US Supreme Court Rulings ON
Misuse of NCIC Criminal History Exhibit #8
You may have never even have been arrested; however the FBI probally has an extensive criminal history on you. The
United States District Courts have ruled that Congress did not authorize the Federal Bureau of Investigation to slander, liable,
and defame your good name and reputation:
Tarlton V Saxbe
(1994)11 165 App DC 293. 507 F2d 1116. case remanded (DC Dist Col) 407 F Supp 1083 "Congress did not intend to authorize FBI
to damage reputation of innocent individuals in contravention of settled common law principles hence, Congress did not intend
through USCS 534 to authorize FBI to disseminate in accurate criminal information without taking reasonable precautions to prevent inaccuracy;
dissemination of inaccurate criminal information without precaution of reasonable efforts to forestall inaccuracy restricts subject's
liberty without any procedural safeguards designed to prevent such inaccuracies to permit FBI to disseminate inaccurate criminal
information without FBI making reasonable effort to prevent inaccuracy would be tantamount to accuse individuals of criminal conduct
without ever providing such individuals opportunity to disprove that accusation: reliable and responsible performance of record-keeping
function requires such reasonable care as FBI is able to afford to avoid injury to innocent citizens through dissemination of
The Court also rules in McKnight v Webster
(1980,Ed PA 499 F Supp 420)
"FBI has duty to request correct information
from local law enforcement agencies which initially reported Plaintiff
arrest when Plaintiff informs FBI it's records are inaccurate."The
scope and intend of the law Title 28 USC 534 Acquisition, preservation....
was clearly to acquire and maintain records on crime and "criminals"
for the good of the country>
The Court also rules in Mendard V Mitchell
(1971, DC Dist (24 Col) 328 F Supp 718, remanded on other grounds 162 App DC 284, 498 F2d 1017,28 ARL Fed 248...(
superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Utz v. Culliname, 172 App DC 67, 520 F2d 467)
"File of arrest records is designed only to facilitate coordinated law enforcement activities between federal
and local government, that is, to assist arresting agencies, courts, and correctional institutions in apprehension, conviction, and
proper disposition of criminal offenders."
Jurisdiction over rights to due process can also
be found in Constitutional Laws 318 56,257, and 992.
As the Constitution Guarantees:
Article the seventh [Amendment V]
No person shall be held to answer for a capital,
or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment
of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval
forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War
or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same
offense to be twice put in jeopardy or life or limb; nor shall
be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process
of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without
Article the eight [Amendment VIII]
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial
jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained
by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory
process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
c/o Salem Union Gospel Mission
345 Commercial St NE
Thank you very much for sending me a copy of the Report on Political Terrorism In
the Homeless Issue. I appreciate your taking the time to provide me with this information, and hope you will continue
to keep me information of your opinions on issues of national interest.
Best Wishes Sincerely
Signed Bill Bradley
United States Senator
Sat Aug 2 14:28:51 1997
Sat, 2 Aug 1997 17:36:41 -0400
2 Aug 97 17:18
EDT Received: from ccMail by mailexch.senate.gov
From: Senator SENATOR@SHELBY.SENATE.GOV
Thank you for your recent e-mail message to my office. I am glad you took
the time to contact me.
I am always interested in receiving the views of Alabamians, and
responding to my constituents is a top priority of my office.
Utilizing the Internet will make my office even more accessible.
Reply From US Congressman Porter Gross
Chairman of US House Committee
U.S. House Permanent Select
Committee On Intelligence
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003
From: Goss, Porter
Subject: Thank You!
I am so pleased that you have taken the time to contact my office via e-mail. The Internet has been a wonderful tool
which has opened up a new and welcome avenue to receive input and advice from my constituents in Southwest Florida. It has
also increased the amount of communication from people all over the world.
Because of the inability to ensure that the complete text and integrity of my response will remain intact through e-mail,
it is not possible to provide a personal e-mail reply to each individual message I receive. However, be assured that my
office reviews all e-mails and tallies those that include an address from Florida's 14th Congressional District.
If you have a problem or concern that needs immediate attention, feel free to contact any of my offfices directly:
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Building F, Suite 212
Naples, FL 34112
Reciept From United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-5225
Fax: (202) 224-9102
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:32:34 -0400
This is an automatic response generated by my Internet mail system to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail message.
I appreciate the views and suggestions of citizens and want to thank you for taking the time to write. As you might expect, however, the convenience of e-mail has increased the volume of constituent communications significantly, and I regret that I am unable to respond personally if you are not a Utah resident.
If you are a Utah constituent, and you have included your postal mailing address with your e-mail message, I will respond to your concerns as quickly as possible via U.S. mail.
Again, I appreciate your views and your interest in matters of public policy.
Sincerely,Orrin G. Hatch
United States Senator