Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

Addressed to the Civil Filing Clerk
United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit
E. Barrett Prettyman U.S.Courthouse
333 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001-2866

Dear Civil Filing Clerk:

Enclosed as a Advisory or Courtsey document is a Notice of a Removal of Cause from United States District Court, District of Columbia leaving for United Nations High Commission on Human Rights:

1. Exhibit A: Questions imposition of fines, sanctions, and penalities on the United States for violations of Human Rights Accords and possibly crimes against Humanity.

2. Exhibit B: Copy of UN Human Rights Accords.

3. Exhibit C: Is an apparent Notice of Dismissal as a handwritten note recieved from US District Court.

Your office does not need to expend the Appellate Court's Postage to this Courtsey Document.

Respectfully Submitted
Chris Walters
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX 78029

Copies of the Questions to UNHCHR were served on Defendant Apfel, US Attorney General, United States in this cause and Walters v. Apfel USDC,WDT A: 99-CV-156SS:

1. As a compelling public interest Courtsey Copies also provided too:

a. Each State Senator of States of California and Texas.

b. Other Notices provided to each County Government in California, Oregon, Washington, Utah, Arizona, Iowa, Nebraska, New Hamshire, Maine, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters this 9-6-1999

Mailed From Kinko Copies
San Antonio, Texas

Kinko's
3740 N.W. Loop 410
San Antonio, TX 78229
(210-731-4400)

Total $52.46

CW216 TR 90551 RG 2 09/06/99 11:05

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

Now Comes The Plaintiff Chris Walters before the Honorable United States District Court, District of Columbia in this Action At Law and Complaint to Wit:

Jurisdiction: United States District Court jurisdiction is found under Title 42 USC 1985 and Civil Rights and elective franchise.

Cause of Action: Social Security Commissioner Kenneth Apfel, his agents, and represenatives acting under color of laws of the Social Security Administrations in July, 1998 enaged in a conspiracy to deny Chris Walters the due process of law guaranteed under both the 5th and 14th Amendments in a Social Security Reconsideration in July 1998.

Relief Sought: The Plaintiff Chris Walters Prays for Award of Damages for violation of 5th and 14 Amendment rights from the Defendant Commissioner Kenneth Apfel as explained more fully in the Attached Memorandum of Law.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters,Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX 78029
(830-896-8850)

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

Now Comes the Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the United States District Court, Federal District of located at 333 Constitution Ave N.W. Washington, D.C. 2001 (202-354-3000) in this Memorandum of Law In Support of Complaint:

Jurisdiction

United States District Court jurisdiction is found under 28 USC 1343 Civil Rights and elective franchise. (a) The district court shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person:

(1) To recover damages for injury to his personor property, or becuase of deprivation of any right or priviledge of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in Section 1985 of Title 42;

(2) To recover damages from any person who failed to prevent or to aid inpreventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 or Title 42 which he had knowledge where about to occur and power to prevent.

(3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, usage, of any right, priviledge, or immunity secured the Consitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for the equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States,

(4) To recover damages or so secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress providing for protection of civil rights including the right to vote.

The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction, adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

1. Exhibit A: Chris Walters filed a claim for Social Security Supplemental Income 261-90-6357 based on claims of disability.

2. Exhibit B: Attorney Charles Tyler Clark notified the Social Security Administration the proper venue for the claim was in Birmingham, Alabama July 14th, 1997 where Chris Walters resided.

3. Exhibit C: Chris Walters gave legal Notice too all parties in August, 1997 that he was moving out of Tallahassee, Florida and going on indefinite leave of medical absence.

4. Local Social Security Administration officials in Tallahassee, Florida responded the request to move the venue merited no respect and held hearings and proceedings in the Social Security claim in a state where Chris Walters did not reside and denied Chris Walters the due process of law guaranteed under both the 5th and 14th Amendment.

5. Commissioner Kenneth Apfel is the party responsible to see that the Social Security Administration operates within the framework of the law set by Congress and governed by the United States Courts.

Discussion

The United States freely admits it embezzled "trillions of dollars" from the Social Security Fund and in fact most recently wanted to "borrow" a billion or so to send to Nicaragua. The Defedant by and through his agents and represenatives has found new and innovative methods to deny American citizens their benefits as demonstrated by the exhibits at hand.

"Rashid" the Social Security employee at Tallahassee, Florida refused to move the case to Birmingham, Alabama over written request of counsel of law. Certainly the best way to deny a person civil rights to to make sure they don't have legal counsel. The Social Security Administration denied Chris Walters application for benefits as explained because Chris Walters did not make himself available for examinations, hearings in a State where he did not reside. Notice of this fraud was passed along to Chris Walters in the form of a Notice of Denial from the Regional Commissioner in Atlamta, GA.

Questions as to the legality of this process was directed in an Amicus Curia Brief to the Social Security Inspector General David Miller in Walters v. Miller, Crownover USDC, WDT SA-CV-1313-97. The explanation offered by State of Texas Assistant Attorney General Morgan is that the Defendants are "soverign and immune" and can violate the law whenever they wish.

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that parties have a right to attend hearings to which they are parties of record, fairness, and equity. The actions of Social Security Administration officials to deny a proper venue and legal counsel to Chris Walters are totally without legal foundation or merit.

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

The Plaintiff Chris Walters Prays for Award of Damages for violation of 5th and 14 Amendment rights from the Defendant Commissioner Kenneth Apfel as the Court might deem meritorious:

1. Damages for violating Chris Walters rights to due process by refusing to move the case to proper venue as requested by legal counsel.

2. Damages for violating Chris Walters rights to due process by holding proceedings in a state where Chris Walters did not reside and thereby denying Chris Walters a fair and equitable opportunity to attending and particpate in the proceedings in question.

3. Damages for sending the fraud back to Chris Walters in the form of an official letter of denial from the Regional Commission for Social Security in Atlanta, GA.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters,Sole Proprietor
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX 78029-1634
(830-896-3030)

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

Now Comes the Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the United States District Court, Federal District of located at 333 Constitution Ave N.W. Washington, D.C. 2001 (202-354-3000) with these Exhibits:

1. Exhibit A: Social Security Supplemental Income claim 261-90-6357 based on disability.

2. Exhibit B: Letter from Attorney Charles Tyler Clark notified the Social Security Administration the proper venue for the claim was in Birmingham, Alabama in 1997.

3. Exhibit C: Legal Notice too all parties in May, 1997 that he was moving out of Tallahassee, Florida and going on indefinite leave of medical absence.

Prepared By Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
Po Box 1634
Kerrville,TX 78029-1634
(830-896-8850)

Wilma A. Lewis (D.C. Bar #358637)
United States Attorney for
District of Columbia
Mark E Nagel (D.C. Bar #416364)
Assistant United States Attorney
Paul S Padda (D.C. Bar #446729)
United States Attorney Office for
The District of Columbia
Civil Section, 10th Floor
555 Fourth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202-307-0268

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

Defendant respectfully request that the Clerk of the Court enter appearance of Assistant United States Attorney Paul S. Padda as counsel as defendant in the above-captioned case.

Wilma A Lewis (DC Bar 358637
United States Attorney For The of Columbia
Paul S Padda (DEC Bar 446729)
Assistant United States Attorney
for District of Columiba Civil Section,
10th Floor 555 Fourth Street, N.W. W
Washington, D.C. 20001 (202307-0268

I hearby certify that on April 26th, 1999, I caused to be served, by the United States mail (first class mail, postage prepaid), a copy of Notice of Appearance"addressed as follows:

Chris Walters
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX 78029

Paul S Padda Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney Office For the District of Columbia

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

Pursuant to Rule 6(b)(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant respectfully request a 36 day enlargement of time, to and including June 1, 1999, within which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. At present, Defendant's response is due on April 26, 1999. This is Defedant's counsel first request for an enlargemetn of time. Counsel for Defendant has not been able to discuss this request with Pro Se Plaintiff, Chris Walters, who has provided us with a telephone number that is no longer in service.

This request is necessitated by counsel for Defendant's competing case commitments. Indeed, during the proceeding three week period, Defendant's counsel is expected to file 4 dispositive motions and respond to written discovery in two other civill matters. Accordingly, the enlargement of time requested herein in order to allow counsel for Defendant sufficent time within which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

For the reasons set forth above, Defendant's counsel respectfully request that the Court allow Defendant until June 1,1999 within which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

Respectfully submitted,
Wilma A Lewis (DC Bar 358637
United States Attorney For The of Columbia
Paul S Padda (DEC Bar 446729)
Assistant United States Attorney
for District of Columiba Civil Section,
10th Floor 555 Fourth Street,
N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001
(202-307-0268)
Attorneys for Defendant April 26, 1999 ***Identical request for extnsion of time were requested June 18, 1999 July 1st,1999m.

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1044(a), Defendant respectfully request that the Court transfere this matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The Interest of justice, the convenience of the parties and the location of all documents relavent to this case militate in favor of transfere. In support of this motion, we reply Upon the Complaint and the memorandum filed herewith.

Respectfully submitted,
Wilma A Lewis (DC Bar #358637)
United States Attorney for the District of Columbia
Mark E. Nagel (D.C. Bar #416364)
Assistant United States Attorney
July 6, 1999

Memornadum of Points And Authorities
In Support of Defendant's Motion To Transfere

Plaintiff Chris Walters filed a Complaint with this Court on or about March 15, 1999. Def App1. The Complaint alleges that Mr. Walters Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when Social Security Administration held a hearing in Tallahassee, Florida rather than Birmingham, Alabama. Def App 3. Specifically, Mr. Walters alleges:

Local Social Security Administration officials in Tallahassee, Florida responded the request to move the venue merited no respect and held hearings and proceedings in Social Security claim in a state where Chris Walters did not reside and denied Chris Walters the due process of law guaranteed under both the 5th and 14th Amendment.

Def app3. Mr. Walter's Complaint request that the Court aware him unspecified monetary damages based upon Defendant's alleged violations of his Constitutional rights. Def. App3-4 However, because the interest of justice favors adjudication of this dispute in Florida, the Court should transfer this matter to the United States District court for the Northern District of Florida.

The change of venue statute, 28 U.S.C (1404(a) provides that for the convience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice a district court may transfere any civil action to any other district or division where it might be brought." Indeed, a number of courts have transferred cases by applying the latter principle See Ceola v. F.B.I. NOn 94C4866Wl 645620 at *3 (N.D. Ill, Nov 1,1995) (transfering remaineder of the case to district where remaining records and Government declarants are located, where plaintiff operates business and where activities described in request records presumably took place).

In this case, the interest of justice favor transfer of this matter to the Northern District of Florida. Indeed, transfere is appropriate here because (1) the constested Social Security Administration disability benefit hearing occured in Tallahassee, Florida (Def App.3)(2) the individuals that denied Mr. Walters request for change of venue are employed in Florida (Def App3), and (3) all documents related to Mr.Walters claims are likely located in Florida (Def. App 3).

Transfere of this matter to the Northern District of florida will not prejudice Mr. Walters's rights. Rathern. Litigiating this matter in the judicial district in which all represenative documents and witnesses are located will actually expedite the resolution of this dispute. Accordingly, for all the reasons set forth here, Defendant respectfully request that this Court transfere this matter to Northern District of Florida.

Wilma A. Lewis (D.C. Bar #358637)
United States Attorney for the District of Columbia
Mark E Nagle (D.C. Bar 416364)
Assistant United States Attorney

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

NOW COMES The Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters to enter this Motion for Summary Judgement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (a) For Claimant to Wit:

1. Defendant has appeared by counsel and twice sought and was granted reasonable extension of time and has failed to enter plead, or reply to claim of Plaintiff Chris Walters as of 7-7-1999.

2. Social Security Administration has again threatened Chris Walters as part on ongoing conspiracy to deny his rights to due process and equal protection which resulted in question to UN High Commission on Civil Right to place Social Security Administration into protection of a "special master".

As explained more fully in the Attached Proposed Order and Finding for the Presiding Judge Robertson.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX 78029-1634

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se

Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

Kenneth Apfel Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Defendant

THE COURT ORDERS, FINDES, AND RULES on Plaintiff Chris Walters Motion For Summary Judgement based on Defendant's failure to plead and answer Complaint and ongoing evidence of a conspiracy to deny Chris Walters his right to due process and equal protection of the laws relating to the Social Security Administration:

1. The evidence and exhibits from Walters v. Judith McColl USDC,NDF (97) that Judge William Stafford expressed no problems with welfare worker telling Chris Walters a disabled person to "slap a police officer to get something to eat" and attempting to send a known carrier of Hepatitis to work at Cafe De Lorenze in Tallahassee, Florida (Citation).

2. Plaintiff Walters filed a Notice that he was on "leave of medical absence" and out of the State of Florida seeking medical treatment and Birmingham Attorney Charles Clark asked the Social Security officials at Tallahassee to move the case to Birmingham for the convience of the counsel or record.

3. The State of Florida and Social Security Administration held a hearing without the Plaintiff on his disability in Tallahassee, in September, 1997 at Tallahassee, Florida in a state where he no longer resided in clear violation of his rights to due process and equal protection guaranteed under 5th Amendment.

4. The "conspiracy" continues into a related case Walters v. Apfel (99-cv-152ss)USDC, WDT, the Honorable Sam Spade Presiding where Chris Walters Social Security Reconsideration was "deported" on June 28th, 1998 to Stockton, CA from Kerrville, Texas with a demand made by California that Chris Walters appear in person the following day.

5. The focus of this denial of due process and equal protection was to deny Chris Walters the right to appear at his own reconsideration and participate in the process of law.

6. The "conspiracy" continues into a related case Walters v. Apfel (99-cv- 152SS) USDC, WDT, Texas The Honorable Sam Spade Presiding as attached Exhibit A of July 28th, 1998 a Notice of Reconsideration from California states no medical records exist.

7. Attached Exhibit B are part of the 30 odd medical reports repeatedly filed with Social Security Administration and subsequently lost or thrown away to violate the rights of Mr. Walters to the due process and equal protection of the law.

8. Walters v. Miller (97-SA-CV-1313)USDC,WDT was an Amicus Curiea filed as a courtsey suit which proposed to provide Social Security officials copies of medical documents and information they were entitled too by law.

9. Judge Fred Biery dismissed this action at the request of US Attorney and Texas State Attorney General stating that the Defendants were 'soverign and immune" and operated under the divine rule of Kings and could violate the law whenever they wished, an appear to 5th Circuit was dismissed because it was untimely and late.

10. There appears to be no known Social Security record of 2 documents from State of Florida Employment office that Chris Walters is unemployable and declining to make employment referrals.

11. The Court has no reason to doubt information found on Mr. Walters records and assetion that officials systematically tried to deny him medical treatment including treatment for cancer across a 14 state area over a 2 year period as is recorded at internet site

http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Center/2011

12. The Court notes the third party threat directed against Chris Walters at the apparent instruction of Administrative Law Judge McCoy in San Antonio, Texas on or about June 21st, 1999 and Complaint to United Nations.

13. The Court notes the Defendant has failed to plead and respond through counsel to the Complaint, Summons, or allegations made by Chris Walters

Finding

The Court and related civil actions demonstrate that the Social Security Administration under the control and responsibility of Commissioner Kenneth Apfel engaged in an extensive and apparent on going conspiracy over a 2 year period to violate Chris Walters rights too the due process and equal protection of the Social Security Laws as best explained to USDC Judge Fred Biery as an exercise authorized by law because the participats are "soverign and immune" or acting under the divine rule or rights of Kings.

The violation of rights includes denial of legal counsel; destruction and loss of 30 medical records on several occassions, holding hearings in several states where Chris Walters did not reside, extensive and organized attempts to deny Chris Walters medical treatment including treatment for cancer, and apparently attempting to turn a Social Security question into an organized professional contract killing of the Plaintiff across a 14 state area over a 2 year period. The most recent threat made against the Plaintiff resulted in a Human Rights Complaint with the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights and question of placing Social Security Administation into the protective custody of a "special master". The Court finds that Defendant Kenneth Apfel, his agents, officers, and employees under his control at the Social Security Administration engaged in an organized and ongoing violation ofChris Walters right to due process and equal protection of the aw in violation of the 5th Amendment of the Constitution and Awards such Damages as the Court deems appropriate after consideration.

Summary Judgement and Award of Damages

The Court Orders Commissioner Kenneth Apfel to pay damages of the amount to be set at a later time by the Court for violation of his rights to the due process and equal protection of the law guaranteed by the 5th Amendment.

DONE AND SO ORDERED BY_____________________Judge Robertson Presiding this

______day of ________, 1999.

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters
Michael Horowitz
2:13-cv-00001-TOR Walters v. Horowitz
The Honorable Thomas O. Rice, Presiding

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

1. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez 1983 was Chairman of the Powerful Banking Committee during the time the S&L Scandals and crisis occured. The Congressman's hometown of San Antonio profited from the repayment of monies which are described below

2. Home of Federal Grand Jury 2002-2006 San Antonio city, local and federal persons form a permanent line of convictions to federal grand jury and prison while working hard to block my medical work

3. This link concerns Congressional Investigations of Haliburgon where it was discovered the company former owned by VP Dick Cheney was over charging the US DOD for billions of dollars.

4. Human Rights Violations 1997 Social Security claims "Divine Right Of Kings" to violate human and civil rights of it's own citizens

5. Fictious conviction 1993-1996 attempt to create and maintain a conviction without trial; judge; jury or any record of court proceedings

6. Local Church 1999 steals $10,000 from me and my interestate business.The San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries and others joined forces to destroy Chris Walters business 1999 which was licensed here in San Antonio in 2001 False Credit History 1999 defeated in 198th Judicial District Court of Texas

7. You Buy Your Dope In Church? 2009 San Antonio has extensive history of using social service agencies to traffick drugs.

8. Attempt to Block Medical Treatment 2009 San Antonio Rescue Mission tells Baptist Hospital I can recover at their shelter and then denies me services for life

9. Dain Kunzler 2011 self professed terrorist explaines in great deal he has been threatening various persons, groups and organizations I receive services from in front a a US District court no less

10. Tyler Texas Blocks Medical Treatment 2012 under new Governor Rick Perry new Rules to prevent seniors from receiving Medicaid

11. Texas Attempts Overturn Rulings 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals has attempted to Quash 4 US Circuit Court of Appeals & USSC.

12. Pastor John Hagee SA possible attempt to acquired nuclear weapons access in Montana.