Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
) The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Now comes the plaintiff pro se Chris Walters before the honorable United States District Court of Montana in tis Amicus Curiae brief to wit:

The Court is asked to establish jurisdiction where numerous ongoing request and demands to challenge the Rule of Law have created questions as to the constitutionality of several US Statutes which is actionable pursuant to Title 28 USC 1331 Federal Question and the Court and Defendants are further asked to consider that ongoing attempts by 3rd parties to empower laws and statutes which directly challenge the US Government are actionable under Title 18 USC 115 Treason, Sedition, and Insurrection�.

Since 1997 questions relating to 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act have been adjudicated and the 3 US Circuit Courts of Appeals (Exhibit A) have closed further questions; discussions, interpleaders, and other legal processes until the Social Security Commissioner exercises his rights pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review.

1. The Court and Defendants and asked to consider whether ongoing 3rd challenges the requirements of Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review have drawn into violated the US Supreme Court�s requirements that citizens are entitled to the equal protection of the law as cited;

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S. Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction, adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp. 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs. Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911. Since 2007 Chris Walters has acquired $81,000 in legal fees and costs in responding to legal challenges from 3rd parties after the USDC of New Mexico ruled the case closed and well pleaded as cited:

Link #1 Index Page

Link #2 Index11 North Carolina

Link #3Index15 North Carolina

Link #4Index 2 Stockton CA & NM

Link #5 index 25 Texas

Link #6 Index 6 North Carolina

Link #7 index 4

The Defendants and the Court are asked to consider the merits of Kill on Sight Authorization under color of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 to address attempted Assassination of federal recipients or aiding and abetting terrorist or challenge the Commissioners right to initiate a review:

Link #1 Index10 Rescue Mission San Antonio,TX

Link #2 index14 Rescue Mission Salem, Oregon

Link #3 Index20 North Carolina

Link #4 Index22a Boise Idaho

Link #5 Index North Carolina

Link #6 Index2

1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitutional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings including such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

2. The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyond the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

We have a large number of nonprofit agencies abusing their status as charities to prevent citizens from residing where they so desire as cited generally to deny persons medical treatment:

1. Specifications 1-28

2 Specifications 29-45

3 Specifications 46-70

4 Specifications 71-84

1. US Supreme Court Ruling Theresa Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

2. International Covenant Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Article 9 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to social security, including social insurance. Article 12 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health... d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness.

1. Specifications #1-16

2. Specifications #17-32

3. Specification #32-42

4. Specification #43-44

1. Attempt to write or empower federal statutes not authorized by US Congress:

Link #1 North Carolina Seceeds From Union

2. Use of law enforcement asset to pilfer counsels papers:

Link #2 USA Freedom Act 2015

3. 9 Millimeter Impeachment-unlawful practice before Committees of Congress or challenging the exclusive right of the US Congress to write and empower federal statutes:

Link #3 Service of Process

In 1997 the Honorable US District Court Judge Fred Biery issued his Find and Order in the USDC WDT in Walters v Miller and Crownover CA: SA-97-CA-1313 at the request of the Social Security Commissioner that Chris Walters can interact with the Social Security 6 times as provided by statute as cited:

1. Application for Social Security

2. Reconsideration

3. Administrative Law Judge

4. Appeals Counsel

5. Commissioners Final Determination

6. USDC Review

The Commissioner of Social Security Michael Asture made an admission of fact and law that Chris Walters was disabled when the question was at bar in Walters V Asture USDC, NM Case #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP the Honorable Judge Judith Herrera Presiding. Subsequent attempts by the Social Security Administrations own staff to over rule the Commissioner and Order of the Court were Quashed by the Honorable Judge Robert Scott C080380 USDC NM. Both Courts ruled the Cause well pleaded and closed from further review except as provided by Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review.

Exhibit B: Since the question at law were created in 1997 Chris Walters has been able to document and catalogue about 300 separate prosecutable violation of Title 18 CRIMES which have been successfully removed to the several Committees of Congress as cited:

http://ichoosetoserve.net/ssi/zzcontract/index26.htm

Exhibit E: The letter from US Circuit Court of Appeals Nov 1, 2012 which reviewed this question in 2009 expressed on problem with imposition of timely and appropriate sanctions on additional challenges to the Rule of Law. The Honorable United States District Court and Defendants are asked to consider that the construction and administration of Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act is so weak and poorly constructed that it should be declared void and unconstitutional and replaced by the Honorable members of the US Congress with some thing which remain within the bounds authorized by the Rule of Law.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Counsel of Record
PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807
(406-728-1809)

Tyler Giliam Clerk of Court
U.S. District Court Missoula
201 E. Broadway
Missoula, MT 59802
(406) 542-7260 Main

RE: Filing Request Walters v Leahy, Oconnor,,,

Dear Clerk Tyler Gilliam:

Please find enclosed a civil action for filing including 2 Copies of Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Civil Cover Sheet; and 2 copies of Civil Complaint for filing.

Many Thanks Chris Walters
Counsel of Record US Circuit Court of Appeals
(406-728-1809)

***Federal Express USDC, MT Tracking # 468629715113524

Mr. Chris Walters
c/o PO Box 7644
Missoula MT 59807
(Message 406-728-1809)
Friday, November 2nd, 2012
The Honorable US Attorney Michael Cotter
US Department of Justice
P.O. Box 8329
Missoula, MT 59807

RE: Certificate of Service Congressional Supersedes
Non black letter law items for 2012 for SSA

Dear US Attorney Michael Cotter:

We have a large number of ongoing non black letter law items occurring in and around a social security case for 15 years. In order not to unduly burden the trial judge, law staff; Social Security Commissioner when he exercises his right to a hearing pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review the non statutory items have been removed to several Committees of Congress.

Revised Exhibit C Data Disc
Since I left a copy of Exhibit C with you staff it was possible to make major improvements in format and presentation and readability and improve it�s value as an eventual discovery item for your clients benefits

Thanks Chris Walters
Appellant Counsel of Record
SSI Claim 261-90-6357

Cc: Certificate of Service on Congress 2012
Updated Exhibit C

Delivered in Person Friday 11-2-2012

Mr. Chris Walters
c/o PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807
Wednesday, November 7th, 2012
The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers Jr
Vice Chair US House Committee on Judiciary
669 Federal Bldg.
231 W. Lafayette
Detroit, MI 48226
313-961-5670
\ 313-226-2085 (Fax)

RE: Question of Constitutionality of Several Acts of Congress
Courtesy Question for House Committee filed in USDC:

Dear Congressman John Conyers Jr:

A question on the constitutionality of the Social Security Act and several other statutes is appended an Amicus Curiae filed in USDC, MT. If no interest exist in defending the statute I will ask the Court to Void the provisions of Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act.

Many Thanks Chris Walters
Counsel of Record US Circuit Court of Appeals
(406-728-1809)

Cc: Prefiling Copy Walters v Congress
USDC, MT

Priority US Mail 03113260000069524916
Delivered November 9th, 2012 10:59 AM

The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
Chairman US Senate Committee on Judiciary
P.O. Box 933
87 State Street, Room 338
Montpelier, VT 05602
(802) 229-0569

RE: Question of Constitutionality of Several Acts of Congress
Courtesy Question for Senate Committee On Judiciary filed in USDC:

Dear Congressman US Senator Patrick Leady:

A question on the constitutionality of the Social Security Act and several other statutes is appended an Amicus Curiae filed in USDC, MT. If no interest exist in defending the statute I will ask the Court to Void the provisions of Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act.

Many Thanks Chris Walters
Counsel of Record US Circuit Court of Appeals
(406-728-1809)

Cc: Prefiling Copy Walters v Congress
USDC, MT

Priority US Mail 03120090000049527600
Delivery November 16th, 2012 8:34 AM

Mr. Chris Walters
c/o PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807
Wednesday, November 7th, 2012
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin
Permanent Committee on Investigations
Patrick V. McNamara Federal Building
477 Michigan Avenue, Suite 1860
Detroit, MI 48226-2576
Phone (313) 226-6020
Fax (313) 226-6948

RE: Question of Constitutionality of Several Acts of Congress
Courtesy Question for Senate Committee on Investigations:

Dear US Senator Carl Levin:

A question on the constitutionality of the Social Security Act and several other statutes is appended an Amicus Curiae filed in USDC, MT. If no interest exist in defending the statute I will ask the Court to Void the provisions of Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act.

Many Thanks Chris Walters
Counsel of Record US Circuit Court of Appeals
(406-728-1809)

Cc: Prefiling Copy Walters v Congress
USDC, MT

Priority US Mail 03113260000069524909
delivery November 9th, 2012 7:14 AM

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
) The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Now comes the Plaintiff Pro Se before the Honorable United States District Court of Montana to wit:

1. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 4 Summons typically provide that the Court issues a Summons for the Defendants and service by the United States Marshal.

2. Because of the separation of powers provision of the US Constitution the Courts cannot service legal process on the United States Congress.

3. The Plaintiff has however provided a true and correct copy of the Complaint and Exhibits by priority US Mail on the defendants regular place or business:

The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers Jr
Vice Chair US House Committee on Judiciary
669 Federal Bldg.
231 W. Lafayette
Detroit, MI 48226
313-961-5670
313-226-2085 (Fax)
Priority US Mail 03113260000069524916
Delivered November 9th, 2012 10:59 AM
Permanent Committee on Investigations
Patrick V. McNamara Federal Building
477 Michigan Avenue, Suite 1860
Detroit, MI 48226-2576
(313) 226-6020
Fax (313) 226-6948
Priority US Mail 03113260000069524909
delivery November 9th, 2012 7:14 AM

The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
Chairman of US Senate Committee on Judiciary
P.O. Box 933
87 State Street, Room 338
Montpelier, VT 05602
(802) 229-0569
Priority US Mail 03120090000049527600
Expected Delivery November 13th, 2012

Under Article 1 Section 8 of the US Constitution states: �Reinforcing these powers is Congress�s broad authority �to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.�

The United States Congress has established the US Senate Committee on Judiciary Chaired by the Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy; US Senate Committee Permanent Committee on Investigations Chaired by the Honorable US Senator Carl Levin and the US House Committee on the Judiciary whose vice Chairman is the Honorable US Congressman John Conyers., Jr. for the specific purpose of reviewing problems in the operation of government as contained in the Complaint.

The US Congress has gone on to create and empower the Government Accountability Office and created such statutes as Title 5 Part 1 Chapter 8 Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking and Title 2 USC Sec. 190d. Legislative review by standing Committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives to empower their right of review.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Counsel of Record
PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807
(406-728-1809)
This 9th Day of November, 2012

The deployment of paramilitary groups from Texas to Idaho and throughout the Pacific Northwest appears to position former veterans with criminal background in close proximity to US missle fields was largely unchallenged or unknown. That the takeover occured during winter in an area controlled by the Catholic Church.

The Obama Administation response to seditionist movements by Christian Conservatives was Operation Jaded Helm and purged a large number of military officers without much explanation

It is very interesting to note that Televangelist Pat Robertson claims to have recieved a Divine Message From God" about a mass terror attack which is going to occur in the United States this year and kill many persons. As with many other statements by Evangelist Pat Robertson such as a call to Assassinate the Leader of Venezuela don't we generally associate his comments as a political sounding board for ideas and policies from the extreme right wing.

This Link Did the Democratic Party splinter groups and allies in NC team up with resident Islamic extremist to take out Republic Party asset and decapitate US Govt during 911

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
) The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Now comes the Plaintiff Pro Se before the Honorable United States District Court of Montana to wit:

1. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 13 Cross Claim and Counterclaim provides for the Plaintiff Chris Walters to address questions to the Defendants, US Attorney, and Court by several 3rd parties.

2. Chris Walters is not a member of the Federal Bar and unable to address the 3rd party concerns can only vend, dispense or practice federal law to the extent permitted by the Officers of the Court.

3. Exhibit A: The Court, US Attorney, or Defendants may be able to more properly addresses the 3rd party concerns and even find a better solution than suggested by the Plaintiff and should not be limited in finding a solution simply because the Plaintiff lacks adequate legal training to form a better question.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 7064
Missoula, MT 59807

I Chris Walters the Plaintiff in the Above cause do state and affirm I have mailed a true and correct copy of Exhibit A to each of the Defendants and a copy of this Motion on by First Class Mail this 10th day of November, 2012

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
) The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Now comes the Plaintiff Pro Se before the Honorable United States District Court of Montana to wit:

1. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56 Summary Judgment cited:

(a) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT A party may move for summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense � or the part of each claim or defense � on which summary judgment is sought. The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court should state on the record the reasons for granting or denying the motion.

2. Citation of Authority Several ORDERS pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review:

As previously cited in the Complaint Docket #1 the Commissioner of Social Security Administration Michael Astrue and has previously exercised his sovereign authority to prevent further litigation, changes in case status or benefits, or other discussions of Chris Walters SSI benefits through litigation before the several US Courts and being sustained in Exhibit A 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals Case 99-50174 Walters v Miller and Exhibit B: 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals DC 08 2094 Walters V Astrue and Exhibit C: US Circuit Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Walters v Asture Civil # 09-0956;

3. Exhibit D Citation of Authority: The Responsibility for Administration of the Social Security Administration resides with the Social Security Commissioner and his staff as cited in Title 42 Chapter 7 Social Security Act and neither the Plaintiff Chris Walters nor the US District Court are responsible permitted or required to administer nor operate the Social Security Administration.

4. Exhibit E Service Of Process & Citation of Authority: The responsibility to oversight the Administrative Branch of government and amend US statutes resides with the United States Congress as cited below:

Under Article 1 Section 8 of the US Constitution states: �Reinforcing these powers is Congress�s broad authority �to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.�

The United States Congress has established the US Senate Committee on Judiciary Chaired by the Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy; US Senate Committee Permanent Committee on Investigations Chaired by the Honorable US Senator Carl Levin and the US House Committee on the Judiciary whose vice Chairman is the Honorable US Congressman John Conyers., Jr. for the specific purpose of reviewing problems in the operation of government as contained in the Complaint.

The US Congress has gone on to create and empower the Government Accountability Office and created such statutes as Title 5 Part 1 Chapter 8 Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking and Title 2 USC Sec. 190d. Legislative review by standing Committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives to empower their right of review.

5. While the Plaintiff Chris Walters has a clear cut constitutional right to petition the government for redress of grievance neither the Plaintiff nor the Court can Issue a Summons or Capitol Hill nor compel the esteemed members of Congress to perform their duties or for instance defend the US Statutes at Bar.

As previously cited in the Docket #1 the Complaint the questions of law:

1. Exhibit D & E Plaintiff Chris Walters has extensively petitioned the Commissioner of Social Security and the Congressional Committees throughout 2012 to exercise their lawful authority to address massive problems in the operation of Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act.

2. Citation of Authority: Despite the expenditure of an estimated $3,800 in service of process neither the Social Security Commissioner, his staff, nor the Congress has even bothered to respond or even acknowledge the questions at bar.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
) The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

As previously cited in the Docket #1 the Complaint the questions of law:

3. The Court might draw the same conclusion the Plaintiff asserts that realizing the Social Security Program is going broke the government has elected to abandon it�s jurisdictional responsibilities and have the program declared void or unconstitutional.

4. Exhibit F Citation of Authority: Addressed to George Scherger Program Director of the Poverello House in Missoula, Montana explains we can have no further discussions or review of Chris Walters Social Security benefits, case history, or other aspects.

5. The first question is asked is how can Chris Walters of the staff of a nonprofit agency vend, dispense or practice any type of federal law without being members of the Federal Bar and being subject to Sanctions pursuant to Title 18 USC 402 Contempt?

6. As the Social Security Commissioner has already secured several ORDERS prohibiting further discussions of Chris Walters SSI claim why won�t the various Court prosecute Chris Walters and the staff of the Poverello House for violation of Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDERS?

7. The question of the constitutionality of Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act is brought to bar by asking how anyone can practice, vend, or dispense federal law on the property of a church without violation of 1st Amendment separation of church/state?

8. Exhibit G: Dr. Eric Ravitz the primary care physician responsible under Medicaid to provide Chris Walters medical treatment is apparently refusing to move forward with Chris Walters medical treatment of suggestion for treatment of MRSA with a PIC line after 3 recent surgeries for infections.

9. The Court is asked to consider that the refusal of the Medicaid provider to provide adequate and effective medical treatment is a challenge to US Supreme Court ruling in Theresa Shiavo-Schindler v Michael Schiavo where patients can decide what type of medical treatment is or is not appropriate as a matter of personal choice.

10. Statement of Fact: On or about 4PM on 10-26-2012 Mountain Pacific Foundation (800) 497-8232 a representative did a phone evaluation of Chris Walters request for assisted living and indicated he would receive a written determination within 4 business days which as of November, 12th, 2012 has not been received or enacted.

11. Citation of State Authority: The State of Montana has created a barrier to persons such as Chris Walters being able to access assisted living services without additional review by the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services utilizing Mountain Pacific Foundation as a contract agent to review client eligibility and require subsequent approval by Missoula Montana.

12. The Court is asked to consider that the State has overstepped it�s bounds by asserting additional case review where none is permitted and challenging federal sovereignty and whether the state statutes in question need to be voided?

13. The Court is asked to consider issuing a Summary Judgment declaring Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act void as it violates the enables and empower 3rd party tampering with SSA programs by parties who have no legal standing to practice federal law; it permits churches or non profits to vend, dispense or practice law in violation of lst Amendment, it requires parties to violate provisions of the US Penal Code; participates directly or indirectly in attempts to assassinate it�s clients; challenges the right of Chris Walters to fair hearings and equal protection of the laws; and most importantly because it appears those in a position of authority of administer and oversight the Social Security program have abandoned their responsibilities.

The Complaint Docket #1 and this brief clearly show the Social Security Administration operates far outside it�s lawful charter and in fact in challenge to it�s mandated functions in Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act. Barring some meritorious appearance and actions by the Defendants or the Social Security Commissioner it is Moved that the provisions of Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act be voided and the Court might even acknowledge the tremendous amount of time and effort expended by the US Government over the last 15 years to dispatch it�s obligations.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters, Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Vs.

The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
) The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

NOW COMES THE Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the Honorable US District Court to give Notice Of Appeal to the 9th US Circuit pursuant to Title 28 USC 1291 Final decisions of district courts from the final decision of Honorable US District Court dated 1-4-2013. Although it is not required of the Appellant; given the nature of the Courts Dismissal With Prejudice of January 4th, 2013 the Plaintiff will append a brief Memorandum showing the showing good faith to proceed with waiver of filing fees in good faith.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters,
1224 E Trent
Spokane, WA 99202

Chris Walters
Petitioners

Case 17-35651
Exhibit #74a Challenges to Rule of Law MT
Exhibit Page #74aSoverignity Returned To US
NATO Options Article 4 & 5

President Donald Trump
Case 17-35651 ORDER

1. Various questions related to US National Sovereignity were deferred as an informational legal action to Trump Administration. US Patriot Act filed from Reno, Nevada. Motion For Summary Judgment on constitutionality of Social Security Act. The Petition was withdrawn as moot when Congress amended Affordable Care Act and other 3rd parties attempts to challenge the rule of law created question placing United States into temporary custody of the United Nations.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Vs.

The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
) The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

The Honorable US District Court has appeared 1/10/2013 in Document 19 and ORDERED the case dismissed based on Chris Walters Motion To Withdraw Docket #18 and addresses and acknowledges several areas which would have been considered on Appeal to wit:

1. Neither the Plaintiff nor the Court can issue or serve a Summons or any other legal process on Capitol Hill or on a Congressional Committee due to doctrine of Separation of Powers.

2. Neither the Plaintiff nor the Court can compel a Congressional Committee to participate in a legal action unless they appear voluntarily-which they did not.

3. None other 3rd party attempting to join has established any legal standing nor successfully challenged the rights of the Social Security Commissioner pursuant to title 42 USC405(g)(H) Judicial Review as sustained in Exhibits A; Exhibits B; and Exhibit C.

4. The Commissioner of Social Security has retired 1/19/2013 and it is possible the new Commissioner will address some of the concerns.

5. The civil suit was brought for information purposes as an amicus curiae and requires no particular relief from the Court and the Plaintiff gives Notice of Withdrawal of the Appeals in Good Faith.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Plaintiff pro Se

Mailed 1-23-2013 From Medford, Oregon

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
) The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants
The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Chris Walters
Appellant

USDC, EDC 2:2019:00238
9th USCA #19-16523
Supreme Court 19-7809

Commissioner Andrew Saul
Social Security Commissioner
Baltimore, MD 21235

President UN Security Council
Press On Image to Enlarge
3rd Party Joinder
UN Security Council

Supreme Court Precedent? Long term bizzare, eratic, and abuse issues this cased asked if government could steal SSI benefits? Should the United States should be place in temporary custody of the United Nations based on government officials operating on dimished capacity to avoid a civil war? In declining to review the ruling of 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals #19-16523 and USDC, Eastern District of California 2:2019:00238 the US Supreme Court appears to have let stand abuses of power the This Link US Attorney General William Barr described as a refusal of local prosecutors to enforce entire classes of laws.

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.