It is the job of local,state, and federal prosecutors to enforce and prosecute all laws with fairness and equity and not deny any person the equal protection of the law (14th and 5th Amendments. This Link Political Patronage Briefly reviews how the political patronage system entices local prosecutors and others to refuse to enforce the law. This Link former US Attorney General Eric Holder also addressed serioius abuses of prosecutorial authority

US Congressman Bill Pascell has efforts to have nursing homes regulated by CMS by US Department of HHS which was revolked by Trump Administration.2 Million dead (250,000 a year) since 2014 as a result of medical error. The online databases show that actually began paying in 2010 to deny patients treatment for pre-existing conditions and block prosecution:

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

Chris Walters
vs.
Michael Astrue
Commissioner SSA

#C080380

The Social Security Administration apparently held a hearing in a state I no longer reside in after having been given notice I moved. The Social Security Administration has already issued a final denial by the Commissioner and lacks jurisdictional standing to adjudicate further.

1. Title 42 USC 405(h) Finality of Commissioner’s decision The findings and decision of the Commissioner of Social Security after a hearing shall be binding upon all individuals who were parties to such hearing. No findings of fact or decision of the Commissioner of Social Security shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 or 1346 of title 28 to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter.

2. Complaint Walters v Astrue civ-08-380 and Summons issued April 10th, 2008

3. Notice of Jonder gives notice that Complaint is related to SSA questions redirected to both Congress and UNHCHR

4. Question to Chief Judge provided to Chief Administrative Law Judge questions legality of ALJ actions

5. Courtesy Note to Administrative Law Judge Sandra Rogers that the disability question she is hearing has been moved to USDC, NM

6. Notice of Lack of Standing where Judge Hererra has ruled in the previous action that both parties lack any standing to litigate in the Final Determination by SSA Commissioner Linda McMahon

1. The Court permitted withdrawl of the Complaint where the Social Security Administration has admitted in the letter than it made a mistake in holding a hearing in the wrong venue.

2. SSA is not entitled to relief because it failed to appear and answer the summons in the origional or related complaint.

3. The Courts can only grant the Social Security Administration consideration under Title 42 USC 405(g) Judicial review which has to be filed by a party to be heard before the bar.

4. Court Docket Press to See Court Record

Chris Walters
vs.
Michael Astrue
Commissioner SSA

#C080380

1. Title 42 USC 405(g) Judicial review Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. Such action shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides, or has his principal place of business, or, if he does not reside or have his principal place of business within any such judicial district, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

As part of the Commissioner’s answer the Commissioner of Social Security shall file a certified copy of the transcript of the record including the evidence upon which the findings and decision complained of are based. The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.

The findings of the Commissioner of Social Security as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive, and where a claim has been denied by the Commissioner of Social Security or a decision is rendered under subsection (b) of this section which is adverse to an individual who was a party to the hearing before the Commissioner of Social Security, because of failure of the claimant or such individual to submit proof in conformity with any regulation prescribed under subsection (a) of this section, the court shall review only the question of conformity with such regulations and the validity of such regulations.

The court may, on motion of the Commissioner of Social Security made for good cause shown before the Commissioner files the Commissioner’s answer, remand the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further action by the Commissioner of Social Security, and it may at any time order additional evidence to be taken before the Commissioner of Social Security, but only upon a showing that there is new evidence which is material and that there is good cause for the failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in a prior proceeding; and the Commissioner of Social Security shall, after the case is remanded, and after hearing such additional evidence if so ordered, modify or affirm the Commissioner’s findings of fact or the Commissioner’s decision, or both, and shall file with the court any such additional and modified findings of fact and decision, and, in any case in which the Commissioner has not made a decision fully favorable to the individual, a transcript of the additional record and testimony upon which the Commissioner’s action in modifying or affirming was based.

Such additional or modified findings of fact and decision shall be reviewable only to the extent provided for review of the original findings of fact and decision. The judgment of the court shall be final except that it shall be subject to review in the same manner as a judgment in other civil actions. Any action instituted in accordance with this subsection shall survive notwithstanding any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security or any vacancy in such office.

2. Title 42 USC 405(h) Finality of Commissioner’s decision The findings and decision of the Commissioner of Social Security after a hearing shall be binding upon all individuals who were parties to such hearing. No findings of fact or decision of the Commissioner of Social Security shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 or 1346 of title 28 to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter.

1. #468391510048409 Delivered Signed for by: AWOOD Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 27, 2008 9:36 AM Destination Denver, CO To US Congressman Lamar Smith. Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009

2. #468391510048416 Delivered Signed for by: JHERNANDEZ Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 22, 2008 10:01 AM Destination Albuquerque, NM

3. #468391510048423 Delivered Signed for by: BBECKELHEIMER Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 22, 2008 1:31 PM Destination Albuquerque, NM

4. #468391510048430 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: JPORITS Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 20, 2008 5:30 PM Destination Dallas, TX

5. #468391510048444 Delivered Signed for by: AZERTUCHE Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 20, 2008 2:55 PM Destination San Antonio, TX Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008

6. #468415010042160 Delivered Signed for by: DWEHEAM Shipment Dates Ship date May 27, 2008 Delivery date Jun 2, 2008 1:04 PM Destination Falls Church, VA

7. #468415010042177 Delivered Signed for by: MMARTINEZ Shipment Dates Ship date May 27, 2008 Delivery date May 28, 2008 1:30 PM Destination Albuquerque, NM

8. #468415010042184 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: DGAMBLE Shipment Dates hip date May 27, 2008 Delivery date Jun 2, 2008 9:58 AM Destination Washington, DC

#To US Supreme Court???? Jonder to Congress was filed May 24, 2008 from Fed Ex Kinko 1001 E University Ave, Las Cruces, NM 88001 Transaction #210110154963:

NOW COMES THE Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the Honorable US District Court of New Mexico to give Notice of a removal of a question of theft/interception of USDC ORDER from the US District Court Walters v Astrue CV-08-380 RHS Docket #13 dated May 1, 2008 to wit:

Pursuant to Title 28 USC 1251(b) Origional Jurisdiction the United States Supreme Court has origional jurisdiction over causes involving foreign governments where this question and similar matters are jonded to several organs of the United Nations. The US Congress has already established over sight on these matters under Article 1 Section 1 of the US Constitution

The type and variety of mail I have been missing in Las Cruces suggest the problem might be human. It is possible the problem could be caused by a sorting machine or whatever

From MailTheft@uspis.gov
tonims2006@gmail.com
dateTue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:19 PM

subjectMail Theft Report
mailed-byuspis.gov

Thank you for completing this form. Your Reference number is: 9380708

The U.S. Postal Inspection Service gathers data on mail-related crime to determine whether a violation has occurred. While we can't guarantee that we can recover lost money or items, your information can help alert Inspectors to problem areas and possibly prevent other people from being victimized.

U.S. Postal Inspectors base their investigations on the number, substance, and pattern of complaints received from the public. We ask you to keep all original documents related to your complaint. We will contact you ONLY if more information is needed.

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

1. Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking;computer hacking...terrorist activities .....

1. Exhibit A copy of the Docket #13 dated May 1st, 2008 an ORDER has been downloaded from the US District Court server which is missing in the mail, lost, or stolen.

2. Exhibit B: a copy of a recent email from the Honorable US Congressman Jerry McNeney expressing an interest in the matters at bar and again reserving the question to Congressional review as opposed to Court jurisdiction. Relief Sought

While interception of US District Court ORDERS is a violation of Title 18 USC 402 Contempt and US mail fraud codes the chronic theft/interception/ and loss of mail here in the US District Court of New Mexico is a matter best reviewed by the existing jurisdictional authorities of the United States Congress and United Nations and Chris Walters has no desire to burden the Court further with these question where the action of law have been closed the both Judges have ruled the matter 'well pleaded". Discussion What anyone would want with an obscure USDC Order from 2 different cases remains a mystery. Chris Walters safe deposit box is full of US Mail which was opened and pilfered last year. The Registered US Mail from Look Glasses to Chris Walters mail box was unable to travel 1 mile in 6 months. It costs Chris Walters about $500.00 to travel from Lodi, California to Las Cruces, New Mexico to recover the glasses last October.

Respectfully Submitted
Chris Walters, Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 232
Las Cruces, NM 88004-0232

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.