Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

Now comes the Plaintiff Pro Se before the Honorable United States District Court Northern District of Texas in this Civil Action pursuant to FRCP Rule 15 to docket an Amended Complaint to wit:

This Honorable US District Court is asked to consider that a question on the constitutionality of Title 42 Chapter 7 Social Security Act is at bar pursuant to Title 28 USSC 1331 Federal Question where the several US Circuit Courts of Appeals previously quashed any changes in Chris Walters SSI claim; statue or benefits without a hearing as required by Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

Now comes the Plaintiff Pro Se before the Honorable United States District Court Northern District of Texas in this Civil Action pursuant to FRCP Rule 15 to docket an Amended Complaint to wit:

This Honorable US District Court is asked to consider that a question on the constitutionality of Title 42 Chapter 7 Social Security Act is at bar pursuant to Title 28 USSC 1331 Federal Question where the several US Circuit Courts of Appeals previously quashed any changes in Chris Walters SSI claim; statue or benefits without a hearing as required by Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review

1. Question on the constitutionality of US statutes are typically heard before the United States District Court pursuant to Title 28 USC 1331 Federal Question and questions regarding proposed amendments of Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act are reserved to the US House Ways and Means Committee and US Senate Select Committee on Aging:

2. Exhibit A: In 1997 the Honorable US District Court Judge Fred Biery in Western District of Texas rules in Walters v Miller SA-cv-1313 and Walters V Apfel A:99CA0156SS USDC, WDT the Honorable USDC Judge Sam Sparks presiding that the Social Security Administration & State of Texas have no statutory authority to speak to Chris Walters until the Commissioner has concluded his final review pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(G)(H) Judicial Review with an appeal being denied by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals 99-50174 the Honorable Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges Presiding.

3. The Court cited the provisions of Title 42 USC 405(g)(H9 Judicial Review that the parties are only allowed to communicate through SSI Application, initiate determination, reconsideration, Administrative Law Review, Appeals Counsel, final determination of Social Security Commissioner and if required a review before a United States District Court and the US Supreme Court has declined to review the 5th Circuit ruling twice.

4. Exhibit B: In 2007 the Commissioner of Social Security Administration Michael Asture made a statement of fact and law that Chris Walters is disabled closing the civil action Walters v Asture Case # 1:07- cv-000257 JCH-RLP in USDC, New Mexico before the Honorable Judge Judith Herrera by informal agreement of the parties docket #6,7, &11.

5. Exhibit C: Challenges to the Commissioner's ruling or request for additional discussions were Quashed as Cited in the enclosed Exhibits in 2008 in Walters v Asture #C080380 the Honorable Judge Robert Hayes Scott being sustained the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals CV-08-294.

6. Exhibit D: In 2009 the State of North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services elected terminate Chris Walters SSI and Medicaid benefits without the permission of the Social Security Commissioner or the required review by a USDC-the ruling of the US Circuit Court Of Appeals in District of Columbia (Walters v Asture 1: CV-09-000956 UNA) quashing further discussion is appended. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that citizens are entitled to attend and participate in review as a matter of due process or at the federal level the equal protection of the law:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a
meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge
VA 1976 96 S. Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction, adequate notice,
and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in
Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process
Galveston vs. Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

1. In April, 2012 Chris Walters was treated by deep vein thrombosis at BSA Hospital in Amarillo, Texas and the hospital staff applied for Medicaid benefits since Chris Walters receives SSI and it was later determined the State of Texas declined to issue the benefits as required by law.

2. Exhibit E: Chris Walters made an emergency move to Greensboro, NC where Social Security Administration issued a verification letter May 8th 2012 and officials in North Carolina refused to issue Medicaid benefits.

3. In an Amicus Curiea on the constitutionality of Social Security Act styled Chris Walters v Michael Asture, US Senator Patrick Leahy, and US Senate Whitehouse 1:12-cv-00624-UA-LPA filed in USDC, Middle District of Carolina Chris Walters had to withdraw the civil action to make an emergency move to Pinnacle Health Systems in Harrisburg, PA and was hospitalized for 8 days and successfully treated for deep vein thrombosis and discharged in July, 2012.

4. The question as to weather the several Committees of Congress could or would defend the constitutionality of the Social Security Act through Committee action from 3rd party tampering was filed in the United States District Court in Montana as Walters v Leahy, OConnor, Levin 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL the Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah Lynch presiding

5. As the USDC Montana Court cited and in it’s Order Docket #19 based Chris Walters motion to withdraw Complaint none of the Congressional Committees even put in an informal appearance and appear as the Honorable Commissioner of Social Security cited in the press recently to not care in the least.

6. Exhibit F: Chris Walters was able to move to Spokane Washington and Social Worker Betty Voss and Washington DSHS refused to issue Medicaid as required by law required Chris Walters to travel to Oregon to receive critical medical treatment as docketed in Walters V Union Gospel Mission in USDC Eastern District of Washington 2:12-cv-00674-TOR the Honorable Timothy Rice presiding Docket #6,7, approved by Order of the Court Docket #8.

7. The question asked by the Union Gospel Mission and DSHS employee Brenda Voss is a demanded access to Chris Walters bank statements for several months without any apparent legal standing to substantiate such a request or review or permission from the Social Security Commissioner to speak. Chris Walters has been noted by the Honorable USDC Eastern District of Washington Civil Case: NO CV-12-674-TOR as being on leave of medical absence a courtesy copy being provided to Social Security Docket #6 & 7.

8. On or about February 13th, 2013 Social Security representatives spoke to Chris Walters by phone on and denied a request for change of Address to Amarillo, Texas because the SSA employee state she could not verify Chris Walters former Spokane residence; Notice of leave of Absence docket #6 filed in USDC, EDW and authorized by Court or discuss the matter apparently intending to suspend Chris Walters SSI benefits as of March 1st, 2013. 9. On arriving in Amarillo, Texas in February 2013 Chris Walters was able to receive services at the Regency Health Network and receive at least partial medication .

1. The Court is asked to consider that Chris Walters is not a member of the Federal Bar and not entitled to vend, dispense, or practice law without the expressed permission of a Judge or Magistrate.

2. The Court is asked to consider that numerous request from 3rd parties to discuss social security matters with persons such as Benda Voss or the Union Gospel Mission who are also not qualified members of the Federal Bar challenges the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure if not Title 18 USC 402 Contempt.

3. Exactly how a church such as the Union Gospel Mission expects to practice federal law over the express and direct Orders from 3 US Circuit Courts of Appeals and 2 letters from the US Supreme Court prohibiting further discussion of without violating 1st Amendment requirements of separation of church/state remains a great mystery and question?

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

1. The Honorable United States District Court is asked if refusal to issue Medicaid and benefits by the Social Security Commissioner and the several states as required by ORDERS of several Courts without judicial Review Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review has rendered Title 7 Chapter 42 Social Security Act unconstitutional as challenging the rights of Chris Walters and other persons the due process and equal protection of a hearing before a US District Court as required by law as suggested by precedents of the US Supreme Court on fair hearings?

2. The Honorable US District Court might further consider the arbitrary and discriminatory manner that denial of service occurs appears to challenge Chris Walters rights to the life, liberty and pursuant of happiness and more closely resembles a contract killing than a federal agency providing services required by law.

1. The Honorable US District Court might ask what right a mere federal agency has to ignore or attempt to Quash the ruling of any federal US District Court much less the rulings of 3 US Circuit Courts of Appeals. The Court is asked to consider the construction and administration of the Social Security Act as being so fundamentally defective that it violates the separation of powers so as to over rule the Court system.

Since the Honorable USDC, WDT ruling in 1997 and 1999 that there are only 6 times and places where the Social Security Administration and Chris Walters can communicate we have acquired hundreds of jonders, and 3rd party pleaders on at about 281 Megabytes of Data on CD-Rom which Chris Walters will seek to have the Honorable US District Court admit as a Discovery Document. Chris Walters believes and will ask the Court to consider that these extraneous and unauthorized events involving 3rd party tampering vastly increase the cost of operating the Social Security & Medicaid programs and have caused Chris Walters to expend over $39,000 in unrecoverable costs since 2007 when the case was closed in New Mexico.

One 3rd party of interest a Dain Kunzler of San Antonio demanded to appears in Walters V Asture, Friendship Case 1:11-cv-000359-LMB and after being denied permission by the Court engaged in extensive threat to have Chris Walters kidnapped from the Kindred Skilled Nursing facility in Boise, Idaho as he explained in extensive emails; and threatened the staff of the facility to have Chris Walters run out of Idaho. While engaged in these terrorist activities Mr. Kunzler refers to himself as a substantial donor to the Republican party who viewed the Bar of Justice as his bought bitch. No challenges to these activities are known to exist by either the US Attorney in Idaho, the USDC, nor the Social Security Administration.

The constitutionality of the Social Security Act is being drawn into question where the evidence suggest that program is occasionally engaged in attempted killing of Chris Walters with a calculated attempt to cause the death or serious injury of the client by obstructing treatment for medical conditions including blood clots; denial of treatment for sleep apnea and other conditions.

The Court might consider the merits of Chris Walters argument that the Social Security Administration appears to be a professional victim and unable to unwilling to defend itself from 3rd party abuse and tampering; which appear attempted precedents to amend the law which should be addressed to Congress.

If the Honorable US District Court finds the question to have merit the Plaintiff Chris Walters might pray for the United States District Court to issue an ORDER and Finding that the Title 42 Chapter 7 Social Security Act and Medicaid program are unconstitutional.

If the Honorable US District Court finds the questions have merit but finds a better resolution that better serves the cause of Justice the Court is asked to bring the possible resolution to Bar.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
200 South Tyler Street
Amarillo, TX 79101
(806-345-7936)

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

1. Exhibit A: ORDER 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals 99-50174 Walters V Miller.

2. Exhibit B: ORDER FROM Walters v Asture Case # 1:07- cv-000257 JCH-RLP in USDC,NM.

3. Exhibit C: ORDER from Walters V Asture 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals CV-08-294..

4. Exhibit D: ORDER from US Circuit Court Appeals DC Walters v Asture 1: CV-09-000956 UNA

5. Exhibit E: SSI residence verification letter May 8th 2012.

6. Exhibit F: Letter from Washington DSHS 12-27-2012 Exhibit in USDC, EDW.

Too: Addressed To Office Manager
Social Security Administration
4750 CANYON DR
AMARILLO, TX 79109

I called your toll free number yesterday and asked to have my address changed from Spokane Washington to Amarillo, Texas and your agent explained she was unable to verify my previous Address or move my SSI case change to my new address:

Chris Walters
1224 E Trent
Spokane, WA 99202

Chris Walters
c/o 200 S Tyler Street
Amarillo, TX 79101
(806-345-7936)

1. Your agent could find no record of the Attached Notice that I was on leave of medical absence as authorized by the United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington.

2. Your agent could not verify my previous address in Montana which is also appended.

3. Your agent was unable to discuss the matter further and the question was removed to USDC and a copy of this letter answer to your question has been provided to your US Attorney.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
200 S Tyler Street
Amarillo, TX 79101
(806-345-7936)
February 14th, 2013

CC: Sarah R. Salda�a USA
Amarillo National Plaza Two
500 South Taylor Street, Suite 300
Amarillo, Texas 79101-2446

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
200 South Tyler Street
Amarillo, TX 79101
(806-345-7936)

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

1. 02/13/2013 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Averitte preliminarily assigned. File to Judge Averitte. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc) (Entered: 02/13/2013)

1. 02/13/2013 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (awc) (Entered: 02/13/2013)

2. 02/13/2013 3 COMPLAINT against Michael J Astrue filed by Chris Walters. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership (awc) (Entered: 02/13/2013)

3. 02/13/2013 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Chris Walters. (awc) (Entered: 02/13/2013)

4. 02/13/2013 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. (Copy of file-marked complaint and copy of file-marked IFP motion given to plaintiff at clerk's office counter.) Wed Feb 13 14:17:33 CST 2013 (crt) (Entered: 02/13/2013)

5. 02/19/2013 NOTICE of Docket Text/Document Modification by Deputy Clerk regarding Doc #5, Motion for Leave to Appeal -- The incorrect event was used. The document should have been filed using the event "Amended Complaint" as indicated by the title on the document. The document was deleted by the clerk and will be redocketed as an Amended Complaint by the clerk. (awc) (Entered: 02/19/2013)

6. 02/19/2013 NOTICE of Docket Text/Document Modification by Deputy Clerk regarding Doc #6, Motion for Certificate of Appealability -- The incorrect event was used. The document appears to be related to the Amended Complaint and should have been docketed as an Additional Attachment to Main Document and linked to the Amended Complaint. The document was deleted by the clerk and will be redocketed as an Additional Attachment to Main Document and linked to the Amended Complaint by the clerk. (awc) (Entered: 02/19/2013)

7. 02/19/2013 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Michael J Astrue filed by Chris Walters. (awc) (Entered: 02/19/2013)

8. 02/19/2013 6 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to 5 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Chris Walters. (awc) (Entered: 02/19/2013)

9. 02/19/2013 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Chris Walters with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 02/19/2013)

10. 02/22/2013 8 MOTION to Withdraw 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Chris Walters with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Walters, Chris) Modified title on 2/27/2013 (awc). (Entered: 02/22/2013)

11. 03/01/2013 9 MOTION to Withdraw 3 Complaint, 5 Amended Complaint filed by Chris Walters with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Walters, Chris) Modified linkage on 3/4/2013 (awc). (Entered: 03/01/2013)

12. 03/11/2013 10 AMENDED MOTION to Withdraw Complaint Based on Actions of Social Security Administration and Order of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals re 3 Complaint, 5 Amended Complaint filed by Chris Walters (plh) (Entered: 03/11/2013)

13. 03/13/2013 11 NOTICE of Change of Address for Pro Se litigant Chris Walters. New address: PO Box 2581 Burlington,NC 27216-2581. (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 03/13/2013)

14. 03/14/2013 12 CROSSCLAIM against Shawn Donovan filed by Chris Walters (Attachments: # 1 Additional Page(s), # 2 Exhibit(s), # 3 Cover Sheet) (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 03/14/2013)

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

15 03/15/2013 13 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted as to Shawn Donovan. (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 03/15/2013)

16. 03/19/2013 14 COUNTERCLAIM against All Defendants filed by Chris Walters (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits, # 2 Proposed Order Civil Summons, # 3 Proposed Order Civil Summons) (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 03/19/2013)

17. 03/19/2013 15 CROSSCLAIM against Michael McCaul filed by Chris Walters, Michael McCaul (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits, # 2 Proposed Order Summons In Civil Case) (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 03/19/2013)

18. 03/19/2013 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Shawn Donovan, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Michael McCaul filed by Shawn Donovan, Michael McCaul, Social Security Administration - Interested Party, Chris Walters, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Application for Judicial Review, # 2 Proposed Order Summons in civil case, # 3 Proposed Order Summons in civil case) (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 03/19/2013)

19. 03/21/2013 17 MOTION for Court to Authorize Service Summons on US Government by Chris Walters re 16 Amended Complaint, 14 Counterclaim (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Summons, # 2 Proposed Order Summons) (Walters, Chris) Modified event on 3/22/2013 (awc). (Entered: 03/21/2013)

20. 03/21/2013 18 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL to the Supreme Court by Chris Walters. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Petiton Filed With USSC, # 2 Exhibit(s) Support Exhibits cited, # 3 Exhibit(s) Denial E Filing US Circuits) (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 03/21/2013)

21. 03/23/2013 19 COUNTERCLAIM against Christopher Coons filed by Chris Walters (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Cross filed in USDC,NM, # 2 Exhibit(s)) (Walters, Chris) Modified document # on 3/25/2013 (jeh). (Entered: 03/23/2013)

22. 03/25/2013 NOTICE of Docket Text/Document Modification by Deputy Clerk regarding document #19; per email from pro se plaintiff advising that an error was made in document #19 and he reentered it as #20, the clerk deleted document #19 and renumbered doc #20 to doc #19. (jeh) (Entered: 03/25/2013)

23. 03/26/2013 20 NOTICE of Defendant Prevails Through Merit re: 16 Amended Complaint, 18 Notice of Appeal, 15 Crossclaim, 17 MOTION, 12 Crossclaim, 14 Counterclaim filed by Chris Walters (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 03/26/2013)

24. 03/26/2013 21 NOTICE of Recommended Revised Sanctions Protocols re: 20 Notice (Other) filed by Chris Walters (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Existing Sanctions Protocol, # 2 Exhibit(s) Amended Docket #20, # 3 Exhibit(s) Notice USDC, NM, # 4 Exhibit(s) Motion USDC, DC, # 5 Exhibit(s) Motion USDC, WDT, # 6 Exhibit(s) Notice filed 5th US Circuit) (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 04/04/2013)

25. 04/05/2013 22 NOTICE Acting Commissioner Has Prevailed at Through Merit Recommendation for Writ of Prohibition (Amended Docket #20) filed by Chris Walters (plh) (Entered: 04/05/2013)

26. 04/11/2013 23 BRIEFING ORDER- Pltf is ordered to confirm or deny this interpretation of his most recent pleadings. If denied, pltf shall state clearly and concisely his exact claims in numerical order and the relief he seeks. Pltf's response shall be limited to five pages, double spaced. Pltf's response shall be entitled "Response to Briefing Order". ( Responses due by 4/25/2013) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Clinton E Averitte on 4/11/2013) (plh) (Entered: 04/12/2013)

27. 04/12/2013 24 MOTION to Withdraw 23 Order,, Modify Hearings/Deadlines, filed by Chris Walters with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 04/12/2013)

28. 04/15/2013 25 NOTICE of Related Case Dissenting ORDER re: 23 Order, Modify Hearings/Deadlines,, filed by Chris Walters (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Order USDC NM, # 2 Exhibit(s) Removed Congress) (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 04/15/2013)

29. 04/16/2013 26 NOTICE of US Supreme Court Decline Review re: 23 Order, Modify Hearings/Deadlines,, filed by Chris Walters (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 04/16/2013)

30. 04/22/2013 27 Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss re [24} Motion to Withdraw Complaint. All claims asserted by pltf in his complaint and other pleadings are hereby dismissed. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 4/22/2013) (plh) (Entered: 04/22/2013)

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

31. 04/22/2013 28 JUDGMENT - Of equal date herewith, the Court has entered an Order Granting Pltf's Motion to Withdraw, construed as a Motion to Dismiss, filed in the above styled and numbered case, and dismissing all claims raised by pltf in his complaint and other pleadings. Judgment is entered accordingly. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 4/22/2013) (plh) (Entered: 04/22/2013)

32. 05/21/2013 29 MOTION for Reconsideration re 28 Judgment, 27 Order of Dismissal or Administrative Closure filed by Chris Walters (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Document from 10th Circuit) (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 05/21/2013)

33. 05/28/2013 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Chris Walters with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 05/28/2013)

34. 05/29/2013 31 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER: re: 29 Motion for Reconsideration. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 5/29/2013) (egb) (Entered: 05/29/2013)

35. 05/29/2013 32 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: re: 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Ordered by Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 5/29/2013) (egb) (Entered: 05/29/2013)

36. 05/30/2013 33 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Fifth Circuit as to 32 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, 31 Order on Motion for Reconsideration by Chris Walters. T.O. form to appellant electronically at Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration(s) Motion Proceed Forma Pauperis) (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 05/30/2013)

37. 05/30/2013 34 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal re 33 Notice of Appeal, filed by Chris Walters (see Doc #33, NOA, for image) (jeh) (Entered: 05/31/2013)

38. 06/03/2013 35 ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL: re: 34 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Clinton E Averitte on 6/3/2013) (egb) (Entered: 06/03/2013)

39. 06/06/2013 USCA Case Number 13-10580 in Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for 33 Notice of Appeal, filed by Chris Walters. (plh) (Entered: 06/06/2013)

40. 06/06/2013 Record on Appeal for USCA5 13-10580 (related to 33 appeal): Record consisting of: 2 ECF electronic record, certified to USCA. To request a copy of the record (on disk or on paper), contact the appeals deputy in advance to arrange delivery. (plh) (Entered: 06/06/2013)

41. 06/08/2013 36 Appellant's BRIEF by Chris Walters. (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 06/08/2013)

42. 06/10/2013 37 Transcript Order Form: re 33 Notice of Appeal, transcript not requested (plh) (Entered: 06/10/2013)

43. 06/12/2013 Supplemental Record on Appeal for USCA5 13-10580 (related to 33 appeal): Record consisting of: 1 ECF electronic record, certified to USCA. To request a copy of the record (on disk or on paper), contact the appeals deputy in advance to arrange delivery. (plh) (Entered: 06/12/2013)

44. 06/12/2013 38 Appellant's BRIEF by Chris Walters. (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 06/12/2013)

45. 06/14/2013 39 Appellant's BRIEF by Chris Walters. (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 06/14/2013)

46. 06/18/2013 Supplemental Record on Appeal for USCA5 13-10580 (related to 33 appeal): Record consisting of: 1 ECF electronic record, certified to USCA. To request a copy of the record (on disk or on paper), contact the appeals deputy in advance to arrange delivery. (plh) (Entered: 06/18/2013)

47. 06/18/2013 40 Record on Appeal for USCA5 13-10580 (related to 33 appeal): Record consisting of: 2 Volume(s) ECF electronic record, 2 Vols. Supplemental ECF electronic reocrd transmitted to USCA5. Shipped: UPS - 1Z X88 804 03 9932 9106 (plh) (Entered: 06/18/2013)

48. 06/27/2013 41 Appellant's BRIEF by Chris Walters. (Walters, Chris) (Entered: 06/27/2013)

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

1. 06/05/2013 SOCIAL SECURITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters [13-10580] (NFD)

2. 06/12/2013 Document Received No action will be taken at this time on the petition for issue extraordinary writ received from Appellant Mr. Chris Walters because the argument can be included within the opening brief [13-10580] (MRW)

3. 06/12/2013 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [7385418-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Notice of Certified ROA due on 06/27/2013. [13-10580] (DLJ)

4. 06/12/2013 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received on 6/10/13 from Appellant Mr. Chris Walters advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [13-10580] (MCS)

5. 06/17/2013 NOTICE RECEIVED FROM DISTRICT COURT. ROA Certified by DCt, FILED. [13-10580] (DLJ)

6. 06/17/2013 NOTICE RECEIVED FROM DISTRICT COURT. Supplemental ROA Cert by DCt, FILED. Certified ROA due deadline satisfied. [13-10580] (DLJ)

7. 06/17/2013 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/29/2013, for Appellant Chris Walters. [13-10580] (DLJ)

8. 06/17/2013 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters to file supplemental briefs based on recent 3rd party inquiry (CD attached with voluminous content) [7389528-2]Supplemental Briefs Included? Yes. [13-10580] (MBC)

9. 06/17/2013 CLERK ORDER denying motion to file supplemental briefs based on recent third party inquiry, filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters [7389528-2]. [13-10580] (DLJ)

10. 06/17/2013 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Chris Walters Brief NOT Sufficient as 6 additional copies are needed to meet the 7 copy requirement and a Statement Regarding Oral Argument is required. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 1. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 07/02/2013, for Appellant Chris Walters. Record Excerpts due on 07/02/2013, for Appellant Chris Walters. [13-10580] (DLJ)

11. 06/18/2013 BRIEFING COMPLETE. [13-10580] (DLJ)

12. 06/18/2013 RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT ROA due on 07/03/2013. [13-10580] (DLJ)

13. 06/19/2013 2nd SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE RECEIVED FROM DISTRICT COURT. 2nd Supplemental ROA Cert by DCt, FILED. [13-10580] (DLJ)

14. 06/20/2013 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appellant's Brief received from Appellant Mr. Chris Walters, because unauthorized corrections were made to the brief. Appellant must file a motion for leave to correct the brief. [13-10580] (DLJ)

15. 06/24/2013 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters to extend time to return sufficient brief [7397833-2], to extend time to file record excerpts [7397833-3], to certify question to Supreme Court [7397833-4]. Date of service: 06/20/2013 [13-10580] (SEND motion to certify question to SCREENING Judge and panel) (MBC)

16. 06/26/2013 RECORD ON APPEAL FILED Electronic Pleadings, 2; ROA deadline satisfied. [13-10580] (DLJ)

17. 06/26/2013 1st SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Supp Electronic Pldg, 1; [13-10580] (DLJ)

18. 06/26/2013 2nd SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Supp Electronic Pldg, 1; [13-10580] (DLJ)

19. 06/27/2013 CLERK ORDER granting motion to extend time to return sufficient appellant's brief [7397833-2], and granting motion to extend time to file appellant's record excerpts, filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters [7397833-3]. Sufficient Brief deadline updated to 07/17/2013, for Appellant Chris Walters. Record Excerpts deadline updated to 07/17/2013, for Appellant Chris Walters. [13-10580] (DLJ)

20. 07/01/2013 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [7400898-2]. Date of service: 06/27/2013 [13-10580] (MBC)

21 07/02/2013 CLERK ORDER granting motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42, filed by Appellant Mr. Chris Walters [7400898-2]. [13-10580] (DLJ)

22. 07/02/2013 Motion Transfere Congress...

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-025-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915
Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities what appears to be a large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect.

Updated: Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 4:28 PM MST
Published : Wednesday, 21 Jan 2009, 1:16 AM MST
Reporter: Tim Maestas ,/br> Web Producer: Bill Diven

ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) - A retiring FBI agent in the thick of investigating and prosecuting public officials said Tuesday New Mexico may be the most corrupt state in the nation. New Mexico has a long list of corrupt politicians, and the list could be growing. High-profile political figures and associates have been convicted, and ongoing investigations are making frequent headlines. Many of those cases began with FBI agents in Albuquerque.

"It's our No. 1 criminal program," Thomas McClenaghan, special agent in charge of the FBI Albuquerque field office, said. Corruption scandals that took down former state Sen. Manny Aragin, once considered the most powerful politician in the Senate. Former State Treasurer Robert Vigil, his predecessor and a long list of criminal accomplices have been convicted or cut plea deals in federal court.

McClenaghan will lead Albuquerque's team of FBI agents only through the end of the week. He retires on Friday. "From what we've seen here, corruption in this state is epidemic," he told KRQE News 13. "It is at all levels of government." New Mexico is not alone, of course. Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich is at the center of a federal investigation that had him arrested late last year. At the time Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant of the Chicago FBI field office had little good to say about how Illinois does political business. "If it isn't the most corrupt state in the United States, it is certainly one hell of a competitor," Grant said.

McClenaghan's take? "All I can say is Special Agent In Charge Rob Grant never worked in New Mexico." That's a strong statement from a man who's made it a point to pursue political corruption aggressively. When his agents went after Vigil, then the sitting state treasurer, undercover video showed a California financial consultant who was cooperating with the FBI handing him $10,000 in cash. At Vigil's first trial jurors couldn't decide whether he was guilty or not, and ultimately the evidence was not enough to convict him on 23 counts of racketeering, conspiracy and extortion. However Vigil was eventually convicted on one count of attempted extortion in 2006.

1. Exhibit Page #17 The Social Security Approves Disability/Medicade Extensive Frauds In USDC, NM Addressed by Congress: Feburary, 2007-July 2007

2. Exhibit Page #18 Social Security Begins To Default On Agreements April-October 2007

3. Exhibit Page #19 Social Security Contract Obligations Search For Affordable Housing In 2007

4. Exhibit Page #25 Social Security Administration's Secret Hearing & Request For Unauthorized Review Generates $15,000 Capital Loss

5. Exhibit Page #27 Motion For Reconsideration Denied By Judge Robert Scott USDC NM June, 2008-August 2008

6. Exhibit Page #31 Can Social Security Administrative Law Judges Over Rule Federal Judges & US Circuit Courts of Appeals? November-December, 2008

7. Exhibit Page #35 Operational Audits July, August, September 2009 Budget Program Cuts Eliminate Services-Options

8. Exhibit Page #36 FBI Director Mueller Apologies US Senate Committee ON Judiciary July 2009-September, 2009