It is the job of local,state, and federal prosecutors to enforce and prosecute all laws with fairness and equity and not deny any person the equal protection of the law (14th and 5th Amendments. This Link Political Patronage Briefly reviews how the political patronage system entices local prosecutors and others to refuse to enforce the law. This Link former US Attorney General Eric Holder also addressed serioius abuses of prosecutorial authority

US Congressman Bill Pascell has efforts to have nursing homes regulated by CMS by US Department of HHS which was revolked by Trump Administration.2 Million dead (250,000 a year) since 2014 as a result of medical error. The online databases show that actually began paying in 2010 to deny patients treatment for pre-existing conditions and block prosecution:

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
910 W Commerce St
San Antonio, TX 78206
210-224-5838
Plaintiff

vs.

Manuel Flores
Student Conduct Officers
San Antonio College
1300 San Pedro Avenue
San Antonio, Texas 78212
et all....
Defendants
Civil Case:
SA97CA1327
Recieved By Clerk:
Oct 28,1997

As Counselor Flories explained this stranger walks up one day and proceeds to explain his role in what he describes as an extensive conspiracy to deny me my Social Security benefits. I was very impressed with what Mr. Flores describes about my background and history with no imput from me.

1. The denial of appropriate medical treatment specified in the patients advanced medical directive shown at the borrom of the page or with chronic medical history of life threatening issuesis likely to result in servere injuries or death

a. Patient Rights To Be fully informed by a physician of his or her total health status and to be afforded the opportunity to participate on an immediate and ongoing basis in the total plan of care. (42CFR §483.10(c))

b. Be fully informed in advance about care and treatment and of any changes in care or treatment that may affect the resident. (42 CFR §483.10(c)(2),(4))

c Participate in planning care and treatment or changes in care or treatment unless adjudged incompetent or otherwise found to be incapacitated under State law. (42 C.F.R. §483.10(d)(3), 42 CFR §483.10(c))

d. To receive all information that is material to his or her decision concerning whether to accept or refuse any proposed treatment or procedure. (42 CFR §483.10(c)(5)(6))

2. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials as the operation of fact and law. Online documents

3. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Good

Malignant Melanoma 5/97
GI Evaluation pending
Condition: temporary
Status of Employability:
unemployable due to X Physical
Lengthy of Disability 3 months
Physician Signature:
Typical physican signature
can't read ID# 12639
Date: 9/25/97

Agency 1: SAMM SHELTER
Agency 2: Texas Department of Human Services
Agency 3: St.Vincent De Paul
Social Work Agency Referral BCHD#531-20-ns 2/94

2. X ray Technician During Lower GI Series Brady Green Source 523 N Leona St San Antonio, TX 78207 (210) 358-3400 Note: X Ray Technician UHS during lower GI series Patient: wow what is that section of gut that looks like strangled cat gut on the camera? X ray Tech: Might be a stricture of decending colon. Patient: Take a picture of it. X Ray Tech: The doctor would have my ass if I photographed that without her being present. X ray Tech: Just relax and don't worry before we begin shooting pictures I will pump enough air into that area to inflate anything

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services

This Link Case History These legal actions are administrative law questions largely seeking administrative law ORDERS from mistakes apparently made to Social Security staff. The United States Attorney Gary Anderson and Texas Assistant State Attorner General Morgan filed briefs explaining they could violate the law whenever they wish and operate their programs without judicial review by any court of law under the "Divine Right of Kings" and as guaranteed by Title 42 USC Sec 405(g)(h)Judicial Review. "Divinity included holding hearings in states I do not reside in; throwing away medical records; and other kingly activitis. After 10 years Social Security Commissioner makes his final denial and then demanded an out of court settlement.:

Some of the pleadings by the Defendants submitted during this hearing suggest Texas and the United States operated under the "Divine Right of Kings" having the right to suspend the rule of law and statute whenever it pleases them. Claims of Nobility and Divinity are prohibited by the United States Constitution

Congress providing for protection of civil rights including the right to vote. Specific Rights Defined By United States Supreme Court Rulings. The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

2. The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

3. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

Link Hi there and welcome to the Social Security Administrations Cafe of Death serving the world famous Heptitis Burger by our own professional plague carrier Chris. My offical finding of 7-12-1999 suggested Chris might consider employment in the food service industry-Whataburger for instance. I neglected to send Chris a copy of my findings so Chris had to pay $50.00 to ride 60 miles a copy of the report ...and read the opinion of a doctor he has never met...

1. Hearing Request

2. Question of frauds by AOJ in offical proceeding

3. AOJ Questions 9 Old Fools on Supreme Court
Question of Fairness and Equity?

I inherited $45,000 and as this link suggest moved to Kerrville, Texas in 1999 and opened a small publishing company on emergency management. The local community spent most of their time robbing me and my business of about $10,000 in property and equipment. That they came back in 2011 and tried to have me thrown out of a nuring home in Boise Idaho gives an indication as what type of people live in Kerrville, Texas.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services

Question of Impeachment of Judges Fred Biery & Mathy involve docket items #9-26 where numerous motions; filing; and other matters were heard and ruled upon without service on Counsel Chris Walters in violation of his 5th Amendment rights to the Due Process of Law. Violation of Chris Walters right to submit evidence at hearings and appear in hearings may constitution a violation of Deprivation of rights under color of law

1. Texas Department of Human Services Disability Services Link This department states it would not accept amicus curiea in USDC to provide them information their website states they are required by law to have

2. Allocuation to violation of Human Rights: Texas Department Voc Rehab Source 68: Mike Ballard Texas Department of Rehabilitation Spoke by long distance stated my claim was being deported to California to make sure the hearing was so far away I could not attend. Austin,TX Title 18 USC 2261a Interstate Stalking Called my relatives house to track me down. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Defraud United States Using SSI to cause harm or injury to client Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law Violated 5th and 15th Amendments right to due protection and equal rights.

3. Social Security Administration July 27, 1998 Directed Chris Walters by letter to attend "Reconsideration" held in Stockton CA the next day. 1004 Junction Highway Kerrville, TX 78028 (830-895-1422) Letter from SSI Office SSA Regional Office Texas

4. Order Dismissal by Judge Fred Biery Missing document-can be ordered from Clerk of USDC

Chris Walters was not invited to or permitted to attend the reconsideration subsequently held in Stockton, CA. The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18 2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436 3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

4. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

5. The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

6. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs. CA: SA-97-CA-1313
SSI Inspector General David C.Miller
Lori E. Crownover
Texas Department of Human Services

NOW COMES THE Appellant Pro Se Chris Walters to give Notice of Appeal to the United States District Court, Western District of Texas too the United States District 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to Wit:

Sec. 1291. Final decisions of district courts The courts of appeals (other than the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States, the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court of the Virgin Islands, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court. The jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall be limited to the jurisdiction described in sections (c) and (d) and 1295 of this title.

The pleadings and actions of United States and Texas State and ruling of Presiding Judge Fred Biery are in conflict with 3 Supreme Court rulings on due process and have drawn into question the Constitutionality of Social Security Act i.e. Matthews v. Eldridge VA, 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18; US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. . D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436 Galveston vs.Press Ca1954, 74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911

Appellant Chris Walters Prays for the Honorable United States Circuit Court of Appeals to correct and set aside the errors of United States and Texas which were provided in this Amicus Curia Action filed in the United States District Court.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters
Appellant Pro Se
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, Texas 78028
(830-896-3030)

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters
Michael Horowitz
2:13-cv-00001-TOR Walters v. Horowitz
The Honorable Thomas O. Rice, Presiding

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

The Political Patronage Systems controls the government and prevents normal protections to entire classes of citizens aiding acts of genocide, criminal activities; terrorist activities... A large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus or lesser sections while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect. Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities

1. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez 1983 was Chairman of the Powerful Banking Committee during the time the S&L Scandals and crisis occured. The Congressman's hometown of San Antonio profited from the repayment of monies which are described below

2. Home of Federal Grand Jury 2002-2006 San Antonio city, local and federal persons form a permanent line of convictions to federal grand jury and prison while working hard to block my medical work

3. This link concerns Congressional Investigations of Haliburgon where it was discovered the company former owned by VP Dick Cheney was over charging the US DOD for billions of dollars.

4. Human Rights Violations 1997 Social Security claims "Divine Right Of Kings" to violate human and civil rights of it's own citizens

5. Fictious conviction 1993-1996 attempt to create and maintain a conviction without trial; judge; jury or any record of court proceedings

6. Local Church 1999 steals $10,000 from me and my interestate business.The San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries and others joined forces to destroy Chris Walters business 1999 which was licensed here in San Antonio in 2001 False Credit History 1999 defeated in 198th Judicial District Court of Texas

7. You Buy Your Dope In Church? 2009 San Antonio has extensive history of using social service agencies to traffick drugs.

8. Attempt to Block Medical Treatment 2009 San Antonio Rescue Mission tells Baptist Hospital I can recover at their shelter and then denies me services for life

9. Dain Kunzler 2011 self professed terrorist explaines in great deal he has been threatening various persons, groups and organizations I receive services from in front a a US District court no less

10. Tyler Texas Blocks Medical Treatment 2012 under new Governor Rick Perry new Rules to prevent seniors from receiving Medicaid

11. Texas Attempts Overturn Rulings 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals has attempted to Quash 4 US Circuit Court of Appeals & USSC.

12. Pastor John Hagee SA possible attempt to acquired nuclear weapons access in Montana.