US Senator John Cornyn

Chase Tower
221 West Sixth Street Suite 1530
Austin, TX 78701

U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison

961 Pickle Federal Building
300 E. 8th Street
Austin, TX 78701

Former US Congressman Charles Gonzalez

B-124 Federal Building
727 East Durango
San Antonio, TX 78206-1286

US Congressman Lamar Smith

Guaranty Bank Building
1100 NE Loop 410
Suite 640
San Antonio, TX 78209

Governor Rick Perry

Office of the Governor
State Insurance Building
1100 San Jacinto
Austin, Texas 78701


Chairman Darrell Issa

Subcommittee Courts, ....
House Judiciary Committee
2269 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-3906

Congressman Jim Jordan

Subcommittee On HealthCare
1524 Longworth House Office Bldg
Washington, DC 20515
T (202) 225-2676

Chairman Jason Chaffetz

House Oversight Committee
2157 Rayburn HOB
Washington,DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5074
Fax: (202) 225-3974
Exhibit C Submitted As Evidence And
Testimony To Congress-Exclusive Jurisdiction
You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings
Standing US Court ORDERS
And Black Letter Law
Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

US Senator Chuck Grassley

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
Wahsington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-7703

US Senator Ron Johnson

Chairman Senate Oversight
Whistleblower
340 Dirksen SOB
Washington, DC, 20510
(202) 224-4751

Congressman Mike Thompson

House Ways and Means Committee
2300 County Center Dr. Suite A100
Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Former President George Bush Jr

1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, DC 20501

Former HHS Secretary

Mike Leavitt
Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201

Commissioner Jo Anne B. Barnhart

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

Exhibit Page #14 December 2005-March 2006
Table of Contents

1. Link to Exhibit Page 13 Washington State DSHS Issues Recommended Federal Grand Jury

2. Exhibit #A Dr. Canon Agrees To Hold My Mail Makes Me Return to Texas To Pick Ruling of Appeals Council It Up December, 2005

3. Exhibit #B Order & Finding from Appeals Council 12/14/2005

4. Exhibit #C Violation Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of Rights...? Dr. Canon Says Welcome to My House Feburary-March, 2006

5. Exhibit #D Appeals Council & I Fired Attorney Tom Mosley Janurary, 2006

6. Exhibit E-H Interception of Mail Withdraw Appeal/Hearing In Wrong Venue/Congressional Review Feburary, 2006

7. Exhibit #E Technical Questions To USA & Senate Title 18 USC 4 Misprison The Felony December 2005/Feburary,2006

8. Exhibit #F Janurary. 2005- Janurary, 2006 Congressional Review Administrative Law Judge Herbert Ruling

9. Exhibit F Interception of Mail Withdraw Appeal/Hearing In Wrong Venue Feburary, 2006 Exhibit #F Request For Clarification of Administration Judge Letter Feburary, 2006

10. Exhibit #G Request For Clarification of Administration Judge Letter Feburary, 2006

11. Exhibit #H Hearing Takes Place In Wrong State/Venue Feburary, 2006

12. Exhibits #I Withdraw DSHS Claim Who Burned Down Pastor's House Feburary 2006

13. Exhibit #J Letter to Administrative Law Judge David Wurm Feburary, 2006

12. Exhibit #K Return to Washington State/Resume Disability Claim/March, 2006

13. Operational Audit 2005-2012

14. Link to Exhibit Page 15 North Carolina-Received Administrative Law Judge Ruling then moved back to Seattle, WA

15. Link to Exhibit Page 15 Washington DSHS Defaults On Contract Recommended For Federal Grand Jury

US Health Works

1151 Denny Way
Seattle, WA 98109
Disability Statement 10-2005

Social Security Administration

office Of Hearings and Appeals
10222 San Pedro Avenue
San Antonio, TX 78216

Dr. Susan Pelzer
SSA Expert
506 Jackson Keller Rd
San Antonio, TX 78216
Partially Favorable Decision
Judge Threw Out All Doctor Records
Administrative Law Judge Ruling April, 2006 where Administrative Law Judge threw away all medical documentation and disability statements previously signed by by SSA

Dr. Robert Cannon

At Goodfellow AFB
Military Intelligence School
I Have To Travel 2000 Miles To Get Appeals Council
ORDER-Operational Impediment #19
Dr. Robert Canon is accepting delivery of my mail at his residence in Austin, Texas and has received the ORDER of the Appeals Council 12-29-2005. Dr. Canon declined to email me a description of the contents or discuss sending it to me via mail. I had to ride a bus 2,000 miles to simply see the ORDER which I actually received 2-8-2006. Dr. Canon who does not eat and dosen't hunt because he dislikes the sight of blood is now packing heavy duty firearms. I can't help to wonder if somone threatened him?


Social Security Administration

office Of Hearings and Appeals
10222 San Pedro Avenue
San Antonio, TX 78216
Partially Favorable Decision
Judge Threw Out All Doctor Records
Administrative Law Judge Ruling April, 2006 where Administrative Law Judge threw away all medical documentation and disability statements previously signed by by SSA. Title 42 USC 423(d)(5)(b) Disability insurance benefit payments and Hallex Volume require Social Security to gather all medical records for consideration in the official record

Dr. Susan Pelzer
SSA Expert
506 Jackson Keller Rd
San Antonio, TX 78216
Judge Admits Testimony Dr. Pfizer
Who Has Never Met Chris Walters
Dr. Susan Pfeizer testifies about what she believes Chris Walters medical condition is who she has never met.

Social Security Administration

Office of Hearings and Appeals
One Skyline Tower
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041

Walters Residence

c/o Dr. Robert Canon
2006-2007
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724

Appeal to Appeals Council

Appeal to Appeals Council made in April, 2006 from Austin, Texas

Citation of Authority: Administrative Law Judge William Herbert
Thorw Out State Disability Determinations: April, 2005 Request Appeals Council Review


Dr. Evans-AZ Disability Determination

Set aside by Homeless Shelter

Dr. Evans-AZ Disability Determination

Set aside by Homeless Shelter

Arizona DES 1997


Press On Image To Enlarge

SSI Reciept for Medical Records
Received SSI Office
2301 Park Avenue
Lynchburg, VA 24501
Social Security Signs For
90 Medical & Doctors Reports 2002

Dr. Mark Cieniawski MD

Care Medical Groups
4291 Meridian Costo Center
Bellingham, WA 98226
Washington State DSHS
Disability Determination 8-2005

Press On Image To Enlarge

Dr. Mark Cieniawski, MD
Disability Determination

Press On Image To Enlarge

Dr. Mark Cieniawski, MD
Disability Determination

Press On Image To Enlarge

US Health Works
1151 Denny Way
Seattle, WA 98109
Dr. Strandberg
Defines Disabilities Cardiac, Digestive, Veins In Legs
Medical examination 10-25-2005 by Dr. Eric Strandberg; US Health Works recommended Echo Cardio Gram; Venous Studies of Legs; and Colonoscopy. No restrictions on computer or job training. Letter from DSHS 10/26/2005 Oks GAU Case #3491348 through 1/31/2006; including Medical and Food Stamps. A person of reasonable and common intelligence would expect all the medical test to be completed within 2 or 3 weeks.

US Social Security Adm

1249 S Vinnell Way # 101,
Boise, ID 83709
(208) 321-2900
Admission of Disabilities
By Social Security
Social Security Administration
Date Feb 22-2000
Claim 261-90-6357
BS

Supplemental Security Income
Notice of Disapproved Claim
Christopher A Walters
c/o Boise Rescue 520 Front Street
Boise,ID 83704

We are writing about your clim for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments. Based on a review of your health problems, you do not quality for benefits on this claim. This is because you are not disabled under our rules:

Trained Staff Reviewed Your Case and Made These Decisions. They work for your State, but used our rules. The determination on your claim was made by an agency of the State. It was not made by your own doctor or by any other agency's written report about you. However, any evidence they gave us was used in making this determination. Doctors and other people in the State agency who are trained in disability evaluation reviewed the evidence and made the determinatio based on Social Security law and regulations.

The Decision on Christopher A. Walters' Case** The following reports were used to decide your claim (16 of 100 medical sources)Birmingham Health Care for Homelss response received Salvation Army Hospital & Health Clinic Cooper Green Hospital Good Shephered Hospital El Rio Clinic Douglas Community Hospital Columbia Community Hospital Columbia Capital Medical Center Cowlitz Family Health Center Mercy Medical Center Brackenridge Hospital Kaweah Delta Hospital Helping Hands Clinic Shands Clinic Munroe Regional Medical Center Lakeland Reg Med Ctr Doug Wright, MD. We have determined that your condition is not severe enough to keep you from working. We considered the medical and other information your age, education, training, and work experience inn determining how your condition affects your ability work to work:

You said you are disabled due to skin cancer, malignant melanoma, GI disorder, frequent vowel movements, blood clots in the legs and hepatitis. The medical shows that you have a history of these problems.

1. It shows that you have surgical excision of melanoma in the past. There is no evidence of recurrence (**failed to include reports on additional treatment).

2. It shows that you have been treated for intestinal problems with frequent bowel movements.

3. You do have a mild edema and varicosities in your lower extremities, but no ulcerations.

4. You should avoid direct exposure to sunlight.

5. You should also have access to restroom facilities.

Upon recent examination, your chest is clear. Your heart rate is regular. There is not evidence of masses or abdominal tenderness. Your weight is stable. The evidence does not show severe neurological deficits. You are able to walk and move about independently. Based on the objective medical finding your condition is not of the severity that would prevent you from doing all types of work. Although you have no past substantial work, you should have the capacity to preform a wide range of other work within your limitations. Thus, your cliam is denied.>>>>... Continues on standardized form information.


Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce

535 East 5th Street,
Austin, TX 78701
512.478.9383

Walters Residence

c/o Dr. Robert Canon
2006-2007
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724
Austin Texas State Capitol
Guest of Dr. Robert Canon
I returning from Washington State I was the guest of Dr. Robert Canon and his wife Sophia while working on my SSI hearings materials.

Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce

535 East 5th Street,
Austin, TX 78701
512.478.9383


US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

Chairman Sheldon Whitehorse

US Senate Committee On Judiciary
Administrative Oversight and the Courts
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Commissioner Jo Anne B. Barnhart

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

David C Williams

Postal Inspector General
14800 Trinity Blvd Ste 600
Fort Worth, TX 76155-2675

Social Security Administration

Office of Hearings and Appeals
One Skyline Tower
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041

Social Security Administration

office Of Hearings and Appeals
10222 San Pedro Avenue
San Antonio, TX 78216
Exhibit #A Administrative Law Judge Engineers Kidknapping
To Move Venue To Texas From Washington State -December, 2005
The best way to force Chris Walters to move back to Texas State for continue abusing the legal process is for the Appeals Council record to be seized and held by Dr. Robert Canon a friend at UT Texas. Dr. Canon explains he cannot not mail it to Chris Walters or email the document but requires Chris Walters to travel 2,000 miles to get the findings of the Appeals Council. Kindknapping is not only a federal crime but executable offense

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

US Congressman Charles Rangle

Chairman House Ways and Means
1102 Longworth HOB
Washington D.C. 20515
P: (202) 225-3625
F: (202) 225-2610

Exhibit #A Dr. Canon Agrees To Hold My Mail Makes Me Return to Texas
To Pick Ruling of Appeals Council It Up December, 2005


Dr. Robert Cannon

At Goodfellow AFB
Military Intelligence School
I'll Hold Your Mail-Dr. Canon
Operational Impediment 18
This email explains Dr. Canon has volunteered to receive my mail. This photo above is Dr. Canon sitting in his car giving us the finger in front ofGoodfellow AFB a military intelligence training facility in San Angelo, TX

Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:11:56 -0500
To: "Chris W"
chrissaidthanks2002@yahoo.com
From: "Robert Canon"
rcanon@mail.utexas.edu
Subject: Re: The ongoing saga of Social Security

If it helps use our address:

7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724

Dr. Robert Cannon

At Goodfellow AFB
Military Intelligence School
I Have To Travel 2000 Miles To Get Appeals Council
ORDER-Operational Impediment #19
Dr. Robert Canon is accepting delivery of my mail at his residence in Austin, Texas and has received the ORDER of the Appeals Council 12-29-2005. Dr. Canon declined to email me a description of the contents or discuss sending it to me via mail. I had to ride a bus 2,000 miles to simply see the ORDER which I actually received 2-8-2006. Dr. Canon who does not eat and dosen't hunt because he dislikes the sight of blood is now packing heavy duty firearms. I can't help to wonder if somone threatened him?

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

Former US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

Former US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales

US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

US Congressman Lamar Smith

Chairman Of House Committee On Judiciary
1100 NE Loop 410, Suite 640
San Antonio, TX 78209
Movement Under Duress or False Pretenses
Title 18 USC 1201 Kidknapping
Citation #4
Title 18 Sec 1209 Kidknapping (a) Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person, except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof, when

(1) the person is willfully transported in interstate or foreign commerce, regardless of whether the person was alive when transported across a State boundary, or the offender travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses the mail or any means, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in committing or in furtherance of the commission of the offense;

(2) any such act against the person is done within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States;

(3) any such act against the person is done within the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States as defined in section 46501 of title 49

(4) the person is a foreign official, an internationally protected person, or an official guest as those terms are defined in section 1116(b) of this title ; or

(5) the person is among those officers and employees described in section 1114 of this title and any such act against the person is done while the person is engaged in, or on account of, the performance of official duties, shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life and, if the death of any person results, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment.

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

Former US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

Former US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales

US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

US Congressman Lamar Smith

Chairman Of House Committee On Judiciary
1100 NE Loop 410, Suite 640
San Antonio, TX 78209
Movement Under Duress or False Pretenses
Title 18 USC 1201 Kidknapping
(b) With respect to subsection (a)(1), above, the failure to release the victim within twenty-four hours after he shall have been u nlawfully seized, confined, inveigled, decoyed, kidnapped, abducted, or carried away shall create a rebuttable presumption that such person has been transported in interstate or foreign commerce. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the fact that the presumption under this section has not yet taken effect does not preclude a Federal investigation of a possible violation of this section before the 24-hour period has ended.

(c) If two or more persons conspire to violate this section and one or more of such persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

(d) Whoever attempts to violate subsection (a) shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than twenty years.

(e) If the victim of an offense under subsection (a) is an internationally protected person outside the United States, the United States may exercise jurisdiction over the offense if (1) the victim is a representative, officer, employee, or agent of the United States, (2) an offender is a national of the United States, or (3) an offender is afterwards found in the United States. As used in this subsection, the United States includes all areas under the jurisdiction of the United States including any of the places within the provisions of this subsection, the term national of the United States has the meaning prescribed in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)).

(f) In the course of enforcement of subsection (a)(4) and any other sections prohibiting a conspiracy or attempt to violate subsection (a)(4), the Attorney General may request assistance from any Federal, State, or local agency, including the Army, Navy, and Air Force, any statute, rule, or regulation to the contrary notwithstanding.

Exhibit #B Order & Finding from Appeals Council


Press On Image To Enlarge

Appeals Council
Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 24041-3255

Press On Image To Enlarge

Appeals Council
Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 24041-3255

Press On Image To Enlarge

Appeals Council
Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 24041-3255

Press On Image To Enlarge

Appeals Council
Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 24041-3255

5th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges
Case- 99-50174
USDC,WDT CA: SA-97-CA-1313
600 Maestri Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Main Number (504) 310-7700
Question Title 18 USC 1509
Obstruction of Court ORDER #5 2005
1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime


Friend Eve Falone Korems

Obituary 2010 Austin Statesman
UT School of Social Work
1925 San Jacinto Blvd,
Austin, Texas 78712

Dr Robert Canon PHD

UT School of Social Work
2006-2007
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724
2 Month At University Of Texas
School of Social Work
Doing some computer training and program updates

Walters Residence

c/o Dr. Robert Canon
2006-2007
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724

Exhibit #C Violation Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of Rights...?
Dr. Canon Says Welcome to My House


Mr. Jake Cherry, President of the Board

San Antonio Rescue Mission
PO Box 120038
San Antonio, TX 78212-0038
Why We Ran Chris
Out of San Antonio-Operational Impediment #20
Chris Walters was a guest of the San Antonio Rescue Mission for sometime and part of our sad duty was to run him out of town in March, 2006. Chris has apparently violated our policy by having friends where are Catholic. At the San Antonio Rescue mission we preach a strong and profound spiritual message each night against the Catholic Church; Mormons; Jehovah's Witnesses and other "religions". Our nightly preachers here at the Rescue Mission often explain that our guest should get saved of they might get a bullet in the head or run over while walking around town; or other wise die and miss their chance at Salvation and the good news of Jesus. Chris apparently left his ink pen on his bed one night which got into the wash and soiled several sets of sheets. Although Chris offered to pay for the soiled linen we declined to permit him to stay. The ink pen was from a local Catholic University which disqualified Chris from receiving further services.

We have gotten complaints from many of our supporting churches that Chris who had many health problems had declined to come to the altar and knee down before our pentacostal preachers and receive "divine healing". Chris keeps seeking medical work at health care providers and apparently intends to continue in this type of sin. Therefore he is barred for ever.

US Congressman Lamar Smith

Chairman Of House Committee On Judiciary
2142 Rayburn House Office Building B-351
Washington, D.C. 20515

Secretary Andrew Cuomo

US Department of HUD
451 7th Street S.W.,
Washington, DC 20410

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

Former US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216
US Supreme Court Law-Rights of Citizens to Reside
Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights
under color of law Citation #7 2005
1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

2. The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

3. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Walters Residence

c/o Dr. Robert Canon
2006-2007
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724
Guest Of Dr. Canon
For 2 Months
After being run out of San Antonio, TX Dr. Canon and his charming wife Sophia offered to let me stay at their house for several months to attend the take care of Administrative Law related issues. I will have to remember to get kidknapped more often.


US Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
202-514-2000
Title 18 CRIMES & Impediments 2005
1. Operational Imediments
Total: 20
2. Computer Hacking
Total: 9
3. Theft of US Mail
Total: 1
4. Title 18 USC Obstruction Court ORDER
Total: 2
5. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy defraud US
Total: 3

US Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
202-514-2000
Title 18 CRIMES & Impediments 2005
6. Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of laqw
Total: 9
7. Genocide or Assassination Attempts
Total: 1
8. Sedition or Treason
Total: 0
9. Other Violations of Title 18
Total: 1 Terrorist burns down Pastor Bien House with family in it
1 move under duress kidknapping
2 Interstate stalking block medical treatment
10. Total Violations
Total: 29

Social Security Administration

Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235
Medical Treatment & Costs 2005
1. Hospital Visits
Total: 4
2. Clinic Visits
Total: 7
3. Hotels Nights
Total: 0
4. Transportation Costs
Total: 1 $200.00


US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

Chairman Sheldon Whitehorse

US Senate Committee On Judiciary
Administrative Oversight and the Courts
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

United States Attorney Johnny Sutton

US Department of Justice
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

Attorney Tom Moseley

112 Villita On The Riverwalk
San Antonio, TX 78205
I Hired Slacker For
Legal Represenative?

Social Security Appeals Council

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
Exhibits #D Review To Appeals Council: Question Removed
to US Senate Interception of Appeals Council Mail
In this section I asked the Social Security Appeals Council to review my case and had to fire an attorney who admitted he wasn't working on my SSI claim. After I moved back to Washington State the person holding my mail in Austin, Texas refused to email me a copy of the SSA Appeals Council ruling. I had to travel 2,000 miles to pick up a copy of the ORDER

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

US Congressman Charles Rangle

Chairman House Ways and Means
1102 Longworth HOB
Washington D.C. 20515
P: (202) 225-3625
F: (202) 225-2610

Exhibit #D Appeals Council & I Fired Attorney Tom Mosley Janurary, 2006


Former President George Bush Jr

1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, DC 20501

Former US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales

US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Unable to follow very simple instructions

Commissioner Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235
Questions Directed
To Social Security Appeals Council
The Social Security Appeals Council was asked to consider that it's precedents challenge not only the US Code but it's own code known as the Hallex and such provisions as Chapter I-1-5. Litigation-Related Inquiries and Chapter I-1-6. Congressional Inquiries and Constitutionality of Statutory Issues and last but not least Chapter I-2-5. Obtaining Evidence

Social Security Appeals Council

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
Evidence & Testimony Appended
To Social Security Appeals Council
Addressed to the Appeals Council

My name is Christopher A. Walters (261-90-6357) and I am requesting a review of Judge William Herbert's Order of Dismissal July 7, 2005.

1. I wanted to thank the staff of the Social Security Administration for appearing in various civil actions at law in several US District Courts and a state Court over the last 7 years and formally waiving your legal right to medical evidence; hearings; and making the ongoing suggestions Social Security wishes to proceed to regular hearings in the US District Courts as cited below:

2. Exhibit A letter of May 10,2004 from 5th Circuit Court of Appeals affirms the Social Security Administrations legal position/right as cited in Walters v. Miller, Crownover SA-97-1313; Walters V Apel USDC, WDT Civil A:99CA0156SS; and Walters V Apel USDC DC CA 99-CV-0668 to refuse to permit me to submit medical evidence in support of my claim of disability.

3. Your staff has claimed the right to amend Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations to permit Social Security the right to discard medical evidence; move my claim to venues thousands of miles from where I reside; and occassionally claimed the right to change the course of medical treatment authorized by my 140 doctors and other authorities to a course of medical treatment selected by your staff.

4. Mr. David Bradshaw sued myself and your represenatives in North Carolina Superior Court #04CVS2674 claiming he was infected and hospitalized twice due to your organizationns negiligence your represenatives.

5. Your North Carolina represenatives and legal counsel again affirmed their legal right to declined to accept medical evidence; explained Social Security can violate the law whenever it wishes; and offered to neuter the Superior Court Judge if he challenged your legal position previously described as the "Divine Right of Kings".

6. Social Security Administration's legal question of amending Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations was removed with the permission of the US Circuit Court of Appeals to Committees of Congress pursuant to Article 1 Section 1 Of The Constitution and Title 5 Part 1 Chapter 8 Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking and Title 2 USC Sec. 190d. Legislative review by standing to the US House.

7. Exhibit B: While members of Congress have for 7 years considered the merits of amending Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability determinations and the Congress has declined to amend the law as your organization requested as of July, 2005

8. My previous Attorney John Heard's staff explained Administrative Law Judge William Herbert had waived a hearing based on "hardship" and received most of medical reports for 8 doctors treating congestive heart failure;45 doctors treating loss of bowel control; 78 doctors treating chronic infections; and 10 doctors treating cancer.

9. Judge William Herbert was apparently unable to continue the hardship hearing based on medical evidence which waived Chris Walters appearance and reach a legal determination because of legal constrains previously specified in various courts.
Discusson on Merits
For Review By US District Court
Your organizations ongoing efforts and request to move the issues to a federal court means we will be reviewing the known facts of the case:

1. Judge William Herbert was unable to complete the hardship determination to reach a conclusion based on prima facia evidence and fact and law because of limitations imposed by previous legal rulings in the case.

2. Your organization has apparently discarded my 140+ doctors statement; disability admissions by several states; 3rd party information; extensive vocational training; employment efforts; and background information which I provided to your organization on CR-Rom.

3. Your legal staff has explained to 4 federal judges; 3 US Circuit Court Judges; the 5th and DC US Circuit Courts of Appeals; and a Superior Court in North Carolina that social security will process a disability claim without medical records or evidence.

4. As I have to travel extensively to seek indigent health care I am attempting to secure qualified legal counsel for your organization to interact with.

With Kindest Regards
Chris Walters, Appellant
Attorney Tom Moseley
112 Villita On The Riverwalk
San Antonio,TX 78205

Attorney Tom Moseley

112 Villita On The Riverwalk
San Antonio, TX 78205
I Hired Slacker For Legal Represenative?
Operational Impediment #3
I hired Attorney Tom Moseley to represent me during the hearings before the Appeals Council and this guy was so slack I actually had to file the appeal myself. The slacker would not order copies of my medical records and I had to give him copies of whatever records I could come by. The file of papers his assistant showed me in Janurary, 2006 were an unorganized mess and I'm sure he couldn't win a case if his life depended on it.

Attorney Thomas Moseley III

112 Villita On The Riverwalk
San Antonio,TX 78205

1. First Class Mail July 2005


Rates Cited Based on USDC SDNY

500 Pearl Street, New York
New York 10007-1312
Legal Costs $.87 postage
Printing Costs $1.00
Counsel's Time to Prepare Documents
1 Hours at $110.00 Hour=$110.00

Total $111.87
Mr. Chris Walters
c/o 7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin, Texas 78724
Monday, January 23rd, 2006
Attorney Tom Moseley
112 Villita On The Riverwalk
San Antonio, TX 78205

RE: Discharge as legal counsel
End of Social Security Appeal:

Dear Tom & Ester:

Im sorry to hear about your recent family loss and about Ester being hospitalized. Ester explained my medical records havent been ordered so we would not be prepared to deal with an Administrative Law Hearing even if the US Circuits or Congress would let officials modify their previous legal position and court rulings.

I sat down recently and carefully reviewed the 4 pieces of paper Social Security provided us since I filed in December, 2003. It is likely you have come to the same conclusion I have that there is no evidence that officials are actually processing an SSI claim but simply send us periodic denials as required by procedure. While I withdrew the claim Friday there is actually no case to withdraw.

As you are no doubt aware Congress declined the amend Title 42 USC 423(b)5(b) disability determinations and rather than authorize prosecution of the legions of frauds, hoaxes, and shams in the process simply cut many billions of dollars from medicare; indigent health care; and similar processes.
I certainly wish you and Ester good fortunes.

Chris Walters,

Mr. Chris Walters
c/o 7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin, TX 78724
Friday, February 3, 2006
Attorney At Law Thomas B Moseley III
112 Villita On the Riverwalk
San Antonio, TX 78205

RE: Consultative Exam completed-that why Im being paid for disability:
Your questions deferred to Congressional Committees

Dear Attorney Thomas Moseley III:

Thank you for your letter 1-27-2006 and explaining your withdrawal as counsel after I have received disability payments and addressing questions remanded to Congressional Committees which oversight the Social Security Administration:

1. The Social Securitys Washington State representative completed both "consultative exams" and they were sent to the Appeals Council by Federal Express about 12-7-2005 by US Senator Gordon Smith Portland, Office to his Committee which oversights Social Security.

2. The many fantastic; idiotic; and moronic request made by various minor persons acting under color of the social security law cited in your letter of 1-27-2006 to amend food stamp laws; amend Title 42 USC 423 (d)5 (b). were printed and included in the materials delivered to Senator Gordon Smiths office-asking why either of us should have to address such issues?

3. The Senate Committee contacted the Appeals Council and shortly later on 12-14-2005 they issued their ORDER and apparently didnt send you a copy of their ORDER because they figured when you saw the "Consultative Exams" in your office files from Dr. Strandberg and Dr. Pinon you might catch them in their lie.

4. Dr. Canon my friend in Austin, TX declined to send me an explanation of the Appeals Council Order and I had a long painful ride a Greyhound bus 2,000 miles to Texas to see a copy of the Appeals Council ORDER of 12-14-2005.

5. The Appeals Council ORDER of 12-24-2005 contains the material lie that I had not completed the "consultative exams" which is after all why Im currently receiving disability payments and was approved by their official represenatives in Washington State-which was just in fact faxed to the US House Ways & Means Committee.

6. Ester your staff asked me if I got paid why your office didn't get any money and as things turned out you don't have to appear before the Office of Hearings and Appeals and explain you had not secured copies of my past medical records because you have been slacking off for the last 6 months.

7. The files you asked me to retrieve can be donated to Polly who can pass judgement on them in her bird cage.

The first time we met you explained that Social Security officials would tell anyone any lie they could think of to get what they wanted. Truer words never came from the mouth of another man. The Social Security officials dumped a pile of BS questions on your client; staff; and wasted your time and then scammed you into believing your client failed to meet his obligations after he is already being paid disability. Seems unfortunate that the folks you have to work with professionally have such a low regard for your professional standing as an "Officer of the Court".

With Kindest Regards Chris Walters-Your former client


US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Wahsington, D.C. 20510

Chairman Sheldon Whitehorse

US Senate Committee On Judiciary
Administrative Oversight and the Courts
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Oregon Id Card
Exhibit E-H Interception of Mail Withdraw Appeal/Hearing
In Wrong Venue/Congressional Review Feburary, 2006
It appears the Appeals Council and Officer of Hearings and Appeals have assigned the SSI claim in San Antonio, Texas where the proper venue in Texas for my Austin address is Dallas, Texas. Since I am a legal resident of Oregon State receiving disability benefits in Washington the proper venue would be in Portland, Oregon

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

US Congressman Charles Rangle

Chairman House Ways and Means
1102 Longworth HOB
Washington D.C. 20515
P: (202) 225-3625
F: (202) 225-2610

Exhibit #E-G Technical Questions To SSA & Senate
December 2005/Feburary,2006


Social Security Appeals Council

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
Request For Clarification Your
Recent Letter-Operational Impediment #4
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:31:11 -0800 (PST)
From: "Chris Walters"
chrissaidthanks2002@yahoo.com
Subject: Request Clarification your clients
request-Social Security

Addressed Too The Honorable:
Johnny K Sutton USA
601 NW Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216
glenn.mactaggart@usdoj.gov
john.paniszczyn@usdoj.gov
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov

My friend Alan Hartman email me he received and opened a letter addressed too me from San Antonio Office of Hearings and Appeals. The attached Appeals Council ORDER 12-14-2005 explains Social Security impeached their Washington State representatives & 3 consultative exams and Washington DSHS realizing it cannot get compensated by Social Security canceled my welfare; medical coupon; and canceled all the doctors appointments. I typed up and mailed this very nice letter to Office of Hearings & Appeals and asked them to clarify whatever it is exactly they wanted since I voluntarily withdrew my appeal in writing 1-20-2006:

Kindest Regards
Chris Walters
Appellate Counsel
US Circuit Court of Appeals

US Congressman Lamar Smith

Chairman Of House Committee On Judiciary
2142 Rayburn House Office Building B-351
Washington, D.C. 20515

Thomas Perez Asst Attorney General

Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

Former US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216
Question Right To Attend Hearings
Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under
color of law Citation #2 2006
Chris Walters was not invited to or permitted to attend the Administrative Law Hearing before Judge Karen McCoy. The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.


4. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Report to 107th Congress

Exhibit #269 The National Survey On
Social Services & Social Security

Author Chris Walters
chrissaidthanks2002@yahoo.com
PO Box 1209
Vancouver, WA 98666
Thursday, December 8,2005
US Senator Gordon Smith
Chairman Special Committee on Aging
One World Trade Center
121 SW Salmon Street, Suite 1250
Portland, OR 97204
503.326.3386
Fax: 503.326.2900
RE: National Survey on Social Security
Question of Substantial Program Savings

Dear Senator Gordon Smith:

The enclosed CD-Rom contains an extensive survey and operational audit of the Social Security disability process between 1997-2005. In reviewing a possible $500,000 loss in the Social Security process we asked if substantial savings to the program might be realized by dealing with:

1. If you explained to a private insurer such as Blue Cross and Blue Shield that you are disabled and needed financial support based on your inability to work their represenative would rush you to a doctor and try to fix what was broke.

2. The national survey on Social Security suggest the process squanders vast sums of public monies trying to deny the problem exist; while fostering institutional 3rd party tampering; and other problems which defy common sense and increase the cost of dealing with treatable medical disabilities.

3. Exhibit A Brief to Appeals Council: The Social Security Administration has appeared in several civil actions Walters v. Miller, Crownover SA-97-1313 ; Walters V Apel USDC, WDT Civil A:99CA0156SS; and Walters V Apel USDC DC CA 99-CV-0668; and Bradshaw V Odom, and Walters in North Carolina Superior Court #04CVS2674 claiming the right to amend Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations with the approval of Congress

4. Exhibit A Brief to Appeals Council: The Social Security Administration claims the right to throw away or discard claimants medical records and a right to compel claimants to move to venues where they do not reside.

5. Exhibit C: Chris Walters 155 doctors which Social Security declines to be submitted into record or evidenc.
Satan Made Me Do It?
Briefs By Social Security Administration
1. Exhibit B: Brief filed On Behalf of Social Security: The Social Security Adminstration appears in various civil actions and claim that US Supreme Court Justice Scalia has authorized any type of criminal activities the Social Security Administration wishes to facilitate.

2. Some of the demands appear to violate United Nations standards for Crimes Against Humanity

3. We asked if Social Security officials are taking Justice Scalia's opinions out of contest or to places the US Supreme Court never authorized

The questions of law were removed from various US Circuits to the 107th US Congress and UNHCHR. As Ad Hoc counsel to a Foreign government I am not permitted to receive or answer questions related to US Statutes:

1. Exhibit C: CD-Rom file 107thcongress/USDA/index.html Texas State has made a very clever attempt to modify the food stamp program which I am not authorized to receive and was able to divert back to the Chairman of House Agriculture Committee

2. Administrative Law Judge William Herbert of Social Security Appeals Office in San Antonio, TX is currently misdirecting the US Mail to prevent the Appeals Council from providing me a copy of their findings like he did with his own Order

3. Administrative Law Judge William Herbert's question is best asked to my SSI Attorney Tom Moseley

If I can be of any additional service or provide any additional information please have your staff contact me or my Social Security Attorney.

Attorney Tom Moseley
112 Villita On The Riverwalk
San Antonio, TX 78205

Press On Image To Enlarge

US Congressman Lamar Smith
Guaranty Bank Building
1100 NE Loop 410
Suite 640
San Antonio, TX 78209
Reciept For National Survey
Social Security Process AlJ Ruling April, 2006
This link reviews the questions removed to Congessional Committees and the actions of the Appeals Council based on failure of Administrative Law Judge Herbert to complete the SSI record on April 30, 2006.

Office of Hearings & Appeals

Trinity Building, Suite 100
4204 Woodcock Drive
San Antonio,TX 78228-1323
Lack of Prima Facie Evidence
Of Social Security Process
As I explained to my attorney there is not evidence of an actual Social Security process. In 2 years the Social Security Administration has simply sent me a few small letters explaining I exist and I have a social security claim. There is no apparent evidence that Social Security actually processed or evaluated the clain as is described by Social Security Administrations own rules the Hallex

Unable to follow very simple instructions

Commissioner Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

US Circuit Court of Appeals

For The Fifth Circuit
600 Camp Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Appeals Council ORDER
Basis For Appeal To Commissioner
1. Copies of my medical records & consultatative exams where send by US Senator Gordon F. Smith's office to the Appeals Council 12-8-2005

2. The ORDER of the Appeals Council contains the materials lie that I have declined to take a "consultative exam".

3. These folks are real gluttons for punishment and have just jumped from frying pan into the fire.... The request for "consultative exams" and medical evidence violates the several Federal Court rulings that Social Security has won to process a social security claim without medical records.

4. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals will not reconsider the matter.
The deliver of the document was delayed and I had to travel 2,000 miles on Greyhound to actually see this document.

5. I met with the Social Security staff in Olympia, WA in November, 2005 who declined to accept new medical evidence

6. The 3 consultative exams completed by Washington State and other records were mailed to the San Antonio Office of Hearings and Appeals.

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

Former US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

Former US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales

US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

US Congressman Lamar Smith

Chairman Of House Committee On Judiciary
1100 NE Loop 410, Suite 640
San Antonio, TX 78209
Citation of Authority Question Violation
Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court Order
Citation #3 2006
1. The Social Security Administration has secured several ORDERS that it will process an SSI claim without documentation; medical records...and in requesting documentation is in contempt of it'S own ORDER

2. Title 18 Sec 1509 Obstruction of Court Order Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

Chairman Gordon Smith

Senate Select
Committee on Aging
G31 Dirksen Senate Office Building,
Washington, DC 20510-6400

US Circuit Court of Appeals

For The Fifth Circuit
600 Camp Street
New Orleans, LA 701300
Congress Addresses 5th Circuit Court
-Question on Social Security
Many thanks for your Judicial staff having dropped by over the last 9 years and filing legal briefs in Walters V Apfel A 99CA0156SS USDC, WDT....et all explaining you had amended Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations as cited below:
"In making any determination with respect to whether an individual is under a disability or continues to be under a disability, the Commissioner of Social Security shall consider all evidence available in such individuals case record, and shall develop a complete medical history of at least the preceding twelve months for any case in which a determination is made that the individual is not under a disability. In making any determination the Commissioner of Social Security shall make every reasonable effort to obtain from the individuals treating physician (or other treating health care provider) all medical evidence, including diagnostic tests, necessary in order to properly make such determination, prior to evaluating medical evidence obtained from any other source on a consultative basis.
The proposed changes would permit the Commissioner of Social Security too throw away claimants medical records; hold hearings thousand of miles from where applicants reside; and change course of medical treatment to treatments where the agency receives financial incentives. The House and Senate have reviewed your request through the 107th; 108th; and the 109th Congress and President Bush even supported reform last year. During the Congressional Committee process for instance Congressman Bob Goodlatte on October 16th, 2001 and Congressman Lamar Smith 1-18-2005 of the House Judiciary Committee in charge of the courts agreed to review the matters.

Unfortunately, as you have probally heard the Congress has declined to accept your proposal to amend the statute requested by Social Security in the 5th US Circuit or US District Court, Western District of Texas. US Senator Gordon F. Smith-Chairman of the US Senate Committee on Aging which oversights the Social Security Administration reviewed the process and questions on 12-7-2005 and instructed the Social Security Appeals Council to return the SSI claim to Office of Hearings and Appeals in San Antonio, TX. The Committee also apparently corrected the defect whereby obscure and minor social security represenatives fielded legions of moronic, idiotic, and fantastic legal questions to Chris Walters and his San Antonio Attorney Tom Moseley. Who can forget the immortal words of US Senator John Kyl (2005) who explained he has been a loyal Republican for decades but if he voted for the Bush Agenda he could not return to his home state of Arizona. The concept of Jus Litigum means that the question asked was answered and the discussion is closed.
Question Of Congressional Sanctions
During the course of the discussion members of the House Judiciary Committee on The Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security has voiced concerns about the quality of Justice; large number of officials being regularily indicted by federal grand juries; improper actions by federal Judges or the Federal Bar Association.

1. It is a violation of Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees or "Treason" to attempt to amend or create a US Statute without the matter being brought before Committees of Congress; or to attempt to vend, dispense or pratice law before Congress (unless your a member); or to review matters submitted into Congressional Records...
2. It is a violation Title 18 USC 402 Contempt for any person who is not a member of the Federal bar to vend, dispense or pratice federal law or having the specific permission of an authority such as a US Magistrate and a violation of Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest for any person to "arrest another citizen who is not a specially appointed federal officer.

3. It is a violation of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law to attempt to vend, dispense, or pratice law or secret counsels legal papers as you probally remember when 40 some odd government officials each earned 5 years in federal prison in US V. Haldeman, Erlichman, and Dean and US Attorney General John Mitchell.

4. The number of persons in the Western District of Texas who appear to be praticing federal law without any license appears to draw into question the need for reforming the San Antonio Federal Bar Association possibly by replacing the current leadership.

Meet The Whip

Chairman Of Congressional Committee

Well of The Souls

Great Fortune & Misfortune?
Discussions On Texans Being
Above The Law & On Well of Souls
It is 1993 and the Dallas Police Officer in Texas v. Walters ex rel BNO935054616 has Mr. Walters arrested and in jail for "stealing his resume book" consisting of testimonials from US Senators; Congressmen; Governors; and many others for years of public service work. The Officer called the Chairman of the US Senate Appropropriations Committee; explained he had arrested Mr. Walters and asked him why he passed a law on behalf of Mr. Walters a person of low social standing? Senator Mark O Hatfield reportedly explained he was having a problem understanding the question and was going to fly down to Dallas and have his Secret Service detail hold the policeman over his desk and sexually review the question until the answer became more clear. The policeman gave Mr. Walters his resume back; threw him out of jail; and told him to get out of town and never return. Most folks have the good sense to stay away from the "Well of the Souls" or Committees of Congress. Unless you are on good terms with the Almighty or the snakes like our intrepid hero Indiana Jones and his pal Sala you will probally not emerge unscathed without many and numerous deadly snake bites all in vital places.

Today we hear a lot of the Bush Administration being "Above The Law" and suffering serious losses on all fronts apparently believing we are from Texas and can do anything we want. Scandals such as Enron; The Tom Delay indictment; possibly the conviction of Jack Abrahamoff; and today's comments from the Senate Judiciary Committee on domestic spying all suggest-nobody is above the law. The recent attempts of minor Social Security officials and federal Judges to amend federal statutes calls like a beacon to Congressional Investigators to apply the wrath of those who indeed have "soverign immunity". If you have any additional questions please feel free to contact Congress and as Indy's side kick Sala would say-"Asps very dangerous you go first":

Chris Walters, Appellate Counsel Pro Se
c/o 7334 Ritchie Drive
Austin,TX 788724
Request For Clarification
Your Recent Letter-Operational Impediment #5
Mr. Chris Walters
chrissaidthanks2002@yahoo.com
c/o Dr. Robert Canon
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin,TX 78724
Saturday, February 11th, 2006

Office of Hearings & Appeals
Trinity Building, Suite 100
4204 Woodcock Drive
San Antonio,TX 78228-1323
(210-731-3301)
Fax 210-731-3325

RE: Hearing Notice 261-90-6357 Received via Mr. Alan Hartman-
Your Request Attorney-Was Fired Or Sacked:

Dear Office of Hearings and Appeals:

Mr. Alan Hartman sent me an email he had opened a letter addressed to me from your office and gave notice that a hearing would be held at some point in the future and indicated you intended to contact my former Attorney Tom Moseley:

1. When I returned to San Antonio, TX and learned Tom Moseley had in 6 months not secured copies of my medical records I fired him or and claims he quit voluntarily (given his qualifications maybe he could find work as an SSI intake worker-jolly jest).

2. Your official represenatives in Washington State DSHS who did the 3 consultative exams by your doctors Eric Strandberg; Dr. Shane Dunaway; and Dr. Pinon understood the Appeals Council ORDER 12-24-2005 has declined to accept and acknowledge their work. Understanding they can't get compensated they closed the GAU benefits case; canceled the remaining appointments; and canceled the medical insurance so it appears nothing can be done to follow through with the disability determinations.

3. Dr. Robert Canon my computer instructor who volunteered to hold my mail received the Appeals Council ORDER 12-14-2005 and declined to either sent it to me or email the contents. Too review a copy of the ORDER I had to travel 2,000 miles on a bus which under the circumstances is an actual hardship.

4. The legions of fantastic and incredible request made by obscure and minor represenatives of social security & various state agencies were deferred to the Honorable US Senator Gordon Smith and others and something both myself and my former Attorney Tom Moseley both agreed we could not answer. If your staff is interested in reviewing what was send to congress it has a website http://www.geocities.com/tulipsthorns
Questions Based On Your Letter?
Since I notified your office of my voluntarily withdrawl from the Appeal Process I to assume your staff intends to complete the appeal and has answers to the following questions I am not able to answer:

1. If you review the case history back to 1997 you should be able to see I always withdraw an SSI claim when it goes to Office of Hearings and Appeals because I either don't have or can't get qualified legal counsel and don't understand the process well enough at your level to participate actively. Renown Attorney Ben Mattlock also retired from SSI cases which have already been in US Circuit Courts of Appeals or before Congress.

2. Since the folks who did the Reconsideration didn't review my 160 doctors findings which are online http://www.geocities.com/chrissaidthanks2003 I would be fascinated to know how you intend to operate under operation of evidence, fact, and law?

3. Your agencies and organizations you work with operate special target programs we have briefly discussed which might include mental health; Veterans; substance abuse; prison programs; programs soliciting bondage or peonage.... I have graciously declined to accept treatment for any program for a medical condition I don't have simply based on special financial incentives and actually suggested to Congress this process be investigated by a Federal Grand Jury.

4. Your Office might have extra ordinary problems contacting me given the number of 3rd parties who open or delay your correspondence. Even if I received Notice to Appear say through my email address I might not have financial means to travel to San Antonio, Texas.

With Kindest Regards
Chris Walters

PS: Your staff must have the patience of Job. If Florida State or North Carolina had sent me that Initial finding or reconsideration saying Chris Walters only had 2 doctors I would have sent it right back to their office and told them to complete the work they should have done 2 years ago.

Mailed Sunday, February 11th, 2006 From Downtown Post Office, SA, TX 78205

Press On Image To Enlarge

Social Security Appeals Council
Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255

US Congressman Lamar Smith

Chairman Of House Committee On Judiciary
2142 Rayburn House Office Building B-351
Washington, D.C. 20515

Thomas Perez Asst Attorney General

Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

Former US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216
Question Right To Attend Hearings
Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under
color of law Citation #4 2006
Chris Walters was not invited to or permitted to attend the Administrative Law Hearing before Judge Karen McCoy. The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.


4. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.


US Senator Patrick Leahy

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
US Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Chairman Sheldon Whitehorse

US Senate Committee On Judiciary
Administrative Oversight and the Courts
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

US Health Works

1151 Denny Way
Seattle, WA 98109
Disability Statement 10-2005

Social Security Administration

office Of Hearings and Appeals
10222 San Pedro Avenue
San Antonio, TX 78216

Dr. Susan Pelzer
SSA Expert
506 Jackson Keller Rd
San Antonio, TX 78216
Exhibits #I Social Security Administration
Holds Hearings In Wrong State/Impeaches State Disability Finding Feburary 2006
The Social Security Appeals Council has apparently impeached their own medical authority Dr. Eric Strandberg wheather they have any legal right to or not and this section gives legal notice of what has occured to Washington State DSHS

I was attending Covenant Church with my friend Reverend Alan Hartman and was surprised to learn that someone burned down Dr. Boyd Biens great big estate house.

US Congressman John Conyers Jr.

US House Committee On Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

US Congressman Charles Rangle

Chairman House Ways and Means
1102 Longworth HOB
Washington D.C. 20515
P: (202) 225-3625
F: (202) 225-2610

Exhibit #I-J Question On Irregularities In
Adminitrative Law Hearings Feburary, 2006


Appeals Council

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 24041-3255
Acknowledgement of Social Security Appeal
Process & Question of Proceedings In Wrong Venue
SSI Claim 261-90-6357
Addressed to the:
Honorable David R. Wurm
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Office of Hearings & Appeals
San Antonio, HO, SSA
Trinity Building, Suite 100
4204 Woodcock Drive
San Antonio, TX 78228-1323

RE: Christopher Walters-legal resident Oregon State
Medical Evidence in Portland OR/Southern Washington:

Your Honor Chief Administrative Law Judge David R. Wurm:

Today is February 22nd, 2006 and I have just received your letter February 3, 2006 which was mailed too Reverend Alan Hartman here in San Antonio, Texas addressed to my former Attorney Tom Moseley which appears to be occurring in the wrong venue:

1. I am currently a legal resident of Oregon State and most of the recent medical evidence & testimony which Office of Hearings and Appeals would consider are located in either Portland, Oregon or across the river in Vancouver, Washington.

2. My efforts to achieve residence here last year were defeated by local medical providers who for instance refused to permit me to participate in indigent care programs such as Care link and for instance I currently have an unfilled prescription for Clindaymacin from Christus Santa Rosa which I cannot get filled.

3. My former Attorneys John Heard and Tom Moseley were unable to provide adequate representation because of local 3rd party tampering with the US Mail and inability to practice law in Oregon or Washington where most of the current medical evidence resides.
Question of Transferring
Appeal to Portland, Oregon

Given the current lack of workable resources or options I might suggest the Office of Hearings and Appeals move the claim from San Antonio, TX to Portland, Oregon. My US Senator Gordon Smith of Portland, Oregon is aware of some of the problems of the SSI claim and his staff has been quite generous in volunteering to resolve any additional legalities.

With Kindest Regards
Chris Walters, Pro Se

PS While I do have mail drops in various locations around the country I do not claim legal residence simply based on the ability to deliver a letter.

Mailed February 2006 From Downtown Post Office, SA, TX 78205
Mr. Chris Walters
c/o 7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin, TX 78724
Thursday, February 2, 2006

Washington State DSHS
Columbia River CSO S53-1
PO Box 8989
Vancouver, WA 98663
(360)896-5128

RE: Voluntary Withdrawl GAU 3491348
Social Security Appeals Council Challenged Your Findings:

Dear Washington State DSHS:

On 12-14-2005 the Social Security Administration Appeals Council returned the SSI Claim 261-90-6357 to the Office of Hearings and Appeals here in San Antonio, Texas for further consideration and work by the Administrative Law Judges. Unfortunately the Order explains that the Appeals Council did not acknowledge or permit the inclusion your consultative exam of 10-25-2005 or the follow up consultative exam by Dr. Pinon and had challenged your rights to be compensated for payments made to me and medical work done. Washington State DSHS is the social security represenative which preforms such exams in Washington State. I am therefore voluntarily withdrawing from the DSHS program effective 12-17-2006.

Ruling Challenges Fair Shake for DSHS

Normally your agency would be entitled to repayment of GAU monies and medical cost from Social Security as their official represenative and I did send copies of your work to the San Antonio OHA where the case resides. As you can see from the enclosed legal brief previously filed by Social Security in other states the agency maintains the right to impeach or challenge any medical finding and the Courts have been unwilling to take remedial action until the matter is removed to a US District Court. While I have questioned the fairness of this pratice with Chairman & Senator Gordon Smith of Senate Aging Committee it is unlikely the Congress will address the matter in the near future. While your agency could continue providing me financial and medical services you would not have any fair chance for repayment which is why I am withdrawing my GAU claim.

If you feel that my actions are not fair or reasonable you can leave a message for me with Dr. Robert Canon (512-471-9653) of UT School of Social Work who can contact me via email.

With Kindest Regards
Chris Walters
cc: US Attorney San Antonio, TX
Mailed Thursday, February 2, 2006 from Austin, Texas

Appeals Council

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 24041-3255
Acknowledgement of Social Security Appeal Process &
Compliance Wit Hallex Submission of Evidence
SSI Claim 261-90-6357
From Christopher Alan Walters
chrissaidthanks2002@yahoo.com
Temporary Address c/o
110 N McCullough
San Antonio, TX 78205

Addressed to the Honorable David R. Wurm
Administrative Law Judge
Office of Hearings & Appeals
San Antonio, HO, SSA
Trinity Building, Suite 100
4204 Woodcock Drive
San Antonio, TX 78228-1323

Washington State DSHS
PO Box 8985
Vancouver, WA 98661
(360-759-2926)
(Fax 360-750-6936

RE: Complainance with Hallex Submission of Evidence:
Request Rescheduling Medical Appointments DSHS Claim 3491348

Your Honor Chief Administrative Law Judge David R. Wurm:
Today is March 1st, 2006 and I have upon review of your letter Feburary 3, 2006 been given to understand I can submit medical documentation and other evidence within the framework of the Hallex even though I don't have an attorney and both . The consultative exams Washington State did are enclosed as well as others:

1. Dr. Eric Strandberg
US Health Works
1151 Denny Way
Seattle, WA 98109
(206-682-7418)
Fax 206-623-0884)

2. Dr. Jose Pinon
Family Physicians Group
100 East 33rd Street, Suite 100
Vancouver,WA 98663
360-735-8100
Fax 360-735-3596

3. Dr. Shaun Harper
Cascade Heart
200 NE Mother Joseph Place, Sutie 400
Vancouver, WA 98664
(360-256-2640)

4. Dr. Mark Greelee MD
333 North Santa Rosa Street
San Antonio, TX 78207
(210-704-2880

5. Medical Records are on CD-Rom:
E://ssi/access/index.html
E://ssi/access/herbertb.htm
Washington States latest finding

Mailed Thursday, February 2, 2006 from Austin, Texas


Rates Cited Based on USDC SDNY

500 Pearl Street, New York
New York 10007-1312
Legal Costs $.87 postage
Printing Costs $.75
Counsel's Time to Prepare Documents
1 Hours at $110.00 Hour=$110.00

Total $111.62
Discussion Of Evidence in Hallex Process
I have submitted Hallex related evidence on 2 copies on CD-Rom which cover background; vocational training; and medical records which are written in Html at 114 Megabytes going back about 20 years. Dr. Eric Strandberg the government's doctor explains in his report of 10-25-2005 my disabilities can be traced by to 1998 based on past medical history and history of digestive problems. Dr. Jose Pinon acting as the government's doctor explained in his report the digestive problems might be related to chronic internal infections which could be supported by the 80 some odd doctors treating chronic infections since 1997. Dr. Shaun Harper of Cascade Heart acting as the government's doctor did an echo cardiograpm which is not conclusive or shows I am missing portions of the heart. Dr. Mark Greelee has treated the open hole in my leg apparent aggrevated by long bus ride to Texas which is cited as a stasis ulcer. The hole is healing enough where I believe I can get back on the Greyhound Bus maybe in early April, 2006 and return to Washington State and resume medical work and testing to see if the problems are permanent or treatable.
Request For Assistance From
DSHS to Reschedule Medical Appointments
I have sent a copy of this letter to Dr. Shane Dunaway at SeaMar Clinic the government's primary care provider and asked his staff to reschedule a GI Exam; consult with Vascular Surgeon... and whatever else we need done. If no unexpected disasters occur I should return to Washington State to resume on or about 4-8-2006.
Vocational Training Report
& Endorsement By Federal Agency
The Social Security Administration requested a vocational training program in 2000 when I was in Boise, Idaho which is on the CD-Rom. The Department of Homeland Security emailed me this and explained my skills related to work are improving:

RE: NIMS Related Research Project
Date: Tuesday 28, Feburary 2006 13:52:01
From: Walker, Mary-Margaret
Mary-Margaret.Walker@dhs.gov

Dear Chris,

Thank you very much for sending us the information about your work for the State of Washington. This preparedness tool is a valuable planning activity and an important resource for response and recovery activities. The Web-based contact list is useful for resource management and easy access to potential contacts statewide. Thanks very much for letting us know about it.

Mary Margaret Walker
NIMS Integration Center
DHS/FEMA
Washington, DC

cc:Dr. Shane Dunaway
SeaMar Clinic
204 East 35th Street
Vancouver, WA 98663
(360-895-5128)

Press on Image To Enlarge

Dr. Cymorek
Vancouver Clinic
Schedule GI Exam
Follow Up GI Evaluation
Canceled Via Appeals Council Action
This is a follow up exam set up by Dr. Shane Dunaway set for 2-17-2006. The appointment fell through because the Social Security Appeals Council disqualified Washington State DSHS medical findings in their report 12-14-2005. An emergency room visit to Metropolitan Hospital in San Antonio with referral to Dr. Ortega(?) was canceled by Washington State in Janurary, 2006

Exhibit #K Return to Washington State/Resume Disability Claim/March, 2006


Mr. Alan & Pat Hartman
Texas Arms of Love
4107 Longvale Drive
San Antonio, TX 78217
210-657-0196
PO Box 33323
San Antonio, TX 78265
Your Opening My Mail Again?
Thanks For The Heads Up
Operational Impediment 11
My friend Reverend Alan Hartman is sending me an email that he has opened another letter addressed to me and explains the Social Security Appeals Office has sent some type of communications"

Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:33:37 -0800 (PST) From: "Alan Hartman" Subject: SS letter, dtd Feb 3, 2006
To: "Chris Walters"
chrissaidthanks2002@yahoo.com

Chris,
I just picked up a letter from Soc Sec Admin to your lawyer saying that a hearing will take place concerning your case. No date was set. They will notify you atleast 20 days in advance of that date.

Blessings, Alan

David C Williams

Postal Inspector General
14800 Trinity Blvd Ste 600
Fort Worth, TX 76155-2675
Citation of Authority Question Violation
Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction of Correspondence
Citation #6 2006
Titel 18 USC 1702. Obstruction of correspondence Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both

Walters Residence

c/o Dr. Robert Canon
2006-2007
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724
Message (512)-471-9653
Mr. Chris Walters
SSI 261-90-6357
chrissaidthanks2002@yahoo.com
c/o Dr. Robert Canon
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin, Texas 78724
Message (512)-471-9653
Saturday, March 4th, 2006
Dr. Eric Strandberg Dr. Jose Pinon US Health Works Family Physicians 1151 Denny Way 100 East 33rd St, Seattle, WA 98109 Vancouver, WA 98663

RE: Question of resetting medical appointments
DSHS 3491348
Return to Washington in April, 2006:

Dear Doctors:

As you can see from the enclosures the Social Security Administration was willing to accept your medical findings in the Office of Hearings and Appeals and DSHS records and I was able to ask if the SSI claim should be moved to Washington State. A local doctor here in San Antonio Texas has been treating the stasis ulcer in my leg which has closed enough to permit me to catch a bus back to Washington State in early April, 2006 and continue the medical work which is incompleted:

1. Consult for GI evaluation.

2. Consult for vascular surgeon.
Request Reset
Medical Appointment
If you are interested in proceeding with the medical work I might ask your staff to call DSHS (360)759-2926 and verify that my medical coupons are still authorized for April, 2006. Dr. Robert Canon has kindly agreed to accept messages and can forward your appointments to me via email. Many thanks for your patience.

Chris Walters, Patient

Dr. Canon
Bus Ticket to Seattle, WA
Link Return To Seattle I believe I had enough money from my DSHS Debit Card to return to Seattle, WA

9/2009-1/2010
Legal Costs $557.80 Or Attorney Fees
1. $111.87 Exhibit #266
2. $111.87 Exhibit #274
3. $111.87 Exhibit #275
4. $110.57 Exhibit #278
5. $111.62 Exhibit #282
Total: $557.80

Appendix A Blackletter Law Requirements Operational Audits


Blackletter Law Requirements
Blackletter Law
Executive Fiat or ORDER 1997
The Social Security Administration appeared at Bar in USDC, WDT Walters v Miller, Crownover and exercised their sovereign authority to limit all activities related directly or indirectly to Social Security to a few authorized protocols listed above. Challenges to the Social Security Administrations soverign authority is prosecuted Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Former US Attorney General

Alberto Gonzalez
US Department of Justice

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

David C Williams

Social Security Inspector General
Fraud Hotline
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Title 18 CRIMES & Impediments 2006
1. Operational Imediments
Total: 19
2. Computer Hacking
Total: 0
3. Theft of US Mail
Total: 2
4. Title 18 USC Obstruction Court ORDER
Total: 5
5. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy defraud US
Total: 1
6. Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of laqw
Total: 6
7. Genocide or Assassination Attempts
Total: 1
8. Sedition or Treason
Total: 0
9. Other Violations of Title 18
Total: 1 Kidknapping 1 Tampering Federal Agency
10. Total Violations
Total: 17
Medical Treatment & Costs 2006
1. Hospital Visits
Total: 3
2. Clinic Visits
Total: 4
3. Hotels Nights
Total: 0
4. Transportation Costs
$500 greyhond to Seattle and back
Total: 0

Advanced Medical Directive

Requires Contract to Provide Medical Services
Why Is The United States Going Broke?
Medical Failure Equal Profit for Hospitals and Doctors
Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

Appendix B Citation of Federal Authority


US Senator Mark O Hatfield

Chairman Senate Appropriations
Salem,Oregon

Former US Congressman Henry B Gonzalez

Chairman Banking & Urban Affairs Committee
San Antonio,Texas 78205

US Congressman Tony Coelho

House Majority Whip
Modesto, CA 95354

Congressional Work Ethic Can
Result In Your Being Volunteered or Drafted

It seems that many Chairman of Congress believe in the concept of work ethic and if they find you on Capitol Hill or too close to something they are working on will actually have someone volunteered or simply drafted. I-5 Cooridor Agreement origionally on covered portions of California, Oregon, and Washington but was rapidly expanded by the national leadership to include a third of the United States. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez caught me on Capitol Hill about 1988 circulating one of my publications and had me introduced to the HUD Inspector General.. This assignment lasted until about 1993 when the Clinton Administration came into power and replaced me with 2 convicted persons who according to press reports were paid $80,000 a year plus expenses..

Infrastructure Protecton Programs

Chris Walters
Survey Coordinator
Background On Audits &
Surveys Done For US Government ...
The author has worked in the security and private investigations industry for 40 years typically wears a uniform carries a fire arm and protects facilities with insured value into billion dollar range. Services and contracts with the United States Government begin in 1997 and include

1. 1-5 Corridor Agreement study authorizations for surveys in 15 states 1986

2. Directory Model Social Service Agencies

3. Organized Crime Ties to US Dept HUD Confirmed Kills

4. Federal Law CSBG US Senator Mark O Hatfield

5. Welfare Reform Act 1986

6. Food Stamps For Homless Act US Congressman Tony Coelho

7. Audits USDA Programs confirmed kills

8. Audits US Postal Programs confirmed kills

9. Terrorist in Social Services confirmed kills

8. Spyware Act of 2005 2nd Federal Law 2015

9. Emergency Management Authorizations1993-2013

10. Emergency Management Structure 15 States1993-2013

11. Operational Audit Social SecurityExecutive ORDER 1997-2015

Server and Internet Operated

By Liquidnet in United Kingdom
Joinder to United Nations
In 1999 the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals authorized a special jonder of study programs and human rights issue to the United Nations The program materials are located in the United Kingdom.

Former US Attorney General

John Ashcroft
US Department of Justice

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

David C Williams

Social Security Inspector General
Fraud Hotline
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Prosecutable Federal Offenses
1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities what appears to be a large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect.

Former US Senator Phil Gramm

"Senate Budget Hawk"
Retired Due To Enron Scandal

Former US Congressman Henry B Gonzalez

Chairman Banking & Urban Affairs Committee
JFK Profile In Courage Award
San Antonio, TX 78206-1286

Former Congressman Dick Armey

House Majority Leader
Retired Due to Enron
San Antonio Home of The
Federal Grand Jury-Even The Prosecutor Get Sacked
While San Antonio maybe a great city these links suggest local politics are on the shady side and best avoided by tourist:

1. Home of Federal Grand Jury San Antonio city, local and federal persons form a permanent line of convictions to federal grand jury and prison.

2. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez was Chairman of the Powerful Banking Committee during the time the S&L Scandals and crisis occured. The Congressman's hometown of San Antonio profited from the repayment of monies which are described below

3. This link concerns Congressional Investigations of Haliburgon where it was discovered the company former owned by VP Dick Cheney was over charging the US DOD for billions of dollars.

4. Human Rights Violations US claims "Divine Right Of Kings" to violate human and civil rights of it's own citizens

5. Fictious conviction attempt to create and maintain a conviction without trial; judge; jury or any record of court proceedings

6. False Credit History defeated in 198th Judicial District Court of Texas

7. You Buy Your Dope In Church? San Antonio has extensive history of using social service agencies to traffick drugs.

8. Dain Kunzler self professed terrorist explaines in great deal he has been threatening various persons, groups and organizations I receive services from in front a a US District court no less

9. Attempt to Block Medical Treatment San Antonio Rescue Mission tells Baptist Hospital I can recover at their shelter and then denies me services for life

10. Local Church steals $10,000 from me and my interestate business

11. The San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries and others joined forces to destroy Chris Walters business which was licensed here in San Antonio in 2001.

Former Mayor Henry Cisneros

City of San Antonio, TX
Convicted Lying Congress
Then Acquitted

Former State Attorney General

Dan Morales

Former Congressman Tom Delay

Speaker of US House


San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

Former US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

Former Congressman Albert Bustamate

Sentenced Prison for Corruption
San Antonio, TX

Enron New Texas

State Flag


Former White House Counsel

"King" Karl Rove

Former US District Judge John Wood Jr

Assassinated On May 29, 1979,
San Antonio, TX

Former US Attorney General

Alberto Gonzalez
US Department of Justice