc Estate
Joan Kroc McDonald's Heiress left $1.5 billion for the Salvation Army to expand community centers into needy communities. The Salvation Army Lodge gives clients 2 or 3 days stay before running them out of town.

November, 2008
$422.00 Legal Costs
November-December, 2008
1. $221.00 Legal Brief Exhibit #483

2. $221.00 Amicus Curiea Brief to Magistrate Judge McKay Exhibit #484

Total: $422.00

November, 2008
$600.00 Operational Costs
November-December, 2008
1. $600.00 cover Greyhound, transportation, motel fare, and meals on the road

Total: 600.00

Blackletter Law Requirements Operational Audits


Blackletter Law Requirements
Blackletter Law
Executive Fiat or ORDER 1997
The Social Security Administration appeared at Bar in USDC, WDT Walters v Miller, Crownover and exercised their sovereign authority to limit all activities related directly or indirectly to Social Security to a few authorized protocols listed above. Challenges to the Social Security Administrations soverign authority is prosecuted Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Former US Attorney General

Alberto Gonzalez
US Department of Justice

Former US Attorney Gregg Fouratt

555 South Telshor, Suite 300
Las Cruces, NM 88011

Social Security Inspector General

Fraud Hotline
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Title 18 CRIMES & Impediments 2008
1. Operational Imediments
Total: 26
2. Computer Hacking
Total: 1
3. Theft of US Mail
Total: 1
4. Title 18 USC Obstruction Court ORDER
Total: 16
5. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy defraud US
Total: 0
6. Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of laqw
Total: 2
7. Genocide or Assassination Attempts
Total: 0
8. Sedition or Treason
Total: 0
9. Other Violations of Title 18
Total: 1
10. Total Violations
Total: 22
Medical Treatment & Costs 2008
1. Hospital Visits
Total: 0
2. Clinic Visits
Total: 5
3. Hotels Nights
Total: $43.65
4. Transportation Costs
Total: $785.00

Advanced Medical Directive

Requires Contract to Provide Medical Services
Why Is The United States Going Broke?
Medical Failure Equal Profit for Hospitals and Doctors
Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

Citation of Authority & Audit of Operational Audits 1997-2017
Review of Possible Federal Crimes and Operational Impediments


US Senator Mark O Hatfield

Chairman Senate Appropriations
Salem,Oregon

Former US Congressman Henry B Gonzalez

Chairman Banking & Urban Affairs Committee
San Antonio,Texas 78205

US Congressman Tony Coelho

House Majority Whip
Modesto, CA 95354

Congressional Work Ethic Can
Result In Your Being Volunteered or Drafted

It seems that many Chairman of Congress believe in the concept of work ethic and if they find you on Capitol Hill or too close to something they are working on will actually have someone volunteered or simply drafted. I-5 Cooridor Agreement origionally on covered portions of California, Oregon, and Washington but was rapidly expanded by the national leadership to include a third of the United States. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez caught me on Capitol Hill about 1988 circulating one of my publications and had me introduced to the HUD Inspector General.. This assignment lasted until about 1993 when the Clinton Administration came into power and replaced me with 2 convicted persons who according to press reports were paid $80,000 a year plus expenses..

Infrastructure Protecton Programs

Chris Walters
Survey Coordinator
Background On Audits &
Surveys Done For US Government ...
The author has worked in the security and private investigations industry for 40 years typically wears a uniform carries a fire arm and protects facilities with insured value into billion dollar range. Services and contracts with the United States Government begin in 1997 and include

1. 1-5 Corridor Agreement study authorizations for surveys in 15 states 1986

2. Directory Model Social Service Agencies

3. Organized Crime Ties to US Dept HUD Confirmed Kills

4. Federal Law CSBG US Senator Mark O Hatfield

5. Welfare Reform Act 1986

6. Food Stamps For Homless Act US Congressman Tony Coelho

7. Audits USDA Programs confirmed kills

8. Audits US Postal Programs confirmed kills

9. Terrorist in Social Services confirmed kills

8. Spyware Act of 2005 2nd Federal Law 2015

9. Emergency Management Authorizations1993-2013

10. Emergency Management Structure 15 States1993-2013

11. Operational Audit Social SecurityExecutive ORDER 1997-2015

Server and Internet Operated

By Liquidnet in United Kingdom
Joinder to United Nations
In 1999 the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals authorized a special jonder of study programs and human rights issue to the United Nations The program materials are located in the United Kingdom.

Former US Attorney General

Alberto Gonzalez
US Department of Justice

Former US Attorney Gregg Fouratt

555 South Telshor, Suite 300
Las Cruces, NM 88011

Social Security Inspector General

Fraud Hotline
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Prosecutable Federal Offenses
1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities what appears to be a large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect.

Former US Senator Pete Domenici

505 South Main, Suite 118
Loretto Town Center
Las Cruces, NM 88001 Fax

Former Special Agency In Charge

T Mc Gleagham FBI
4200 Luecking Park Ave. NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107
New Mexico "The Most Corrupt State In the United States"
Updated: Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 4:28 PM MST
Published : Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 1:16 AM MST
Reporter: Tim Maestas ,/br> Web Producer: Bill Diven

ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) - A retiring FBI agent in the thick of investigating and prosecuting public officials said Tuesday New Mexico may be the most corrupt state in the nation. New Mexico has a long list of corrupt politicians, and the list could be growing. High-profile political figures and associates have been convicted, and ongoing investigations are making frequent headlines. Many of those cases began with FBI agents in Albuquerque.

"It's our No. 1 criminal program," Thomas McClenaghan, special agent in charge of the FBI Albuquerque field office, said. Corruption scandals that took down former state Sen. Manny Aragin, once considered the most powerful politician in the Senate. Former State Treasurer Robert Vigil, his predecessor and a long list of criminal accomplices have been convicted or cut plea deals in federal court.

McClenaghan will lead Albuquerque's team of FBI agents only through the end of the week. He retires on Friday. "From what we've seen here, corruption in this state is epidemic," he told KRQE News 13. "It is at all levels of government." New Mexico is not alone, of course. Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich is at the center of a federal investigation that had him arrested late last year. At the time Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant of the Chicago FBI field office had little good to say about how Illinois does political business. "If it isn't the most corrupt state in the United States, it is certainly one hell of a competitor," Grant said.

McClenaghan's take? "All I can say is Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant never worked in New Mexico." That's a strong statement from a man who's made it a point to pursue political corruption aggressively. When his agents went after Vigil, then the sitting state treasurer, undercover video showed a California financial consultant who was cooperating with the FBI handing him $10,000 in cash. At Vigil's first trial jurors couldn't decide whether he was guilty or not, and ultimately the evidence was not enough to convict him on 23 counts of racketeering, conspiracy and extortion. However Vigil was eventually convicted on one count of attempted extortion in 2006.

Former US Attorney General

Alberto Gonzalez
US Department of Justice

Former Bush Advisor Carl Rove

"King Carl"
White House
1. Exhibit Page #17 The Social Security Approves Disability/Medicade Extensive Frauds In USDC, NM Addressed by Congress: Feburary, 2007-July 2007

2. Exhibit Page #18 Social Security Begins To Default On Agreements April-October 2007

3. Exhibit Page #19 Social Security Contract Obligations Search For Affordable Housing In 2007

4. Exhibit Page #25 Social Security Administration's Secret Hearing & Request For Unauthorized Review Generates $15,000 Capital Loss

5. Exhibit Page #27 Motion For Reconsideration Denied By Judge Robert Scott USDC NM June, 2008-August 2008

6.
Exhibit Page #31 Can Social Security Administrative Law Judges Over Rule Federal Judges & US Circuit Courts of Appeals? November-December, 2008

7. Exhibit Page #35 Operational Audits July, August, September 2009 Budget Program Cuts Eliminate Services-Options

8. Exhibit Page #36 FBI Director Mueller Apologies US Senate Committee ON Judiciary July 2009-September, 2009