Congress providing for protection of civil rights including the right to vote. Specific Rights Defined By United States Supreme Court Rulings. The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

1. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900) The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

1.Donald Dovell was a senior citizen I was traveling with in December, 1996.

2. Donald was slightly senile and apparently offended a young prison hood who was working at the Salvation Army Red Shield Lodge in Olympia, WA.

3. The punk made sure Donald with many health problems got to remain outside in his car hours after the other guest checked in to help him get sick or die. I was able to drive Donald to Roseburg, Oregon where Veterans Hospital checked him in and he apparently survived.

4. Donald Dovell's rights shelter, reasonable accomodations, and medical attention by a nonprofit agency in violation of Article 12 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health... d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness." and Article 12 Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.

This link reviews why it took 10 Doctors took 5 years to do 10 minute surgery for cancer. The principals who stand to profit from this situation are of course the nonprofit agenices and medical authorities who are paid to re-prescribe the medical work which of course is easily treated. This link concerns 45 doctors and social service agencies who are prescribing a simple colon exam but always come through with a winning excuse not to do the work. As we study the following section we can see the work has to be represcribed and the beneficiaries of this fraud is the medical profession and $250 billion a year nonprofit industry.

This brief concerns a systematic and coordinated effort to deny medical treatment with the reasonable expectation that the victim would eventually die of cancer or other serious disabilities. Suggestion or admission of a conspiracy and extensive interstate coordination against a moving target suggest extensive abuse of law enforcement and intelligence assets.

International Covenant Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Article 9 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to social security, including social insurance.

Article 12 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health... d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness."and the

International Covenant Civil and Political Rights and Article 14 provide All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.

Mr. Chris Walters     	)
Plaintiff Pro Se      	)
PO Box 4062            	)
Tallahassee, Fla  32315	)
chrisw911@hotmail.com  	)
                        )
     vs.                )
     Roger C. Viadero,  )
	Office of 	)
Inspector General	)
PO Box 23399		)
Washington, D.C. 20026	)
(202-690-1622)
        Defendant       )
CIV NO CV-97-AR-1802-S   
Stamped Filed: July 17, 1997

This link concerns a demand that a homeless person requiring surgery for cancer be required to "slap a policeman upside of the head to get food stamps". While the USDA Investigator Mr. Kennedy verified the request was made by a welfare worker; and 2 investigative agencies replies no effort was made to prosecute the matter.

International Covenant Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Article 9 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to social security, including social insurance. Article 12 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health... d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness."and the

International Covenant Civil and Political Rights and Article 14 provide All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.

Chris Walters   )
Plaintiff Pro   )
vs              )
		)
Judith McCall   )
USDA, OCR       )
Civil No: 4 97 CV 279 MP
Stamp Filed: 97 Aug-
1PM 1:10 9:40 AM

Chris Walters, )
vs. )
Judith McCall )
CIV NO CV-97-AR-1802-S

This link concerns"Barbecue Bob" Aka State Attorney General Bob Butterworth known nationally as "Barbecue Bob" for his work with Florida Electric Chair. Reportedly worked behind the scenes to help win Florida ruling for disabled cancer patient requiring surgery to slap a police officer upside of the head as part of his campaign against medicaide fraud. This should give you some insight as to what the medical, welfare, and legal system was doing instead of arranging minor surgery for cancer in 1996.

a. Leon County District Attorney Question of commission of crime

b. USDA Civil Rights ADA Complaint ackowledged and received July 10,1997

c. HHS Civil Rights ADA based complaint acknowledged and received

Name Doctor: Dr. Williams
Source: Neighborhood Health Services
Address: 438 W Brevard Room 11
City,State: Tallahassee,Fl 323
Dated Seen: 1997
Diagnosis Noted Melonoma on neck couldn't be bothered with tumor in groin
Treatment: Referral for surgery
Comment No way to pay for procedure

Treatment: Referral Cooper Green Hospital for SurgeryComment Made arrangements for housing with the Salvation Army

Name Doctor: Resident Doctor Harris
Source: Cooper Green Hospital
Address: 2130 11th Ave N
City,State: Birmingham,Al
Phone: (205) 934-2330
(FAX 205) 934-8724
Patient 328587
Dated Seen: 5/13/1997
Diagnosis: Melanoma in neck & tumor in groin
Treatment: Biopsy and infusion of silver nitrate
Comment Shelter refused to grant extension after medical procedure begun.

1. Dr. Johnson of Cooper Green Hospital of Birmingham, Al called over a 5 state area in 1997 explaining he was the physician of a person he had never met and asking social service agencies funded by US Department of HUD and FEMA to deny his victim assistance to get surgery for cancer.

2. The basis of this request was apparently that the Salvation Army Shelter in Birmingham, Alabama was unable to get some free labor from a disabled person and turn a little profit.

3. Is it harder to believe anyone would call a church asking to have somebody denied treatment for cancer or that the church would willing assist their efforts:

Comment Employee David Culpepper admitted in 6-1998 that Dr. Johnson called here trying to have me denied treatment for cancer and apparently does not realize that if someone died under these circumstances he could be an accessory to a homocide. I reported matter District Attorney. Shelter barred me for life for filing this complaint.

David Culpepper
South Harbor Homeless shelter
2900 St. Paul
Meridian, MS 39301
HHS Civil RightsComplaint July, 1997
Cooper Green Hospital
2130 11th Ave N
Birmingham,Al
Patient 328587
Dated Seen:5/13/1997

Comments Dr. Phillip Johnson  of Cooper Green Hospital,Birmingham who has never met patient represented himself as physician of record and asked social service agencies in Alabama, Mississippi, and Texas to denied medical treatment to person with cancer.

This Link The recent statement of US Attorney General William Bar is that local prosecutors are declining to prosecute entire classes of crimes to the obvious detriment of victims.

1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

2. The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

3. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

4. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Comments: Social Worker indicated his job was to delay benefits as long as possible such as minor prescription for antihistimes for 45 days and has not authorized payment to GI specialist anywhere near what GI examam will require

Social Worker Thomas Briganti
Washington State DSHS
PO Box 1908
Olympia, WA 98502
Patient# 3491348
Date Seen: April 2nd, 1998
Diagnosis: Referaal to GI Specialist
Treatment: None

This Link The recent statement of US Attorney General William Bar is that local prosecutors are declining to prosecute entire classes of crimes to the obvious detriment of victims.
1. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

2. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

3. The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

4. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

2. The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

3. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

4. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900)

2. The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

3. ADA Home Page US Department of Justice technical assistance on Americans With Disabilities Act

4. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

1. ADA Home Page US Department of Justice technical assistance on Americans With Disabilities Act

2. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

This Link The recent statement of US Attorney General William Bar is that local prosecutors are declining to prosecute entire classes of crimes to the obvious detriment of victims.

1. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

2. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

1. Congress has on all previous occassions declined to amend the statute to permit Social Security officals to discard claimants medical records; hold hearing thousands of miles from where claimants reside; challenge claimants choice of medical treatment; or empower slavery,bondage, or peonage.

2. The State of North Carolina apparently acting as a represenative of the Social Security Administration is again using my social security claim as a vehicle to ask Congress to amend or invalidate Title 42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability Determinations

3. Question of violation of Title 18 Sec 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees aks Contempt of Congress exist because neither the Social Security Administration nor North Carolina have any legal right to address proposed changes in US Statutes to private citizens-a right reserved to Congressional Committees

4. Letter Social Security 2003 Unclear Social Security position. On one hand Social Security claims it is not entitled to medical documentation and on the other states it wants me to see it's doctors.

5. Question on Kim Falor-USDC which the US Magistrate was not interested in hearing

6. Attempt setaside Medical WorkKim Falor requested Dr. Hickson setaside GI exam.

7. Proposed Stipulated Agreements in Tallahassee addressed to Social Security Administration: Link 1 & Link 2 & Link 3 &Link 4

8. North Carolina State is requesting medical records or examinations which they subsequently admitted in State Superior Court they are not entitled too Link1& Link 2 & Link 3 which occured in April and May, 2004

Addressed Too Dr. Tayna Hickson
Downtown Health Center of Baptist Hospital
Winston Salem, NC

Dear Dr. Hickson:

I am discharging you today as Primary Care Physician for the following reasons:

1. The referral you attempted to make for colonoscopy clinic was not properly set and an appointment is not possible as the clinic explained because you failed to do the things needed to set an appointment.

2. The State of North Carolina Disability Determinations services explained today you have authorized a medical examination expressly prohibited by several ORDERS of USDC requested by the Social Security Administration. Any of the Judges involved could cite you for contempt.

3. North Carolina Disability Determination Services has previously indicated last month they have already denied my claim and are of course not therefore entitled to anything.

Kindest Regards
chris Walters

This Link The recent statement of US Attorney General William Bar is that local prosecutors are declining to prosecute entire classes of crimes to the obvious detriment of victims.

1. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

2. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Generally known in all federal programs as clients rights and responsibities defined by law as Title 42 USC 423 (d)(5)(b) Disability Determinations and only subject to review pursuant to provisions of Title 42 USC 405 Judicial Review Since 1997 the Social Security Administration has appeared at BAR in numerous civil actions to prevent and block any legal or technical reviews which have not been filed in a USDC

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

It seems that many Chairman of Congress believe in the concept of work ethic and if they find you on Capitol Hill or too close to something they are working on will actually have someone volunteered or simply drafted. I-5 Cooridor Agreement origionally on covered portions of California, Oregon, and Washington but was rapidly expanded by the national leadership to include a third of the United States. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez caught me on Capitol Hill about 1988 circulating one of my publications and had me introduced to the HUD Inspector General.. This assignment lasted until about 1993 when the Clinton Administration came into power and replaced me with 2 convicted persons who according to press reports were paid $80,000 a year plus expenses..

The author has worked in the security and private investigations industry for 40 years typically wears a uniform carries a fire arm and protects facilities with insured value into billion dollar range. Services and contracts with the United States Government begin in 1997 and include

1. 1-5 Corridor Agreement study authorizations for surveys in 15 states 1986

2. Directory Model Social Service Agencies

3. Organized Crime Ties to US Dept HUD Confirmed Kills

4. Federal Law CSBG US Senator Mark O Hatfield

5. Welfare Reform Act 1986

6. Food Stamps For Homless Act US Congressman Tony Coelho

7. Audits USDA Programs confirmed kills

8. Audits US Postal Programs confirmed kills

9. Terrorist in Social Services confirmed kills

8. Spyware Act of 2005 2nd Federal Law 2015

9. Emergency Management Authorizations1993-2013

10. Emergency Management Structure 15 States1993-2013

11. Operational Audit Social SecurityExecutive ORDER 1997-2015

In 1999 the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals authorized a special jonder of study programs and human rights issue to the United Nations The program materials are located in the United Kingdom.

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities what appears to be a large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect.

1. Circia 1986 California housing programs heavily involved in organized criminal activities which are apparently causing the deaths of a several thousands of clients a year

2. US Congressman Tony Coelho 1989 resigns after attempting to create artificial famine in largest food producing area of the planet. US Senator Alan Cranston gets sanctioned for $1.4 Trillion Savings and Loan Scandal

3. Walters V Blessings Diversion Food Stamps 1993-1996 apparently organized by the Clinton Administration involved refusing to close food stamp cases and permitting states to steal from USDA overpayments.

4. US Congressman Tony Coelho 1989 resigns after attempting to create artificial famine in largest food producing area of the planet

5. Chronic Theft US Mail routine theft of welfare benefits; obstruction of legal documents including federal court ORDERS

6. Fictious Conviction 1993-1996 challenged in USDC Modesto Rescue Mission intercepts Court ORDER to maintain conviction without trial. Mission Director Vern Deatheridge reportedly fired years later for stealing millions from the Mission

7. Theft of Bank Accounts 2008 Question of diversion of unauthorized of bank accounts and bogus conservatorships designed to steal from the elderly and disabled.

8. Challenges to Social Security Commissioner 2008 ALJ Dawson and Rogers fail in attempt to Quash Comissioners final determination USDC,NM Walters V Asture 2008 quashes California's challenges to Commissioners final determination and begins retaliation

10. Corruption in Casa Esperanza 2014 Manager sacked from alleged thefts from shelter and clients Secretary of HUD Shawn Donovan resigns-reassigned White House Chief of Staff

11. Denial of Reasonable Accomodation To Disabled Person 2014 HUD policy issue

12. Santa Barbara County Defrauds Medicare 2014 combat operations against organized criminal interest in HUD programs in California and Oregon

13. Santa Barbara County Retaliates 2016 County employee admits retaliation is in progress as various organization screw my primary care physician Dr.Diana Garcia MD

14. Path Shelter Trying to Kill Clients Included in package of items sent from United Nations back to Trump Administration

15. Lodi California Combat Operations sustained attacks of web providers and denial of medical treatment

16. Walters V Saul US Supreme Court 2019-2020 San Joaquin Skilled Nursing home Bakersfield, CA

17. Rest and Care Home Bakersfield, CA 2020