It is the job of local,state, and federal prosecutors to enforce and prosecute all laws with fairness and equity and not deny any person the equal protection of the law (14th and 5th Amendments. This Link Political Patronage Briefly reviews how the political patronage system entices local prosecutors and others to refuse to enforce the law. This Link former US Attorney General Eric Holder also addressed serioius abuses of prosecutorial authority

US Congressman Bill Pascell has efforts to have nursing homes regulated by CMS by US Department of HHS which was revolked by Trump Administration.2 Million dead (250,000 a year) since 2014 as a result of medical error. The online databases show that actually began paying in 2010 to deny patients treatment for pre-existing conditions and block prosecution:

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.

The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Now comes the plaintiff pro se Chris Walters before the honorable United States District Court of Montana in tis Amicus Curiae brief to wit:

The Court is asked to establish jurisdiction where numerous ongoing request and demands to challenge the Rule of Law have created questions as to the constitutionality of several US Statutes which is actionable pursuant to Title 28 USC 1331 Federal Question and the Court and Defendants are further asked to consider that ongoing attempts by 3rd parties to empower laws and statutes which directly challenge the US Government are actionable under Title 18 USC 115 Treason, Sedition, and Insurrection.

Since 1997 questions relating to 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act have been adjudicated and the 3 US Circuit Courts of Appeals (Exhibit A) have closed further questions; discussions, interpleaders, and other legal processes until the Social Security Commissioner exercises his rights pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review.

1. Specification #1 Various concerns in and around Greensboro, NC refused to issue Chris Walters a Medicaid Card & Benefits in an ongoing challenge to the ORDERS OF 3 different US Circuit Courts of Appeals with the intent to cause death or serious injury to Chris Walters through denial of adequate medical treatment as cited online:

http://ichoosetoserve.net/ssi/zzzassistedliving/index.html

2. Specification #2 the various local, state, and federal concerns in and around North Carolina have an extensive history of sedition, insurrection, and treason and the area has been the home base of operations of Islamic terrorist for 30 years:

http://ichoosetoseerve.net/ssi/zzcontract/index21.htm

3. Recommendation placement of this State under temporary Martial Law whereby each and every employee of every city, state, and federal office will reaffirm their Oath of Allegiance to the United States of American; face summary execution or be denied employment with all government positions.

This Link The recent statement of US Attorney General William Bar is that local prosecutors are declining to prosecute entire classes of crimes to the obvious detriment of victims. Probably a violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act and Title 18 Sec 371 Conspiracy to Commit An Offense To defraud the United States USDC,NDTWalters V Colvin and 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals were unable to support the Social Security Act and precedent Black letter law ruling from hundreds of 3rd party challenges

1. Specification #4: On or about August 12th, 2012 abuse law enforcement and intelligence assets in Missoula County to intercept and block email and counsels privileged communications from email accounts specialdefenders@gmail.com chrissaidthanks2012@gmail.com, chrissaidthanks2003@yahoo.com, specialdefenders@gmail.com in violation of the National Security Act and creates a question as to the constitutionality of US Patriot Act.

2. Recommendation: Temporary placement of Missoula County and State of Montana under temporary Martial Law where by any officer, agent, or representative engaged in the further abuse of national security assets will face summary execution.

3. Specification #6 Missoula County operates Partnership Health who attempted to defraud the United States in probable violation of Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to commit an offense to defraud the United States by repeatedly attempting to facility $8,000 in medical test for the patient as a sleep study and colon exam which were recently completed.

4. Recommendation: For each act of defrauding the United States either Missoula Montana and Partnership Health will be required to perform restitution and face possible criminal prosecution.

5. Recommendation: the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the patient has a right to choose their medical provider and treatment in their landmark ruling Theresa Shiavo-Schindler v Michael Schiavo and any person, group or organization attempting to hijack, oppose, impede or Quash Patients should face summary execution for Sedition and Insurrection.

6. Specification #7: On or about 4PM on 10-26-2012 Mountain Pacific Foundation(800) 497-8232 a representative did a phone evaluation of Chris Walters request for assisted living and indicated he would receive a written determination within 4 business days which as of November, 8th, 2012 has not been received of enacted.

7. Recommendation: Barring inadvertent error or extenuating circumstances it recommended the Mountain Pacific Foundation and State Agency known as Passport to Health into custody of a special master to guarantee compliance with requirement to process client applications.

8. Specification #8- Exhibit B: On or about Chris Walters was seen in the emergency room of St Patrick Hospital in Missoula, MT for treatment of blood clots and the ER nurse made extensive queries not related to the treatment as to if Chris Walters came from Oregon, North Carolina, and Florida and why he should not get out of Montana and go back to where he belongs in an interesting challenge to the US Supreme Court ruling in Williams V Fears and US V guest that citizens have a right to live where they so desire.

9. Recommendation: If someone finds the ER Nurse asking to have ER patients run out of Montana have someone hang the problem off the side of the St Patrick Hospital building.

10. Specification #9: On or about November 4th, 2012 a man named Carl approached Chris Walters on the property of the Poverello House in the soup line and verbally assaulted Chris Walters in front of about 40 other persons accusing him of faking his illness; challenging his right to have and use a walker; taking up a bed needed by a Veteran. Carl who claims to be a veteran with a long pony tail has his ass hanging out of his holes in his blue jeans apparently feels it is his calling and right in life to violate the Federal Privacy Act and question the Judgment of several Courts and the Social Security Administration.

11. Recommendation: Why not drop Carl his pony tail; his holy ass and drop him into a federal penal facility for violation of Title 18 USC 402 Contempt?.

12. Specification #10-Exhibit C: On or about October 24th, 2012 Passport to Health confirmed Dr. Eric Ravitz and Blue Mountain Clinic as Chris Walters primary care provider and at on or about October 23rd, 2012 Chris Walters provided Dr. Eric Ravitz with an advanced medical directive on what medical needs should be met and with further written request Exhibit D.

Dr. Eric Ravitz indicated he would have no problem authorizing an CPAP machine from NORCO for obstructive sleep apnea and as of November 7th, 2012 the NORCO representative indicates they have not heard a peep from the good doctor:

The plaintiff is asking if we have moved away from a great American Tradition where seditionist and traitors are summarily hanged? This lost art was reportedly discarded in the 1880s after the retirement of US Marshal Wyatt Earp and prior to that after the end of the civil war when the Union Army assisted dissidents to some quality time on a tree and a rope. Colonel Charles F. Fisher of a civil war hero from Burlington ,NC died at the battle of Bull Run of a well placed 50 caliber bullet.

The point of law being tendered at the Bar is that this is not the Peoples Independent Republic Of Montana but a part of the Sovereign United States of America where obedience to those in positions of authority is not an of law issue but a fact of life. In a recent newspaper article a public official was asking if the State of Montana really has to comply with a new regulation from Washington the answer obviously is comply or face the consequences.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Appellant Counsel of Record
PO Box 7644
Missoula MT 59807

The deployment of paramilitary groups from Texas to Idaho and throughout the Pacific Northwest appears to position former veterans with criminal background in close proximity to US missle fields was largely unchallenged or unknown. That the takeover occured during winter in an area controlled by the Catholic Church.

The Obama Administation response to seditionist movements by Christian Conservatives was Operation Jaded Helm and purged a large number of military officers without much explanation

It is very interesting to note that Televangelist Pat Robertson claims to have recieved a Divine Message From God" about a mass terror attack which is going to occur in the United States this year and kill many persons. As with many other statements by Evangelist Pat Robertson such as a call to Assassinate the Leader of Venezuela don't we generally associate his comments as a political sounding board for ideas and policies from the extreme right wing.

This Link Did the Democratic Party splinter groups and allies in NC team up with resident Islamic extremist to take out Republic Party asset and decapitate US Govt during 911

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
) The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Now comes the Plaintiff Pro Se before the Honorable United States District Court of Montana to wit:

1. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 13 Cross Claim and Counterclaim provides for the Plaintiff Chris Walters to address questions to the Defendants, US Attorney, and Court by several 3rd parties.

2. Chris Walters is not a member of the Federal Bar and unable to address the 3rd party concerns can only vend, dispense or practice federal law to the extent permitted by the Officers of the Court.

3. Exhibit A: The Court, US Attorney, or Defendants may be able to more properly addresses the 3rd party concerns and even find a better solution than suggested by the Plaintiff and should not be limited in finding a solution simply because the Plaintiff lacks adequate legal training to form a better question.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 7064
Missoula, MT 59807

I Chris Walters the Plaintiff in the Above cause do state and affirm I have mailed a true and correct copy of Exhibit A to each of the Defendants and a copy of this Motion on by First Class Mail this 10th day of November, 2012

By Andrew Edwards | The Daily Tar Heel
Updated: 11/16/12 1:05am

North Carolina seceded from the Union more than 150 years ago. But if petitioners have their way, the Tar Heel state will again separate from the United States.

The N.C. petitioners are not alone. As of Wednesday night, citizens have petitioned for each of the 50 states to peacefully secede from the U.S. through the White Houses website, petitions.whitehouse.gov. North Carolinas secession petition, which has collected more than 27,000 signatures since its creation on Nov. 9, was drafted by conservative blogger, columnist and Pittsboro resident Randy Dye.

Political analysts say the petitioners are likely more concerned about voicing their disapproval with the Obama administration than actually following through with secession. Mark Jones, professor and chairman of the political science department at Rice University in Texas, said the level of support for Texas petition likely stems from residents concerns about the outcome of the presidential election. He added that the state has always had a self-governing mentality.

I think states need to become independent again like our forefathers had planned, Dye said. The federal government is too huge to wrap my mind around. I think we need to bring it back to the states to the point where (state) representatives can control (each states) finances better and keep track of them versus having someone in Washington do it. Dye says while he knows the petition is absolutely going to go nowhere, he drafted the petition on principle, citing strong objections to the federal governments deficit spending and mounting debt.

According to an e-mail from a White House official, every petition that receives more than 25,000 signatures will be reviewed and issued an official response from President Barack Obamas administration. As of Wednesday night, petitions from seven states including North Carolina exceeded the signature threshold needed to merit a response from the White House. Among these petitions, Texas has garnered the most support, with almost 104,000 signatures.

Texas has the history of being a formerly independent country there is often a mistaken belief that we somehow have an additional privilege or ability that other states dont have, he said. Harry Watson, a UNC history professor and former director of the Universitys Center for the Study of the American South, said he could not recall a secession movement that began with an effort to petition the federal government. The Confederate States did not petition the United States government when they left the nation they just did it, he said.
Published November 14, 2012 in State

November 20, 2012 11:45 pm
By CHARLES S. JOHNSON Gazette State Bureau

HELENA A Tea Party group based in Billings has launched digital petitions asking the White House to allow Montana to secede from the United States and create its own new government.
Similar efforts began in all 50 states after the President Barack Obamas victory earlier this month, the Los Angeles Times reported.

There are two separate digital petitions requesting that Montana be allowed to secede on the White House website for petitions. Spearheading the secession effort here are the Montana Shrugged Tea Party Patriots.

Its more of an attention-getter, said Eric Olsen, the groups co-founder. Were trying to raise our voice again, hoping people will listen. We hope somebody listens to us someday. The petitions call on the Obama administration to peacefully grant the state of Montana to withdraw from the United States of America and create its own NEW government. As of Tuesday afternoon, one Montana petition had the first names of 13,334 signers, while the other had 61.

Anyone can sign the petitions. People signing the petitions electronically do not have to be from the state seeking to secede. Many of the people signing them were from out of state. On Nov. 13, blogger Tyler Evilsizer reported on IntelligentDisconent.com that of the 7,425 people who had signed the Montana petition by then, only 8 percent were from Montana, while 69 percent were from out of state. The other 23 percent left their addresses blank. Montana Shruggeds Olsen called the petitions a step in a long battle and a move to garner some publicity.

We had some pretty good press for two years, Olsen said. After 2010, the press ignored us. Its just another voice to say were still here. We just need the federal government to wake up. He added, This is just a thing to raise the voice of concern. The Tea Party is concerned about deficits and extreme budgets.

Craig Wilson, a political science professor at Montana State University Billings, called the digital petition for secession a sign of the polarization that exists in Montana and nationally. Obviously, theyre a faction of the electorate in Montana, Wilson said. However, Wilson said the Tea Party group from Montana cant secede from the United States. It would require a federal constitutional amendment to allow a state to secede. He said the MSUB poll done this fall found that 87 percent who disapproved of President Barack Obama said they were economically worse off than they were four years earlier. It also showed that 67 percent who said they were economically better off since 2008 said they would vote for Obama.

You have economic unrest linked to political unrest, Wilson said, adding that each affects the other. The Obama White House has a website, We the People, through which people can petition their government. The website is at: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/. Petitioners have 30 days to obtain 25,000 digital signatures to get a response from the White House.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Now comes the Plaintiff Pro Se before the Honorable United States District Court of Montana to wit:

1 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 4 Summons typically provide that the Court issues a Summons for the Defendants and service by the United States Marshal.

2 Because of the separation of powers provision of the US Constitution the Courts cannot service legal process on the United States Congress.

3 The Plaintiff has however provided a true and correct copy of the Complaint and Exhibits by priority US Mail on the defendants regular place or business:

The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers Jr
Vice Chair US House Committee on Judiciary
669 Federal Bldg.
231 W. Lafayette
Detroit, MI 48226
Priority US Mail 03113260000069524916
Delivered November 9th, 2012 10:59 AM

The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin
Permanent Committee on Investigations
Patrick V. McNamara Federal Building
477 Michigan Avenue, Suite 1860
Detroit, MI 48226
Priority US Mail 03113260000069524909
delivery November 9th, 2012 7:14 AM

The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
Chairman of US Senate Committee on Judiciary
P.O. Box 933
87 State Street, Room 338
Montpelier, VT 05602
Priority US Mail 03120090000049527600
Expected Delivery November 13th, 2012

Under Article 1 Section 8 of the US Constitution states: Reinforcing these powers is Congresss broad authority to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

The United States Congress has established the US Senate Committee on Judiciary Chaired by the Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy; US Senate Committee Permanent Committee on Investigations Chaired by the Honorable US Senator Carl Levin and the US House Committee on the Judiciary whose vice Chairman is the Honorable US Congressman John Conyers., Jr. for the specific purpose of reviewing problems in the operation of government as contained in the Complaint.

The US Congress has gone on to create and empower the Government Accountability Office and created such statutes as Title 5 Part 1 Chapter 8 Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking and Title 2 USC Sec. 190d. Legislative review by standing Committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives to empower their right of review.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Counsel of Record
PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807
(406-728-1809)
This 10th Day of November, 2012

The operation of Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act is heavily involved in long term challenges to the rights of citizens to reside where they so desire. The activities of the many "homeless shelters" are in conflict with US Supreme Court law and United Nations Human Rights treaties. Exactly why anyone would want a homeless travel agency which has clients traveling 20,000 miles a year is a great mystery? Why not replace the current law with a Homeless Transitional program which makes some commitment beyound running clients out of town?

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Now comes the Plaintiff Pro Se before the Honorable United States District Court of Montana to wit:

1. The Plaintiff in his Complaint Docket #1 has asserted US District Court right of review pursuant to Title 28 USC 1331 Federal Question asking the Defendants if several statutes are constitutional and Is currently asserting a Counter or Cross claim against a 3rd party who has appeared.

2. RULE 13. COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSSCLAIM PERMITS (h) joining additional parties. Rule 19 and 20 govern the addition of a person as a party to a counterclaim or crossclaim

3. RULE 19. Required Joinder of Parties: (a) PERSONS REQUIRED TO BE JOINED IF FEASIBLE.

(1) Required Party. A person who is subject to service of process and whose joinder will not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction must be joined as a party if:

(A) in that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties; or

(B) that person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person's absence may:

(i) as a practical matter impair or impede the person's ability to protect the interest; or (ii) leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the interest.

4. Freedom of movement under United States law is governed primarily by the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution which states, "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." As far back as the circuit court ruling in Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (1823), the Supreme Court recognized freedom of movement as a fundamental Constitutional right. In Paul v. Virginia,.75S. 168 (1869), the Court defined freedom of movement as "right of free ingress into other States, and egress from them."[1]

5. However, the Supreme Court did not invest the federal government with the authority to protect freedom of movement. Under the "privileges and immunities" clause, this authority was given to the states, a position the Court held consistently through the years in cases such as Ward v. Maryland, 79 U.S. 418 (1871), the Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873) and United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883). US V Guest 383 U.S. 745 (1966) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900).

6. Exhibit A: In March 1988 the Honorable US Senator Mark O Hatfield, US Senator Edward M Kennedy and US Senator John Glen passed a bill into law which provides as cited below: When the Senate considered the urgent relief for the Homeless Act I added an amendment which would provide for case management to track and assist the homeless in obtaining comprehensive services, including job training. It is likely that this matter will come up during debate on welfare reform. Your interest and compassion are to commended.

1. Based on Chris Walters Complaint Docket #1 and Exhibits it is apparent as a point of fact and law That Chris Walters is currently a registered voter and legal resident of Missoula Montana residing at the Poverello House 535 Ryman Street, in Missoula, MT 59807 and receiving Medicaid and SSI benefits.

2. Exhibit A & B: On October 31st, 2012 The staff of the Poverello House is asking Chris Walters for additional details on his SSI and Medicaid under color of Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act the case management functions were passed into law in 1998 based on Chris Walters research.

3. The first question is asked is how can Chris Walters of the staff of a nonprofit agency vend, dispense or practice any type of federal law without being members of the Federal Bar and being subject to Sanctions pursuant to Title 18 USC 402 Contempt?

4. As the Social Security Commissioner has already secured several ORDERS prohibiting further discussions of Chris Walters SSI claim why wont the various Court prosecute Chris Walters and the staff of the Poverello House for violation of Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDERS?

5. The question of the constitutionality of Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act is brought to bar by asking how anyone can practice, vend, or dispense federal law on the property of a church without violation of 1st Amendment separation of church/state.

6. While the staff of the Poverello House are no doubt well intended Exhibit B shows they intend to compel Chris Walters to move from his residence on November 14th, 2012.

7. The question of the constitutionality of Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act is drawn into question as it questions the right of citizens such as Chris Walters to reside in Montana as cited under US Supreme Court Constitutional law on interstate travel.

8. If the United States government and states cannot compel a citizen to move without legal process exactly how is a church exercise a right to tell citizens where they can or cannot live?

9. In reviewing the content of Plaintiffs Exhibit C a CD-Rom submitted with Docket #1 we can review the national practice of requiring citizens to move up to 20,000 miles a year as cited;

E:\107thcongress\hud\audits\matt4c.htm

In the event cited in this file the Rescue Mission at San Antonio decided to provide no further services to Chris Walters and the losses to Medicaid is estimated at $50,000

E:/ssi/zzcontract/index10.htm

In the event cited in this file the Samaritan Ministry states that unless they can practice federal law in Chris Walters SSI claim he can no longer reside

E:/ssi/zzcontract/index15.htm

In the event cited in this file the Rescue Mission at Salem, Oregon decided to provide no further services to Chris Walters and the losses to Medicaid are estimated at $50,000

E//ssi/zzcontract/index17.htm

In this event cited in this file the Boise Rescue Mission explains that persons who receive SSI cannot receive extended residential services unless they sign their SSI check over to the Mission and agree to a conservatorship:

E:/ssi/zzcontract/index22.htm

Self professed Texas Terrorist demanded Chris Walters be run our of a Skilled Nursing facility in Boise Idaho

E:/ssi/zzcontract/index22a.htm

In this event the Greensboro Urban Ministry is limited residents allotted stay time to once a year for 2 months:

E:/ssi/zzzassistedliving/index.html

10. Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act is administered through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Affairs and we might ask what right the US Department of HUD has to practice law in the Social Security Administration without violating the concept of separation of powers?

11. The United States District Court is asked to consider that the attempt to case manage SSI claim by HUD representatives is causing hundreds of thousands of dollars in losses to the Social Security Administration and Medicaid by interfering with completion of medical work?

12. Plainiff Exhibit C: submitted as evidence and testimony before Congress review Chris Walters finding as honorary field investigator between 1986-1997 and identified model programs which address the issue at bar as cited:

E:/107thcongress/index.html

13. The Court is asked to consider the model program in use at the Salvation Army Shelter in Salem, Oregon which permits clients to stay up to year and half; clients are given a legally binding contract showing their rights and responsibilities and operate a program in conjunction with a case manager and have a right to contribute a portion of their income as rent to the Salvation Army.

14. The results of these surveys and model facilities have been widely circulated throughout government for decades and the subject of a national news article are widely ignored in favor of programs which either dont produce tangle results or violate their clients rights:

E:/107thcongress/service/service.htm

E:/ssi/zzcontract/index26.htm

15. The Court is asked to consider issuing a Summary Judgment declaring Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act void as it violates the citizens right to reside; separation of church and state; requires participants to violate provisions of US Penal Code; violates the separation of powers, and requires clients to ignore rulings of various US Courts, and generated massive losses to other federal programs.

In crafting its Finding and Order the Honorable United States District Court is again asked to bear in mind that the Plaintiff Chris Walters is proceeding in good faith however is not a qualified member of the Federal Bar. It is quite possible the Court, its Officers; or the Defendants might much better solution or resolution to these questions and should not be limited in their scope of action simply because Chris Walters is limited in preparing legal briefs. If Chris Walters is compelled to move out of Montana on November 14th, 2012 and is unable to get placed in an assisted living facility some litigation might be possible through use of PACER.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807
(406-728-1809)

I Chris Walters the plaintiff in the above cause to state and affirm that I have mailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing document and Exhibits to the United States Attorney Michael Cotter at 131 E Pine Street, in Missoula, MT 59802 this

10 day of November, 2012
Fed Express To USDC 468629715114132 Delivery 11-13-2012 Delivered signed for by: NSTEVENS Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 12, 2012 Delivery date Nov 13, 2012 2:52 PM

This is a question of warrant to arrest of employees of the Poverello House for continuing to discuss Social Security related issues which the several US Courts of law have closed with extreme prejudice.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

Now comes the Plaintiff Pro Se before the Honorable United States District Court of Montana to wit:

1. Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil Investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

2. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt

Any person, corporation or association willfully disobeying any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command of any district court of the United States or any court of the District of Columbia, by doing any act or thing therein, or thereby forbidden, if the act or thing so done be of such character as to constitute also a criminal offense under any statute of the United States or under the laws of any State in which the act was committed, shall be prosecuted for such contempt as provided in section 3691 of this title and shall be punished by a fine under this title or imprisonment, or both.

Such fine shall be paid to the United States or to the complainant or other party injured by the act constituting the contempt, or may, where more than one is so damaged, be divided or apportioned among them as the court may direct, but in no case shall the fine to be paid to the United States exceed, in case the accused is a natural person, the sum of $1,000, nor shall such imprisonment exceed the term of six months. This section shall not be construed to relate to contempts committed in the presence of the court, or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice, nor to contempts committed in disobedience of any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command entered in any suit or action brought or prosecuted in the name of, or on behalf of, the United States, but the same, and all other cases of contempt not specifically embraced in this section may be punished in conformity to the prevailing usages at law. For purposes of this section, the term State includes a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

3. Citation of Authority Several ORDERS pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review: As previously cited in the Complaint Docket #1 the Commissioner of Social Security Administration Michael Astrue and has previously exercised his sovereign authority to prevent further litigation, changes in case status or benefits, or other discussions of Chris Walters SSI benefits through litigation before the several US Courts and being sustained in Exhibit A 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals Case 99-50174 Walters v Miller and Exhibit B: 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals DC 08 2094 Walters V Astrue and Exhibit C: US Circuit Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Walters v Asture Civil # 09-0956;

As previously cited in the Docket #1 the Complaint the questions of law:

1. Exhibit A: Chris Walters is a registered voter and legal resident of Montana currently residing at the Poverello House 535 Ryman Street in Missoula, Montana and is required by the management of the nonprofit to have a case plan for instance to get into assisted living and explain every 2 weeks what exactly he is doing.

2. Exhibit AExhibit B Chris Walters letter to Program Director George Scherger of the Poverllo House is that no further discussion of Chris Walters SSI claim or benefits can occur between the staff of the Poverello House and Chris Walters is dated October, 31,2012.

3. On or About November 13th, 2012 Chris Walters completed a request for an extension which included the Court Docket that the Court recently mailed to Chris Walters and indicated work on Chris Walters case plan was taking place in USDC to seek relief on current refusal of Doctor Ravitz to provide medical treatment.

4. Exhibit C The Poverello House granted Chris Walters request for an extension through November 28th, 2012 and to quote: Plan your exit strategy.

5. On or about 8:30 AM on Thursday, November 15th, 2012 Chris Walters was confronted by an employee of the Poverello House Travis Mateer (Lead Staff/HOT Program Coordinator) who demanded to know why federal court documentation was attached to his request for an extension.

6. Lead Staff Travis Mateer goes on to state that he hopes Chris Walters is saving some of his SSI money and not wasting it on a Don Quoite legal action and appears to lack any standing to ask such a question.

7. As previously established in several documents filed in the USDC neither the Poverello House nor any member of its staff have any legal standing to discuss any aspect of Chris Walters SSI claim; income, expenditures, nor anything else.

8. The ongoing demands to acquire information on Chris Walters activities on a regular basis which the Poverello House is not entitled to; complaining about what information is received; and attempting to harass Counsel at Bar suggest the possible need for sanctions possibly pursuant to Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees Or Title 18 USC 402 Contempt.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters, Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807

I Chris Walters the Plaintiff Pro Se do state that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been mailed by first class mail to the United States Attorney Michael Cotter at 151 E Pine Street, Missoula, MT on this the 15th day of November, 2012 and a Courtesy Copy has also been delivered to the 3rd Party the staff of the Poverello House

Signed_________________________________________

Mailed From UPS Store 400 W Broadway #4104 Suite 101, Missoula, MT 59802 (406-542-3800) 11/15/2012 2:31PM $2.49 postage Reciept 82038029879358888893 Jenny Tran 5319 Reg: 02

The State of Montana appears too busy trying to secede from the Union to complete the assisted living application process and it appears Dr. Eric Ravitz is refusing to provide medical treatment which he had recently indicated his office would provide. Strange to say the least. The lack of access to medical treatment means Chris Walters will probably have to move out of Montana to another state.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Vs.
The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

The Plaintiff Chris Walters was just completing the filing of Administrative law briefs addressed to the several committees of the US Congress and unexpectedly received several voluntary admissions by the non recognized 3rd parties the State of Montana Passport to Health and Blue Mountain Clinic desiring to challenge the US Supreme Court landmark precedent in Theresa Shiavo-Schindler v Michael Schiavo to wit:

1. In the case at bar the Court is already asked to consider various litigation questions pursuant Title 28 USC 1331 Federal Question

2. Pursuant to FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 13. COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSSCLAIM PERMITS (h) JOINING ADDITIONAL PARTIES. Rules 19 and 20 govern the addition of a person as a party to a counterclaim or crossclaim including the State of Montana and Blue Mountain clinic at the discretion of the Honorable USDC.

3. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56 Summary Judgment cited:

(a) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. A party may move for summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense or the part of each claim or defense on which summary judgment is sought. The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court should state on the record the reasons for granting or denying the motion.

4. In its landmark decision the United States Supreme Court declined to permit 3rd parties to over rule patients medical directives in Theresa Shiavo-Schindler v Michael Schiavo.

5. The State of Montana Passport to Health client handbook states

You have the right to choose any or none of the services offered to you.
-The mission of Passport to Health is to manage the delivery of health care to people with Medicaid
and Healthy Montana Kids Plus in order to improve quality and access while minimizing the use of
health care resources.

Your Rights What To Expect: You get the same quality of care as people with different insurance. You can choose your own Passport Provider. You can change your Passport Provider once a month. Passport Providers and staff are polite and treat you with respect. Passport Providers explain your medical conditions to you. Passport Providers will keep your medical records and conversations with you private and confidential. You can ask your Passport Provider for a copy of your medical records. Passport Providers will explain your treatment before it starts. You can refuse medications or treatments you can make a complaint about Medicaid or HMK Plus and get a response.

6. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that citizens have a well established right to the due process or equal protection of the law in hearings or reviews as cited:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S. Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction, adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp. 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs. Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911

7. Citation of Authority: So as not to unduly burden the Court with extra paper work or 3rd parties an online record of documents filed in USDC and submitted as evidence to Congress and referred to are online:

http://ichoosetoserve.net/ssi/zzzassistedliving/index4.htm

1. Citation of Previous Submitted Court Documents: The Plaintiff Chris Walters had provided courtesy copies of some of the materials filed before the Honorable USDC in Montana to the State Passport to Health and Blue Mountain Clinic and the 3rd parties as cited from various Court Documents:

Specification #7: On or about 4PM on 10-26-2012 Mountain Pacific Foundation (800) 497-8232 a representative did a phone evaluation of Chris Walters request for assisted living and indicated he would receive a written determination within 4 business days which as of November, 8th, 2012 has not been received of enacted.

Specification #10-Exhibit C: On or about October 24th, 2012 Passport to Health confirmed Dr. Eric Ravitz and Blue Mountain Clinic as Chris Walters primary care provider and at on or about October 23rd, 2012 Chris Walters provided Dr. Eric Ravitz with an advanced medical directive on what medical needs should be met and with further written request.

Dr. Eric Ravitz indicated he would have no problem authorizing an CPAP machine from NORCO for obstructive sleep apnea and as of November 7th, 2012 the NORCO representative indicates they have not heard a peep from the good doctor:

From: To: Keisha Boyce
keishab@norco-inc.com
TO: Chris Walters
Tuesday, November 6, 2012 8:50 AM
Subject: Question on Cpap

Hello Chris,

I was looking through all of your chart notes for your CPAP and realized that I dont have a prescription. So I need to reschedule your appointment because the Poverello Center is not open to have them fax a prescription. Sorry about the inconvenience. Just give me a call @ 549-2321.

Thanks a Bunch! Keisha

Exhibit A: a is a subsequent request faxed twice to Dr. Eric Ravitz and Blue Mountain Clinic for treatment of specific medical conditions

2. Reply from Montana Passport to Health: was a phone call made a Scott (800-330-7847) with Chris Walters on the afternoon of November, 16th, 2012 where Scott was seeking to reply and gain facts about Chris Walters concerns.

3. Scott indicated he was not in a position to address the refusal of Passport to Health and Mountain Pacific Foundations refusal to move forward with Chris Walters application for assisted living made on 10-26-2012.

4. The reply draws into question the operation of the State Code which continues to deny Chris Walters a fair hearing and challenges the Due process and Equal protection precedents enacted by the US Supreme Court.

5. Exhibit B: a letter of November 14th, 2012 from Blue Mountain Clinic replying to Chris Walters several request to move forward with the medical plan which Dr. Eric Ravitz has previously agreed too and states:

You event went to far as to imply we may be denying my patient rights In light to the threatening manner that this information was conveyed, we are here by discharging you as a patient of Blue Mountain clinic We are a full family practice clinic, and not engaged in aggressive games of this fashion.

6. The reply received from Annie Hansen, Clinic Director states that Chris Walters well established right to exercise his rights to as a patient to seek appropriate and timely medical treatment is threatening and the filing of an appropriate brief in the USDC is an aggressive game.

7. If these events were considered simply by themselves the Court might simply chalk the events up to is communications or a minor administrative snafu in the Passport to Health System however when considered as an ongoing series to events cited throughout the proceedings and presents a much more compelling challenge to the Rule of Law.

In review the current record of events over the past 3 months from the online record cited and filed in various records before the Honorable Court we can see that:

1. Montana is an active participant in call to Secede from Union as cited in the press The first Montana petition was posted by "Scott E.", who is reportedly from Columbia Falls. As of Wednesday afternoon, the petition had drawn more than 12,000 names with another 12,900 needed by December 10th to meet the goal of having 25,000 names.

2. Presumably one of the primary reasons for seceding is to protest Obamacare and federal sovereignty.

3. 3rd Party Demands Chris Walters move out of Montana have been made by a ER Nurse at St. Patrick Hospital, a pony tailed Vet named Car, the Poverello House where the Plaintiff resides and created a question at bar as to the Constitutionality of Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act because these demands challenge and US Supreme Court rulings that citizens have a right to reside where they so choose. (United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883). US V Guest 383 U.S. 745 (1966) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900))

4. 3rd Party demands to challenge the right of the Social Security Commissioner to exercise his sovereign right pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review to prevent litigations or further discussion of Chris Walters SSI case pending his asking for a timely USDC Review.

5. 3rd Party challenges to the right of Chris Walters to receive timely and appropriate medical treatment as a Medicaid patient including the possible services of either assisted living facility. And US Supreme Court rulings on patient rights and rights to fair hearing as the equal protection of the law.

6. From the record it appears the rising cost of Medical care might well be assigned to the State of Montana and its residents who have done just about everything possible to increase the costs of Chris Walters medical treatment instead of getting the work done.

7. Although Chris Walters has only resided in Montana for 3 months numerous news articles have been seen where the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned various legal actions in the Court in Montana.

a. Chris Walters could only express empathy for any member of the Federal Bar, Officer of the Courts or others who have to vend, dispense, and practice law in a venue where a large portion of the population believes that insurrection, sedition, or treason are a part of their patriotic duty.

Lacking any way to continue to receive medical treatment Chris Walters will have to move out of Montana to secure medical treatment. In answer to many request to as where Chris Walters might move it seems plausible that Chris Walters will move closer to 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals so as to facilitate a probable Notice of Appeals or other Writ of review.

In dispatching the State of Montanas Constitution the Court is asked to consider that 700,000 men, women and others died in combat in the civil war ending the debate as to where States right supersede the rights of the United States Government. The original government operated under the Articles of Confederation which has to be replaced by the US Constitution and a strong federal government structure. The Plaintiff Chris Walters recently visited the York Pennsylvania where the original seat of government resided and can pretty well quote the Obama Administration that it didnt work then and it wont work now?

Would be seditionist might consider that the current administration signed into law the Defense Authorization Act of 2012 under which persons can be detained and held indefinitely by the military.

The Honorable United States District Court is asked to consider that the State of Montana Constitution if fundamentally defective in that it empowers unlawful challenges to the Rule of Law, US Supreme Court rulings; and appears to foster insurrection and sedition. Citizens concerns about government waste and spending could be addressed simply by the State of Montana creating a new constitution which adheres to federal guidelines and does not create undue litigation to 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807

I Chris Walters the Plaintiff Pro Se do state that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been mailed by first class mail to the United States Attorney Michael Cotter at 151 E Pine Street, Missoula, MT on this the 17th day of November, 2012

Signed_________________________________________ /s/

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se

Vs.

The Honorable US Senator Patrick Leahy
The Honorable US Senator Carl Levin,
The Honorable US Congressman John Conyers
Respondents, Defendants

The Honorable Dana L Christensen
The Honorable US Magistrate Jeremiah C Lynch
Case: 9:12-cv-00184-DLC-JCL

NOW COMES the Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals to tender a question of Judiciary Disability occurring under extraordinary circumstances to wit:

1. Citation of Authority: the Complaint #1 is an Amicus Curiae asks the Senate and House Judiciary Committees to consider that various 3rd parties are creating challenges to the constitutionality of several Acts of Congress by direct challenges to the Rule of Law and previous rules of 3 other US Circuit Courts of Appeals.

2. The 3rd party ongoing challenges to the Rule of law are of such a nature as to violate Title 18 USC 115 Treason, Sedition, and Insurrection.and a Motion has been filed asking if Montana should temporarily be placed under Martial Law?

3. Appended Exhibit A: If the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals feels concern is warranted the attached brief explain the matter in greater detail.

4. There is no question as to the honesty, competence, or abilities of the US District Court Judges at this time which would normally be the basis for a Judicial Misconduct or Disability question beyond the fact we have substantial ongoing challenges to the Rule of Law.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 7644
Missoula, MT 59807

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.