The Prima Vera Foundation has written an excellent referral to place me into assisted living and the homeless shelter at San Luis Obispo, CA is operated in conjunction with a day room run by college children playing social worker whose only interest is to prowl around in my legal affairs. The shelter explains if I can't work in thier facility due to disability I must leave-bye bye

I land in Modesto, CA when I have to get off Amtrak to go to hospital and another shelter operated by the Salvation Army has an excellent and inexcusable chance to put me into assisted living. The aged old manager however had dictated that mere finding of fact and law that I am disabled backed up by court finding are not adequate for his purposes and demands disabled persons get a disability for his purposes. As fortune would have it the shelter is a golden parachute program for convicted persons who torched the county jail and the Sheriff who is on the Salvation Army Board wants the homeless facility for his charges

The 9th Street shelter in Merced, CA is too busy profiting from the homeless to provide adequate services such as laundry; day room....The management would rather have the dirty; mentally ill; and diseased bastards roaming the streets to justify the need for funding for the shelter in this small farm town.

Santa Rosa tried real hard to help me and the Redwood Rescue Mission is very active in giving from the heart for the less fortunate. The temperature is rising and because I do not have a CPAP machine I must move to a cooler climate or stop breathing. On the way Santa Maria, CA I stop in Modesto at the Best Western Motel for some R&R. The staff tries to over charge me for an extra night and when questioned denied the fraud. They were however nice enough to return my money later My debit card company explains that the largest single case of frauds are motels attempting to over charge guest and hoping they won't notice an extra day.

In the last 20 years each time I visit Arizona medical authorities do an excellent job of evaluating my medical problems at great expense to the taxpayers. The work up done by UA Banner probably set the taxpayer back $10,000. When it comes time make medical referrals or do some actual medical work it is suddenly time to leave the shelter; or we can't get you sign up for this program or that. The amount of money this sham sucks out of the taxbased is it really any wonder former US Senator John McCain opposing ending the Obamacare.

The Staff of the Primavera Foundation Shelter indicated they are interested in providing housing to see if I can get my medical work done.

From: Brad Montgomery
brad@chicoshelter.org
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:16 PM,

Hello Chris,

It is actually not an unusual question. It comes up fairly often.

We are an ADA compliant facility, but we are not an assisted living facility and other than CPR/First Aid our staff does not have any medical training. This means that our guests do need to demonstrate that they are able to care for themselves while they are with us. Examples - Are they able to take their own medication? Can they make their own way, without assistance, to an emergency exit in case of a fire? Can they shower regularly and dress themselves? Are they able to leave for the day (9 and 1/2 hours) along with the rest of our guests? These and others are requirements to staying with us successfully.

As far as the other implied part of your email Chris. Our shelter is not intended as a way for people to transition from other communities to ours and we don't make "reservations'. You didn't mention in your email what your current living situation is but I would strongly suggest that you not leave housing and any programming and benefits you have currently established in Arizona to become homeless in California. It is a considerable amount of red tape, bureaucracy and frustration moving your benefits and support systems from one county to another and from one state to another but putting the time in while you're there to transfer these benefits will have a far better outcome then showing up in your new community without them.

Last thought, our climate overall might be listed as cooler then where you are at in Arizona, but we can go weeks at a time in the summer with temperatures in the triple digits and so you might want to take a closer look at our temperature trends before choosing Chico.

I doubt this is what you wanted to hear Chris but I hope it helps in the long run.

Thanks, Brad Montgomery
Executive Director
Torres Community Shelter

From Linda S. Powers
lsp@can-v.org
Date 3/4/2014 8:49 AM
to: cwaltersgonefishing@gmail.com

Chris, my apologies for appearing unwelcoming, but I need to share that our shelter is full and based on our funding, we must serve local residents first. I would consider relocating somewhere else, especially if you are looking for cool weather. Napa has higher summer temps than most of the Bay Area. Folks only sleep at the shelter - we have a day center, but it is not air conditioned. To answer your question, we try our best to serve folks with disabilities.

Linda

Rev. Linda S. Powers
Program Director Shelter Services/HR- CANV
wk (707) 253-6100, ext 10<

San Luis Obispo, California is the home of Cal Poly and a very pretty traditional California city.

Shelter manager explains they are unable to support authorized programs.

1. On 3/10/2014 the staff of Maxine Lewis Memorial Homeless Shelter where Chris Walters was temporarily residing explained that if Chris Walters was unable to do a chore or work on the shelter property he could not continue to receive services.

2. On 3/7/2014 the Case Management of Prado Day Center explained all clients would be required to permit the case manager to access privileged legal materials and Social Security records.

3. With knees and hips requiring surgery a chore would not be possible and Chris Walters can�t image a nonprofit agency having any right to legal papers, records, or social security information as it violated the Federal Privacy Act.

4. Pending other arrangements Chris Walters will propose use of General Delivery as a place to receive mail pending other arrangements.

Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
Date 3/10/2014

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-0156-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915

Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

USDC,NDTWalters V Colvin and 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals were unable to support the Social Security Act and precedent Black letter law ruling from hundreds of 3rd party challenges

1 The shelter operators demand to set aside bed rest for free labor probably is a technical violation of US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

2. Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Dr Randolph Madrid verifies no blood clot and effectively treats massive edema in legs and problems breathing with shot of Lassix-really cleaned out excess water-nice work

Social Security Administration
1521 N Carpenter Road, Suite E1
Modesto, CA 95351

RE: Change of Address SSI 261-90-XXXX

Dear Social Security Administration:

I have recently moved from my old address

Chris Walters
c/o Prado Day Center
43 Prado
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805) 786-0617

New Address:

Berberian Homeless and Transition Shelter
320 9th Street
Modesto, CA 95354
209.525.8954

Many Thanks Chris Walters
SSI 261-90-6357

Cc: Notice Of Move Filed In USDC

$74,000 Paid to Salvation Army to house Sheriff Inmates alhtough it has to close down in the summer to Homeless persons. The Sheriff is on the Salvation Army Board of Directors and has not considered a question of conflict of interest

Kathy Lewis klewis@casademodesto.org
to: Chris Walters cwaltersgonefishing@gmail.com
date: Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:50 PM
subject: RE: Question on Assisted Living?

Hi Chris,

Thank you for your interest in Casa de Modesto. Regarding Assisted Living, our rooms come with a bed, nightstand and lamp (some include a dresser); and the resident brings the remaining furniture. At this time I only have private Patio Rooms available at $2,560/mo (the Garden Court Rooms are full--- $1,969/mo.). ( Medi-Cal does not pay toward the cost of assisted living). The services at this level include: 3 meals/day, assistance with medications, 2 assisted showers/week and weekly housekeeping. We also have transportation and an activities program. Please let me know if you have any additional questions

Kathy Lewis

1. The denial of appropriate medical treatment specified in the patients advanced medical directive shown at the borrom of the page or with chronic medical history of life threatening issuesis likely to result in servere injuries or death

a. Patient Rights To Be fully informed by a physician of his or her total health status and to be afforded the opportunity to participate on an immediate and ongoing basis in the total plan of care. (42CFR §483.10(c))

b. Be fully informed in advance about care and treatment and of any changes in care or treatment that may affect the resident. (42 CFR §483.10(c)(2),(4))

c Participate in planning care and treatment or changes in care or treatment unless adjudged incompetent or otherwise found to be incapacitated under State law. (42 C.F.R. §483.10(d)(3), 42 CFR §483.10(c))

d. To receive all information that is material to his or her decision concerning whether to accept or refuse any proposed treatment or procedure. (42 CFR §483.10(c)(5)(6))

2. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials as the operation of fact and law. Online documents

3. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Civil Case: 2-13CV-0156-JBBUSDC, NDT
Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-10915

Vs.
Carol Colvin
Acting Social Security Commissioner
Defendant

NOW COMES THE PLAINTIFF Chris before the Honorable United States District Court for Northern District of Texas to address question by 3rd party Salvation Army at Modesto, CA to wit:

Addressed Too Lt Dustin Rowe & Lt Carolina Rowe
The Salvation Army Modesto Red Shield Center
1649 Las Vegas Street
Modesto, CA 95358 209-538-7111
dustin.rowe@usw.salvationarmy.org

My name is Chris Walters and I have been in residence at your emergency shelter here in Modesto, Ca for about a month (Exhibit A) Your staff has explained that the winter shelter operations end and that persons who are disabled such as myself can return for extended stay on June, 1, 2014 if they secure a current disability statement from a local doctor.

****USDC,NDTWalters V Colvin and 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals were unable to support the Social Security Act and precedent Black letter law ruling from hundreds of 3rd party challenges

As you can see from the link the Salvation Army Shelter in Lynchburg, VA is listed as a national model Shelter. As you can see from the enclosures the social service manager sent me over here by referral. Maybe some day we can keep me around long enough to put your facility at Modesto and the Lodi Salvation Army shelter in the competition.

Many Thanks “Signed Chris Walters” Date 4/8/2014”
Chris Walters
Former Honorary Field Investigator US Dept HUD (retired)

PS. I have to explain to Social Security Administration where I live and why I have to move which is why this document was generated and filed in USDC. NDT

While your excellent shelter would be a great place for me to get my hip and knee surgery the Social Security Commissioner has gone to Bar 50 times since issuing my disability determination in 2007 and maintains a statutory right Title 42 USC 405(G)(h) Judicial Review that no further determinations on my disability question can occur without her legal staff’s permission at a hearing before a USDC (Exhibit B USDC, ID). With my current SSI payments it is ashamed I can’t simply pay to stay which would keep me off my feet When my legs swell up Exhibit C (Medical Statement Arizona)

1. Case Law: Walters v Apfel & Asture CA: SA-97-CA-1313 USDC, WDT and being Affirmed by 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals (99-50174). the Social Security Administration lacks the jurisdictional authority to review the finding of a USDC Judge and is required to request hearings in Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

2. Case Law: Walters v Astrue UNDC, NM #: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP The Social Security Commissioner made a determination of fact and law that Chris Walters is disabled and the only review which can be had is Title 28 Sec 405 (g)(h) Final decisions of district courts Attempts by mere Administrative Law employees to over rule or Quash the ORDER of the Courts is nonsensical and could be addressed pursuant to:

3. Case Law: Walters v Astrue 09-05206 US Circuit Court DC at the request of the parties a 3rd party request to interplead was Quashed and no hearing can be held without the Commissioner filing for a Judicil Review

4. Title 18 USC 1509. Obsruction of Court ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

1. The basis for denying Chris Walters access to a HUD shelter is based on a fairy tale being market by Mr. Clark which the prosecutor rejected 10 years ago Title18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

2. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Best Western Inn
909 16th Street
Modesto, CA 95354

from: Carolina Nava noreply@app.medallia.com
reply-to: Carolina Nava 05063@hotel.bestwestern.com
to: Chris Walters cwaltersgonefishing@gmail.com
cc: Carolina Nava 05063@hotel.bestwestern.com
date: Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:17 PM
subject: Your stay at BEST WESTERN Town House Lodge

Dear Chris Walters,

Thank you for completing the survey regarding your recent stay at our property.

On behalf of our entire team, I would like to apologize for not exceeding your expectations. Your satisfaction is important to us and we will be using the feedback you gave us to implement improvements to ensure we offer a better experience for guests in the future. I hope that you will consider staying with us again so that we can have another chance to provide you with a superior experience.

After receiving your comments on-line both Don and myself pulled up your statements for the 3 nights you stayed starting on May 1st. On May 1st you paid $83.37 for the room and $100 cash deposit. You had a 2nd reservation you had made for May 2nd which Don canceled for you due to an error in address when booked. You asked to extend your stay but wanted to pay with your debit/credit card. You then were refunded the $100 cash deposit and paid $83.37 on your credit/debit card ending in #0603 for the night of May 2nd. May 3rd you also extended your stay one more night and paid $ 83.37 on the same credit/debit card ending in #0603. Those 3 nights are the only nights you were billed for. If there is some sort of issue I can e-mail you copies of your receipts if that would help you resolve it. We only authorize credit/debit cards for the amount of room charge and tax. So in total you paid $83.37 in cash and $166.74 was charged to your credit/debit card, for a total of $250.11 for the 3 nights. There were no other charges billed to you by my hotel.

If I can provide any assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me directly at 209-524-7261.

Sincerely, Carolina Nava
GENERAL MANAGER
BEST WESTERN Town House Lodge

Having reportedly been given a $130 million to impelment Obama Care Oregon reported it was unable to but more likely unwilling to put the computerized system online.

The current Governor Garin Newsom appears to be a practicing career criminal whose leadership has turned California into a 3rd world country catering to those who seeek to be homeless by choice; free benefits for illegal migrants; early release for 18,000 convicted felons; extreme appliation of minority groups civil rights for instance LGBQ protection for children . The rape of the California unemployment benefits reportedly have resulted in theft of $20 Billion by criminal elements. The idea that the law is evil and the police should defunded leads to anarchy is ok is apparently a theme enpowered by some of the prosecutors state wide refusing to enforce laws. The migration of industry and wealth persons have created housing crisis in Missoula Montana as Montana is Californicated.

Many Doctors from India & Punjabi only have 2 years formal medical education before beginning practice in the United States and many need great deal of additional training. My 500 medical providers took 5 years for 10 doctors to remove melanoma; another 180 doctors to discover Xeralto to address blood clots; 150 doses of antibiotic to treat chronic infections; 50 doctors to decline my collapsed left hip cannot be replaced; and more recently a host of doctors; medical providers; and hospitals were unable to remove a reported renal cancer. A doctor in Texas stating he could take it out in 2 hours day surgery and send the patient home. Although the Advanced Medical Directive reviews what medical treatment is required many of my doctors routinely make changes in medications; order unneeded medical test; and make patient calls simply to defraud the Medicare or Medicaid Programs.

The US Supreme Court apparently empowered patient rights in Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials as the operation of fact and law which lead to creation of a host of state and federal statutes to protect patient rights: (42CFR §483.10(c)) Patient Rights To Be fully informed by a physician of his or her total health status and to be afforded the opportunity to participate on an immediate and ongoing basis in the total plan of care. (42 CFR §483.10(c)(2),(4)) Be fully informed in advance about care and treatment and of any changes in care or treatment that may affect the resident.(42 C.F.R. §483.10(d)(3), 42 CFR §483.10(c)) Participate in planning care and treatment or changes in care or treatment unless adjudged incompetent or otherwise found to be incapacitated under State law. (42 CFR §483.10(c)(5)(6)To receive all information that is material to his or her decision concerning whether to accept or refuse any proposed treatment or procedure.

Generally known in all federal programs as clients rights and responsibities defined by law as Title 42 USC 423 (d)(5)(b) Disability Determinations and only subject to review pursuant to provisions of Title 42 USC 405 Judicial Review Since 1997 the Social Security Administration has appeared at BAR in numerous civil actions to prevent and block any legal or technical reviews which have not been filed in a USDC

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

You are looking at part of Exhibit C a United States source document submitted as Evidence and Testimony to the several committees of the United States Congress since 1986. The survey data is occassionally used for creation of federal statutes; considering possible improvements in operation of federal programs; and study of operational field impediments. Because of the Separation of Powers found in US Constitution and various Rules of Congress it not possible to serve summons, subponeas; or other court process on Capitol Hill and persons attempting to can be detained and arrested by Capitol Police or otherwise sanctioned. Obviously the only legal reviews which can occur would require permission of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee reviewing the matters at public hearings

Beginning in 1997 the Social Security Administration issued an Executive ORDER or Fia before a USDC, WDT link restricting legal discussions to places and times authorized by statute and have successfully defended their statutory rights from a over 500 challenges A small host of poor bastards who appear to have challenged the Sovereign rights of the Social Security Administration or Congress appear to have been thrown down the political 5 ton wood chipper and the confirmed kill list appears to include at least 1 or 2 federal judges; maybe a couple of cabinet level officers; a bunch of US Attorneys and a many more lesser persons. Whispered in the background are the strange, sacred, and holy legal incantations muttered by federal officials including Title 18 USC 402 Contempt; Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction Court Order; tampering with federal agency, Contempt of Congress...

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.