Congress providing for protection of civil rights including the right to vote. Specific Rights Defined By United States Supreme Court Rulings. The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

1. Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct 893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18

2. The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction,adequate notice, and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md. D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436

3. Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

1. US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Online documents

1. The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900) The gist of the Supreme Court Law is that citizens have a well established right to engaged in interstate travel and live where they so wish. Generally it is beyound the power of the federal, state, or city governments to restrict these rights.

From United Nations Human Rights Council
From Chris Walters-Ad Hoc Counsel
UN Headquarters
New York, New York 10017

My name is Chris Walters and I have been given permission to proceed as ad Hoc Counsel to the UN High Commission on Human Rights about 20 years ago in USDC, WDT. During my tenure of service the United States has appeared by and through legal counsel and openly allocuted to an amazing variety of crimes against humanity; genocide; terrorist activities; and there are serious questions as to wheather United States official are operating under dimished capacity

Hundreds of public and private concerns have stepped over numerous Court ORDERS for 20 years to ask "special defender on human rights" to UN for permission to amend the key provisions of Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act instead of addressing the matters to the United States Congress:

1. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/index.html1997-2007

2. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/index2.htm2008-2018

3. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/index3.htm2019

FBI request to problem President Trumps mental fitness and public assertions made from associates and employees of President Donald Trump frequently ask if he is mental unfit to hold the office of President and should be removed under Article 25. Medical doctors in Congress reportedly stated House Speaker Pelosi has state 6 dementia and might best serve in long term care facility. Senator Mitch McConnell states the United States has an "Opoid Crisis" and a person might believe that a large number of members of Congress are so whacked on drugs and liquor they can't find their behind with both hands.

In reviewing actions of US Officials some years ago US Magisrate Judge Jerimah Lynch explained the actions of government officials were incrediable, fantastice, and hard to believe. In reviewing the open public allouctions of the United States to criminal and terrorist activities the United Nations Security Council might find it expident to temporarily place the United States in custody of NATO under Article 4 or Article 5. All sitting US Judge; The President of the United States; Cabinet level officers; Senator and Congressman shoulld have a serious mental health evaluation; including testing for exposure to chemical and bilogical weapons; substance abuse.

This question is being removed the United States District Court, Eastern District of California through the United Nations visa via Title 28 USC 1251(a) Original Jurisdiction

1 It is recommended every The President of the United States; every cabinet level officer; US Senators Congressmen; and sitting Judge be transported to a secure facility for mental health examination; exposure to chemical or biological agents; or substance abuse and evaluated as to their fitness to hold public office

2. Officials deemed to be be fit to resume their officials will be returned to office and others can be given early retirement...

My name is Chris Walters and I have been given permission to proceed as ad Hoc Counsel to the UN High Commission on Human Rights about 20 years ago in USDC, WDT. In the course of doing pro bono surveys and audit for the US Congress I received extensive request to amend the key provisions of the Title 42 USC Chapter 7 Social Security Act the questions being deferred to the Committes of Congress as cited on these links

1. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/index.html1997-2007

2. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/index2.htm2008-2018

3. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/index3.htm2019

The several Social Security Commissioners have prevailed at law before the US Supreme Court; 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals; 10 US Circuit Court of Appeals; 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals; and DC Circuit Ccourt of Appeals to Quash any challenges to their exclusive jurisdicitonal authorities under Title 42 423 disability determinations & Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review as cited on this link:

1. This folder

As the United Nations cannot receive questions on amending United States statures-additional Questions by 3rd parties on amending the Social Security Act have been deferred to the the US House Committee on Ways and Means or US Senate Select Committe on Aging or US House or US Senate Judiciary Committees which have exclusive jurisdicitonal authority over any issues of law as cited on this link:

1. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/zzcontract/index26.htm

1. US District Court Jurisdiction is found in: Title 28 USC 1331 Federal Question

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.

2. Article 1 Section 1 the right of Congress to pass legislation is cited

Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested
in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of
a Senate and House of Representatives.

3. Since the Social Security Administration appeared in USDC, in 1997 the Commissioners have conducted a highly meritorious defense of their statutory authority pursuant to Title 42 423 disability determinations & Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review from hundreds of 3rd party challenges being sustained in many US Courts; as cited online in this Congressional archive:

1. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/index.html1997-2007

2. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/index2.htm2008-2018

3. http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/index3.htm2019

4. The Commissioners Final Determination of 2007 cannot be overturned or amended as cited in Title 42 USC (G)(H) Judicial Review:

..No findings of fact or decision by the Commissioner shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or government agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under Section of 1331 or 1346 of Title 28,United States Code, to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter.

The US Supreme Court and 5 US Circuit Court of Appeals have Quashed further challenges to the Social Security Commissioner legal rights as cited on this link

5. This Folder

6. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt cited online on this link.

7. Obstruction of Court Orders

Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime.

8. Additional question has been transfered to the Committees of Congress whose exclusive jurisdiction does share jurisdiction with any Court of law; the execuive branch of government; or other 3rd party:

http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/ssi/zzcontract/index26.htm

9. The US Supreme Court Ruling Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo, et al. protects the rights of patients to choose their medical treatment over the objection of medical or government officials. Patient Rights can be reviewed on this website and on this Health and Human Services Publication

10. The United States Supreme Court has ruled in Williams v Fears and US V Guest that the right of citizens to live where they wish is so desire is a matter of right not subject to the approval of any government entity.

The United States Supreme Court has enacted Constitutional Law on the Right of Citizens to Interstate Travel or reside where they desire is comprised by 100 some odd rulings incuding such precedents as US V Guest (383 U.S. 745 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 L. Ed. 2d 239) and Williams V Fears 179 U.S. 270 (1900) and appears to violate the United Nations Genocide Code Many homeless facilities for the homeless fail to meet the UN standards for operating a concentration camp and have resulted in widespread outbreaks of Hepatitis

The forced migration of homeless populations along interstate highway corridors causes massive problems for cities such as Los Angeles, New York, Seattle, Houston, Jacksonville, as smaller conservative communities in the midwest dump their homeless clients into inner cities. The movement of 4 or 5 million Texans into California in the 1980's and subsequent dumping has affected the quality of life of every man, woman, and child in California for decades; put entire counties into austerity; almost bankrupted the state with benefits for persons displaced from other states while rewarding this criminal behavior by smaller more conservative states who refuse to carry their fair share of the load and then bellyache in Congress about the costs of social service programs.

http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/107thcongress/hud/audits/matt4c.htm

1. Filed Walters V Berryhill Filed In USDC, EDC 2-7-2019

2. The numerous standing Court ORDERS have Quashed any officer, agent, or emplyee of Social Security or anyone else from "conducting a review" or discussing any technial issues with Chris Walters without the required filing an appropriate legal brief in a US District Court pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review

3. The Courts have for 10 year refused to permit any review pursuant to Title 42 USC 405(g)(H) Judicial Review Judicial Review because the Commissioner final determination was an out of court settlement where there is no known statutory authority for review.

4. The Social Security Administration could defer their question to the US House Committee on Ways and Means or US Senate Select Committe on Aging or US House or US Senate Judiciary Committees which have exclusive jurisdicitonal authority over any issues of law.

5. The right of Chris Walters to receive his $602 a month retirement; $321.00 SSDI Medicare; and Med Cal is the operation of fact and law supported by 20 years of Fact and Law having been sustained by 5 US Circuit Courts of Appeals; US Supreme Court and other authorities for 10 years and retirement has been implemented in 2014

5. In 2008 Former Governor Arnold Schwartznegger and California State Assemblyman Dave Jones attempted to deal with long term problem of with bogus conservatorships designed to defraud senior citizens of their assets by declaring them incompetent without any legal notice or legal process simply to steal their assets. California State Assembly Dave Jones proposed legislation in 2007 to curb this abusive practice.

6. Chris Walters has over $100,000 in unpaid legal bills answering or addressing questions the Court have ruled have no merit or basis in law.

1. Can the Honorable US District Court consider any law or construction of Medicare law which empowers a medical provider to tell a patient to move out of California a challenge to the US Supreme Court precedents in Williams V Fears and US V Guest aka the right of citizens to reside and renders "Medicare" dead on arrival or Void and issue a finding that Medicare be declared unconstitutional?

2. Can the Honorable US District Court consider any law or construction of Medicare law which empowers a medical provider deny the patient timely and appropriate medical treatment as required by Thersea Schiavo-Schindler, et al. v. Michael Schiavo to be dead on arrival and issue an ORDER of finding that Medicare is unconstitutional?

3. Can the Honorable US District Court consider any law or constitution of the Social Security Act as challenging the standing rulings of any US Court to be dead on arrival and issue an ORDER or finding that Title 42 Chapter 7 Social Security Act is unconstitutional as violating the Constitutional separation of power?

4. While the Social Security Administration can send their question to Congress they cannot vend, dispense, or practice law before any Congressional Committee; typically federal employees appearing on Capitol Hill without summons or subponeas are subject to arrest by the Capitol Police.

At the end of the civil war General Shermans March To Sea destroied a 60 mile wide swath between Atlanta and Savannah and reportedly engaged in the indicriminate hanging of men, women, and children; helping to break the will of the South to continue the war and saved lives. In the 1800's US Marshal Wyatt Earp vendetta ride successfully employied hanging to break the power of organized criminal groups in Arizona. While summary execution can be a great incentive to deter sedition, treason, or insurrection under emergencies a better solution might be creation of a National Pledge of Allegiance Day to wit:

1. Every officer, agent, and employee of all local, state, and federal agencies will be required to reaffirm their allegiance to the United States government as a condition of continued employment

2. Persons who cannot take an Oath to support and defend the law and constitution of the United States cannot hold public office

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters
Appellant Counsel of Record

Title 18 USC Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

As President Barrack Obama repeatedly overstepped the law and lacking the willingness to take responsibility for his acts sucked in a large number of law enforcement personnel and helped write the USA Freedom Act of 2015

A technical evaluation of the computer hacking events shows the party involved has the ability to tap into at least 8 separate networks which are not connected-which suggest the state Fusion Center operated by the Department of Homeland Security. Of particular concern are browser intrusions where a 3rd party can use an email account for criminal activities without the knowledge of the account owner.

In Walters V Horowtiz The Honorable US District Court Judge Tim Rice Presiding in USDC Eastern District of Califonia the Court has no problem with a motion being resubmitted to another court on the constitutionality of the US Patriot Act and several federal agencies for continued violations of the law and the constitution

The Russians are and Chinese are flying simulated combat operations against the United States as Valamir apparently made some recent comments while testing a new hypersonice missle. Premier Valadimir Putin explained he is tired of having the USA tamper in his countries inteneral affairs; impose unlawful sanctions and is prepared to burn the Bull Dykes; Clintons; and former President Obama off the face of the planet. Would it be something if President Trump dropped one first nuke on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?

Addressed to the Honorable
President Donald Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500

Please pardon the intrusion. A number of public and private interest are continuing to challenge rulings of the Courts supporting the Social Secuirty Commissioners sovereign rights.

I have posted a recommendation for the United States Marshal Service to consider arresting or executing the principals which is posted online:

http://afterdarkportal.net/zzzznsdw/index.html

A further recommendation is made to send public officials unable to support the law given a promotion to process penguin poop in Antartica

With Kindest Regards
Chris Walters,
Appellant Counsel of Record
Walters, V Trump 9th Circuit
622 N Sacramento St
Lodi, CA 95240
209) 367-9560

Notice of Retirement Congress 2016
Field Investigator Return Commissions;Boise Idaho

Certificate of Service on the United States in late 2018

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

6. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant ( (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

History of Electronic Warfare attacks apparently by the United States against domestic and foreign interest led to creation of USA Freedom Act of 2015

Chris Walters

vs 2:13-cv-00001-TOR

Hon. Michael Horowitz
US Department of Justice
Inspector General

Exhibit Page Question of Constitutionality of US Patriot Act based on serial stalking; computer hacking...creation of fictious convictions...

Generally known in all federal programs as clients rights and responsibities defined by law as Title 42 USC 423 (d)(5)(b) Disability Determinations and only subject to review pursuant to provisions of Title 42 USC 405 Judicial Review Since 1997 the Social Security Administration has appeared at BAR in numerous civil actions to prevent and block any legal or technical reviews which have not been filed in a USDC

Strange I thought medical professionals were supposed to be healers who resolved medical problems instead of dragging them out for years and years to increase profits 10 Doctors 5 years to do minor surgery for cancer in office. 45 Doctors took 15 years to do colon exam. 160 Doctors treated chronic blood clots and 4-5 hospitalizations a year at $400,000 until 1 doctor prescribed Xarelto-a pill a day..131 Doctors Treat Chronic Infection 1 doctor solves problem with hospital visit. Primary Care Physicians prescribe assisted living as needed for hip replacement...., how many years will pass before this occurs

It seems that many Chairman of Congress believe in the concept of work ethic and if they find you on Capitol Hill or too close to something they are working on will actually have someone volunteered or simply drafted. I-5 Cooridor Agreement origionally on covered portions of California, Oregon, and Washington but was rapidly expanded by the national leadership to include a third of the United States. Congressman Henry B Gonzalez caught me on Capitol Hill about 1988 circulating one of my publications and had me introduced to the HUD Inspector General.. This assignment lasted until about 1993 when the Clinton Administration came into power and replaced me with 2 convicted persons who according to press reports were paid $80,000 a year plus expenses..

The author has worked in the security and private investigations industry for 40 years typically wears a uniform carries a fire arm and protects facilities with insured value into billion dollar range. Services and contracts with the United States Government begin in 1997 and include

1. 1-5 Corridor Agreement study authorizations for surveys in 15 states 1986

2. Directory Model Social Service Agencies

3. Organized Crime Ties to US Dept HUD Confirmed Kills

4. Federal Law CSBG US Senator Mark O Hatfield

5. Welfare Reform Act 1986

6. Food Stamps For Homless Act US Congressman Tony Coelho

7. Audits USDA Programs confirmed kills

8. Audits US Postal Programs confirmed kills

9. Terrorist in Social Services confirmed kills

8. Spyware Act of 2005 2nd Federal Law 2015

9. Emergency Management Authorizations1993-2013

10. Emergency Management Structure 15 States1993-2013

11. Operational Audit Social SecurityExecutive ORDER 1997-2015

In 1999 the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals authorized a special jonder of study programs and human rights issue to the United Nations The program materials are located in the United Kingdom.

1. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt might include practicing, vending, or dispensing federal law without license or actual contempt of Court

2. Title 18 USC 1509 Obstruction of Court ORDER; Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime

3. Title 18 USC 913 Impersonator Making Arrest Whoever falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrests or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

4. Title 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Committ an Offense To defraud the United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

5. Title 18 USC 1701 Obstruction of Mail Generally Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

7. Title 18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; (C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees concerns acts such as Contempt of Congress while Chapter 115-Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities what appears to be a large number of 3rd party casualties appear to have gone to meet Jesus while trying to explain to those who run they country they merited no respect.

1. Circia 1986 California housing programs heavily involved in organized criminal activities which are apparently causing the deaths of a several thousands of clients a year

2. US Congressman Tony Coelho 1989 resigns after attempting to create artificial famine in largest food producing area of the planet. US Senator Alan Cranston gets sanctioned for $1.4 Trillion Savings and Loan Scandal

3. Walters V Blessings Diversion Food Stamps 1993-1996 apparently organized by the Clinton Administration involved refusing to close food stamp cases and permitting states to steal from USDA overpayments.

4. US Congressman Tony Coelho 1989 resigns after attempting to create artificial famine in largest food producing area of the planet

5. Chronic Theft US Mail routine theft of welfare benefits; obstruction of legal documents including federal court ORDERS

6. Fictious Conviction 1993-1996 challenged in USDC Modesto Rescue Mission intercepts Court ORDER to maintain conviction without trial. Mission Director Vern Deatheridge reportedly fired years later for stealing millions from the Mission

7. Theft of Bank Accounts 2008 Question of diversion of unauthorized of bank accounts and bogus conservatorships designed to steal from the elderly and disabled.

8. Challenges to Social Security Commissioner 2008 ALJ Dawson and Rogers fail in attempt to Quash Comissioners final determination USDC,NM Walters V Asture 2008 quashes California's challenges to Commissioners final determination and begins retaliation

10. Corruption in Casa Esperanza 2014 Manager sacked from alleged thefts from shelter and clients Secretary of HUD Shawn Donovan resigns-reassigned White House Chief of Staff

11. Denial of Reasonable Accomodation To Disabled Person 2014 HUD policy issue

12. Santa Barbara County Defrauds Medicare 2014 combat operations against organized criminal interest in HUD programs in California and Oregon

13. Santa Barbara County Retaliates 2016 County employee admits retaliation is in progress as various organization screw my primary care physician Dr.Diana Garcia MD

14. Path Shelter Trying to Kill Clients Included in package of items sent from United Nations back to Trump Administration

15. Lodi California Combat Operations sustained attacks of web providers and denial of medical treatment

16. Walters V Saul US Supreme Court 2019-2020 San Joaquin Skilled Nursing home Bakersfield, CA

17. Rest and Care Home Bakersfield, CA 2020