Congress providing for protection of civil rights including the right to vote. Specific Rights Defined By United States Supreme Court Rulings. The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

1. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900) The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

This link Part of reason is believed to be setting aside advanced medical directives; and allowing insurance companies to short cut treatment of pre existing conditions because of payments to public officials by the health care industry. Ongoing Questions and Legal Issues directed to the UN High Commission on Human Rights appear to violate the United States national sovereignity as being reserved to the US Congress House and Ways Committee visa via the 1503 Treaty

The family of legal actions styled Walters V Social Security...have been closed for 20 years from futher adjudication. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 was an out of court settlement which cannot be appealed, modified. or amended The several US Circuit Courts of Appeals and US Supreme Court have declined to permit the matter to be brought up for additional review.

1. This link concerns cut off of medical benefits in North Carolina without the required Judicial Review by a USDC Judge. Because I am under treatment for Deep Vein Thrombosis a person of reasonable or common intellingence might conclude the persons involved hoped the violation of the law would cause serious injury or death.

2. The United States Supreme Court ruled in Terry Schindler Schiavo V Michael Schiavo that patients have an absolute right to accept or decine medical treatment and choose their own doctors.

This page reviews a recent finding of both the US Supreme Court (10-2008) and the current ruling of the US Circuit Court of Appeals in District of Columbia both of which closed further conversation related to my SSI claim. After returning to Winston Salem, NC I circulated an FYI letter addressed to Chief Judge USDC, MDC to everyone in the area that the questions of law were closed by ORDER of the US Circuit Court of Appeals. On or about 11-25-2009 Mr. Willis Miller the manager of the Samaritan Ministries indictated I could no longer remain at the facility if he could not tamper with the questions of law

Mr. Miller specifically stated the US Marshal had provided some priviledged medical informations on which he based his actions however the information is not even remotely priviledged and has been provided to Mr. Miller and his staff on CD-Rom for at least 4 years. Mr. Miller's challengs to the rule of law is common to this area of North Carolina where patriotism is almost as great an honor as challenging the federal government. Sedition and Treason disrespect for government is something many folks around hear wear proudly on their sleve.

USA Wagoner retired after AUSA Folmar's Florida State Bar license was retired and his North Carolina ... Middle District U.S. Attorney Anna Mills Wagoner fired Prosecutor David P Folmar in March 2009 for practing law without a current license.

1. This link concerns cut off of medical benefits in North Carolina without the required Judicial Review by a USDC Judge. Because I am under treatment for Deep Vein Thrombosis a person of reasonable or common intellingence might conclude the persons involved hoped the violation of the law would cause serious injury or death.

2. The United States Supreme Court ruled in Terry Schindler Schiavo V Michael Schiavo that patients have an absolute right to accept or decine medical treatment and choose their own doctors.

In 2009 FBI Officials admitted they had been intercepting federal Court ORDERS and other documents for some years under color of Title 18 Chapter 113b Terrorism or the US Patriot Act. Exactly how a Federal Court ORDERs; my SSI check; eye glass prescriptions... threatens the national security remains a profound mystery.

FBI admits cheating on tests Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 28th Jul 2010
McClatchy Newspapers WASHINGTON

An undisclosed number of FBI agents have cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases, FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged Wednesday, but he added that he is waiting for the results of an inspector general's investigation to determine how widespread the cheating has become.... The FBI head was asked about the controversy by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who heads the committee. Leahy he said he knew that some agents had been caught cheating on the tests, in which they were supposed to show they understood the limitations in conducting domestic surveillance and beginning cases without first having evidence of a crime. The test is mandatory, and it is put on by the bureau's Domestic Investigation and Operations Guidelines section.

"We are expecting a letter from the IG pointing out other occasions, where there were abuses and the procedures were not followed, with recommendations. And we will follow those recommendations." Mueller added that "it is quite obviously my concern that all of our personnel understand the parameters in which we are to work." He pledged that eventually all the agents will understand "the limitations of what we can do."

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se

vs.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant

07/09/2007 Doucment filed with the US House & Senate Oversight Committees suggest a national Security Death Warrant for a John Doe in USDC New Mexico (bap) (Entered: 07/09/2007) for 3rd party who has apparently seized or intercepted USDC ORDER-Docket #20. After the shooting was over it appears the US Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez and others official expired from numerous and painful wounds.

PACER Service Center Transaction Receipt
07/11/2007 13:08:05
PACER Login: cw2281 Client Code:
Description: Docket Report
Search Criteria: 1:07-cv-00257-JCH-RLP
Billable Pages: 2 Cost: 0.16

In 2009 FBI Officials admitted they had been intercepting federal Court ORDERS and other documents for some years under color of Title 18 Chapter 113b Terrorism or the US Patriot Act. Exactly how a Federal Court ORDERs; my SSI check; eye glass prescriptions... threatens the national security remains a profound mystery.

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 160
Las Cruces, NM 88004
Plaintiff Pro Se

vs.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner Of Social Security
The Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Defendant

This section concerns chronic theft and interception of US Mail; federal court ORDERS and delivery of eye glasses from UPS. It was possible to learn in September, 2009 that theft of these items in 2007 were apparently engineered by a renegade FBI Agent

The United Parcel Service where I receive my mail sent me a very nice email thanking me for the nice postcards from Oregon and California. They however could not email me and explain why they refused to forward my mail for several months and we are definitely going to Court to ask for damages-unless they have a very very good story. Documents filed with the USDC

1. Report of Apparent Interception of USDC Docket #20 and note to

2. US Postmaster; shows pilfering of US Mail

3. Loss of a registered US Mail containing my eye glass prescriptions. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt It is a federal offense to obstruct a USDC ORDER;Title 18 USC 1708. Theft or receipt of stolen mail matter generally; Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law concerns obstruction or secreting counsels papers.

In 2009 FBI Officials admitted they had been intercepting federal Court ORDERS and other documents for some years under color of Title 18 Chapter 113b Terrorism or the US Patriot Act. Exactly how a Federal Court ORDERs; my SSI check; eye glass prescriptions... threatens the national security remains a profound mystery.

FBI admits cheating on tests Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 28th Jul 2010
McClatchy Newspapers WASHINGTON

An undisclosed number of FBI agents have cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases, FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged Wednesday, but he added that he is waiting for the results of an inspector general's investigation to determine how widespread the cheating has become.... The FBI head was asked about the controversy by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who heads the committee. Leahy he said he knew that some agents had been caught cheating on the tests, in which they were supposed to show they understood the limitations in conducting domestic surveillance and beginning cases without first having evidence of a crime. The test is mandatory, and it is put on by the bureau's Domestic Investigation and Operations Guidelines section.

"We are expecting a letter from the IG pointing out other occasions, where there were abuses and the procedures were not followed, with recommendations. And we will follow those recommendations." Mueller added that "it is quite obviously my concern that all of our personnel understand the parameters in which we are to work." He pledged that eventually all the agents will understand "the limitations of what we can do."

Chris Walters

vs.

Michael Astrue
Commissioner SSA

Civil #C080380

1. The ORDER of the Court disappeared in the US Mail and is either lost, missing, or stolen? A Notice of Appeal to US Supreme Court and Answer for ODAR Monday, May 19th, 2008 on technical question for Judical Review SSI Claim from Kinko Copies 4418 Broadway Street, San Antonio, Texas 78209:

Cost to print these documents at Kinko & Computer usage was $150.00
3 Hours at $110.00 Hour=$330.00

Total $480.00

#468391510048409 Delivered Signed for by: AWOOD Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 27, 2008 9:36 AM Destination Denver, CO To US Congressman Lamar Smith. Shipment Dates Ship date Nov 2, 2009

#468391510048416 Delivered Signed for by: JHERNANDEZ Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 22, 2008 10:01 AM Destination Albuquerque, NM

#468391510048423 Delivered Signed for by: BBECKELHEIMER Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 22, 2008 1:31 PM Destination Albuquerque, NM

#468391510048430 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: JPORITS Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 20, 2008 5:30 PM Destination Dallas, TX

#468391510048444 Delivered Signed for by: AZERTUCHE Ship date May 19, 2008 Delivery date May 20, 2008 2:55 PM Destination San Antonio, TX Shipment Dates Ship date May 19, 2008

#468415010042160 Delivered Signed for by: DWEHEAM Shipment Dates Ship date May 27, 2008 Delivery date Jun 2, 2008 1:04 PM Destination Falls Church, VA

#468415010042177 Delivered Signed for by: MMARTINEZ Shipment Dates Ship date May 27, 2008 Delivery date May 28, 2008 1:30 PM Destination Albuquerque, NM

#468415010042184 Delivered Delivered Signed for by: DGAMBLE Shipment Dates hip date May 27, 2008 Delivery date Jun 2, 2008 9:58 AM Destination Washington, DC

#To US Supreme Court???? Jonder to Congress was filed May 24, 2008 from Fed Ex Kinko 1001 E University Ave, Las Cruces, NM 88001 Transaction #210110154963:

We have a rather large going theft of Court ORDERS, legal instrumentalities,,, which some persons have alleged are being engineered by law enforcement or intelligence persons.

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt

2. Title 18 USC 242Deprivation of rights under color of law

3. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER

4. Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

5. Title 18 USC CHAPTER 115Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities

The type and variety of mail I have been missing in Las Cruces suggest the problem might be human. It is possible the problem could be caused by a sorting machine or whatever

From MailTheft@uspis.gov
tonims2006@gmail.com
dateTue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:19 PM

subjectMail Theft Report
mailed-byuspis.gov

Thank you for completing this form. Your Reference number is: 9380708

The U.S. Postal Inspection Service gathers data on mail-related crime to determine whether a violation has occurred. While we can't guarantee that we can recover lost money or items, your information can help alert Inspectors to problem areas and possibly prevent other people from being victimized.

U.S. Postal Inspectors base their investigations on the number, substance, and pattern of complaints received from the public. We ask you to keep all original documents related to your complaint. We will contact you ONLY if more information is needed.

Chris Walters, )
Plaintiff )
vs.
Ken Lewis, CEO )
Bank of America )
Judge: The Honorable Judge Bruce Black
Civil 09-811

We have a rather large going theft of Court ORDERS, legal instrumentalities,,, which some persons have alleged are being engineered by law enforcement or intelligence persons.

Apparent theft of Safe Deposit Box at Las Cruces, NM

1. Mr. Willis Miller explained the US Marshal provided health information to him which he was not entitled too and decided to run me out of town. Mr. Willis has been given this information in the past in print and on CD Rom and it appears he is using the matter as a pretext to challenge a US District Court ORDER.

September, 2009 begin 3 month stay at Samaritan Ministries in preparation to finding apartment. The Federal Judge is the case manager and has an approved case plan My inhouse case files; computer disc; and other documents are missing and the staff member cannot find them..before Mr. Willis explains I must leave because he has no legal right to discuss legal issues related to my SSI claim.

Forsyth County Department of Social Services is supposed to provide Medicare when Social Security notifies them I moved into the state. A Month and half later no medical benefits or card have been issued.

Chris Walters
Appellant
vs

Michael Asture,
Social Security Administration
Appellee

US Circuit Court District of Columbia
Docket # 1:09-cv-00095206
USDC-DC Docket #1:09-cv -09-0956
The Honorable Rosemary Collyer Presiding

Addressed Too: James A. Beaty, Jr ~ Chief District Judge
United States District Court Middle District of North Carolina
251 N. Main St
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
336-734-2516

Your Honor:

I wanted to thank the Social Security Administration local offices here in Winston Salem and Greensboro and several non profit agencies for continuing to drop by and practice, vend, or dispense federal law without a license in a family of cases known as Walters v Asture. Their ongoing request for hearing has been denied by ORDER of 5th, 10th, and more recently Circuit Court of Appeals at DC; and numerous lower courts *** (cited below)

Given the enormous costs to myself and ongoing waste of valuable Court time to have various non parties fielding questions in actions of law to which they are not named parties of interest it might be meritorious to draft this public FYI letter to the Court . It appears several nonprofit agencies incorrectly believe they are authorized by the US Department of HUD to interplead or join the actions where the US Department of HUD is not a named party or party of interest.

While the Social Security Administration does have a clear cut right to hearing pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(h) Judicial Review the party best equipped to represent and file such a matter is the Social Security Administration’s legal counsel David Black in Baltimore, MD in the proper venue in Washington, D.C. The ruling of the Circuit Court of Appeals cites lack of controversy because the Office of General Counsel had no interest in appearing or pleading in a question of law initiated by the local Social Security Office who are not licensed to vend, dispense, or practice before the Federal Bar.

Respectfully Submitted by Chris Walters
Appellant Counsel of Record
PO Box 266
Greensboro, NC 27402
11-06-2009

We have a rather large going theft of Court ORDERS, legal instrumentalities,,, which some persons have alleged are being engineered by law enforcement or intelligence persons. If this is true we asked Congressional authorities to shoot the offending party twice in the back of the head. Items Walmart Visa Card pilfered from PO Box in Greensboro, NC

In discussing missing SSI payment on my debit card with Walmart it was discovered a permanent walmart debit was mailed to homeless shelter in PO Box 160 Las Cruces, NM 88004 and a request was made to invalidate the card.

We have a rather large going theft of Court ORDERS, legal instrumentalities,,, which some persons have alleged are being engineered by law enforcement or intelligence persons. If this is true we asked Congressional authorities to shoot the offending party twice in the back of the head. The green reciept for delivery of certified US Mail #7008 3230 0001 6090 6083 to US Senator Whitehouse Chairman of Senate Committee on Judiciary. returned to Burlington, NC as is normal. The Shelter manager Bobby Clark forwarded the reciept to me in Greensboro and it failed to appear.

The Marion County District Attorney Walter M Beglau has been engaged in stalking Chris Walters through the internet and apparently trying to examine Plaintiff's Specification C: Submitted As Evidence and Testimony before Congress:” It is possible that the District Attorney is unaware that the materials are in the public domain and submitted to public arena from Congress to Courts of law and can be viewed or subject to public debate by any person. If the Congress wishes to discuss it's review of the questions of law it can subpoena District Attorney Walter Beglau. If DA Walter Beglau is found vending law in counsel's paper it is recommended the Committees authorized sanctions for under color of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.

While FBI and District Attorney here in Marion County, Oregon appear to be busy trying to practice law in counsels priviledged papers we have a person named Jefferson Jerry "Duce-N-Half" Worthington appearing at a homeless shelter in Medford, Oregon recently and during church services screams for someone to Kill that Nigger In the White House.

McClatchy Newspapers WASHINGTON "An undisclosed number of FBI agents have cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases", FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged Wednesday, but he added that he is waiting for the results of an inspector general's investigation to determine how widespread the cheating has become.

"I've got a general idea. But I do not know how many" have cheated, he said in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. "And I'm not sure the IG knows how many either." But, Mueller added, the IG "has pointed out instances orally to me where there may be persons and a particular office where it was widespread. And it may be attributable to a lack of understanding and confusion about the procedures."

The FBI head was asked about the controversy by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who heads the committee. Leahy he said he knew that some agents had been caught cheating on the tests, in which they were supposed to show they understood the limitations in conducting domestic surveillance and beginning cases without first having evidence of a crime. The test is mandatory, and it is put on by the bureau's Domestic Investigation and Operations Guidelines section.

"We learned last year that a small number of agents were accused of cheating on the test. That's what I was told," Leahy said to Mueller. "I was amazed when I went online this morning to find from press accounts that the cheating was reportedly more widespread." Mueller strongly defended the bureau and said his agents are instructed not to purposely target Muslim-Americans and other religious and ethnic groups for investigations. "That is at the heart of these guidelines. And that is what we teach each of our personnel," he said.

He said the guidelines require agents to undertake more than 16 hours of training, followed by an open-book test. He said that a year ago, problems surfaced because some agents were taking it with the help of other agents. At that point, he said, the FBI's IG office began to investigate. Since then, he said, the IG "has indicated that there are additional personnel that did not abide by those procedures."

"We are expecting a letter from the IG pointing out other occasions, where there were abuses and the procedures were not followed, with recommendations. And we will follow those recommendations." Mueller added that "it is quite obviously my concern that all of our personnel understand the parameters in which we are to work." He pledged that eventually all the agents will understand "the limitations of what we can do."

Title 18 Sec 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Another person known as Tim Robinson a self professed convicted felon from Polk County Oregon states he is on parole and was put in jail and violated for calling his mother on one occasion; for applying for work with the State of Oregon on another; and for having a smiley face on his resume on another. It appears that when Polk County Commissioner learn the jail is not full they require parole agents to arrest or violate parolees so as to defraud the US Bureau of Prisons in violation of Title 18 USC 372 Conspiracy to commit and offense to defraud the United States.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters, Prevailing Counsel Before Congress
Ad Hoc Counsel Before UNHCHR
c/o 345 Commercial Street NE
Salem, Oregon 97301

Dear Chairman of Congressional Committee:

I wanted to thank Director Robert Mueller of the Federal Bureau of Investigations for having 2 agents drop last September, 2009 in Las Cruces, NM to confess to several violations of Title 18 CRIMES. The Agents explained they had been intercepting Federal Court ORDERS in a family of actions known as Walters V Asture; pilfering counsel’s mail; and apparently seized Counsel’s Safe Deposit Box 259 at Bank of America:

http://afterdarkportal.net/ssi/zzcontract/index14.htm

As the Committee staff is probably aware violation of counsel’s papers is a violation of Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law as the case law cited in US v Haldeman, Erlichman, and Dean. Director Robert Mueller should be given high marks on his allocution and apparent willingness to do 5 years at hard labor in a federal penal facility for each violation of counsels papers and also:

Apparently misused law enforcement and intelligence assets to help create the Anti-Spyware Act:

http://afterdarkportal.net/hssecurity/spywareact/index16.htm

Apparently created and maintained a fictious conviction without trial:

http://afterdarkportal.net/hssecurity/sanctions/index.html

Apparently is so incapacitated in performance of his duties as being unable to completely challenge terrorist interest or organized criminal interest:

http://afterdarkportal.net/hssecurity/index2.htm

http://afterdarkportal.net/107thcongress/hud/index.html

The challenges of the FBI to the 5th and 6th Amendment of the US Constitution appear to have drawn into question the constitutionality of Title 28 Chapter 33 FBI and other acts of Congress. As a result of tampering it appears that a Motion For Summary Judgment was filed questioning the constitutionality of Title 42 Chapter 7 Social Security Act which can be reviewed online:

http://afterdarkportal.net/ssi/zzcontract/index17.htm

A true and correct or draft copy of the foregoing document and Specifications has been serviced on:

1. Marion County District Attorney Walter Beglau at his place of business in Salem, Oregon by priority US Mail on June 17th, 2010 Priority Mail (#03091830000208802879).

2. US Senator Ron Wyden (Priority Mail:0309 1830 0002 0881 7972) Notice Left, June 19, 2010, 9:51 am, EUGENE, OR 97401 Out for Delivery or Available at PO Box, June 19, 2010, 9:09 am, EUGENE, OR 97401 Arrival at Post Office, June 19, 2010, 7:27 am, EUGENE, OR 97401 Processed through Sort Facility, June 18, 2010, 11:20 pm, EUGENE, OR 97401 Acceptance, June 18, 2010, 4:07 pm, SALEM, OR 97301

3. And on the several Committees of the US Congress via fax From Fed Ex Kinko 5302 (Fax 503-375-3988) Salem, Oregon: 6/15/2010 8:52 Am fax to 1-202-225-7682; 6/15/2010 8:56 AM fax to 1-202-225-8354; 6/15/2010 8:54 AM fax to 1-541-465-6458

4. From: OTP InformationDesk OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int
Date: Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: FBI Director Mueller's alleged confession deferred to US Congress,
To: Ad Hoc Counsel thirdcommitteestaff@gmail.com

Dear Madam, Sir,

This is an automatically generated response to confirm the receipt of your e-mail. For more details about the Office of the Prosecutor please visit the following link:

Best regards. Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
International Criminal Court

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters, Prevailing Counsel Before Congress
Ad Hoc Counsel Before UNHCHR
c/o 345 Commercial Street NE
Salem, Oregon 97301

Chris Walters Aka
Special Defenders
320 NW 1st Ave
Ocala, Florid 34475

vs Docket: 5:10-cv-384-oc-10GRJ
Filed August 12 2010 11:11 AM

Assistant Secretary for Legal Affairs
Mr. Peter Taksoe-Jensen
United Nations Headquarters
RoomM -13047
New York, NY 10017
Fax 2-212-963-6430
Defendant

This link reviews dismissal of the question of website block and and jonder to Committees of Congress

1. Amicus Curiae Brief WP10 concerns website block placed on my primary website http://afterdarkportal.net at Marion County Library apparently caused by Mc Afee.

2. Motion for Summary Judgement WP 10 motion withdraw lawsuit based on admission of Marion County

3. Recommendation US Magistrate

4. ORDER Adopting Recommendation

5. ORDER Dismissal Without Prejudice

6. Motion For Reconsideration 12-4-2010

Amicus Curiae Question of law filed in USDC, Middle District of Florida questioned the right of the Public Library to put a website block on Counsel's resume and legal papers. The Library admitted that the problem was result of computer listing error and not intentional

After the Library admitted innocent human error was involved the Court dismissed the action and quashed Plaintiff's request for reasonable Court Cost and ruled in the Library's favor even though Marion County had not even appeared and entered a pleading. It appears the Court went on to ORDER a block of additional communications to either the United Nations or the US Congress

You may have never even have been arrested; however the FBI probally has an extensive criminal history on you. The United States District Courts have ruled that Congress did not authorize the Federal Bureau of Investigation to slander, liable, and defame your good name and reputation:

(1994)11 165 App DC 293. 507 F2d 1116. case remanded (DC Dist Col) 407 F Supp 1083 "Congress did not intend to authorize FBI to damage reputation of innocent individuals in contravention of settled common law principles hence, Congress did not intend through USCS 534 to authorize FBI to disseminate in accurate criminal information without taking reasonable precautions to prevent inaccuracy; dissemination of inaccurate criminal information without precaution of reasonable efforts to forestall inaccuracy restricts subject's liberty without any procedural safeguards designed to prevent such inaccuracies to permit FBI to disseminate inaccurate criminal information without FBI making reasonable effort to prevent inaccuracy would be tantamount to accuse individuals of criminal conduct without ever providing such individuals opportunity to disprove that accusation: reliable and responsible performance of record-keeping function requires such reasonable care as FBI is able to afford to avoid injury to innocent citizens through dissemination of inaccurate information."

The Court also rules in McKnight v Webster
(1980,Ed PA 499 F Supp 420)

"FBI has duty to request correct information from local law enforcement agencies which initially reported Plaintiff arrest when Plaintiff informs FBI it's records are inaccurate."The scope and intend of the law Title 28 USC 534 Acquisition, preservation.... was clearly to acquire and maintain records on crime and "criminals" for the good of the country>

The Court also rules in Mendard V Mitchell

(1971, DC Dist (24 Col) 328 F Supp 718, remanded on other grounds 162 App DC 284, 498 F2d 1017,28 ARL Fed 248...( superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Utz v. Culliname, 172 App DC 67, 520 F2d 467)

"File of arrest records is designed only to facilitate coordinated law enforcement activities between federal and local government, that is, to assist arresting agencies, courts, and correctional institutions in apprehension, conviction, and proper disposition of criminal offenders."

Jurisdiction over rights to due process can also
be found in Constitutional Laws 318 56,257, and 992.
As the Constitution Guarantees:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy or life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

Chris Walters
Appellant
vs
Michael Asture,
Social Security Administration
Appellee

US Circuit Court District of Columbia
Docket # 1:09-cv-00095206
USDC-DC Docket #1:09-cv -09-0956
The Honorable Rosemary Collyer Presiding

1. The Court Docket from US Circuit Court of Appeals in District of Columbia shows 2 letters and an ORDER from the Clerk which were returned addressed unknown when delivery was attempted in USDC, Middle District of North Carolina in Burlington, NC

2. Local subversive elements also seized priority US Mail addressed to US Attorney in Washington, DC however released the documents after pressure was applied.

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Generally known in all federal programs as clients rights and responsibities defined by law as Title 42 USC 423 (d)(5)(b) Disability Determinations and only subject to review pursuant to provisions of Title 42 USC 405 Judicial Review Since 1997 the Social Security Administration has appeared at BAR in numerous civil actions to prevent and block any legal or technical reviews which have not been filed in a USDC

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

It seems that many Chairman of Congress believe in the concept of work ethic and if they find you on Capitol Hill or too close to something they are working on will actually have someone volunteered or simply drafted. I-5 Cooridor Agreement origionally on covered portions of California, Oregon, and Washington but was rapidly expanded by the national leadership to include a third of the United States. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez caught me on Capitol Hill about 1988 circulating one of my publications and had me introduced to the HUD Inspector General.. This assignment lasted until about 1993 when the Clinton Administration came into power and replaced me with 2 convicted persons who according to press reports were paid $80,000 a year plus expenses..

The author has worked in the security and private investigations industry for 40 years typically wears a uniform carries a fire arm and protects facilities with insured value into billion dollar range. Services and contracts with the United States Government begin in 1997 and include

1. 1-5 Corridor Agreement study authorizations for surveys in 15 states 1986

2. Directory Model Social Service Agencies

3. Organized Crime Ties to US Dept HUD Confirmed Kills

4. Federal Law CSBG US Senator Mark O Hatfield

5. Welfare Reform Act 1986

6. Food Stamps For Homless Act US Congressman Tony Coelho

7. Audits USDA Programs confirmed kills

8. Audits US Postal Programs confirmed kills

9. Terrorist in Social Services confirmed kills

8. Spyware Act of 2005 2nd Federal Law 2015

9. Emergency Management Authorizations1993-2013

10. Emergency Management Structure 15 States1993-2013

11. Operational Audit Social SecurityExecutive ORDER 1997-2015

In 1999 the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals authorized a special jonder of study programs and human rights issue to the United Nations The program materials are located in the United Kingdom.

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities what appears to be a large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect.

1. Circia 1986 California housing programs heavily involved in organized criminal activities which are apparently causing the deaths of a several thousands of clients a year

2. US Congressman Tony Coelho 1989 resigns after attempting to create artificial famine in largest food producing area of the planet. US Senator Alan Cranston gets sanctioned for $1.4 Trillion Savings and Loan Scandal

3. Walters V Blessings Diversion Food Stamps 1993-1996 apparently organized by the Clinton Administration involved refusing to close food stamp cases and permitting states to steal from USDA overpayments.

4. US Congressman Tony Coelho 1989 resigns after attempting to create artificial famine in largest food producing area of the planet

5. Chronic Theft US Mail routine theft of welfare benefits; obstruction of legal documents including federal court ORDERS

6. Fictious Conviction 1993-1996 challenged in USDC Modesto Rescue Mission intercepts Court ORDER to maintain conviction without trial. Mission Director Vern Deatheridge reportedly fired years later for stealing millions from the Mission

7. Theft of Bank Accounts 2008 Question of diversion of unauthorized of bank accounts and bogus conservatorships designed to steal from the elderly and disabled.

8. Challenges to Social Security Commissioner 2008 ALJ Dawson and Rogers fail in attempt to Quash Comissioners final determination USDC,NM Walters V Asture 2008 quashes California's challenges to Commissioners final determination and begins retaliation

10. Corruption in Casa Esperanza 2014 Manager sacked from alleged thefts from shelter and clients Secretary of HUD Shawn Donovan resigns-reassigned White House Chief of Staff

11. Denial of Reasonable Accomodation To Disabled Person 2014 HUD policy issue

12. Santa Barbara County Defrauds Medicare 2014 combat operations against organized criminal interest in HUD programs in California and Oregon

13. Santa Barbara County Retaliates 2016 County employee admits retaliation is in progress as various organization screw my primary care physician Dr.Diana Garcia MD

14. Path Shelter Trying to Kill Clients Included in package of items sent from United Nations back to Trump Administration

15. Lodi California Combat Operations sustained attacks of web providers and denial of medical treatment

16. Walters V Saul US Supreme Court 2019-2020 San Joaquin Skilled Nursing home Bakersfield, CA

17. Rest and Care Home Bakersfield, CA 2020