Press On Image For Brief

On Black Letter Law

President Bill Clinton

1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, DC 20501

USAG Janet Reno

US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, DC 20530-0001
202-514-2000

Social Security Commissioner

Kenneth Apfel
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Walters v Crownover Miller
USDC WDT
1. Exhibit A Amicus Curiae Filed With Court Seeks No Relief But Simply Asks A Technical Question of Law From SSA & Texas

2. Exhibit B Memorandum of Law In Support of Amicus Curiae Brief Review Rights & Losses In Current Government Programs

3. Exhibit C Memorandum of Law In Support of Amicus Curiae Brief Review Rights & Losses In Current Government Programs

4. Exhibit D Texas State Pleading of Jurisdictional Authority Social Security Administration Requires Submission of Evidence In Social Security Claim
Walters v Crownover Miller
USDC WDT
5. Exhibit #E Deportation To Stockton, California Question of Kidknapping or Genocide-To Prevent Chris Walters from Attending Hearings July, August, 1997

6. Exhibit F Ruling and ORDER USDC, WDT Issues With Plaintiff In Absentia

7. Exhibit #R Appeal to 5th Circuit Court of Appeals & Appeal Ruled Untimely Dated 1999



Walter Giffard, Lord of Longueville

B 978-Died: 1084, Longueville-sur-Scie, France

John Walter(s) (Waters)

Crest York Herald
Birthdate: circa 1420
Died March 28, 1502
Burial: Christ Church Newgate
London, England, UK

Col. William Waters,

House of Burgess
b. Abt 1622, Blount Point, Virginia,
d. 29 Jul 1689, Accomac,
Accomack county, Virginia,
Margaret Robins
b. Abt 1625, Virginia,
United States Pleads "Divine Right Of Kings
To Win Friend of Court Brief?
The Plaintiff file a Friend of Court or Amicus Brief under Title 18 USC 4 Misprision the felony which seeks no relief. Both the State of Texas and Social Security Inspector General answered the challenging their own jurisdictional authority pleading the "Divine Right of Kings" Decades before Donald Trump became President of the United States the folks here in Texas proved they are also crazier than a Shit House Bat which in year 2024 still continue
The Plaintiff Is Decendant of English & French Royalty
Walters are English & French Royalty who invaded and ruled Wales for 700 years and if memory serves the Magna Carta ended governments claim to being "Divine"

Exhibit A Amicus Curiae Filed With Court Seeks No Relief But
Simply Asks A Technical Question of Law From SSA & Texas


Honorable Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, Texas 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711-2548

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Why United States Is Going
Broke/Review of Losses & Factors October, 1997
This Amicus Curiea brief asked the United States and Social Security Administration and State of Texas if they are entitled to Chris Walters medical records and reviews problems in homeless problems and delays in medical programs. The Defendants appeared by and through counsel and suggest something in the brief requested some legal relief from them other than answering a technical question at law. The Defendants deported Chris Walters SSI claim to Stockton, CA to prevent Chris Walters from attend SSI hearings and to prevent Chris Walters from participating in Court proceedings while he was out of town.

The social Security Administration asserted it's technical right to process an SSI claim without medical records and without the applicant being able to attend hearing as explained by Assistant Texas State Attorney General Morgan in his brief on "The Divine Right of Kings". This means the government can violate the law whenever it wishes. Apparently the government felt it had not be adequately punished for extensive delays in social services and needed to pay more money:

The Social Security Administraton's subsequent processing an SSi claim without medical records and without Chris Walters being able to attend hearings generated massive 3rd party complaints from officials attempting to fulfill their officials duties even as late as 1998 as can been seen from this link Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson long loud scream that there is no case history. How could a case history exist when SSA processed a claim for 10 years without medical records or hearings?

Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
COMPLAINT
Now Comes The Plaintiff Chris Walters before the Honorable United States District Court, Western District of Texas in this Action At Law and Complaint to Wit:

1. Jurisdiction: This action is mandated by law by Social Security Administration, Title 7 USC 2011 food stamps, required by Title 18 USC 4 Misprision the felony and permitted under Title 28 USC 1343 (a)(3) as cited by Magistrate John Primo on 12-30-93 in Walters v. Raiford SA93CA1115.

2. Cause of Action: Chris Walters is required by law to provide medical information to Social Security Administration in case 216-90-6357 in claim worth $200,000 and Texas Department of Human Services in Food Stamp Claim 014935835 questions violation of USDC Order SACV891214 Irma Villarreal v. Mosbacher as evidence of possible federal crimes is apparent is required by Title 18 USC 4 Misprision the felony

3. Relief Sought: Pursuant to Title 18 USC 4 Misprision the felony Chris Walters seeks the permission of the Court to proceed with enclosed Amicus Curia brief over existing alleged criminal and civil rights violations to provide medical information to the Social Security Administration through the offices of Inspector General David C. Miller and offices of Lori E. Crownover of Texas Department of Human Services.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se Registered Voter At:
910 W Commerce
San Antonio, Texas 78206

Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Your Offer to Pay More Taxes?
Having already receive many tens of thousands of dollars in taxpayer services I was stunned by your generosity to offer to squander another $110,000.00 in my support. My brief on my social security claim reviews your magnanimous offer: The actual cost of supporting a homeless person for one day and night might be estimated at roughly $30.00: if the estimate includes such real and hidden costs such as value of bed, cost of buildings, pay and benefits for staff, cost and value of "volunteers" and support staff; value of free clothing and hygiene items, value of food, value of medical treatment... $30.00 a day is about $900 a month or a value of almost $11,000.00 a year.

Our society funds such activities through Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless act; Title 7 USC 2011 food stamps; state homeless programs; FEMA; non profit agencies; donations to charities..... In May 1997 a surgeon Dr. Steph of Tyler, Texas removed a plum size tumor from Chris Walters groin which had for 5 years made it impossible for Chris Walters to bend, stoop, lift and was a substantial disability. Dr. Steph took a whole 10 minutes to remove a tumor which 9 other medial authorities neglected for 5 years through incompetence, malpractice, misdiagnosis and mistreatment, interference from uninvolved 3 parties. The cost to the American taxpayer to support Chris Walters for 5 years was $55,000.00 because of the lack of a simple 10 minute treatment.

Can we see evidence of the role medical malpractice, incompetence, fraud, hoaxes, and shams in relation to the Social Security Claim 261-90-6357, Texas food stamp case, and violation of Chris Walters rights under 5th and 14 Amendments which proposes to squander another $110,000.00 in taxpayers dollars and other benefits?

Amicus Curia Brief
Prepared By Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro
Se 910 W Commerce,
San Antonio, TX 78206

Exhibit B Memorandum of Law In Support of Amicus Curiae Brief
Review Rights & Losses In Current Government Programs


Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Review of Past Treatment, Evidence
And Actions By Competent Medical Authorites
1. Chris Walters grandmother, and mother known as Doris Walters/Kunzler, and Clifton Frank Walters all died of cancer and it is believed within 2 or 3 years of when they were first diagnosed and treated for cancer. A subpoena of medical examiner records at Harris County, Texas can for 1960 can bring forth records relating to death of Clifton Frank Walters and a subpoena records for medical examiner at Bexar County can bring forth admissible evidence concerning death of Doris A. Walters/Kunzler in April, 1995.

2. Chris Walters Exhibit A is a statement of Dr. Steph of Tyler, Texas that he excised a "Post op excision of melanoma of neck" and " post op excision tumor supra public area" on May 23, 1997. Smith County Indigent Health Care Case 9705537 can be subpoena to establish the presence of over $2,000.00 in medical bills as prima facie evidence.

3. Chris Walters Exhibit B is a statement of Dr. Posey of DCH Regional Medical Center dated 7-05-97 and prescribed course of medical treatment to "stay out of sun" to avoid increased risk of skin cancer. Chris Walters can also establish through direct evidence that he was given verbal instructions to avoid unneeded exposure to the sun by Dr. Steph and Dr. Thompson to avoid unneeded risk of additional cancer.

4. Chris Walters Exhibit C is a written referral from Dr. Hilda Thompson of Tyler, Texas made on 8/29/97 to have possible melanomas evaluated by a dermatologist.

5. Disability Established on Competent Medical Prescribed Course Of Treatment: Obviously Chris Walters disability would preclude employment in "day labor" or on "construction sites" most commonly the type of work done by "homeless persons"; require Chris Walters to wear long sleeve shirts; take other precautions; and for instance limits where Chris Walters can habituate or live. Chris Walters couldn't for instance simply habituate or move into West Texas, New Mexico, or Tuscon, Arizona in the summer because Chris Walters health would be adversely affected by another big dose of solar radiation and direct prolonged exposure to the sun.

7. In May, 1997 Chris Walters was given a preliminary examination and competent and prescribed course of treatment by a Dr. Fleisher a Texas Board Certified Gastro Intestinologist of Tyler, Texas. Having considered Chris Walters 40 year history of disabling gastro intestinal problems and family history;, Dr. Fleisher prescribed a course of medical treatment which included:

a. Immediate referral to competent "onocologist" or cancer specialist.

b. Chris Walters placed on medication "Librax" whose medical affect on Chris Walters body is to cause between 10 and 30 bowel movements a day depending on such variables as dosage, what Chris Walters eats,.....as later diagnosed at Baptist Hospital in San Antonio, TX in 2009

c. Prescribed a "colonoscopy"including evaluation and presence of qualified GI specialist.

d. Evaluation is to be followed by diagnosis and treatment by qualified GI specialist.

8. Chris Walters medical treatment by Dr. Fleisher was interrupted by a non profit agency in Tyler, Texas who felt Chris Walters disability might be a means of turning a profit through free labor.
Discussion Of The Role Frauds, Hoaxes, Shams Play
In Paying Chris Walters Additional $500.00 A Month
A question of a little humor to lighten up your wallet? The food stamp case worker in Tallahassee, Florida in April, 1997 explained to Chris Walters a person already established to be disabled that if he wanted something to eat he should "slap a police officer upside of the head" while another worker attempted to send Chris Walters to work as a dishwasher at Cafe D Lorenzo. Many parties have expressed some humor at the idea of Chris Walters a federally certified carrier of Hepatitis C working in a food preparation area or being asked to slap a police officer. Since you are probably smiling at these events the Administrative Law Judge over there will ask me to give you this ink pen and paper and sign.

The Administrative Law Judge in the social security claim will see a disability which is not being addressed to probably ask you wallet to pay Chris Walters at least two month disability or about a $1,000.00. USDA Civil Rights Director Gloria McColl who receive the complaint in USDC, NDF 4 97 CV 297 MP is apparently more concerned with a violation of Americans With Disabilities Act.


Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Meet $500.00 worth of Stupidity: Meridian, Mississippi , Attorney Katherine Blackwell requested Chris Walters be given an extension for a week or two for shelter at Community Action Agency in Meridian, Mississippi for evaluation of social security and health needs which the shelter director granted in June, 1997. The weekend employee ran Chris off by explaining he could not use the 1 working bathroom in the shelter while Chris is on a medication causing up to 25 bowel movements a day. The Administrative Law Judge states your wallet has been raped again to the tune of $500.00

A little attitude worth $1,000? The nonprofit agency in Birmingham, Alabama handing health care and Dr. Johnson of Cooper Green Hospital apparently were quite put out when housing arrangements promised to Chris Walters by the Salvation Army failed to appear. It seems the medical folks got caught calling a Community Action Agency in Tuscaloosa, Alabama in July, 1997 and asking them to make sure Chris Walters receive no treatment or assistance. The Firehouse Shelter in Birmingham, Alabama decided that all homeless persons have too attend drug and alcohol treatment even if they don't have such a problem because it is tied to their federal funding. As an SSI applicant Chris Walters cannot engage in any "treatment" which is not prescribed by a qualified competent medical authority. The Administrative Law Judge will ask you to open your wallet and pay $1,000.00 for incompetence and some attitude for July and August, 1997. The Region IV Civil Rights Division of Health and Human Services at Atlanta, GA is sort of going through the motions of handling a complaint on behalf of your wallet.

Drop Dead Therapy Cost $500.00: The Dr. Foster at Longview, TX made a written request to Salvation Army Lodge for a 1 day extension for Chris Walters to have surgery. The social worker told Dr. Foster to drop dead and the Administrative Law Judge will of course pronounce your wallet legally dead for May, 1997 to the tune of $500.00. Maybe we can have the medical examiner declare your wallet legally dead, hold a funeral and bury your wallet so no one can find it.

Slavery Impacts on Your Wallet? The Salvation Army Lodge manager in Tyler: Openly professing the right to keep Chris Walters disabled and prevent him from receiving "free medical service" as a "non tax payer" was certainly honest in explaining why he discontinued Chris Walters medical treatment in May, 1997 and September, 1997.

Both the Salvation Army and another "Christian Shelter" explained Chris Walters would not get to see a GI specialist, dermatologist, cancer specialist or receive other medical attention your wallet desperately requires. What exactly was the compelling reason the community discontinued medical treatment?

The shelters are part of the $143 Billion dollars a year non profit industry which requires lots of free labor to support their business interest. Exactly how a disabled person who practically lives in the bathroom on a medication which causes up to 25 bowel movements a day is supposed to work on the "construction site" or work on the Salvation Army Truck moving furniture remains a great and profound mystery. The Administrative Law Judge at the Social Security Hearing may explain your wallet is in for some serious surgery.

Has "Rashid" Crapped in Your Future? As "Rashid" an employee of the Social Security Administration explained he is aware Chris Walters has moved out of Tallahassee, Florida; that attorney Charles Tyler Clark of Birmingham, Al has instructed the Social Security Administration to move the claim to Alabama; and that Chris Walters is on extended leave of absence to seek medical attention as docketed in 2 US District Courts.

"Rashid" explained he would refuse to move the case to Alabama; go on ahead and hold SSI hearings knowing that Chris Walters is out of state and violate the equal protection and due clause of the 5th Amendment. After this stunt the Administrative Law Judge may want to know if you can just simplify things and sign your paycheck over to Chris Walters?

University Health Systems Did What? It finally looked like your wallet might get a some long deserved relief from University Health Systems in San Antonio, Texas in their case 0056 5286 9400 in October, 1997. Good fortunate seemed to smile on your future when Chris Walters's diagnosis and treatment began apparently in earnest under direction of Dr. K Mauck who prescribed a battery of medical test. Unfortunately University Health Systems repeatedly refusal to grant Chris Walters written and repeated request to have process include experienced and competent dermatologist, cancer specialist, and GI specialist whose experience might represent your wallet's best interest.

Wouldn't it be nice if we could accept the statements of the college children (medical students) that they preformed the miracle cure of the century and Chris Walters has no disabilities? The Administrative Law Judge will want to know exactly how the children cured Chris Walters risk of dying of genetic predisposition to cancer; why Chris Walters is no longer at risk of skin cancer from exposure to the sun; and about the surgical removal of and cauterization and treatment of 16 growths without pain killer. Exactly what the children did to treat and cure Chris Walters long standing GI problems beyond trying to take Chris Walters off "prescribed medication" with no other competent treatment remains a great mystery.

Will Administrative Law Judge Give You A Fair Shake? We have reviewed the extensive history of frauds, hoaxes, and shams surrounding Chris Walters social security claim and considering how much damage the medical conditions have already caused to your wallet. The Judge might show some mercy and place Chris Walters on SSI. SSI is $5,000 a year cheaper than the estimated $11,000 you are currently spending; will grant medicare which might bring in qualified medical professionals to find a permanent cure; and provide everyone involved freedom of action from overt interference from third parties such as the non profit industry which capitalizes on disabilities.


Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Government Policies In Conflict
With Employment
Is Employment a viable option? If Chris Walters disabilities are "healed" is employment a viable and reasonable option or are the Social Security Administration, Texas Department of Human Services, Chris Walters, and others whipping a dead horse? Why don't we review a few of the existing precedents which revolve around this question?

Arrest of Persons Seeking Work?: Judge James Redden (R) ruled in Walters v. InterAgency Council on the Homeless (92 CV 1631 RE USDC,Oregon) that if Chris Walters if found engaged in a "for profit activity" on the property of a "non profit agency" using mail, messages, or other facilities he is subject to prosecution for violating the nonprofit agencies non profit status. The Judge cited the precedent New Orleans v. Dukes in supporting the governments position that sales of a $10.00 computer disc occassionally through the mail of a multimillion dollar concern such as the Union Gospel Mission at Salem, Oregon constituted a dire threat to the public welfare. The government's compelling interest apparently did not extend too the Mission's extensive thrift store and other overt business interest. Chris Walters cannot be required to violate a USDC Order which might result in his prosecution no matter how ludicrous the cause might be. The Order in question precludes Chris Walters from not only using message phone, mail, of a nonprofit but from being a "Volunteer" at a nonprofit because such activities lend themselves to profitable interest of the agency. The US Department of Justice certainly did an admirable job of shafting any credible work efforts by Chris Walters.

Extensive Criminal History? Various parties might ask if Chris Walters could do such in door work as clerk, security guard, computer clerk or other bondable position inside a building. The City of Troy Alabama Police asked twice in 1995 how Chris Walters a person who has never been tried in a "criminal proceeding" in any court of law anywhere could have an "extensive criminal history". The printout from the City of Troy Alabama Police Department showed a "felony conviction" from City of Dallas Police Department BNO930054616 which stems apparently from a false arrest in July, 1993.

Chris Walters v. Director Louis Freeh, filed in USDC, NV CVS 892 HDM a sked if the "conviction" had been politically arranged or was simply the result of a computer accident? Judge Freeh was provided an opportunity to bring evidence before the Court which might include trial transcripts; information on defense counsel; name of the presiding judge; materials relating to pretrial hearings..... or any other suggestion of process of law. The Administrative Order of the Court assigning Judges was seized by a nonprofit agency at Modesto, CA which prompted Walters v. Deatherage and Austin USDC, EDC Misc 306 GEB. The Presiding Judge Burrell expressed no objections to obstruction of Federal Court Order in question seized to obstruct Walters v. Freeh and suppress legal process. It certainly was generous of FBI Director and Judge Freeh be play the role of the patsy or fall guy for the "convicted felons" at the Dallas Rescue Mission who had Chris Walters arrested while they were trying to steal Chris Walters computer software in hand to hand combat. What were the "convicts" stealing? The software is found at http://www.ci.monroe.la.us/911 and is known as the national 911.

The "Boss" Said Goodbye? Social Worker John Webb at Va Hospital in Big Spring, Texas explained in 1995 thatChris Walters could no longer "volunteer" at the VA Hospital or publish his directory because John Webb was told to get rid of Chris Walters by the "bosses".

Sorry To Hear You Got Fired? In 1995 Wayne McDilda operated the Texas State Homepage on the Internet at http://www.state.tx.us and offered Chris Walters a minor spot as a "public service" . In April, 1997 Mr. Alford explained Wayne McDilda got fired from his position in Texas government for providing the spot to Chris Walters and was as he stated told not to place the publication on Texas Homepage again.US Senator Threatens University of Texas Employee? Paul Roscoe is the reference Librarian at University of Texas in Austin, Texas place Chris Walters obscure publication on the UT homepage some years ago. The world's largest search engine" Yahoo" identified Chris Walters publication as one of the foremost publications in the world in emergency management and made the publication potentially worth a great deal of money. In April, 1997 Paul Roscoe explained to Chris Walters he had to remove the publication from the UT Homepage because of threats made by US Senator Larry Craig of Idaho and Portland Chamber of Commerce to have Mr. Roscoe's employment terminated. It can only be surmised that such action occurred because service offered by Chris Walters on the internet called into question the need for similar services proposed by American Information and Referrals (AIRS) based in the Pacific Northwest (Portland or Seattle). Mr. Roscoe prudently removed the publication from the internet to save him employment with State of Texas.
Meet A $200,000 Claim
If Chris Walters application for SSI benefits made in Tuscaloosa, Alabama on June 26th, 1997 is found to meritorious it will pay Chris Walters a 46 year old male $500.00 a month, or an estimated $6,000.00 a year probably through the year 2030 if Chris Walters lives to age 80. The actual value of benefits in issue and estimated cost of increase of living expenses in issue is over $200,000.00 not counting probable expenses involved in medicare. If a meritorious claim is demonstrated in Texas Department of Human Services food stamp claim 014035835 Chris Walters will receive many thousands of dollars in benefits. All or most of the parties involved are required by law to consider either "Prima Facie Evidence" or "clinical evidence" secured from qualified and competent medical authorities.

Exhibit C Memorandum of Law In Support of Amicus Curiae Brief
Review Rights & Losses In Current Government Programs


Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Florida Governor Neuters Federal Prosecutor? In 1996 Florida Governor Lawton Chiles of Florida wrote a recommendation for ChrisWalters publication which took 7 days to cross Tallahassee, Florida. It is generally believed that the mail was being obstructed by the federal prosecutor who was removed last October, 1996 . The idea of telling the Governor who he could and could not speak too apparently didn't go over very well.

"Vested Political Interest Protected by "Some Powerful Person"? The number of persons, groups, and organizations who suggested they have been subjected to harassment, intimidation, or threats for working with Chris Walters is so large a substantial computer list is kept to maintain the growing list. In May, 1990 Chris Walters had a meeting at HUD with Assistant HUD Inspector General Thad Stanuil who reviewed why his office was given instructions to stay away from low income programs. As Mr. Staunil explained he was told to stay away from the programs his offices was supposed to investigate by "some powerful person".

Sham Replaces Origional JTPA Program? The Jobs Training Partnership Act operated in the 1980's paid half the employee's wages to the employer as incentive to hire and provide on the job training to low income groups. The program resulted in payment of full time wages to low income groups including homeless. The progam was elminated by special interest who felt the monies should instead to go "non profit agenices" who use their funding to provide classes to clients who are over 40 years old with information such as how to complete an employment application. The special political interest involved found the origional JTPA program was too effective and provided a means where many of the clients returned to a useful role in society and replaced the program witht he current sham which is does nothing for the welfare of the clients while making money for the non profit community.

Powerful Person Loses Amicus Curia to GAO: Government Accounting Office email inquiry to Chris Walters about possibile irregularities in federal programs is from sysop.osi@gao.gov dated 11:56:09 September 15th, 1997 and request retransmission of information. The reply from Chris Walters includes an computer disc mailed October 1, 1997 by certified US Mail Z 263 540 175 with request for return reciept cost $3.69. Does the loss of the return reciept as of October 22, 1997 suggest the documents were stolen in the US Mail?

Question of National Blacklist? The government no longer official sanction computerized "national blacklist" which identify persons by their name, social security number, date of birth to be denied "gainful employment" As suggested in the book Technospies by Rowan and Martin (1976?) national blacklist are in the age of political correctness is an art practiced under the subtleties of employer/employee relations in the form of background investigations conducted by "former government officials" working as private investigators... for such companies as Equifax, TRW, or the Wackenhut Corporation. As former Wackenhut Employee Bartz Larg testified before the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence he believed the Wackenhut Corporation passed 20,000 names to the "Church League of America" to be denied employment using a national enemy list.
Question of Violation of Chris Walters
Rights to Due Process and Equal Protection
of 5th and 14th Amendments?
Can there be any doubt that attempts by the Social Security Administration to hold hearings when SSA knows Chris Walters has moved out of Florida, and is on extended medical leave of absence is a violation of Chris Walters rights to the due process and equal protection of the 5th Amendment? What fair and equitable process of law allows the SSA to refuse to move a claim to Alabama or any other venue when for instance substantial additional medical findings or other meritorious issues are involved in a new venue?

In 1989 the United States District Court, Western District of Texas ruled in Irma Villarreal v. Mosbacher SACV 1214 that Texas State requirements that indigent food stamp recipients be required to produce "collateral statements" from third parties over whom they have no means of control violated the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. The Court assumed the burden of redressing this violation of civil rights by Ordering the state to comply with it's administration by the USDC from the year 1989 to 1999. The demand by Texas State in food stamp case 014035835 that Chris Walters produce "collateral statements" from a doctor that he is or is not disabled was made by caseworker Moreno in September, 1997. How can Chris Walters a person who is medically indigent and without medical insurance compel a qualified, competent medical authority to produce a statement such as Texas demands?

On October 16th, 1997 Texas Department of Human Services Community Care Worker Lori Crownover of Region 08 Services to Persons With Disabilities attended a seminar for disabled services being held at a downtown San Antonio Church where she met and talked to Chris Walters. Lori Crownover provided Chris Walters her business card and promised to review his case and consider intervention in his food stamp case and to provide Chris Walters bus tokens and a book about cancer. If Lori Crownover's office does indeed intervene and mediate on Chris Walters behalf with the food stamp caseworker or for competent medical diagnosis and evaluation there might not be any serious violation of Chris Walters rights to the due process of the 14th Amendment. If however Texas State is simply engaged in another fraud, hoax, sham and challenge to the standing Order of the United States District Court in Case SA89CV1214 Chris Walters may seek the Court's permission to seek appropriate legal recourse for a violation of Chris Walters rights under due process clause of the 14th Amendment or Extra Ordinary Writs from 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Subponea of Exhibits
If the Social Security Administration Inspector General Miller's Office is interested in pursuing the question of fraud, hoaxes, sham, or simply seeing if the parties involved can get a fair shake and act in the public interest various items can be subpoenaed:

a. Social Security Claim at Tallahassee, Florida.

b. Current Food Stamp Claim of Chris Walters in Texas.

c. Chris Walters computerized records and possibly portions of records of Attorney Charles Tyler Clark of Birmingham, Alabama.

d Medical Records from University Health Systems.

e. Such other records as the parties might require.

Repectfully Submitted by
Chris Walters,
Amicus Curia
Bexar County Registered Voter: #01 619 626
910 West Commerce Street
San Antonio, Texas 78207

Report for GAOMedical Malpratice Cost $55,000


From sysop.osi@gao.gov Mon Sep 15 11:56:09 1997
Received: from viper.gao.gov (root@localhost) by viper.gao.gov
(8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA04436 for; Mon,
15 Sep 1997 14:55:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgateway.gao.gov (mailgateway.gao.gov [161.203.15.2])
by viper.gao.gov (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA04415 for
; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 14:55:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ccMail by mailgateway.gao.gov (SMTPLINK V2.10.04o)
id AA874360306; Mon, 15 Sep 97 14:33:22 EST
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 97 14:33:22 EST
Message-Id: <9708158743.AA874360306@mailgateway.gao.gov>
To: chrisw911@hotmail.com
Subject: Re. Database for proposal US Senate Judiciary Committee

The GAO FraudNET is in receipt of your August 9, 1997, internet message with a 911.zip file.

Please resend your 911.zip file as an e-mail attachment. When we attempted to upziped your file we received an error message. Although, PKZIP for Windows tried to fix the error by creating pkfixed.zip, we were unable to open most of the compressed files in 911.zip. Thank you!

United States District Court
Western District of Texas
SA-89-CA-1214
The Honorable Judge H.F. Garcia
@ San Antonio


Irma Villarreal et al
Plaintiffs



Rob Mosbacher
Defendant
June 14, 1991
Citation of Authority
Irma Villa V Rob Mosbacher: United States District Court, Western District of Texas Civil SA-89-CA 1214 at San Antonio,TX. In an action at law brought under Title 42 USC 1983 the The Honorable Garcia ruled that the requirement food stamp applicants produce "collateral statements" was unconstitutional and violated the due process and equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment because it requires the applicant to secure a written statement from a 3rd party over whom they have no means of control. The Court placed the Texas Department of Human Services into the Court's control for 10 years through 1999 to ensure compliance Texas Department of Human Services
Legal Counsel
701 W. 51st Street
Austin, Texas 78751
P.O. Box 149030
Austin, Texas 78714
(888) 834-7406
(888) 425-6889 (TDD)

Honoable H.F. Garcia
Courtroom Deputy:
Ms. Judy Dietrich
(210) 472-6550, ext. 300
U.S. District Court Judge
655 East Durango Blvd
San Antonio,TX 78206
(210 472-6575
(210) 472-6550, ext. 300

Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Plaintiff Returns From Leave of Absence
Replies To Court, Defendant
1. Chris Walters has been on "leave of absence" for medical reasons asExhibit A demonstrates.

2. Texas State Rehabilitative Services acting as an agent of Social SecurityAdministration deported Chris Walters SSI claim 261-90-6357 to Californiawhere the Plaintiff does not reside as demonstrated in Exhibits B, C.

3. Chris Walters gives Notice to Court, Defendants, and other parties he hasreturned and was informed of an attempt to deliver a legal document at anauxillary mail site an address in Stockton, CA where he does not reside.

3. Application for Penalty on United States filed with the Administrative LawJudge in San Antonio, Texas agrees that the United States has suffered asubstantial loss of rights it was entitled too as suggested by Exhibit D.

4. Exhibit E filed with United Nations acknowledge the United States selfinflicted loss of legal rights as a direct result of frauds, hoaxes, andshams committed and explained by Legal Brief filed by the United Statesand State of Texas as being "soverign and immune".
Discussion On Plantiff Notice of
Removal to United Nations & Congress
The attached Memorandum or Complaint for filing with United Nations,World Court,US Congress and other interested parties concerns request for "biological weapons"made to the Plaintiff from a known terrorist organization under color of state or federal law.

Respectfully Submitted By

Chris Walters, Amicus Curia
Brief Before United Nations
415 Washington Street
Kerrville, TX 78029
Certificate Of Service
I Chris Walters, Plaintiff in the above Amicus Curia Cause of Action do stateand affirm that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document and attachedExhibits was mailed by First Class United States Mail on this ________day ofJanurary, 1999 from Kerrville,Texas too:

United States Attorney		Texas Attorney General
US Department of Justice	Civil Division	
816 Congress Ave #1000		PO Box 12548
San Austin, TX  78212		Austin, TX 78711-2548

US Attorney General
Janet Reno
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave North
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

Exhibit D Texas State Pleading of Jurisdictional Authority Social Security Administration
Requires Submission of Evidence In Social Security Claim


Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Citation of Title 42 USC 423(d)(5)(b) Disability insurance benefit payments
6 Required Protocols In Social Security Application Process
As correctly cited by State of Texas in their brief the Social Security application process has 6 authorized protocols which include

1. SSI Application and initial review

2. SSI reconsideration

3. Administrative Judge Review

4. Appeals Council

5. Commissioner's Final Determination

6. Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review provides for the Commissioner's final determination to be reviewed in a United States District Court by a federal judge

7. Title 42 USC Sec 423(d)(5)(b)Disability Insurance benefits payments (B) In making any determination with respect to whether an individual is under a disability or continues to be under a disability, the Commissioner of Social Security shall consider all evidence available in such individuals case record, and shall develop a complete medical history of at least the preceding twelve months for any case in which a determination is made that the individual is not under a disability. In making any determination the Commissioner of Social Security shall make every reasonable effort to obtain from the individuals treating physician (or other treating health care provider) all medical evidence, including diagnostic tests, necessary in order to properly make such determination, prior to evaluating medical evidence obtained from any other source on a consultative basis.
Citation of Hallex Social Security Administrative
Rules of Evidence & Procedure
Hallex Volume 1

Hallex Volume 2

Hallex Volume 3

Supreme Court of the United States

1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Telephone:202-479-3000
US Supreme Court Commands The
Due Process & Equal Protection of the Law
Congress providing for protection of civil rights including the right to vote. Specific Rights Defined By United States Supreme Court Rulings. The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

Federal Bar Association, San Antonio Chapter

P.O. Box 460878
San Antonio TX 78246
United States Pleads Divine Right of Kings
Challenges It Own Statutory Authority
The actions of the Social Security Administration seems to be intend on voiding various provisions of Title 42 USC Sec 423(d)(5)(b)Disability Insurance benefits payments and the Hallex Codes by requiring a claimant to proceed through an SSI claims without medical records; holding hearings thousands of miles from where parties reside, and other bizarre and unusual claims not apparently supported by statute. Question of Impeachment of Judges Fred Biery & Mathy involve docket items #9-26 where numerous motions; filing; and other matters were heard and ruled upon without service on Counsel Chris Walters in violation of his 5th Amendment rights to the Due Process of Law. Violation of Chris Walters right to submit evidence at hearings and appear in hearings may violate Deprivation of rights under color of law

Former Assistant Johathan B Morgan
Texas State Attorney General
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711-2548
(512) 463-2100

Former Assistant Johathan B Morgan
Texas State Attorney General
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711-2548
(512) 463-2100

Exhibit #E Deportation To Stockton, California
Question of Kidknapping or Genocide-To Prevent Chris Walters from Attending Hearings July, August, 1997


Press on Image to Enlarge

Demand Plaintiff requested attend hearing
in Stockton,CA
Deportation To Stockton, CA
Secret Hearings Docket #9-26 Operational Impediment #9
Question of Impeachment of Judges Fred Biery & Mathy involve docket items #9-26 where numerous motions; filing; and other matters were heard and ruled upon without service on Counsel Chris Walters in violation of his 5th Amendment rights to the Due Process of Law. Violation of Chris Walters right to submit evidence at hearings and appear in hearings may constitution a violation of Deprivation of rights under color of law

1. Texas Department of Human Services Disability Services Link This department states it would not accept amicus curiea in USDC to provide them information their website states they are required by law to have

2. Allocuation to violation of Human Rights: Texas Department Voc Rehab Source 68: Mike Ballard Texas Department of Rehabilitation Spoke by long distance stated my claim was being deported to California to make sure the hearing was so far away I could not attend. Austin,TX Title 18 USC 2261a Interstate Stalking Called my relatives house to track me down. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Defraud United States Using SSI to cause harm or injury to client Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law Violated 5th and 15th Amendments right to due protection and equal rights.

3. Social Security Administration July 27, 1998 Directed Chris Walters by letter to attend "Reconsideration" held in Stockton CA the next day. 1004 Junction Highway Kerrville, TX 78028 (830-895-1422) Letter from SSI Office SSA Regional Office Texas

4. Order Dismissal by Judge Fred Biery Missing document-can be ordered from Clerk of USDC

J Florez/17,

Disability Eval Analyst II
California Department
of Social Services
PO Box 997120
Sacramento, CA 95899-9866
(559) 733-2231
Disability Determination
August 21, 1999
J Florez/17,
Disability Eval Analyst II
California Department
of Social Services
PO Box 997120
Sacramento, CA 95899-9866
(559) 733-2231

Patient# DDS CASE NUMBER: 230760
Date Seen: Aug 21, 1999: Comments: Held hearing without my being able to attend; reply and Texas apparently threw away records

Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Citation of Authority Question Violation
Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
Chris Walters was not invited to or permitted to attend the reconsideration subsequently held in Stockton, CA. The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.


4. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

5. The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

6. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Honorable High Commissioner
Navanethem Pillay United Nations High
Commission on Human Rights
OHCHR unog
8-14 Avenue de la Paix 1211
Geneva 10, Switzerland

International Criminal Court

Fatou Bensouda,Prosecutor
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
Post Office Box 19519
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands

Remigiusz Achilles Henczel
President
Human Rights Council
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) Palais Wilson 52 rue des P�quis
CH-1201 Geneva, Switzerland
Question of Violations of
UN Human Rights Treaties/Genocide Code
1. statements of the Social Security Administration that it is empowered to deny citizens the right to submit evidence during their hearings; require applicants to move to communities choosen by Social Security officals; or deny persons medical treatement or demand bondage, peonage, or servitude on behalf of 3rd parties appear to challenge International Law & Treaty which can be reviewed pursuant to the 1503 Complaint Process do not permit 3rd party joinders but are limited to diplomatic processes.

2. Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948

a. Article 4 No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

b. Article 8 Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

c Article 25 Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

2. International Covenant Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

a. Article 9 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to social security, including social insurance.

b. Article 12. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health... d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness.

3. International Covenant Civil and Political Rights

a. Article 12. Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.

Article 14 b.. All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law....

2. Question of Sanctions for violation of diplomatic immunity and obstruction of Congress.

Exhibit F Ruling and ORDER USDC, WDT Issues With Plaintiff In Absentia
Dismissal For Want of Additional Prosecution & Amended Complaints


Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
.CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
.CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
.CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313
Dismissal For Lack of
Continued Prosecution

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Press On Image To Enlarge
US District
Presiding Judge Fred Biery
US Magistrate Robert OConnor
Court Western District Texas
U.S. District Clerk's Office
655 East Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, Texas 78206

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Walters v Crownover Miller

USDC, WDT
CA: SA-97-CA-1313

Exhibit #R Appeal to 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
& Appeal Ruled Untimely Dated 1999


Hon Fred Biery

USDC WDT
655 E Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, TX 78206

David C Williams

SSA Inspector General
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Johathan B Morgan

TX SAG
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

Asst USA Gary Anderson

601 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Tx 78216
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services
Notice of Appeal
NOW COMES THE Appellant Pro Se Chris Walters to give Notice of Appeal to the United States District Court, Western District of Texas too the United States District 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to Wit:
Jurisdiction
Sec. 1291. Final decisions of district courts The courts of appeals (other than the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States, the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court of the Virgin Islands, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court. The jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall be limited to the jurisdiction described in sections (c) and (d) and 1295 of this title.
Cause of Action
The pleadings and actions of United States and Texas State and ruling of Presiding Judge Fred Biery are in conflict with 3 Supreme Court rulings on due process and have drawn into question the Constitutionality of Social Security Act i.e. Matthews v. Eldridge VA, 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18; US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. . D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436 Galveston vs.Press Ca1954, 74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911
Relief Sought
Appellant Chris Walters Prays for the Honorable United States Circuit Court of Appeals to correct and set aside the errors of United States and Texas which were provided in this Amicus Curia Action filed in the United States District Court.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters
Appellant Pro Se
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, Texas 78028
(830-896-3030)

5th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges
600 Maestri Place
New Orleans, LA 70130-3408
Charles R. Fulbruge III, Clerk
David E. Young, Chief Deputy Clerk

Chris Walters,
Appellant Pro Se

vs.

SSI Inspector General
David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services

Presiding Judge Fred Biery
US 5th Circuit # 99-50174
CA: SA-97-CA-1313
Appeal from the United States District Court
For Western District of Texas

Before Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges.
By The Court
This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessar. Mosley v Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660(5th Circuit. 1987) Rule 4(a)(1)(b), Fed. R App. P., requires that the notice of appeal in a civil action in which the UnitedStates or an officer or agency thereof is a party be filed within 60 days of entry of the judgement or order from which appeal istaken. In this civil rights case, the final judgement was entered on November 19, 1998 (according to the distrit court's docket Therefore, the final day for filing a timely noticeof appeal was Tuesday, Janurary 19, 1999, because the sixtieth day was a legal holiday. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(3). The plaintiff filed his pro se notice of appeal on Feburary 11,1999 well outside the prescribed period. The time limitation fortimely notice mandates dismissal ofthe appea. Robbins v Maggio,750 F 2d 405, 408 (5th Cir. 1985)

APPEAL DISMISSED

Press On Image To Enlarge

5th US Circuit Court of Appeals
600 Camp Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Main Number (504) 310-7700
Questions Before 5th US Circuit Court Of Appeals
Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges Case- 99-50174 Removed to United Nations
a. Notice Plaintiff Returns From Leave of Medical Absence

b. Notice of Appeal

c. 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals Dismissal of Appeal as untimely. April 10,1999>


Press On Image To Enlarge

USA Freedom Act 2015
USA Liberty Act 2017


Former President Barrack Obama

The Whitehouse
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Secretary Jeff Johnson

US Depart of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528
Freedom of Speech-So Let It Be Written And Let It Be Done
Leads To Passage of US Freedom Act of 2015
In 2015; US Senator Patrick Leahy the Dean of the US Senate and Congressman James Sensebrenner of House Committee on Judiciary cosponsored the USA Freedom Act of 2015. The US Congress passed the USA Freedom Act to curb abuses of US Patriot Act based on idea that most citizens didn't need the permission of government to speak; communicate or forfeit their rights to privacy without due process of law. The widespread abuses included the CIA breaking into computers of US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence; gathering of metadata from all sources which is only useful for blackmail and extortion; and sustained electronic warfare attacks against United Kingdom a sovereign country where the internet service provider is located.

The United Kingdom is not subject to the laws of the United States and persons, groups, and organizations facilitating terrorist or electronic warfare attacks are legitimate military targets. The materials on this website are submitted as "Evidence and Testimony" before the US Congressional Committees and no members of the Courts or Executive Branch of Government can server legal process on Capitol HIll . Provisons of US Patriot Act for warrantless searches was declared unconstitutional in USDC,DC by Judge Richard Leon in Klayman v Obama As the Obama Administration continues to challenge the Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution it will be interesting to see how many officials get removed or have to resign from public office for abuse of power. The Watergate Hearings rebuked the doctrine that government officials are above the law and blessed 40 government employees with 200 years in prison for violation of

Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Press On Image To Enlarge

USA Freedom Act 2015
USA Liberty Act 2017


United Nations Security Council

UN Secretariat Building
New York, New York 10017
Acts of War Directed Against the United Nations & United Kingdom
By 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals
History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

US Senator Larry Craig

225 North 9th Street, Suite 530
Boise, Idaho 83702

US Senator Larry Craig Said No
You Will Be Punished!
When US Senator Larry Craig isn't busy molesting policement in the bathroom of the Minnesota Airport he seems to spend a lot of time engaged in computer hacking and terrorist activities in his home state of Idaho and Unniversity of Texas At Austin, TX

Hon Thomas O Rice

USDC, WDW
2:13-cv-00001-TOR
920 West Riverside Ave
Spokane, WA 99201

Michael E. Horowitz

USOJ OIG
2:13-cv-00001-TOR
Washington, D.C. 20530

Michael C. Ormsby, USA

2:13-cv-00001-TOR
P.O. Box 1494
Spokane, WA 99210
Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General
Question of Constituionality of US Patriot Act
& FBI Charter For Abuse of Law Enforcement and Intelligence Assets
Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

US Senator Sam Erwin

Democrat From North Carolina
WaterGate Hearing
Photo From Allen Green Blog
Washington, D.C. 20510
US Attorney General John Mitchell, Haldeman
Erlichman; Dean Blessed With 200 Years in Federal Prison
Violation of Counsels papers was used to prosecute US Attorney General John Mitchell, Haldemann, Erlichman, and Dean and 40 some off other federal employees who were blessed with collective 200 years in federal prison by USDC Judge Maxmimum John Sirrica under Deprivation of rights under color of law The breakin at the Watergate Hotel was the beginning of the end for renagade law enforcement activities whose neutering was supervised by US Senator Frank Church Chairman of US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, (D)Idaho

Appendix B Blackletter Law & Roman Model
For Enforced Migration of Low Income Populations


Blackletter Law Requirements
Blackletter Law
Executive Fiat or ORDER 1997
The Social Security Administration appeared at Bar in USDC, WDT Walters v Miller, Crownover and exercised their sovereign authority to limit all activities related directly or indirectly to Social Security to a few authorized protocols listed above. Challenges to the Social Security Administrations soverign authority is prosecuted Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Advanced Medical Directive

Requires Contract to Provide Medical Services
Why Is The United States Going Broke?
Medical Failure Equal Profit for Hospitals and Doctors
Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

Roman Model

Press On Image To Enlarge
The Roman Model-Enforced Migration
For Homeless Programs
Link As in Roman Times the migration of low income groups to major cities created many problems. The modern day policy of enforced migration broadly violates United States Supreme Court Williams v Fears and US V Guest

Appendix C Citation of Federal Authority


US Senator Mark O Hatfield

Chairman Senate Appropriations
Salem,Oregon

Former US Congressman Henry B Gonzalez

Chairman Banking & Urban Affairs Committee
San Antonio,Texas 78205

US Congressman Tony Coelho

House Majority Whip
Modesto, CA 95354
Exhibit C Submitted As Evidence And
Testimony To Congress-Exclusive Jurisdiction
You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings
Standing US Court ORDERS
And Black Letter Law
Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Congressman Bob Goodlatte

ChairJudiciary Commmittee
2240 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515

US Senator Lloyd Bentsen

Contact Tony Kuntsen
United States Senate
Washington,D.C. 20510


Press On Image

Library of Congress
101 Independence SE,
Washington, DC 20540
Citations 1983-2020

Government Accountability Office

441 G St., NW
Washington, DC 20548

Acting US Attorney General

William Barr
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chrsisti Grimm
Acting Inspector General
HHS Inspector General
PO Box 23489
Washington, DC 20026

Gale Ennis

SSA Inspector General
SAIG Fraud Hotline
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Prosecutable Federal Offenses
1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Press On Image To Link

National Security Death Warrants
Or Amnesty Application
Execution of Public & Private Interest
Engaged In Sedition; Insurrection & Other Challenges
1 The Political Patronage Systems controls the government and prevents normal protections to entire classes of citizens aiding acts of genocide, criminal activities; terrorist activities... A large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus or lesser sections while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect. Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities

1. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez 1983 was Chairman of the Powerful Banking Committee during the time the S&L Scandals and crisis occured. The Congressman's hometown of San Antonio profited from the repayment of monies which are described below

2. Home of Federal Grand Jury 2002-2006 San Antonio city, local and federal persons form a permanent line of convictions to federal grand jury and prison while working hard to block my medical work

3. This link concerns Congressional Investigations of Haliburgon where it was discovered the company former owned by VP Dick Cheney was over charging the US DOD for billions of dollars.

4. Human Rights Violations 1997 Social Security claims "Divine Right Of Kings" to violate human and civil rights of it's own citizens

5. Fictious conviction 1993-1996 attempt to create and maintain a conviction without trial; judge; jury or any record of court proceedings

6. Local Church 1999 steals $10,000 from me and my interestate business.The San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries and others joined forces to destroy Chris Walters business 1999 which was licensed here in San Antonio in 2001 False Credit History 1999 defeated in 198th Judicial District Court of Texas

7. You Buy Your Dope In Church? 2009 San Antonio has extensive history of using social service agencies to traffick drugs.

8. Attempt to Block Medical Treatment 2009 San Antonio Rescue Mission tells Baptist Hospital I can recover at their shelter and then denies me services for life

9. Dain Kunzler 2011 self professed terrorist explaines in great deal he has been threatening various persons, groups and organizations I receive services from in front a a US District court no less

10. Tyler Texas Blocks Medical Treatment 2012 under new Governor Rick Perry new Rules to prevent seniors from receiving Medicaid

11. Texas Attempts Overturn Rulings 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals has attempted to Quash 4 US Circuit Court of Appeals & USSC.

12. Pastor John Hagee SA possible attempt to acquired nuclear weapons access in Montana.