Title 42 USC 423(d)(5)(b) Disability insurance benefit payments There are only 6 authorized protocols where claimiant for SSI benefits can engage in legal processes relating to application for Social Security benefits. . The Social Security has prevailed at law in 1997, 2007 and 2009 to prevent any additional legal processes and various interest attempting to move against the law have received substantial sanctions

1.. SSI Application and initial review and submission of medical evidence in 2002

2. SSI reconsideration

3. Administrative Judge Review

4. Appeals Council and Page 2

5. Commissioner's Final Determination Page 2 and later grant of benefits Benefits granted also Page 2

6. Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review provides for the Commissioner's final determination to be reviewed in a United States District Court by a federal judge as seen in Walters v Asture USDC, Idaho 1:11-cv-000359-LMB and being citex by SSA employees as a matter of occassional review

7. Congressional and Diplomatic Immunity to protect the constitutionality of Acts of Congress arising from misuse of federal statutes

8. Title 18 CRIMES many references are made concerning possible violations of federal law however it is important to remember no person has been arrested or charged with violation of a federal crime and the references are being used for stastical purposes.

1. Herbertf5b.htm Specifications

2. Exhibit #29 SSA Processing Claim In Wrong Venue Worker Demands I Move Back To Roanoke, VA? April 2002

3. Exhibits #30-Withdraw SSI Claim-Recommendation Federal Grand Jury Investigation November-December 2002

4. Specification #31 Theft Of Welfare Benefits Throughout Eastern District of California

5. Specification #32 Communications Prohibited by ORDER USDC

6. Specification #33 Obstruction Of Document House Ways and Means Committee

7. Specification #34 Heard & Smith, L.L.P. Medical Evidence Missing?

8. Specification #35 Mr. Hartman Is Returning Your Mail

9. Specification #37:Specification #37 Washington State DSHS In Contempt of Federal Court ORDER

10. Specification #36 Intentional Misdelivery Official Order & Document

11. Specification #38 I Have To Travel 2000 Miles To Get Appeals Council ORDER?

12. Jesus Burned Down The Pastor's House? God Is Punishing US-Specification #39

13. Specification #40 Your Opening My Mail Again? Thanks For The Heads Up

14. Specification #41 Interception of Certified US Mail Washington State DSHS

15. Specification #42 Recommended For Indictment By Federal Grand Jury Assassination Attempt-December 2006

16. Specification #43 Unlawful Request For Review of USDC Action

17. Specification #44 Your Terminated? We Want Your SSI Check

18. Specification #45 -Judicial Misconduct Question In 9th and 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals

19. Herbertf5c.htm Specifications

This link Part of reason is believed to be setting aside advanced medical directives; and allowing insurance companies to short cut treatment of pre existing conditions because of payments to public officials by the health care industry. Ongoing Questions and Legal Issues directed to the UN High Commission on Human Rights appear to violate the United States national sovereignity as being reserved to the US Congress House and Ways Committee visa via the 1503 Treaty

1. In 2009 FBI Officials admitted they had been intercepting federal Court ORDERS and other documents for some years under color of Title 18 Chapter 113b Terrorism or the US Patriot Act.

2. Exactly how a Federal Court ORDERs; my SSI check; eye glass prescriptions... threatens the national security remains a profound mystery.

3. Subsequently the FBI Director testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that some of his agents had cheated on their national security exams and had made mistakes

Specification #31 Theft Of Welfare Benefits
Throughout Eastern District of california

Chronic Theft of US Mail throughout the USDC Eastern District of California questions the fitness of various Judges to sit on the Federal Bench.

Title 18 1702. Obsruction of Correspondence Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Office Manager of the
Social Security Administration
5205 University Parkway
Winston Salem,NC 27106

RE: Complaint Filed Against Your Represenative
With United States Magistrate:
SSI -261-90-xxxx

Dear Office Manager:

One of your represenatives who contacted me by phone a Kim Fayor may have tried to convey a threat and I have enclosed a copy of the question submitted to the United States Magistrate as a possible violation of TITLE 18 CRIMES.

Among other things your represenative explained that since I was following the instructions of my Primary Care Physician Dr. Hickson to not be seen by other doctors my claim for SSI was summarily denied. Obviously additional request for medical information is inappropriate at this time and I doubt that Dr. Hickson could complete the extensive testing she is conducting in a 10 day period of time. I will be awaiting your decision and prepared to file a reconsideration.

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

1. Attorney John Heard staff explained Judge Herbert had received medical records and given me permission to proceed as a "hardship"

2. Administrative Law Judge Herbert ruling however contains no reference to medical records because this is permitted by previous ORDERS

Heard & Smith, L.L.P.
Email Form
Social Security Representative
Case Manager Henry M. Lopez
3737 Broadway, Suite 310
San Antonio, TX 78209

This email from Attorney John Heard explains that Mr. Alan Hartman is returning my mail addressee unknown. Mr. Hartman has received letters for me from US Congressman Lamar Smith and at times later-however at this point decided to sent my mail back and is in contact with Administrative Law Judge Herbert apparently trying to get himself appointed as a "conservator":

Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:11:50 -0600
From: "Silvia Inocencio"
sdeleon@heardandsmith.com
To: chrissaidthanks2002@yahoo.com
Subject: Address

Dear Mr. Christopher Walters:

Our office tried sending you a copy of our letter that was sent to Office of Hearings and Appeals withdrawing as representative and waiving any fee for services provided.

We sent it to you at PO Box 33323 San Antonio, Texas 78265 but it was sent back as undeliverable. This was the last known address that was in our system. Do you have a new address if so please let me know so that I can forward this letter to you.

1. Exhibit C: Judge William Herbert Order of June 21, 2005 was obstructed by delivering it to a person believed to be acting as a confererate known as Mr. Alan Hartman Of Texas Arms of Love 4107 Longvale Drive San Antonio, TX 78217 210-657-0196 (PO Box 33323 San Antonio, TX 78265) who claims the document never arrived at his mail address.

2. The animus of the postal fraud was to deny Chris Walters the knowledge that the SSI Appeal was denied to prevent an appeal which is currently in the Appeals Counsel.

Judge William Herbert
SSA, Office of Hearings & Appeals
Trinity Building, Suite 100
4204 Woodcock Drive
San Antonio, Texas 78228

Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Dr. Robert Canon is accepting delivery of my mail at his residence in Austin, Texas and has received the ORDER of the Appeals Council 12-29-2005. Dr. Canon declined to email me a description of the contents or discuss sending it to me via mail. I had to ride a bus 2,000 miles to simply see the ORDER which I actually received 2-8-2006. Dr. Canon who does not eat and dosen't hunt because he dislikes the sight of blood is now packing heavy duty firearms. I can't help to wonder if somone threatened him?

The letter above is a demand from an HUD vendor in Vancouver, Washington in 2006 that Chris Walters discontinue his medical treatment; stop asking for his SSI benefits and go look for a job. This Courtsey Brief explained to Share House that their request is prohibited by an existing ORDER of the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals and the US Supreme Court ruled in Terry Schindler Schiavo V Michael Schiavo that the the patient is the decider of what is and is not appropriate medical treatment. The Share House subsequently denied Chris Walters services during a major winter storm with the expectation that Chris Walters would either die or suffer severe injury as a result of exposure and resulted in this written request addressed too Federal Prosecutor for a Federal Grand Jury Investigation of the organization.

Katherine Garrett
Share Outreach Program Director
PO Box 1209
Share House
Vancouver, WA 98666
1 (360) 695-7658304

RE: Appeal Case Management Ruling:
Request Prohibited ORDER Federal Judge;

Dear Outreach Program Director Katherine Garett:

I wanted to thank your case manager Lanni Kali for offering to develop a case management plan for employment, ssi, and long term housing. Unfortunately the Social Security Administration has secured a number of exotic ORDERS from several federal courts which places these matters in the hands of the Social Security Appeals Council The Social Security Commissioner has been successful in pleading the exclusive right of the Appeals Council to determine if I am employable or disabled and her rights have thus far been sustained by rulings of Justice Scalia of the US Supeme Court. To avoid additional problems where nonprofit agencies and others are penalized or sanctioned the 5th US Circuit Court issued a final ruling that the matter is closed and cannot be reconsidered by any, group, or organization the matters being removed to Congress. You might say that until the Appeals Council issues its final report we are casual observers on the slow moving bus of government and some of the rulings relate directly to questions asked by Lannie Kali:

1. The proposal for employment was provided to the Social Security Appeals Council in the Appellate document based on the findings of the Washington DSHS and social security medical representative Dr. Eric Strandberg in April, 2006 and is pending review..

2. Lanni wanted too know if I would give up my employment opportunity with PublishAmerican to seek more gainful work which involves the US Supreme Court doctrine that all employment in the United States is at will and cannot be regulated by any government or process of law-Cite Walters v Askew USDC, SDNY (1976)

3. Lanni wanted to know if I would be willing to step over the disability statement of Dr. Eric Strandberg and other doctors to seek work which the United States Supreme Court has ruled in Terry Schindler Schiavo V Michael Schiavo that the patient is the ultimate decider of what is or is not appropriate course of action regarding medical issues.

4. The complex rules of federal laws provide that material issues of law before Courts is not subject to review by 3rd parties for instance US Department of HUD or nonprofit agencies and provides criminal penalities such under Title 18 USC 402 Contempt for persons overstepping or challenging the Courts authority.

5. The US Department of HUD funds Share House and requires it program vendors to accommodate persons who are either disabled or unemployable-Cites Title 18 USC 371

With Kindest Regards Chris Walters
Mr. Chris Walters-Bed #22
C/o PO Box 1209
Vancouver, WA 98666
Wednesday, November 22nd, 2006

Question Medicare Fraud Washington DSHS Claim #3491348 October-December, 2005 includes and 3rd party tampering Question Federal Grand Jury Investigation Involving DSHS where medical providers; contact with fraud investigation hotlines; and reported threats against Dr. Fitch. Washington State Auditor issued this report suggesting the program is rampant with fraud, waste, and mismanagement. Tampering in 2006 by a federally funded homeless shelter caused me to contact the Federal Prosecutor and suggest a Federal Grand Jury investigation.

Addressed to Federal Prosecutor
Karin J Immergut USA
Mark O Hatfield U.S. Courthouse
1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600
Portland, Oregon 97204-2902

Dear Federal Prosecutor

I am counsel of record in questions of law removed to the Social Security Appeals Council in the case of Christopher A. Walters SSI 261-90-6357 and have noted the appearance of a 3rd party already ejected by a Social Security Judge for fraud and continued efforts to tamper in possible violation of Title 18 USC 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees and other statutes:

1. In April of 2006 the Social Security Administrative Law Judge William Herbert in San Antonio, Texas issued his ruling which ejected all of Washington States DSHS and representatives medical findings and efforts apparently as being a fraud, hoax, or sham which are probably best described as a possible violation of Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States.(*Cited).

2. In 2006 Washington State Auditor Brian Sonntag issued his report and disallowed $6.1 billion of Washington State DSHS repayments from Medicare as fraudulent(**cited).

3. As counsel of record before the Social Security Appeals Council I had specifically asked if the Social Security Administrations representative Washington State DSHS and their doctors could readmitted or rehabilitated and Washington DSHS subsequently declined to participate in completion of their medical findings.

4. Exhibit A-On or about November 16th, 2006 I received written instructions from a nonprofit agency which a contract vendor for Washington DSHS and the US Department of HUD to prepare draft letters to permit their staff to create an 3rd party joiner or interpleader to the Social Security Appeals Council.

5. There is no statute whereby the US Department of HUD; a nonprofit agency; can file briefs or act in a matter of law before the Social Security Appeals Council.

6. A question exist as to whether Share House Case Manager Lannie Kali in demanding Chris Walters disregard his medical providers instructions and legal findings of disability to look for work violated US Supreme Court rulings in Terry Schindler Schiavo V Michael Schiavo that the patient has a well established right to adhere to medical advice of their doctors.

Question Medicare Fraud Washington DSHS Claim #3491348 October-December, 2005 includes and 3rd party tampering Question Federal Grand Jury Investigation Involving DSHS where medical providers; contact with fraud investigation hotlines; and reported threats against Dr. Fitch. Washington State Auditor issued this report suggesting the program is rampant with fraud, waste, and mismanagement. Tampering in 2006 by a federally funded homeless shelter caused me to contact the Federal Prosecutor and suggest a Federal Grand Jury investigation.

7. A question was asked to Health Department as to whether Share House staff in demanding Chris Walters a person known to transmit communicable diseases work in the Share House kitchen created a serious health care threat to the public.

8. Exhibit B: I served a copy of this legal notice on the Katherine Garrett Share Outreach Program Director 1 (360) 695-7658304 indicating their request is prohibited at the request of the Social Security Administration and prohibited by ORDER of 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals.

9. On Monday 11-27-2006 at a meeting with Katherine Garrett indicated Share House has a 25 year history as a vendor for US Department of HUD has a 25 year history of tampering with clients medical and legal affairs and indicated I was to be denied services at this federally funded facility.

10. A question exist as to whether the Share House violated Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law by denying Chris Walters access to the federally funded program and leaving him out in a winter storm with the expectation that he would suffer serious physical injury or death.

The report of Brian Sonntag on frauds, hoaxes, and shams which disallowed $6.1 Billion in medicare payments to the Washington State DSHS cites harassment of his staff by DSHS personnel which as I recall are described by Title 18 1511. Obstruction of State or local law enforcement Title 18 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant .

The Administrative Law Judge in reviewing the Washington State DSHS files on CD Rom omits their numerous findings and doctors to appear in his official report. The obvious fraud is that DSHS doctors prescribed a clear cut course of medical treatment and then obstructed their own contractual demands for evaluation and treatment as best described as a violation of Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States.

The subsequent appearance of DSHS and HUD vendor Share House and demands to set aside medical treatment and instructions and findings is an obvious and direct attempt to tamper with the Social Security Appeals Council and violation of Title 18 USC 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees . In attempting to overstep the ORDER OF THE 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals regarding 3rd party joiners Share House is also culpable to Title 18 USC 402 Contempt. Share House subsequent denial of services to Chris Walters during a major winter storm is simply an act of retaliation or attempted murder in violation of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters Legal Counsel or Record
Email: chris.saidthanks2006@gmail.com

Exhibits 397-428 Social Security reports they held a "Secret Hearing" October 15, 2007 and then attempted to conduct a review of the Commissioner's Final Determination outside the provisions of Title 42 USC 405(g)(h) Judicial Review The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security cannot be reviewed by anyone except a US District Court Judge as a point of fact and law.

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Generally known in all federal programs as clients rights and responsibities defined by law as Title 42 USC 423 (d)(5)(b) Disability Determinations and only subject to review pursuant to provisions of Title 42 USC 405 Judicial Review Since 1997 the Social Security Administration has appeared at BAR in numerous civil actions to prevent and block any legal or technical reviews which have not been filed in a USDC

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

It seems that many Chairman of Congress believe in the concept of work ethic and if they find you on Capitol Hill or too close to something they are working on will actually have someone volunteered or simply drafted. I-5 Cooridor Agreement origionally on covered portions of California, Oregon, and Washington but was rapidly expanded by the national leadership to include a third of the United States. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez caught me on Capitol Hill about 1988 circulating one of my publications and had me introduced to the HUD Inspector General.. This assignment lasted until about 1993 when the Clinton Administration came into power and replaced me with 2 convicted persons who according to press reports were paid $80,000 a year plus expenses..

The author has worked in the security and private investigations industry for 40 years typically wears a uniform carries a fire arm and protects facilities with insured value into billion dollar range. Services and contracts with the United States Government begin in 1997 and include

1. 1-5 Corridor Agreement study authorizations for surveys in 15 states 1986

2. Directory Model Social Service Agencies

3. Organized Crime Ties to US Dept HUD Confirmed Kills

4. Federal Law CSBG US Senator Mark O Hatfield

5. Welfare Reform Act 1986

6. Food Stamps For Homless Act US Congressman Tony Coelho

7. Audits USDA Programs confirmed kills

8. Audits US Postal Programs confirmed kills

9. Terrorist in Social Services confirmed kills

8. Spyware Act of 2005 2nd Federal Law 2015

9. Emergency Management Authorizations1993-2013

10. Emergency Management Structure 15 States1993-2013

11. Operational Audit Social SecurityExecutive ORDER 1997-2015

In 1999 the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals authorized a special jonder of study programs and human rights issue to the United Nations The program materials are located in the United Kingdom.

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities what appears to be a large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect.

1. Circia 1986 California housing programs heavily involved in organized criminal activities which are apparently causing the deaths of a several thousands of clients a year

2. US Congressman Tony Coelho 1989 resigns after attempting to create artificial famine in largest food producing area of the planet. US Senator Alan Cranston gets sanctioned for $1.4 Trillion Savings and Loan Scandal

3. Walters V Blessings Diversion Food Stamps 1993-1996 apparently organized by the Clinton Administration involved refusing to close food stamp cases and permitting states to steal from USDA overpayments.

4. US Congressman Tony Coelho 1989 resigns after attempting to create artificial famine in largest food producing area of the planet

5. Chronic Theft US Mail routine theft of welfare benefits; obstruction of legal documents including federal court ORDERS

6. Fictious Conviction 1993-1996 challenged in USDC Modesto Rescue Mission intercepts Court ORDER to maintain conviction without trial. Mission Director Vern Deatheridge reportedly fired years later for stealing millions from the Mission

7. Theft of Bank Accounts 2008 Question of diversion of unauthorized of bank accounts and bogus conservatorships designed to steal from the elderly and disabled.

8. Challenges to Social Security Commissioner 2008 ALJ Dawson and Rogers fail in attempt to Quash Comissioners final determination USDC,NM Walters V Asture 2008 quashes California's challenges to Commissioners final determination and begins retaliation

10. Corruption in Casa Esperanza 2014 Manager sacked from alleged thefts from shelter and clients Secretary of HUD Shawn Donovan resigns-reassigned White House Chief of Staff

11. Denial of Reasonable Accomodation To Disabled Person 2014 HUD policy issue

12. Santa Barbara County Defrauds Medicare 2014 combat operations against organized criminal interest in HUD programs in California and Oregon

13. Santa Barbara County Retaliates 2016 County employee admits retaliation is in progress as various organization screw my primary care physician Dr.Diana Garcia MD

14. Path Shelter Trying to Kill Clients Included in package of items sent from United Nations back to Trump Administration

15. Lodi California Combat Operations sustained attacks of web providers and denial of medical treatment

16. Walters V Saul US Supreme Court 2019-2020 San Joaquin Skilled Nursing home Bakersfield, CA

17. Rest and Care Home Bakersfield, CA 2020