US Senator John Cornyn

Chase Tower
221 West Sixth Street Suite 1530
Austin, TX 78701

U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison

961 Pickle Federal Building
300 E. 8th Street
Austin, TX 78701

Former US Congressman Charles Gonzalez

B-124 Federal Building
727 East Durango
San Antonio, TX 78206-1286

US Congressman Lamar Smith

Guaranty Bank Building
1100 NE Loop 410
Suite 640
San Antonio, TX 78209

Governor Rick Perry

Office of the Governor
State Insurance Building
1100 San Jacinto
Austin, Texas 78701


Chairman Darrell Issa

Subcommittee Courts, ....
House Judiciary Committee
2269 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-3906

Congressman Jim Jordan

Subcommittee On HealthCare
1524 Longworth House Office Bldg
Washington, DC 20515
T (202) 225-2676

Chairman Jason Chaffetz

House Oversight Committee
2157 Rayburn HOB
Washington,DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5074
Fax: (202) 225-3974
Exhibit C Submitted As Evidence And
Testimony To Congress-Exclusive Jurisdiction
You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings
Standing US Court ORDERS
And Black Letter Law
Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

US Senator Chuck Grassley

Chairman Senate Committee On Juriciary
433 Russell SOB
Wahsington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-7703

US Senator Ron Johnson

Chairman Senate Oversight
Whistleblower
340 Dirksen SOB
Washington, DC, 20510
(202) 224-4751

Congressman Mike Thompson

House Ways and Means Committee
2300 County Center Dr. Suite A100
Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Former President George Bush Jr

1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, DC 20501

Former HHS Secretary

Mike Leavitt
Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201

Social Security Commissioner

Mike Asture
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235

Appendix Page
Request Review Too Appeals Council
1. Citation of Authority Administrative Law Judge Decision April, 2005 Request Appeals Council Review

2. Citation of Authority Disabiltiy Findings Thrown Out By Administrative Law Judge Decision April, 2005

3. Exhibits #A Appeals Council Request For Review

Social Security Administration

Office of Hearings and Appeals
One Skyline Tower
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041

Walters Residence

c/o Dr. Robert Canon
2006-2007
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724

Appeal to Appeals Council

Appeal to Appeals Council made in April, 2006 from Austin,Texas

From Technical Expert Betsy Huber

Social Security Administration
2141 Summit Court
Las Cruces, NM 88011

Commissioners Disability Determination

Citation of Authority Administrative Law Judge
Decision April, 2005 Request Appeals Council Review


Social Security Administration

office Of Hearings and Appeals
10222 San Pedro Avenue
San Antonio, TX 78216
Partially Favorable Decision
Judge Threw Out All Doctor Records
Administrative Law Judge Ruling April, 2006 where Administrative Law Judge threw away all medical documentation and disability statements previously signed by by SSA. Title 42 USC 423(d)(5)(b) Disability insurance benefit payments and Hallex Volume require Social Security to gather all medical records for consideration in the official record

Dr. Susan Pelzer
SSA Expert
506 Jackson Keller Rd
San Antonio, TX 78216

Judge Admits Testimony Dr. Pfizer
Who Has Never Met Chris Walters

Dr. Susan Pfeizer testifies about what she believes Chris Walters medical condition is who she has never met.

Social Security Administration

Office of Hearings and Appeals
One Skyline Tower
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041

Walters Residence

c/o Dr. Robert Canon
2006-2007
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin TX 78724

Appeal to Appeals Council

Appeal to Appeals Council made in April, 2006 from Austin, Texas

Citation of Authority State Disabiltiy Findings Thrown Out
By Administrative Law Judge Decision April, 2005 Request Appeals Council Review


Dr. Evans-AZ Disability Determination

Set aside by Homeless Shelter

Dr. Evans-AZ Disability Determination

Set aside by Homeless Shelter

Arizona DES 1997


Press On Image To Enlarge

SSI Reciept for Medical Records
Received SSI Office
2301 Park Avenue
Lynchburg, VA 24501
Social Security Signs For
90 Medical & Doctors Reports 2002

Dr. Mark Cieniawski MD

Care Medical Groups
4291 Meridian Costo Center
Bellingham, WA 98226
Washington State DSHS
Disability Determination 8-2005

Press On Image To Enlarge

Dr. Mark Cieniawski, MD
Disability Determination

Press On Image To Enlarge

Dr. Mark Cieniawski, MD
Disability Determination

Press On Image To Enlarge

US Health Works
1151 Denny Way
Seattle, WA 98109
Dr. Strandberg
Defines Disabilities Cardiac, Digestive, Veins In Legs
Medical examination 10-25-2005 by Dr. Eric Strandberg; US Health Works recommended Echo Cardio Gram; Venous Studies of Legs; and Colonoscopy. No restrictions on computer or job training. Letter from DSHS 10/26/2005 Oks GAU Case #3491348 through 1/31/2006; including Medical and Food Stamps. A person of reasonable and common intelligence would expect all the medical test to be completed within 2 or 3 weeks.

US Social Security Adm

1249 S Vinnell Way # 101,
Boise, ID 83709
(208) 321-2900
Admission of Disabilities
By Social Security
Social Security Administration
Date Feb 22-2000
Claim 261-90-6357
BS

Supplemental Security Income
Notice of Disapproved Claim
Christopher A Walters
c/o Boise Rescue 520 Front Street
Boise,ID 83704

We are writing about your clim for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments. Based on a review of your health problems, you do not quality for benefits on this claim. This is because you are not disabled under our rules:

Trained Staff Reviewed Your Case and Made These Decisions. They work for your State, but used our rules. The determination on your claim was made by an agency of the State. It was not made by your own doctor or by any other agency's written report about you. However, any evidence they gave us was used in making this determination. Doctors and other people in the State agency who are trained in disability evaluation reviewed the evidence and made the determinatio based on Social Security law and regulations.

The Decision on Christopher A. Walters' Case** The following reports were used to decide your claim (16 of 100 medical sources)Birmingham Health Care for Homelss response received Salvation Army Hospital & Health Clinic Cooper Green Hospital Good Shephered Hospital El Rio Clinic Douglas Community Hospital Columbia Community Hospital Columbia Capital Medical Center Cowlitz Family Health Center Mercy Medical Center Brackenridge Hospital Kaweah Delta Hospital Helping Hands Clinic Shands Clinic Munroe Regional Medical Center Lakeland Reg Med Ctr Doug Wright, MD. We have determined that your condition is not severe enough to keep you from working. We considered the medical and other information your age, education, training, and work experience inn determining how your condition affects your ability work to work:

You said you are disabled due to skin cancer, malignant melanoma, GI disorder, frequent vowel movements, blood clots in the legs and hepatitis. The medical shows that you have a history of these problems.

1. It shows that you have surgical excision of melanoma in the past. There is no evidence of recurrence (**failed to include reports on additional treatment).

2. It shows that you have been treated for intestinal problems with frequent bowel movements.

3. You do have a mild edema and varicosities in your lower extremities, but no ulcerations.

4. You should avoid direct exposure to sunlight.

5. You should also have access to restroom facilities.

Upon recent examination, your chest is clear. Your heart rate is regular. There is not evidence of masses or abdominal tenderness. Your weight is stable. The evidence does not show severe neurological deficits. You are able to walk and move about independently. Based on the objective medical finding your condition is not of the severity that would prevent you from doing all types of work. Although you have no past substantial work, you should have the capacity to preform a wide range of other work within your limitations. Thus, your cliam is denied.>>>>... Continues on standardized form information.

Exhibits #A Appeals Council Request For Review


Notice Of Appeal To Appeals Council,

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255

Christopher A. Walters
Social Security Claim 261-90-6357
c/o Dr. Robert Canon
7335 Ritchie Drive
Austin, TX 78724

This is an Appeal from a "Notice of Decision-Partially Favorable" rendered by Williams S Herbert dated April 20, 2006 at the Office of Hearings and Appeals in San Antonio, Texas. Although Chris Walters is a resident of the State of Oregon and not a resident of the State of Texas a Dr. Robert Canon a Professor at the University of Texas School of Social Work has agreed to hold Chris Walters mail and messages as an assistance to the parties. Judge William Herbert indicated in his ruling that I have a right to appeal his decision in writing.
Should Appeals Council Review Judge Herbert's
Failure to Complete the Record?
The Appeals Council Order of 12-14-2005 instructed the Office of Hearings and Appeals at San Antonio, Texas to complete the record. While Judge Herbert Decision does cite the Social Security case history it neglects to mention or cite various civil actions which include Walters v.Crownover Miller SA-97-CA-1313USDC, WDT 1997; Walters v Apfel A99CA156SS USDC WDT, 1999; Bradshaw V. Odom and Walters 04 CVS 2674 in Forsyth County Superior Court, NC. Perhaps most importantly the Orders and Findings of the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals Of May 10th, 2004 which permitted extraordinary review by Committees of Congress and the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights. The vague statement of threats to various public officials are probably sanctions imposed on the Social Security Administration and it's representatives authorized by Federal Courts of Appeals; Committees of Congress; and United Nations law. The statments made by your North Carolina representatives in Bradshaw V. Odom and Walters 04 CVS 2674 in Forsyth County Superior Court, NC that they can violate any law they wish whenever they want instead of complying with CFR Title 20 Section 416... was in fact the basis of recent intervention of the US Senate Committee on Aging in December, 2005.

Judge Herbert refers to Chris Walters counsel of record as "The claimant did not appear for the scheduled hearing and the Administration law Judge finds that the claimant was considered a non-essential witness” and proceeded with the scheduled hearing." Judge Herbert ignored evidence that Chris Walters is a legal resident of Portland, Oregon and the medical evidence resides in Washington State and held a hearing in a state Chris Walters does not reside in. Do the flaws in Judge Herbert's Decision stem from failing to permit Chris Walters as Appellant Counsel of Record to introduce evidence into the record; to examine evidence and cross examine his expert witness Dr. Susan Piezer. Judge Herbert makes no mention of the obstruction of the Appeals Council ORDER of 12-14-2005 which was obstructed in Texas to compel Chris Walters to discontinue a disability claim in Washington State to travel 2,000 miles in person to receive your ORDER. As with previous obstruction of Court ORDERS the obstruction of your ORDER of April 14, 2005 is a highly prosecutable crime.

Since Judge Herbert considers Chris Walters an unwanted tourist at the hearings can we easily discern the Judge's errors? The completion of the record pursuant to Title 42 Section 423(d)(5)(b) Disability Determinations or the Hallex and Code of Federal Regulation Title 20 Section 416 requires an intelligent and concise discussion of Chris Walters medical records. For instance the decision should include a brief and clear review of major medical experts of which there are 160 doctors medical work on colon problems; congestive heart failure; chronic infections; and circulation problems in the legs. Judge Herbert mumbles a few words about "chronic colon infections" doesn't even mention the findings of the 3 consultative exams preformed by Washington State DSHS representatives Dr. Eric Strandberg; Dr. Pinon; and Dr. Shaun Harper.

Judge Herbert's expert Dr. Susan Peizer refers to Chris Walters setting up extensive websites and complex paper work falls short of the facts that the Social Security Administration asked Chris Walters in 2001 to under take "vocational training" which in the case at bar involves computer training. One of Chris Walters earlier resumes on CD-ROM is apparently cited and fails to mention the computer or vocational training being supervised by Dr. Robert Canon a PHD at University of Texas School of Social Work whose PHD is in psychology and social work.

Notice Of Appeal To Appeals Council,

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
Proposal For Settlement & Agreement
Filed With Social Security Council April, 2006
Question of Incompetence Of Fraud By
Expert Witness Dr. Susan Pelzer PHD
1. Title 42 § 416.1013 Disability determinations the State makes required Dr. Pizer and Judge Herbert to review and consider the findings of the 3 consultative exams provided by Washington State DSHS Dr. Strandberg, Dr. Pinon, and Dr. Shawn Harper.

2. The 3 consultative exams done by the Social Security Administrations representative Washington State DSHS on 10-25-2005 includes detailed instructions for diagnosis and possible treatment as cited by Dr. Eric Strandberg the Social Security Administrations representative. The Case Worker Sharon Langs in the exhibits instructs Dr. Strandberg "Please perform test to establish a diagnosis-including xrays". While Dr. Strandberg readily established a disability will exist for at least 12 months he declined to perform the medical test Washington State authorized to be completed.

3. Dr. Pizer PHD dispatched 160 doctors treating medical conditions including congestive heart failure; 80 doctors treating infections; and 45 doctors treating chronic colon problem with a statement that doctors can't address the issues because Chris Walters exaggerates the conditions.

4. In fact it is extremely profitable for doctors and medical authorities to facilitate the fraud, hoax, and scram by demanding additional disability statements which abuse the taxpayer and demand medical examinations which no one has any intention of preforming.

5. The United States Supreme Court ruled in Schindler Schiavo V Michael Schiavo that patients have an absolute right to accept or decline medical treatment and choose their own doctors which your agency lacks the standing to challenge.

6. How well has Dr. Piezer presented her medical claim to Chris Walters the person who decides what treatment is or is not appropriate?

7. Title 20 § 416.920a Evaluation of mental impairments.(b) Use of the technique. (1) Under the special technique, we must first evaluate your pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings to determine whether you have a medically determinable mental impairment(s). See §416.908 for more information about what is needed to show a medically determinable impairment. If we determine that you have a medically determinable mental impairment(s), we must specify the symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of the impairment(s) and document our findings in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section.

8. Does Dr. Piezer present an exact and particular list of mental institutions where Chris Walters was incarcerated for the type of behavior alleged over a period of years; including the name of treating physicians and medications most effective in treatment of these problems?

9. Does Dr. Piezer have a list of witnesses who can come forth and under oath and withstand cross examination and testify to the bizarre and unusual behavior and specific instances which are alleged?

10. If Dr. Peizer for instance disagrees with Chris Walters assessment that Attorney Tom Moseley neglect to acquire copies of Chris Walters medical record for 6 months is within accepted norms for the federal bar we can discuss the matter in great detail and maybe Tom Moseley won't get disbarred from practicing Social Security law.
Review of Alleged Threats or
Imposition of Congressional Sanctions?
1. Dr. Susan Peizer PhD “testified further in the extreme level of socialization as he threatened people in their offices, to include Judges and office worker, for many years.

2. Any person threatening a federal judge; a social security employee; or Social Security Judge would be apprehended and arrested instantly and Dr. Piezer's report should include an extensive list of arrest, convictions, and detentions at various penal facilities.

3. Chris Walters has of course has never met a Federal Judge; never met a Social Security Judge; never attended a Social Security Hearing in person; never been in the chambers or before the Court in a federal courthouse and has never spoken to your Administrative Law executive staff on the phone?

4. Couldn't we even be a little more honest and state that Chris Walters hires legal counsel or withdraws appellate claims and has declined to appear in person in Social Security Hearings for 9 years and currently before the Appeals Council because he declines to meet with your staff in person?

5. Chris Walters would bet money that Congressional staff threatened your staff in December, 2005 when they learned your agency has spent the last 9 years trying to compel a homeless person to amend the key provisions of the largest item on federal budget otherwise known as Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations.

6. Congressman Bob Goodlatte learned that Texans in San Antonio, Texas were trying to amend Title 7 USC 2011 and you can bet as Chairman of the Committee on Agriculture he did not appreciate it in the least and possibly privately threatened folks in San Antonio.

7. Congressman Lamar Smith's letter of Janurary 18th, 2005 states" Thank you for taking the time to write and letting me know of your survey information on the Social Security program. I appreciate having the benefit of the information".

8. Congressman Lamar Smith is Chairman of House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Courts,Internet, and Intellectual Property an by definition of law decides what is the law; what is appropriate; and who will sit on the federal bench and no Federal Judge will remain on the bench long by critizing the Congressman's findings.

9. Congressman Bob Goodlatte is another Chairman of House Committee on Judiciary who is reviewing Chris Walters operational audits of social service programs and in his letter of October 16,2001 states: "Thank you for your recent letter and link to your website"

10. If members of the Social Security staff are found on Capitol Hill or in Committee business or praticing in the Congressional Record they are subject to arrest by Capitol Police unless they have been authorized to appear by summons or subponea. Your staff's characterizations of materials plainly marked "Evidence and Testimony Before Congress" may be sufficent to warrant prosecution under Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.

11. Chris Walters suggest that Dr. Piezer and Judge Herbert used the proceeding as a political vehicle to attack and criticize members of Congress whose have repeatedly sanctioned your staff over a period of years.

12. The United States Supreme Court ruled in US V Haldeman, Erlichman, and Dean that the 40 government officials who opened counsel papers were prosecuted under Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.
13. The Appeals Council is probally unaware of the fact that the San Antonio City Council is a revolving door for the federal prison system where corruption is shortlived and regularily rewarded by substantial prison terms.

14. That we can tell any lie which is convenient is a mentality found in the conviction of former HUD Secretary and councilman Henry Cisneros who was convicted of lying to Congress and former Congressman Bustamente doing years in prison for corruption. Former State Attorney General Dan Morales who pleaded the "Divine Right of Kings" on behalf of your agency in USDC, WDT in 1997 is currently in federal prison in Texarkana, Texas.

15. Does the San Antonio community view these individual as outcast or lowlifes? The situational ethics which prevade San Antonio and the Decision of Judge Herbert provides that the folks we described are viewed as heroes whose time in prison is viewed as a badge of honor.

16. The San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries of San Antonio is operated by the Catholic Church is a well known killing ground where clients are stabbed and injured and where the police drive by and ignore drug abuse and drinking. Dr. Piezer 's comments about homeless are believed to be inappropriate because after all Dr. Piezer community lacks the ability to provide the simple services required by the US Department of HUD for drug free, alochol free; and abuse free facilities. Dr. Piezer lacks the credentials to practice in a field where Chris Walters is a nationally recognized expert whose research has created several federal statutes.

17. Possibly the Appeals Council will share Chris Walters insight into the disobedince of Judge Herbert's refusal to complete the Record and scam the process as typical sociopathic behavior which prevades all of South Texas.
Chris Walters Rebuttal
Chris Walters will present a recent newspaper article from Winston Salem Journal, in Winston Salem, NC citing persons who have known him since 2001 who explain Chris Walters is a great and wonderful person of excellent character who donates his time to public institutions. Mr. Willis Miller (336-784-1962-ext 26) the Assistance Director of the Samaritan Ministries explained his shelter has known Chris Walters for 5 years and never had a disciplinary problem with Chris who he explains has excellent and outstanding deportment to the newspaper. Mr. Miller and his staff deal with problem clients and mental health clients as described by Dr. Piezer on a daily basis.

Chris Walters will also present as rebuttal omissions of fact and merit described below which Judge Herbert left out of his report including: numerous of public commendations; and thanks from professionals in law enforcement and emergency management which are on line on the enclosed resume. Chris Walters role in creating several federal statutes such as Community Service Block Grants and Welfare Reform Act of 1996 ; Title 42 USC 11301; Title 7 USC 2014(b) Food stamps Chris Walters operational audits form found on the CD-Rom and on line http://www.angelfire.com/dc2/107thcongress suggest that information about homeless processes are not based on vague mumbled industry words concerns urban legends but on field work by a qualified investigator.

Extensive audits of program functions or as the GAO explains operational impediments frequently become federal law and city master plans such as those found on various resume pages require more skill than shucking the blame for failures on the clients who after all don't operate the 250 Billion a year nonprofit industry. We have a long term problem with minor staff and other representatives fielding technical; unauthorized; and inappropriate legal questions to Chris Walters a person regarded as an "Officer of the Court" which violate the Order of the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals. The legal FYI cited at the end of this brief suggest Chris Walters is not authorized by any Magistrate or Federal Judge to practice; vend or dispense any law here in the United States and your staff is not authorized to practice law with either the US Congress of the United Nations. Dr. Robert Canon's Reviews of Your Findings

Dr. Robert Canon is a PHD in social work and clinical psychology who has known Chris Walters for over a decade and volunteered to assist Chris Walters prepare his 135 megabyte Resume and background information. Preparing thousands of pages of resume is a long time consuming process which however does provide excellent opportunities to acquire skills for future employment. Dr. Canon responded to your comments as: "I tend to assume that you have some time on your hands and building ironic web pages in the vein of Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal is an entertaining way to work on your html skills. I noticed in the decision, though, that the judge had an "expert" testify to the effect that you're suffering from a "personality disorder". Providing meticulously crafted, densely populated web pages full of ironic passive aggression kind of plays into that perception. It might be best to keep the web pages for the amusement of you and your friends and focus specifically on the issues in your case during the appeal. I agree that the vague mention of threats you've made to judges and staff are preposterous and his decision was vague in general. " We could if your agency would like to have Dr. Canon review the current CD-Rom and identify specific problem areas? We have to ask is the Social Security Administration in the business of telling claimants what they can or can’t have on their Resume?
Does The Social Security Administration
Need Additional Embarassment?
Chris Walters has enclosed an extensive database of review of apparent human rights abuses involving the Social Security process and has an opportunity to either have it reviewed by a US District Court or begin serious considerations of asking the United Nations to place some of the the Social Security Administration processes into control of a "Special Master" for Human and Civil Rights concern. If I worked at the Appeals Council I wouldn't want to have anyone explain to a either a US District Court Judge; the United Nations the problems plaguing your agency. Would you want someone like Chris Walters acquiring even partial control of my organization or trying to place sanctions on it?
Proposed Agreement With Social Security Appeals Council ?
What is a hard working federal employee to do when it appears Judge Herbert and his expert dropped the ball? We go back to the basic US Code which is Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations and the consultative exams recently completed by your experts in Washington State DSHS which outlines a clear cut course of action based on treatment and returning Chris Walters to work:

1. I would recommend payments of SSI to Chris Walters for a period of 1 calendar year to evaluate and possibly treat existing medical conditions and see if gainful employment is a possibility at the end of the target period.

2. A qualified doctor will perform and complete the "colonoscopy with the idea of finding out if the problem is treatable. We recommend consideration of your expert Dr. Pinon who felt the process could be cause by chronic infections which are highly treatable.

3. Several medical authorities have suggested C. diff a colon disease absorbs "potassium" which in turn might cause the heart problems which require regular medication involving Lassix and 20 MEQ Potassium.

4. A Cardiologist will do another "echocardiogram" and determine if evidence of heart disease is present and hopefully will not present another report trying to explain why portions of Chris Walters heart are missing.

5. A qualified vascular surgeon will complete the exam of the lower legs like Dr. Strandberg recommended and see if the damage is can be corrected to put Chris Walters back on his feet long enough to return to work as a security guard.

6. Dr. Robert Canon is Chris Walters long term computer trainer and a PHD in Psychology who already supervises Chris Walters computer training and will expand his work to check for any alleged threats or other dangerous whatever.

7. Dr. Strandberg's report suggest Chris Walters might be able to do sedentary work and our training efforts will involve computer oriented work or some bonded position which does not require extensive physical activity.

8. Dr. Susan Peizer professional opinion is that Chris Walters: “testified further in the extreme level of socialization as he threatened people in their offices, to include Judges and office worker, for many years. Even if Dr. Peizer does not meet Chris Walters in person she should be able from the date of 4-30-2006 be able to acquire extensive evidence of threats; bizarre of threatening behavior; acquire witnesses who can be called to testify under oath. The good doctor should have no problems acquiring loads of evidence.

9. An agreement will exist between Chris Walters and the Appeals Council that Chris Walters will not accept or be treated by conditions of financial convenience to the Social Security Adminsitration. If your agency has special incentives for veterans Chris Walters will not become a veteran so your agency can get more money. Chris Walters will not become or be treated for substance abuse or become a convicted felons because we have a special rate for felon. Chris Walters is not going to develop a treatable mental illness simply because of HHS programs which pay a higher rate to agencies or financial incentives. Chris Walters medical treatment will revolved around medical documented illness.

10. Assignment of a new Social Security# because of damage to bondability through misuse of Chris Walters social security # will assist me to remain or work in a bondable position.

11. We are asking the Appeals Council to authorize medicare or medicde payments so that diagnosis and treatment can begin without extended delay.

12. Disability period is asked to be assigned as 1 year with the results to be reviewed by the Appeals Council and not lower level employees to avoid additional abuse of the social security process.

With Kindest Regards Chris Walters
Appellate Counsel of Record
US Circuit Court of Appeals
Citation Appendix
1. Public Commendation for Chris Walters social service research http://www.angelfire.com/tx6/vocrehab/service/index.html

2. Public Commendations and access to federal statutes which Chris Walters research helped create and research emergency management accessed off:
http://www.geocities.com/chrissaidthanks2005.

3. Standard for auditing social service agencies:
http://www.angelfire.com/dc2/107thcongress

4. Pathology report for deviations in the Social Security process:
http://www.geocities.com/tulipsthorns

5. Standardized legal fyi which explains Chris Walters can't answer legal questions is online:
http://www.geocities.com/tulipsthorns/herberte.htm

Notice Of Appeal To Appeals Council,

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
Proposal For Settlement & Agreement Filed
With Social Security Appeals Council April, 2006

Mr. Chris Walters
Social Security #261-90-6357
C/o Mr. Ben Morgan
(Message 336-765-5383)
1451 Brookcrest Drive
Winston Salem ,NC 27106

Social Security Administration
5205 UNIVERSITY PKWY
WINSTON SALEM, NC 27106
(336) 767-3736

RE: Written Appeals To Appeals Council:

Dear Social Security Administration:

I am visiting Winston Salem, NC and doing some volunteer work at the Forsyth County Public Library and have been notified that Administrative Law Judge William Herbert of San Antonio, Texas has made a partially favorable decision on April, 20th, 2006 on my behalf.

In the enclosed documents I have asked the Appeals Council to review the Judge’s Decision and address some technical questions. Although I am not a legal resident of either Texas or North Carolina my friend Mr. Ben Morgan has again agreed to hold any mail for me that your staff might wish to send.

With Kindest Regards
Chris Walters, Claimant

Commissioner Michael J. Astrue

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235
Exhibit #319-Appendix Other Communications Too
and From Social Security

These are extra administrative communications to and from the Social Security Administration which includes this link on other matters:

from "Forest, Cathy"
Cathy.Forest@ssa.gov
to chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
cc "Luna, Roland"
date Apr 13, 2007 8:45 AM
Subject Scheduling Social Security Hearing

Mr. Walters, after a cursory review of your file, it appears that you may want your hearing to be in a location other than San Antonio so that you do not have to travel great distances to a hearing. However, until we know where you are so that we can provide a closer hearing site, we cannot forward the claim file to your preferred location.

It appears you want your postal mail sent in care of Dr. Robert Canon in Austin, TX. Even though your mail goes to a Texas address, if you provide an address at the preferred hearing site, we can forward your claim to that location.

Please respond to Mr. Roland Luna at roland.luna@ssa.gov

Thanks, Cathy

From Chris Walters
chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
to roland.luna@ssa.gov,
Cathy.Forest@ssa.gov,
chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
date Apr 14, 2007 9:43 AM
Subject Reply your email conclusion Walters V SSA USDC,NM 07CV-257

Dear Roland Luna
Forest, Cathy
Social Security Administration
roland.luna@ssa.gov
Cathy.Forest@ssa.gov

Thank you for your recent email and notifying me of a hearing on SSI issues. If you visit this website you can see we have already been in a USDC,NM Walters v Astrue 07-257 and reached an agreement which is attached:

http://www.angelfire.com/nc3/ssireform/nm/index.html

Medical Records Website:

http://www.geocities.com/chrissaidthanks2003

I will be claiming residence in New Mexico

Chris Walters
c/o PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004

The worker who is familiar with the claim and resolving the issues is:

Technical Expert Betsy Huber
2141 Summit Court
Las Cruces, NM 88001
(505-523-9313 ext 1215
(Fax 505-525-0946

I have enclosed a letter to Social Security General Counsel Thomas Crawley asking if I can submit medical records to your organization and if he approves will probably provide the records on CD-Rom

Please feel free to contact me via email.

Chris Walters
261-90-6357

2 attachments — appeals.rtf

generalcounsel.doc

from "Luna, Roland"
Roland.Luna@ssa.gov
to Chris Walters chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
date Apr 19, 2007 6:30 AM
Subject RE: Thanks again fyi technical or legal issues:

Good morning Mr. Walters, being that you stated that you will be residing in Las Cruces, New Mexico, I will be transferring you case to Albuquerque NM, being that NM is not our Jurisdiction.

SSA ODAR HEARING OFC SUITE 200
555 BROADWAY NE
ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87102-2362
BUSINESS # 505-346-7823
FAX # 505-346-7862

From: Chris Walters
mailto:chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 12:41 PM
To: Luna, Roland; chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com
Subject: Thanks again fyi technical or legal issues:

Good Morning Luna, Roland"
Roland.Luna@ssa.gov

I wanted to thank you again for contacting me concerning my SSI claim for Christopher Walters 261-90-6357 and Walters V Asture USDC, NM 07-cv-0257. Any legal questions or technical issues should be directed to these parties who are representing Social Security Administration's interest and can file briefs or provide any legal assist you might require:

Larry Gomez, USA
P.O. Box 607
Albuquerque, NM 87103
(505)346-7296
Fax (505)346-7274

General Counsel Thomas W. Crawley
Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

Technical Expert Betsy Huber
2141 Summit Court
Las Cruces, NM 88011
(505-523-9313 ext 1215
Fax 505-525-0946

Many thanks again
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
c/o PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004

Exhibit #315 Citation of Authority
Title 42 USC 405 (G)(H) Judicial Review

1. Title 42 USC 405(g) Judicial review Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. Such action shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides, or has his principal place of business, or, if he does not reside or have his principal place of business within any such judicial district, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

As part of the Commissioner’s answer the Commissioner of Social Security shall file a certified copy of the transcript of the record including the evidence upon which the findings and decision complained of are based. The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.

The findings of the Commissioner of Social Security as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive, and where a claim has been denied by the Commissioner of Social Security or a decision is rendered under subsection (b) of this section which is adverse to an individual who was a party to the hearing before the Commissioner of Social Security, because of failure of the claimant or such individual to submit proof in conformity with any regulation prescribed under subsection (a) of this section, the court shall review only the question of conformity with such regulations and the validity of such regulations.

The court may, on motion of the Commissioner of Social Security made for good cause shown before the Commissioner files the Commissioner’s answer, remand the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further action by the Commissioner of Social Security, and it may at any time order additional evidence to be taken before the Commissioner of Social Security, but only upon a showing that there is new evidence which is material and that there is good cause for the failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in a prior proceeding; and the Commissioner of Social Security shall, after the case is remanded, and after hearing such additional evidence if so ordered, modify or affirm the Commissioner’s findings of fact or the Commissioner’s decision, or both, and shall file with the court any such additional and modified findings of fact and decision, and, in any case in which the Commissioner has not made a decision fully favorable to the individual, a transcript of the additional record and testimony upon which the Commissioner’s action in modifying or affirming was based.

Such additional or modified findings of fact and decision shall be reviewable only to the extent provided for review of the original findings of fact and decision. The judgment of the court shall be final except that it shall be subject to review in the same manner as a judgment in other civil actions. Any action instituted in accordance with this subsection shall survive notwithstanding any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security or any vacancy in such office.

2. Title 42 USC 405(h) Finality of Commissioner’s decision The findings and decision of the Commissioner of Social Security after a hearing shall be binding upon all individuals who were parties to such hearing. No findings of fact or decision of the Commissioner of Social Security shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under Title 28 USC 1331 or Title 28 USC 1346 to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter.

Exhibits B Social Security Appeals Council Attempts To Overturn Commissioners
Final Determination April 2007...Quashed In USDC, New Mexico Novermber 14, 2008


United States District Court

US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Clerk's Office
U.S. District Court
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Acting Commissioner Linda McMahon

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

Former US Attorney Larry Gomez

555 South Telshor, Suite 300
Las Cruces, NM 88011
Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se
vs.
Civil Docket For Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
US Magistrate Judge Richard L Puslisi
Presiding Judge Judith Hererra

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant
Commissioner's Final Determiination
Out of Court Settlement/ Can't Be Overturned
Acting Commisssioner Linda McMahon issued a final denial which can only be overturned or modified in a USDC as cited in Title 42 USC 405(g) Judicial Review:

...No findings of fact or decision by the Commissioner shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or government agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under Section of 1331 or 1346 of Title 28,United States Code, to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter

1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

3. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

ORDER-Docket #11

Recovered From PACER
ORDER USDC NM
Acknowleges Out Of Court Settlement

Before the United States District Court

The Honorable Judge Robert Scott
US District of New Mexico
333 Lomas N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Commissioner Michael J. Astrue

Social Security Administration
Office of Public Inquiries
Windsor Park Building
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235

Former US Attorney Gregg Fouratt

555 South Telshor, Suite 300
Las Cruces, NM 88011
Chris Walters
vs.
Michael Astrue
Commissioner SSA

#C080380
USDC NM Finds No Merit
In Reviewing Comissioners Final Determination 2008
Judge Magistrate Edward M Chen explains the Complaint is too complicated for him to understand and the matter was subsequently resolved in by Judge Robert Scott in US District Court of New Mexico with no great problem and the Commissioners legal counsel made to supportive pleadings to move the cause forward.

Before Social Security Appeals Council

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
ODAR Hearing Documents
For Disability Determination 2007
These documents were finally secured fro the Stockton Administrative Law Judge and offered some explanation of what was going on and denial of benefits by the Appeals Counsel in April,2 2007

Press To Enlarge

ODAR Hearing Materials
Office of Disability Adjudication & Review
3116 W March Lane #200
Stockton, CA 95249

Press To Enlarge

ODAR Hearing Materials
Office of Disability Adjudication & Review
3116 W March Lane #200
Stockton, CA 95249

Press To Enlarge

ODAR Hearing Materials
Office of Disability Adjudication & Review
3116 W March Lane #200
Stockton, CA 95249

Before Social Security Appeals Council

Office of Hearings and Appeals
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3255
Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson
Attempts Unknown Hearing November, 2008
About year and half after my benefits were granted as part of out or court settlement ALJ Mark Dawson was still attempting hearings

Press On Image to Enlarge

The Social Security Administration
Office of Disability Adjuciation and Review
Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson
555 Broadway, NE Suite 200
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Press On Image to Enlarge

The Social Security Administration
Office of Disability Adjuciation and Review
Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson
555 Broadway, NE Suite 200
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Press On Image to Enlarge

The Social Security Administration
Office of Disability Adjuciation and Review
Administrative Law Judge Mark Dawson
555 Broadway, NE Suite 200
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Appendix A Blackletter Law Requirements Operational Audits


Blackletter Law Requirements
Blackletter Law
Executive Fiat or ORDER 1997
The Social Security Administration appeared at Bar in USDC, WDT Walters v Miller, Crownover and exercised their sovereign authority to limit all activities related directly or indirectly to Social Security to a few authorized protocols listed above. Challenges to the Social Security Administrations soverign authority is prosecuted Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Former US Attorney General

Alberto Gonzalez
US Department of Justice

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

David C Williams

Social Security Inspector General
Fraud Hotline
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Title 18 CRIMES & Impediments 2006
1. Operational Imediments
Total: 19
2. Computer Hacking
Total: 0
3. Theft of US Mail
Total: 2
4. Title 18 USC Obstruction Court ORDER
Total: 5
5. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy defraud US
Total: 1
6. Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of laqw
Total: 6
7. Genocide or Assassination Attempts
Total: 1
8. Sedition or Treason
Total: 0
9. Other Violations of Title 18
Total: 1 Kidknapping 1 Tampering Federal Agency
10. Total Violations
Total: 17
Medical Treatment & Costs 2006
1. Hospital Visits
Total: 3
2. Clinic Visits
Total: 4
3. Hotels Nights
Total: 0
4. Transportation Costs
$500 greyhond to Seattle and back
Total: 0

Advanced Medical Directive

Requires Contract to Provide Medical Services
Why Is The United States Going Broke?
Medical Failure Equal Profit for Hospitals and Doctors
Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

Appendix B Citation of Federal Authority


US Senator Mark O Hatfield

Chairman Senate Appropriations
Salem,Oregon

Former US Congressman Henry B Gonzalez

Chairman Banking & Urban Affairs Committee
San Antonio,Texas 78205

US Congressman Tony Coelho

House Majority Whip
Modesto, CA 95354

Congressional Work Ethic Can
Result In Your Being Volunteered or Drafted

It seems that many Chairman of Congress believe in the concept of work ethic and if they find you on Capitol Hill or too close to something they are working on will actually have someone volunteered or simply drafted. I-5 Cooridor Agreement origionally on covered portions of California, Oregon, and Washington but was rapidly expanded by the national leadership to include a third of the United States. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez caught me on Capitol Hill about 1988 circulating one of my publications and had me introduced to the HUD Inspector General.. This assignment lasted until about 1993 when the Clinton Administration came into power and replaced me with 2 convicted persons who according to press reports were paid $80,000 a year plus expenses..

Infrastructure Protecton Programs

Chris Walters
Survey Coordinator
Background On Audits &
Surveys Done For US Government ...
The author has worked in the security and private investigations industry for 40 years typically wears a uniform carries a fire arm and protects facilities with insured value into billion dollar range. Services and contracts with the United States Government begin in 1997 and include

1. 1-5 Corridor Agreement study authorizations for surveys in 15 states 1986

2. Directory Model Social Service Agencies

3. Organized Crime Ties to US Dept HUD Confirmed Kills

4. Federal Law CSBG US Senator Mark O Hatfield

5. Welfare Reform Act 1986

6. Food Stamps For Homless Act US Congressman Tony Coelho

7. Audits USDA Programs confirmed kills

8. Audits US Postal Programs confirmed kills

9. Terrorist in Social Services confirmed kills

8. Spyware Act of 2005 2nd Federal Law 2015

9. Emergency Management Authorizations1993-2013

10. Emergency Management Structure 15 States1993-2013

11. Operational Audit Social SecurityExecutive ORDER 1997-2015

Server and Internet Operated

By Liquidnet in United Kingdom
Joinder to United Nations
In 1999 the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals authorized a special jonder of study programs and human rights issue to the United Nations The program materials are located in the United Kingdom.

Former US Attorney General

John Ashcroft
US Department of Justice

San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

David C Williams

Social Security Inspector General
Fraud Hotline
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Prosecutable Federal Offenses
1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities what appears to be a large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect.

Former US Senator Phil Gramm

"Senate Budget Hawk"
Retired Due To Enron Scandal

Former US Congressman Henry B Gonzalez

Chairman Banking & Urban Affairs Committee
JFK Profile In Courage Award
San Antonio, TX 78206-1286

Former Congressman Dick Armey

House Majority Leader
Retired Due to Enron
San Antonio Home of The
Federal Grand Jury-Even The Prosecutor Get Sacked
While San Antonio maybe a great city these links suggest local politics are on the shady side and best avoided by tourist:

1. Home of Federal Grand Jury San Antonio city, local and federal persons form a permanent line of convictions to federal grand jury and prison.

2. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez was Chairman of the Powerful Banking Committee during the time the S&L Scandals and crisis occured. The Congressman's hometown of San Antonio profited from the repayment of monies which are described below

3. This link concerns Congressional Investigations of Haliburgon where it was discovered the company former owned by VP Dick Cheney was over charging the US DOD for billions of dollars.

4. Human Rights Violations US claims "Divine Right Of Kings" to violate human and civil rights of it's own citizens

5. Fictious conviction attempt to create and maintain a conviction without trial; judge; jury or any record of court proceedings

6. False Credit History defeated in 198th Judicial District Court of Texas

7. You Buy Your Dope In Church? San Antonio has extensive history of using social service agencies to traffick drugs.

8. Dain Kunzler self professed terrorist explaines in great deal he has been threatening various persons, groups and organizations I receive services from in front a a US District court no less

9. Attempt to Block Medical Treatment San Antonio Rescue Mission tells Baptist Hospital I can recover at their shelter and then denies me services for life

10. Local Church steals $10,000 from me and my interestate business

11. The San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries and others joined forces to destroy Chris Walters business which was licensed here in San Antonio in 2001.

Former Mayor Henry Cisneros

City of San Antonio, TX
Convicted Lying Congress
Then Acquitted

Former State Attorney General

Dan Morales

Former Congressman Tom Delay

Speaker of US House


San Antonio Home Of Federal Grand Jury

Former US Attorney Johnny Sutton
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216

Former Congressman Albert Bustamate

Sentenced Prison for Corruption
San Antonio, TX

Enron New Texas

State Flag


Former White House Counsel

"King" Karl Rove

Former US District Judge John Wood Jr

Assassinated On May 29, 1979,
San Antonio, TX

Former US Attorney General

Alberto Gonzalez
US Department of Justice