1. Exhibit A Take Out Law Enforcement First

2 Exhibit B President Bush Jr Offer of $200 Millon For Homeless Dismissed as Chump Change While Cities Admit Genocide

3. EXHIBITS C REPORTS OF HOMELESS DEATHS 2018-2020

4. Exhibit D Bush Administration Practice and Politics of Homeless For Profit

5. Congessional Audits and Surveys The Study of Operational Impediments & The Study Of Entrophy In Fluid Systems 1986-2020

Ongoing Questions and Legal Issues directed to the UN High Commission on Human Rights appear to violate the United States national sovereignity as being reserved to the US Congress House and Ways Committee

1. The Reagan and Bush Administrations apprently sold the entire US Department of HUD to a consortium of special interest who came into power through the political patronage system. A later Congressional inquiry into this era was able to determine that the Secretary of HUD Samuel Pierce was a very lonely man who spent much of his time in office playing Monopoly with visitors to his office while his Department was run by others.

2. The National Survey on Social Services between 1986-1996 studies the pratice and politics of failure as an exact field of political science.

3. These questions were deferred to the 107th US Congress which assisted in creation of Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act; Title 7 USC 2011 Food Stamps; Community Service Block Grants; and Welfare Reform Act of 1996.

1. Gilligan's Island Syndrone? in a manner remarkably similar to the "Castaways" in this American Sitcom the "homeless" are stranded on the island of poverty, being washed from shore to shore by every type of calamity, disaster,and storm. The 15 year survey found that most of the calamity, disaster,and storms were carefully engineered by special interest and political patronage groups.

2. During the 1980's and 1990'2 the operational audits of Homeless Shelters in 1993and 1994 and 1995 and 1996. demonstrated the role movement in shuffling clients around the United States and denying them participation in federal programs which might assist their plight. The results suggest the average client is traveling about 20,000 per years and is too busy being moved around by shelter limits to participate in various federal programs.

3. Sort of a variation on old carnival and pea game where the rube tries to guess which shell the pea is under. In this system the "Corner Cities" such as New York,Seattle, and Los Angeles get screwed because they are at the end of massive interstate highway systems which dump the "garbage" from "Christian Communities" into the liberal communities.

Robert DeVries robert@n2.net
mndailyreporter@hotmail.com
Re: Question
Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:11:37-0700(PDT)
Hi! Thanks for your message I don't think that the website you mention is living in the real world. But the point is still well taken that the life of homeless people is extremely dangerous and the obstacles that homeless people face are severe. There are supposedly 15,000 homeless people here in San Diego County and the death rate is so high that the local paper no longer even bothers to mention when yet another body is found in Balboa Park. When there was a meeting of the Renaissance Commission here in Ocean Beach a couple of years ago, the concensus in the audience was running more than 10 to 1 in favor of the theory that homeless people were ENTIRELY responsible for their own situation. What is needed is not $250 billion but a commitment by society that we will do what is necessary to help those homeless people who are willing to help themselves.

Best regards, Robert DeVries
Democratic Central Committee

What is the normal attrition rate for a city wide population composed of alcoholics, drug users, disabled....? We asked a local organization in San Francisco for their candid opinon:

"The reports are NOT exaggerated. actually, the preface to the SF Dept. of Public Health's annual homeless deaths report contains a caveat where the Dept. states that each year's count is actually an undercount -- the half-time position to do the legwork to confirm the housing status of the decedents was eliminated from SF-DPH's budget. the current counts reflect only those whose homelessness could be confirmed by the M.E.'s staff, or by police reports. if you're interested, check out SF Medical Examiner it's the text of the Director of Public Health to the Health Commission regarding homeless deaths in 1999, and has a link for the 1999 report, which I co-authored. it was, as they say, a record year.

chance martin
Coalition on Homelessness
Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:48:36 -0700
468 Turk Street,
San Francisco, CA 94102
415 346.3740
415 375.5639-fax

cody.williams@phoenix.gov
mndailyreporter@hotmail.com
Subject: Question on
http://nemd3.tripod.com
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:36:39 -0700

Dennis, The problem is vast and complex, but substantially solvable. Divide the number of projected homeless in any metro area by the number of citizens who reside in that metro area. Ratios of 1 homeless person to 200 or 300 residents is not uncommon. Effectively, housing 40 individuals in a community of 8,000 should not e too difficult or noticable. You'd think, however, that a toxic waste site was moving in if a transitional or affordable housing development were proposed in just about any community in the nation.

Providing mental health evaluatins and treatment as well ass substance abuse treatment helps to impact 40% to 60% of those considered homeless. It is very expensive and for the most part, non-existent. No place to go and no help when they get there. $250 billion could easily solve the problem if distributed within the context of a national homeless strategy where levels of consistency in service could be measured. $250 billion can fix a lot of problems or be wasted like any other big pot of money.

From: "Lynne Potler"
lpotler@pagnet.org
mndailyreporter@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:08:20 -0700

Mr. Stringer,
Your e-mail about a study of homelessness in San Francisco was forwarded to me. I have no direct knowledge of the study or the situation of the homeless in San Francisco so I can't comment on that. While I do not work directly with the homeless in the Tucson metropolitan area, I am aware that life "on the street" is difficult and that it can hard to move to a more "mainstream" existence. In our community it has been reported that a substantial proportion of the homeless have mental health, substance abuse and/or physical disabilities which certainly are barriers to changing their status. Lack of job skills and educational attainment also are barriers.There are programs here that seek to help the homeless, particularly with a focus on moving them to employment, but it still is hard for some of these individuals to make the transition and then to maintain a job which often is low wage and low status and leaves relatively little discretionary income. Some of the homeless are unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of these programs which require individuals to show up regularly for job search training, appointments, etc. Living "on the street" and having to scrounge for meals, etc. certainly could make it hard to keep a regular schedule and appear clean, well groomed, and focused each morning. There are some beds in homeless shelters set aside for those who participate satisfactorily in job search and related employment activities. However, many of the homeless do not feel they can afford to spend weeks or months participating in a job training program when they have no income during that time.

The $250 billion you mention may relate to the proposal to allow faith-based organizations to seek funding to provide a range of social services. That apparently is existing funding for a wide range of services, for many population groups in addition to the homeless, and represents little or no increase in the overall amount curently available. I'm certain you are aware of the concerns raised by some about whether allowing faith based organizations to receive public (government) money could constitute government support of organized religion. Lynne Potler

1. A new memoir by David Kuo, former second-in-command of President Bush's Office of Faith-Based Initiatives, has the White House on the defensive with its account of an Administration that mocked Evangelicals in private while using them at election time to bolster its support. In this exclusive adaptation from the book, Kuo writes about how his White House experiences left him disillusioned about the role religion can play in politics.

2. In 2005 The Bush Administration proposed cutting $37 Billion from the homeless programs leaving only $13 Billion a year and taking away control of the programs from organizations such as US Conference of Mayors which have long history of abusing programs.

3. If we take $50 Billion a year and divide it by an estimated 1 million homeless clients we arrive at a figure of $50,000 a year in federal spending per client. By comparison we could take $10,000 a year and put each client in a nice motel room and $10,000 for food and expenses and save $30,000 a year.

4. Does the service delivered to the clients even vaguely justify this type of expenditure?

1. Who is entitled to represent the homeless? The Association of Gospel Rescue Missions which raises billions for homeless programs puts out this type of propoganda which is very unlikely to solicit help from others.

2. The National Coalition for Homeless represents who? It is not known that the homeless have voted to elect officers and represenatives to empower this organization to act in their behalf; play a role in policy... per United Nations mandate rights to indigeneous peoples Rather The National Coalition for Homeless simply appointed itself to represent the homeless and maintaines offices in Washington D.C. to influzence funding and national policy.

3. NCH Represenative Michael Stoops was run out of Portland as a accused child moldestor after his shelter Baloney Joe's was closed for drug trafficking to drive up customers on main street Portland, Oregon

4. According to Portland Police Department. Joanne Ferrero, Margaret Moreland and other members of Centraleast Side Industrial Council accused Mr. Stoops of giving 8 children VD of the throat who was spared from prosecution by the intervention of US Senator Mark O Hatfield. Michael was sent to DC to help run the country.

National Coalition for Homeless
Michael Stoops-Advocate
1012 Fourteenth Street, NW #600,
Washington, DC 20005-3471
202.737.6444
Fax: 202.737.6445

Associated Press BOISE, Idaho (AP)

The city of Boise could see its tab for losing a lawsuit over housing for the homeless climb from $1 million to nearly $3 million once attorneys' fees and costs are added.

A federal jury ordered the city to pay $1 million to Community House in September, after finding that the city discriminated against homeless women and children and retaliated against the organization when board members complained. Now the attorneys that represented Community House in the lawsuit are asking that their client be compensated for fees and costs � which they say total nearly $1.9 million.

Under federal law, the winner of a lawsuit can generally seek to recover attorney's fees and costs from the losing side. The fees and costs have to be approved by a judge and they can be appealed, just like the verdict itself. But they can substantially raise the financial stakes for the losing party. Attorneys for the city, meanwhile, have asked U.S. District Judge Candy Dale to issue a judgment notwithstanding the verdict � a legal move in which a judge can set aside a jury's finding and issue a new verdict � or to hold a new trial.

In the city's motion filed Wednesday, the city contends that the judge made mistakes during the trial and that the verdict wasn't supported by the evidence presented in the case. In Community House's motion for attorney's fees and other supporting documents, also filed Wednesday, attorney Howard Belodoff said that he and several other attorneys and staffers with Idaho Legal Aid Services worked on the case over the past seven years. "Given the complexity and difficulty of the issues, the appeals, the defenses raised by Defendants, the length of time it took before a jury heard the case and contingent nature of the case, few if any attorneys would have considered representing the plaintiffs who had no resources to compensate counsel or pay the costs,"

Belodoff wrote in a court document. Community House and the city of Boise worked together in the 1990s to build and run a homeless shelter and soup kitchen, funded largely through federal grants and private donations. But over time, the relationship began to unravel, and in 2003 the city began looking for a new organization to run the shelter. When Community House officials learned the city planned to partner with the Boise Rescue Mission � which houses only men � Community House filed a complaint under the Fair Housing Act contending that the move amounted to discrimination against the homeless women and children currently living there because it would leave them with no place to go. The city of Boise officially entered into a lease-and-purchase agreement with the Boise Rescue Mission in 2005, passing an ordinance to make it a shelter for men only.

Community House then sued in federal court, bringing a number of claims including discrimination and retaliation. The city strongly denied those claims and the lawsuit eventually went to trial in August. After 11 days of testimony and arguments, the federal jury sided with Community House, finding the city violated the state constitution, discriminated against homeless women and children and retaliated against Community House. The jury awarded the organization $1 million, which Belodoff said would be used to house and provide for homeless families, women and children. After the verdict was announced, Boise city spokesman Adam Park released a prepared statement in which the city again denied any discrimination and said the $1 million award was without basis. The statement went on to note that even if the city were to fail in its efforts to overturn and reduce the damages, that amount would likely be covered by the city's insurance policy and not come out of taxpayer funds.

1. Prisons For Profit the United States has created an incentive or bounty type prison system under which the cities and states are encouraged to arrest low income persons solely for the purpose of getting paid a set amount per night per prisoner. Ordinances and law such as vangrancy; hitchiking; loitering; which were declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court a generation ago are reappearing as officals seek a way to cash in on the federal bounty system.

2. It is remarkable to see communities which once competed for manufacturing plants competing for prisons. Questions of possible Human Rights violations are made to the United Nations each year concerning US Prisons. The Bush Administration saw a vast increast for golden parachute programs for ministries which catered to convicted felons returning from prison as so called "rehabilitative services".

1. This link reviews the development of prison based gangs; organized criminal takeovers of facilities and even occassional terrorist activities which evolved as the political patronage system eliminate law enforcement oversight of HUD functions.

2. This link discusses public and private persons who were eventually assassinated or eliminate while challenging organized crime turfs.

1. 1-5 Corridor Agreement study authorizations for surveys in 15 states 1986

2. Directory Model Social Service Agencies

3. Organized Crime Ties to US Dept HUD Confirmed Kills

4. Federal Law CSBG US Senator Mark O Hatfield

5. Welfare Reform Act 1986

6. Food Stamps For Homless Act US Congressman Tony Coelho

7. Audits USDA Programs confirmed kills

8. Audits US Postal Programs confirmed kills

9. Terrorist in Social Services confirmed kills

8. Spyware Act of 2005 2nd Federal Law 2015

9. Emergency Management Authorizations1993-2013

10. Emergency Management Structure 15 States1993-2013

11. Operational Audit Social SecurityExecutive ORDER 1997-2015